A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England
Purpose Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities 2016-07, Vol.10 (4), p.258-270 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 270 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 258 |
container_title | Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Guinn, Ashley Jaydeokar, Sujeet McCarthy, Jane Roy, Ashok Hassiotis, Angela |
description | Purpose
Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services.
Design/methodology/approach
The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets.
Findings
In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services.
Research limitations/implications
Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners.
Originality/value
This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1826446815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4206687501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AU8Bz9HZj2w3x1KrLVT00PuySSa6ZZvU3Y2Qf2_SiiA4DMwcnncGHkJuKdxTCuph8bLePKbAUwY0SwEouyATBkKklOVw-bsrdk1mIexhKCFZnsOEvC2S0Pkv7JO2Tsq2CZ2LponJMfTlhzXR2xBDYpuhIzqHZeyMSyobTGGdjX1SmIDVCKyad2ea6oZc1cYFnP3MKdk9rXbLdbp9fd4sF9u05HQe07KgqpZC1sgReV1ylmdc8ipTDCqRmbkAlTEUucklpVgoZPMcMw4GZG0yPiV357NH3352GKLet51vho-aKiaFkIqOFDtTpW9D8Fjro7cH43tNQY_u9MmdBq5Hd3p0N4ToOYQH9MZV_2f--Obf_s1v7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826446815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Guinn, Ashley ; Jaydeokar, Sujeet ; McCarthy, Jane ; Roy, Ashok ; Hassiotis, Angela</creator><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Ashley ; Jaydeokar, Sujeet ; McCarthy, Jane ; Roy, Ashok ; Hassiotis, Angela</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services.
Design/methodology/approach
The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets.
Findings
In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services.
Research limitations/implications
Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners.
Originality/value
This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-1282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-1290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Clinics ; Community mental health services ; Community Relations ; Community research ; Community Services ; Consultants ; Data Analysis ; Early intervention ; Health Conditions ; Health Needs ; Health Personnel ; Health Services ; Hospitalization ; Inpatient care ; Integrated care ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Learning disabilities ; Learning disabled people ; Literature Reviews ; Medical personnel ; Mental Disorders ; Mental health care ; Mental Health Programs ; Occupational Therapy ; Outcome Measures ; Patients ; Polls & surveys ; Psychiatric Services ; Psychiatrists ; Quality of service ; Regional differences ; Regional variations ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Social services ; Statistical Significance ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities, 2016-07, Vol.10 (4), p.258-270</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,968,11639,12850,21699,27348,27928,27929,31003,33778,52693,53248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassiotis, Angela</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</title><title>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities</title><description>Purpose
Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services.
Design/methodology/approach
The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets.
Findings
In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services.
Research limitations/implications
Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners.
Originality/value
This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.</description><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Community mental health services</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Community research</subject><subject>Community Services</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Health Conditions</subject><subject>Health Needs</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Integrated care</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental Health Programs</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Psychiatric Services</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Regional differences</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Statistical Significance</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>2044-1282</issn><issn>2044-1290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AU8Bz9HZj2w3x1KrLVT00PuySSa6ZZvU3Y2Qf2_SiiA4DMwcnncGHkJuKdxTCuph8bLePKbAUwY0SwEouyATBkKklOVw-bsrdk1mIexhKCFZnsOEvC2S0Pkv7JO2Tsq2CZ2LponJMfTlhzXR2xBDYpuhIzqHZeyMSyobTGGdjX1SmIDVCKyad2ea6oZc1cYFnP3MKdk9rXbLdbp9fd4sF9u05HQe07KgqpZC1sgReV1ylmdc8ipTDCqRmbkAlTEUucklpVgoZPMcMw4GZG0yPiV357NH3352GKLet51vho-aKiaFkIqOFDtTpW9D8Fjro7cH43tNQY_u9MmdBq5Hd3p0N4ToOYQH9MZV_2f--Obf_s1v7A</recordid><startdate>20160704</startdate><enddate>20160704</enddate><creator>Guinn, Ashley</creator><creator>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</creator><creator>McCarthy, Jane</creator><creator>Roy, Ashok</creator><creator>Hassiotis, Angela</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160704</creationdate><title>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</title><author>Guinn, Ashley ; Jaydeokar, Sujeet ; McCarthy, Jane ; Roy, Ashok ; Hassiotis, Angela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Community mental health services</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Community research</topic><topic>Community Services</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Health Conditions</topic><topic>Health Needs</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Integrated care</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental Health Programs</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Psychiatric Services</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Regional differences</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Statistical Significance</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassiotis, Angela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guinn, Ashley</au><au>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</au><au>McCarthy, Jane</au><au>Roy, Ashok</au><au>Hassiotis, Angela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</atitle><jtitle>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities</jtitle><date>2016-07-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>258-270</pages><issn>2044-1282</issn><eissn>2044-1290</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services.
Design/methodology/approach
The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets.
Findings
In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services.
Research limitations/implications
Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners.
Originality/value
This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-1282 |
ispartof | Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities, 2016-07, Vol.10 (4), p.258-270 |
issn | 2044-1282 2044-1290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1826446815 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Clinics Community mental health services Community Relations Community research Community Services Consultants Data Analysis Early intervention Health Conditions Health Needs Health Personnel Health Services Hospitalization Inpatient care Integrated care Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability Learning disabilities Learning disabled people Literature Reviews Medical personnel Mental Disorders Mental health care Mental Health Programs Occupational Therapy Outcome Measures Patients Polls & surveys Psychiatric Services Psychiatrists Quality of service Regional differences Regional variations Resistance (Psychology) Social services Statistical Significance Teams |
title | A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A28%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20consultant%20psychiatrists%20in%20intellectual%20disability%20based%20in%20England&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20mental%20health%20and%20intellectual%20disabilities&rft.au=Guinn,%20Ashley&rft.date=2016-07-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=258-270&rft.issn=2044-1282&rft.eissn=2044-1290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4206687501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826446815&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |