Implementation of the affordable care act: a case study of a service line co-management company
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test and measure the outcome of a community hospital in implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through a co-management arrangement. RQ1: do the benefits of a co-management arrangement outweigh the costs? RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of health organization and management 2016-09, Vol.30 (6), p.818-835 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 835 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 818 |
container_title | Journal of health organization and management |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Lanese, Bethany |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to test and measure the outcome of a community hospital in implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through a co-management arrangement. RQ1: do the benefits of a co-management arrangement outweigh the costs? RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals?
Design/methodology/approach
A case study of a 350-bed non-profit community hospital co-management company. The quantitative data are eight quarters of quality metrics prior and eight quarters post establishment of the co-management company. The quality metrics are all based on standardized national requirements from the Joint Commission and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines. These measures directly impact the quality initiatives under the ACA that are applicable to all healthcare facilities. Qualitative data include survey results from hospital employees of the perceived effectiveness of the co-management company. A paired samples difference of means t-test was conducted to compare the timeframe before co-management and post co-management.
Findings
The findings indicate that the benefits of a co-management arrangement do outweigh the costs for both the physicians and the hospital (RQ1). The physicians benefit through actual dollar payout, but also with improved communication and greater input in running the service line. The hospital benefits from reduced cost – or reduced penalties under the ACA – as well as better communication and greater physician involvement in administration of the service line. RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals? The hospital improved in every quality metric under the co-management company. A paired sample difference of means t-test showed a statistically significant improvement in five of the six quality metrics in the study.
Originality/value
Previous research indicates the potential effectiveness of co-management companies in improving healthcare delivery and hospital-physician relations (Sowers et al., 2013). The current research takes this a step further to show that the data do in fact support these concepts. The hospital and the physicians carrying out the day-to-day actions have shared goals, better communication, and improved quality metrics under the co-management company. As the number of co-management companies increases across the USA, more research can be directed at determining th |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JHOM-09-2015-0145 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1826744153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4207003861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ee2010240f6661fac541d9aba07cbd53d139c3c3bf3f3a96dd8527d75053fe293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtP3TAQRi1UxPsHdIMidcMmZcaO44RdhXgKxAbW1sQPGpTHxU6Q7r_H4VKkVl35G-nMJ_uYse8IPxGhOr29frjPoc45oMwBC7nF9lDJKle8UN9SLpRKuSx32X6MLwCccyV32C5XZYWA9R7TN_2qc70bJpracchGn02_XUbej8FS07nMUEizmc4ySjm6LE6zXS8gZdGFt9a4rGuHBI55TwM9f7SlqV_RsD5k25666I4-zwP2dHnxeH6d3z1c3Zz_ustNATjlzqU3AC_Al2WJnows0NbUECjTWCksitoIIxovvKC6tLaSXFklQQrveC0O2MmmdxXG19nFSfdtNK7raHDjHDVWXHKspISE_vgHfRnnMKTbLVSpigKlSBRuKBPGGIPzehXansJaI-jFvl7sa6j1Yl8v9tPO8Wfz3PTOfm380Z0A2ADJUaDO_rfzrx8V75YVjVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826744153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of the affordable care act: a case study of a service line co-management company</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Lanese, Bethany</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanese, Bethany</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to test and measure the outcome of a community hospital in implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through a co-management arrangement. RQ1: do the benefits of a co-management arrangement outweigh the costs? RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals?
Design/methodology/approach
A case study of a 350-bed non-profit community hospital co-management company. The quantitative data are eight quarters of quality metrics prior and eight quarters post establishment of the co-management company. The quality metrics are all based on standardized national requirements from the Joint Commission and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines. These measures directly impact the quality initiatives under the ACA that are applicable to all healthcare facilities. Qualitative data include survey results from hospital employees of the perceived effectiveness of the co-management company. A paired samples difference of means t-test was conducted to compare the timeframe before co-management and post co-management.
Findings
The findings indicate that the benefits of a co-management arrangement do outweigh the costs for both the physicians and the hospital (RQ1). The physicians benefit through actual dollar payout, but also with improved communication and greater input in running the service line. The hospital benefits from reduced cost – or reduced penalties under the ACA – as well as better communication and greater physician involvement in administration of the service line. RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals? The hospital improved in every quality metric under the co-management company. A paired sample difference of means t-test showed a statistically significant improvement in five of the six quality metrics in the study.
Originality/value
Previous research indicates the potential effectiveness of co-management companies in improving healthcare delivery and hospital-physician relations (Sowers et al., 2013). The current research takes this a step further to show that the data do in fact support these concepts. The hospital and the physicians carrying out the day-to-day actions have shared goals, better communication, and improved quality metrics under the co-management company. As the number of co-management companies increases across the USA, more research can be directed at determining their overall impact on quality care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2015-0145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27681019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Communication ; Community hospitals ; Companies ; Costs ; Data ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Efficiency ; Federal legislation ; Health administration ; Health care ; Health care access ; Health care delivery ; Health care industry ; Health care management ; Health care policy ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Voluntary - organization & administration ; Medicaid ; Medicare ; Nonprofit organizations ; Organizational Case Studies ; Orthopedics ; Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US ; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ; Patient satisfaction ; Penalties ; Physicians ; Quality of care ; Reimbursement ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of health organization and management, 2016-09, Vol.30 (6), p.818-835</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ee2010240f6661fac541d9aba07cbd53d139c3c3bf3f3a96dd8527d75053fe293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ee2010240f6661fac541d9aba07cbd53d139c3c3bf3f3a96dd8527d75053fe293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JHOM-09-2015-0145/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,12825,21674,27901,27902,30976,52664,53219</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27681019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanese, Bethany</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of the affordable care act: a case study of a service line co-management company</title><title>Journal of health organization and management</title><addtitle>J Health Organ Manag</addtitle><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to test and measure the outcome of a community hospital in implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through a co-management arrangement. RQ1: do the benefits of a co-management arrangement outweigh the costs? RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals?
Design/methodology/approach
A case study of a 350-bed non-profit community hospital co-management company. The quantitative data are eight quarters of quality metrics prior and eight quarters post establishment of the co-management company. The quality metrics are all based on standardized national requirements from the Joint Commission and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines. These measures directly impact the quality initiatives under the ACA that are applicable to all healthcare facilities. Qualitative data include survey results from hospital employees of the perceived effectiveness of the co-management company. A paired samples difference of means t-test was conducted to compare the timeframe before co-management and post co-management.
Findings
The findings indicate that the benefits of a co-management arrangement do outweigh the costs for both the physicians and the hospital (RQ1). The physicians benefit through actual dollar payout, but also with improved communication and greater input in running the service line. The hospital benefits from reduced cost – or reduced penalties under the ACA – as well as better communication and greater physician involvement in administration of the service line. RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals? The hospital improved in every quality metric under the co-management company. A paired sample difference of means t-test showed a statistically significant improvement in five of the six quality metrics in the study.
Originality/value
Previous research indicates the potential effectiveness of co-management companies in improving healthcare delivery and hospital-physician relations (Sowers et al., 2013). The current research takes this a step further to show that the data do in fact support these concepts. The hospital and the physicians carrying out the day-to-day actions have shared goals, better communication, and improved quality metrics under the co-management company. As the number of co-management companies increases across the USA, more research can be directed at determining their overall impact on quality care.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Community hospitals</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Federal legislation</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care management</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Voluntary - organization & administration</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</subject><subject>Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Penalties</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1477-7266</issn><issn>1758-7247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUtP3TAQRi1UxPsHdIMidcMmZcaO44RdhXgKxAbW1sQPGpTHxU6Q7r_H4VKkVl35G-nMJ_uYse8IPxGhOr29frjPoc45oMwBC7nF9lDJKle8UN9SLpRKuSx32X6MLwCccyV32C5XZYWA9R7TN_2qc70bJpracchGn02_XUbej8FS07nMUEizmc4ySjm6LE6zXS8gZdGFt9a4rGuHBI55TwM9f7SlqV_RsD5k25666I4-zwP2dHnxeH6d3z1c3Zz_ustNATjlzqU3AC_Al2WJnows0NbUECjTWCksitoIIxovvKC6tLaSXFklQQrveC0O2MmmdxXG19nFSfdtNK7raHDjHDVWXHKspISE_vgHfRnnMKTbLVSpigKlSBRuKBPGGIPzehXansJaI-jFvl7sa6j1Yl8v9tPO8Wfz3PTOfm380Z0A2ADJUaDO_rfzrx8V75YVjVY</recordid><startdate>20160919</startdate><enddate>20160919</enddate><creator>Lanese, Bethany</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160919</creationdate><title>Implementation of the affordable care act: a case study of a service line co-management company</title><author>Lanese, Bethany</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ee2010240f6661fac541d9aba07cbd53d139c3c3bf3f3a96dd8527d75053fe293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Community hospitals</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Federal legislation</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care management</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Voluntary - organization & administration</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</topic><topic>Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Penalties</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanese, Bethany</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of health organization and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanese, Bethany</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of the affordable care act: a case study of a service line co-management company</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health organization and management</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Organ Manag</addtitle><date>2016-09-19</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>818</spage><epage>835</epage><pages>818-835</pages><issn>1477-7266</issn><eissn>1758-7247</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to test and measure the outcome of a community hospital in implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through a co-management arrangement. RQ1: do the benefits of a co-management arrangement outweigh the costs? RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals?
Design/methodology/approach
A case study of a 350-bed non-profit community hospital co-management company. The quantitative data are eight quarters of quality metrics prior and eight quarters post establishment of the co-management company. The quality metrics are all based on standardized national requirements from the Joint Commission and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines. These measures directly impact the quality initiatives under the ACA that are applicable to all healthcare facilities. Qualitative data include survey results from hospital employees of the perceived effectiveness of the co-management company. A paired samples difference of means t-test was conducted to compare the timeframe before co-management and post co-management.
Findings
The findings indicate that the benefits of a co-management arrangement do outweigh the costs for both the physicians and the hospital (RQ1). The physicians benefit through actual dollar payout, but also with improved communication and greater input in running the service line. The hospital benefits from reduced cost – or reduced penalties under the ACA – as well as better communication and greater physician involvement in administration of the service line. RQ2: does physician alignment aid in the effective implementation of the ACA directives set for hospitals? The hospital improved in every quality metric under the co-management company. A paired sample difference of means t-test showed a statistically significant improvement in five of the six quality metrics in the study.
Originality/value
Previous research indicates the potential effectiveness of co-management companies in improving healthcare delivery and hospital-physician relations (Sowers et al., 2013). The current research takes this a step further to show that the data do in fact support these concepts. The hospital and the physicians carrying out the day-to-day actions have shared goals, better communication, and improved quality metrics under the co-management company. As the number of co-management companies increases across the USA, more research can be directed at determining their overall impact on quality care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><pmid>27681019</pmid><doi>10.1108/JHOM-09-2015-0145</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-7266 |
ispartof | Journal of health organization and management, 2016-09, Vol.30 (6), p.818-835 |
issn | 1477-7266 1758-7247 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1826744153 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; MEDLINE; Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | Case studies Communication Community hospitals Companies Costs Data Diffusion of Innovation Efficiency Federal legislation Health administration Health care Health care access Health care delivery Health care industry Health care management Health care policy Hospitals Hospitals, Voluntary - organization & administration Medicaid Medicare Nonprofit organizations Organizational Case Studies Orthopedics Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Patient satisfaction Penalties Physicians Quality of care Reimbursement Surveys and Questionnaires United States |
title | Implementation of the affordable care act: a case study of a service line co-management company |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A07%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20the%20affordable%20care%20act:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20a%20service%20line%20co-management%20company&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20organization%20and%20management&rft.au=Lanese,%20Bethany&rft.date=2016-09-19&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=818&rft.epage=835&rft.pages=818-835&rft.issn=1477-7266&rft.eissn=1758-7247&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JHOM-09-2015-0145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4207003861%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826744153&rft_id=info:pmid/27681019&rfr_iscdi=true |