Promoting Social Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through Accreditation: Comparing National and International Standards for Public Affairs Programs in Latin America
Purpose: This purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which accreditation of public affairs programs can be a tool to advance social equity, diversity, and inclusion. The paper is presented in the context of the widespread acceptance of the importance of addressing social inequalities in L...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality assurance in education 2016-01, Vol.24 (4), p.541-561 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 561 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 541 |
container_title | Quality assurance in education |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Rubaii, Nadia |
description | Purpose: This purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which accreditation of public affairs programs can be a tool to advance social equity, diversity, and inclusion. The paper is presented in the context of the widespread acceptance of the importance of addressing social inequalities in Latin America and the critical role that public policy and public administration can have on advancing these goals. Design/methodology/approach: International and national accreditation standards are compared using content analysis for their reference to social equity and diversity in their standards regarding faculty, students, curriculum content and learning outcomes. The research applies content analysis of key documents and thematic coding. Findings: International accrediting agencies that focused explicitly on programs in public affairs place a much greater emphasis on social equity and diversity than their national counterparts which accredit a full range of programs and institutions. National accrediting agencies assert the value of diversity, but their standards and reporting requirements suggest otherwise. Research limitations/implications: The research suggests that international accreditation standards have the potential to advance social equity goals more effectively than national standards and that there is great potential to enhance this component of national accreditation standards. Implications for policymakers, accreditation professionals and scholars are identified. Originality/value: The research is original in its focus on the role of accreditation in promoting social equity and its comparison of national and international standards. Although limited to Latin America and public affairs programs, the research provides a basis for examining similar patterns with respect to other disciplines and professions, and in other regions of the world. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/QAE-02-2016-0007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1826809241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1113387</ericid><sourcerecordid>4207456141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-77f23de9f7f6a4cde58f4d46c122df98e9e7c4894410bb1374ed3092c00cdc543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUtrGzEUhUVIIU6afTYFQbeZVi-PNN0NrpummDxwshayHo7CzMiRNIX8n_zQaOymq3s5fOdwLweAC4y-YYzE9_t2WSFSEYTrCiHEj8AM87moeF2TYzBDTS0qJgQ9AacpPReCCtbMwNtdDH3IftjCddBedXD5Mvr8egl_-r82pv2qBgOvB92NyYcB5qcYxu0TbLWO1visclF_wEXodypOQTd7pUQdfNnG4UNZ56KpaBJ0IcK7cdN5DVvnlI8JllO2UfUJ-gGuimOAbW-j1-oz-ORUl-z5v3kGHn8tHxa_q9Xt1fWiXVWasDpXnDtCjW0cd7Vi2ti5cMywWmNCjGuEbSzXTDSMYbTZYMqZNRQ1RCOkjZ4zega-HnJ3MbyMNmX5HMZyfJckFqQWhWW4UOhA6RhSitbJXfS9iq8SIzl1IUsXEhE5dSGnLorly8EyvfMfX_7BGFMqOH0HpHSIxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826809241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Promoting Social Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through Accreditation: Comparing National and International Standards for Public Affairs Programs in Latin America</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Rubaii, Nadia</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubaii, Nadia</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which accreditation of public affairs programs can be a tool to advance social equity, diversity, and inclusion. The paper is presented in the context of the widespread acceptance of the importance of addressing social inequalities in Latin America and the critical role that public policy and public administration can have on advancing these goals. Design/methodology/approach: International and national accreditation standards are compared using content analysis for their reference to social equity and diversity in their standards regarding faculty, students, curriculum content and learning outcomes. The research applies content analysis of key documents and thematic coding. Findings: International accrediting agencies that focused explicitly on programs in public affairs place a much greater emphasis on social equity and diversity than their national counterparts which accredit a full range of programs and institutions. National accrediting agencies assert the value of diversity, but their standards and reporting requirements suggest otherwise. Research limitations/implications: The research suggests that international accreditation standards have the potential to advance social equity goals more effectively than national standards and that there is great potential to enhance this component of national accreditation standards. Implications for policymakers, accreditation professionals and scholars are identified. Originality/value: The research is original in its focus on the role of accreditation in promoting social equity and its comparison of national and international standards. Although limited to Latin America and public affairs programs, the research provides a basis for examining similar patterns with respect to other disciplines and professions, and in other regions of the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-4883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/QAE-02-2016-0007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; Accreditation ; Accreditation (Institutions) ; Case Studies ; Coding ; Comparative Education ; Content Analysis ; Diversity (Faculty) ; Diversity (Institutional) ; Educational Policy ; Educational Quality ; Foreign Countries ; Globalization ; Higher Education ; Inclusion ; International standards ; Latin Americans ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Organizational Culture ; Organizational Effectiveness ; Outcomes of Education ; Public Administration ; Public Affairs Education ; Public Policy ; Qualitative Research ; Quality Assurance ; Quality control ; Role ; Social Change ; Social Differences ; Social Problems ; Social Responsibility ; South America ; Student Diversity</subject><ispartof>Quality assurance in education, 2016-01, Vol.24 (4), p.541-561</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-77f23de9f7f6a4cde58f4d46c122df98e9e7c4894410bb1374ed3092c00cdc543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1113387$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubaii, Nadia</creatorcontrib><title>Promoting Social Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through Accreditation: Comparing National and International Standards for Public Affairs Programs in Latin America</title><title>Quality assurance in education</title><description>Purpose: This purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which accreditation of public affairs programs can be a tool to advance social equity, diversity, and inclusion. The paper is presented in the context of the widespread acceptance of the importance of addressing social inequalities in Latin America and the critical role that public policy and public administration can have on advancing these goals. Design/methodology/approach: International and national accreditation standards are compared using content analysis for their reference to social equity and diversity in their standards regarding faculty, students, curriculum content and learning outcomes. The research applies content analysis of key documents and thematic coding. Findings: International accrediting agencies that focused explicitly on programs in public affairs place a much greater emphasis on social equity and diversity than their national counterparts which accredit a full range of programs and institutions. National accrediting agencies assert the value of diversity, but their standards and reporting requirements suggest otherwise. Research limitations/implications: The research suggests that international accreditation standards have the potential to advance social equity goals more effectively than national standards and that there is great potential to enhance this component of national accreditation standards. Implications for policymakers, accreditation professionals and scholars are identified. Originality/value: The research is original in its focus on the role of accreditation in promoting social equity and its comparison of national and international standards. Although limited to Latin America and public affairs programs, the research provides a basis for examining similar patterns with respect to other disciplines and professions, and in other regions of the world.</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Comparative Education</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Diversity (Faculty)</subject><subject>Diversity (Institutional)</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Inclusion</subject><subject>International standards</subject><subject>Latin Americans</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Organizational Effectiveness</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Public Administration</subject><subject>Public Affairs Education</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Social Change</subject><subject>Social Differences</subject><subject>Social Problems</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Student Diversity</subject><issn>0968-4883</issn><issn>1758-7662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUtrGzEUhUVIIU6afTYFQbeZVi-PNN0NrpummDxwshayHo7CzMiRNIX8n_zQaOymq3s5fOdwLweAC4y-YYzE9_t2WSFSEYTrCiHEj8AM87moeF2TYzBDTS0qJgQ9AacpPReCCtbMwNtdDH3IftjCddBedXD5Mvr8egl_-r82pv2qBgOvB92NyYcB5qcYxu0TbLWO1visclF_wEXodypOQTd7pUQdfNnG4UNZ56KpaBJ0IcK7cdN5DVvnlI8JllO2UfUJ-gGuimOAbW-j1-oz-ORUl-z5v3kGHn8tHxa_q9Xt1fWiXVWasDpXnDtCjW0cd7Vi2ti5cMywWmNCjGuEbSzXTDSMYbTZYMqZNRQ1RCOkjZ4zega-HnJ3MbyMNmX5HMZyfJckFqQWhWW4UOhA6RhSitbJXfS9iq8SIzl1IUsXEhE5dSGnLorly8EyvfMfX_7BGFMqOH0HpHSIxQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Rubaii, Nadia</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Promoting Social Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through Accreditation: Comparing National and International Standards for Public Affairs Programs in Latin America</title><author>Rubaii, Nadia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-77f23de9f7f6a4cde58f4d46c122df98e9e7c4894410bb1374ed3092c00cdc543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Accreditation (Institutions)</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Comparative Education</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Diversity (Faculty)</topic><topic>Diversity (Institutional)</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Inclusion</topic><topic>International standards</topic><topic>Latin Americans</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Organizational Effectiveness</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Public Administration</topic><topic>Public Affairs Education</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Social Change</topic><topic>Social Differences</topic><topic>Social Problems</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Student Diversity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubaii, Nadia</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Quality assurance in education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubaii, Nadia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1113387</ericid><atitle>Promoting Social Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through Accreditation: Comparing National and International Standards for Public Affairs Programs in Latin America</atitle><jtitle>Quality assurance in education</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>541-561</pages><issn>0968-4883</issn><eissn>1758-7662</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which accreditation of public affairs programs can be a tool to advance social equity, diversity, and inclusion. The paper is presented in the context of the widespread acceptance of the importance of addressing social inequalities in Latin America and the critical role that public policy and public administration can have on advancing these goals. Design/methodology/approach: International and national accreditation standards are compared using content analysis for their reference to social equity and diversity in their standards regarding faculty, students, curriculum content and learning outcomes. The research applies content analysis of key documents and thematic coding. Findings: International accrediting agencies that focused explicitly on programs in public affairs place a much greater emphasis on social equity and diversity than their national counterparts which accredit a full range of programs and institutions. National accrediting agencies assert the value of diversity, but their standards and reporting requirements suggest otherwise. Research limitations/implications: The research suggests that international accreditation standards have the potential to advance social equity goals more effectively than national standards and that there is great potential to enhance this component of national accreditation standards. Implications for policymakers, accreditation professionals and scholars are identified. Originality/value: The research is original in its focus on the role of accreditation in promoting social equity and its comparison of national and international standards. Although limited to Latin America and public affairs programs, the research provides a basis for examining similar patterns with respect to other disciplines and professions, and in other regions of the world.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/QAE-02-2016-0007</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-4883 |
ispartof | Quality assurance in education, 2016-01, Vol.24 (4), p.541-561 |
issn | 0968-4883 1758-7662 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1826809241 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Academic Standards Accreditation Accreditation (Institutions) Case Studies Coding Comparative Education Content Analysis Diversity (Faculty) Diversity (Institutional) Educational Policy Educational Quality Foreign Countries Globalization Higher Education Inclusion International standards Latin Americans Multiculturalism & pluralism Organizational Culture Organizational Effectiveness Outcomes of Education Public Administration Public Affairs Education Public Policy Qualitative Research Quality Assurance Quality control Role Social Change Social Differences Social Problems Social Responsibility South America Student Diversity |
title | Promoting Social Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through Accreditation: Comparing National and International Standards for Public Affairs Programs in Latin America |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A21%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Promoting%20Social%20Equity,%20Diversity,%20and%20Inclusion%20through%20Accreditation:%20Comparing%20National%20and%20International%20Standards%20for%20Public%20Affairs%20Programs%20in%20Latin%20America&rft.jtitle=Quality%20assurance%20in%20education&rft.au=Rubaii,%20Nadia&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=541-561&rft.issn=0968-4883&rft.eissn=1758-7662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/QAE-02-2016-0007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4207456141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826809241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1113387&rfr_iscdi=true |