A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England

Purpose Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities 2016-07, Vol.10 (4), p.258-270
Hauptverfasser: Guinn, Ashley, Jaydeokar, Sujeet, McCarthy, Jane, Roy, Ashok, Hassiotis, Angela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 4
container_start_page 258
container_title Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities
container_volume 10
creator Guinn, Ashley
Jaydeokar, Sujeet
McCarthy, Jane
Roy, Ashok
Hassiotis, Angela
description Purpose Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services. Design/methodology/approach The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets. Findings In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services. Research limitations/implications Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners. Originality/value This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1826446815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4206687501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AU8Bz9HZj2w3x1KrLVT00PuySSa6ZZvU3Y2Qf2_SiiA4DMwcnncGHkJuKdxTCuph8bLePKbAUwY0SwEouyATBkKklOVw-bsrdk1mIexhKCFZnsOEvC2S0Pkv7JO2Tsq2CZ2LponJMfTlhzXR2xBDYpuhIzqHZeyMSyobTGGdjX1SmIDVCKyad2ea6oZc1cYFnP3MKdk9rXbLdbp9fd4sF9u05HQe07KgqpZC1sgReV1ylmdc8ipTDCqRmbkAlTEUucklpVgoZPMcMw4GZG0yPiV357NH3352GKLet51vho-aKiaFkIqOFDtTpW9D8Fjro7cH43tNQY_u9MmdBq5Hd3p0N4ToOYQH9MZV_2f--Obf_s1v7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826446815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Guinn, Ashley ; Jaydeokar, Sujeet ; McCarthy, Jane ; Roy, Ashok ; Hassiotis, Angela</creator><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Ashley ; Jaydeokar, Sujeet ; McCarthy, Jane ; Roy, Ashok ; Hassiotis, Angela</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services. Design/methodology/approach The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets. Findings In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services. Research limitations/implications Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners. Originality/value This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-1282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-1290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Clinics ; Community mental health services ; Community Relations ; Community research ; Community Services ; Consultants ; Data Analysis ; Early intervention ; Health Conditions ; Health Needs ; Health Personnel ; Health Services ; Hospitalization ; Inpatient care ; Integrated care ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Learning disabilities ; Learning disabled people ; Literature Reviews ; Medical personnel ; Mental Disorders ; Mental health care ; Mental Health Programs ; Occupational Therapy ; Outcome Measures ; Patients ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Psychiatric Services ; Psychiatrists ; Quality of service ; Regional differences ; Regional variations ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Social services ; Statistical Significance ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities, 2016-07, Vol.10 (4), p.258-270</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,968,11639,12850,21699,27348,27928,27929,31003,33778,52693,53248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassiotis, Angela</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</title><title>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities</title><description>Purpose Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services. Design/methodology/approach The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets. Findings In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services. Research limitations/implications Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners. Originality/value This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.</description><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Community mental health services</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Community research</subject><subject>Community Services</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Health Conditions</subject><subject>Health Needs</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Integrated care</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental Health Programs</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Psychiatric Services</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Regional differences</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Statistical Significance</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>2044-1282</issn><issn>2044-1290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AU8Bz9HZj2w3x1KrLVT00PuySSa6ZZvU3Y2Qf2_SiiA4DMwcnncGHkJuKdxTCuph8bLePKbAUwY0SwEouyATBkKklOVw-bsrdk1mIexhKCFZnsOEvC2S0Pkv7JO2Tsq2CZ2LponJMfTlhzXR2xBDYpuhIzqHZeyMSyobTGGdjX1SmIDVCKyad2ea6oZc1cYFnP3MKdk9rXbLdbp9fd4sF9u05HQe07KgqpZC1sgReV1ylmdc8ipTDCqRmbkAlTEUucklpVgoZPMcMw4GZG0yPiV357NH3352GKLet51vho-aKiaFkIqOFDtTpW9D8Fjro7cH43tNQY_u9MmdBq5Hd3p0N4ToOYQH9MZV_2f--Obf_s1v7A</recordid><startdate>20160704</startdate><enddate>20160704</enddate><creator>Guinn, Ashley</creator><creator>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</creator><creator>McCarthy, Jane</creator><creator>Roy, Ashok</creator><creator>Hassiotis, Angela</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160704</creationdate><title>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</title><author>Guinn, Ashley ; Jaydeokar, Sujeet ; McCarthy, Jane ; Roy, Ashok ; Hassiotis, Angela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-cb18f646fe3ee3fc3295363d5820d45a740852e49a9611eb8e279e530a06fa53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Community mental health services</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Community research</topic><topic>Community Services</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Health Conditions</topic><topic>Health Needs</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Integrated care</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental Health Programs</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Psychiatric Services</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Regional differences</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Statistical Significance</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassiotis, Angela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guinn, Ashley</au><au>Jaydeokar, Sujeet</au><au>McCarthy, Jane</au><au>Roy, Ashok</au><au>Hassiotis, Angela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England</atitle><jtitle>Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities</jtitle><date>2016-07-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>258-270</pages><issn>2044-1282</issn><eissn>2044-1290</eissn><abstract>Purpose Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services. Design/methodology/approach The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets. Findings In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services. Research limitations/implications Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners. Originality/value This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-1282
ispartof Advances in mental health and intellectual disabilities, 2016-07, Vol.10 (4), p.258-270
issn 2044-1282
2044-1290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1826446815
source Sociological Abstracts; Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Clinics
Community mental health services
Community Relations
Community research
Community Services
Consultants
Data Analysis
Early intervention
Health Conditions
Health Needs
Health Personnel
Health Services
Hospitalization
Inpatient care
Integrated care
Intellectual disabilities
Intellectual Disability
Learning disabilities
Learning disabled people
Literature Reviews
Medical personnel
Mental Disorders
Mental health care
Mental Health Programs
Occupational Therapy
Outcome Measures
Patients
Polls & surveys
Psychiatric Services
Psychiatrists
Quality of service
Regional differences
Regional variations
Resistance (Psychology)
Social services
Statistical Significance
Teams
title A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A28%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20consultant%20psychiatrists%20in%20intellectual%20disability%20based%20in%20England&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20mental%20health%20and%20intellectual%20disabilities&rft.au=Guinn,%20Ashley&rft.date=2016-07-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=258-270&rft.issn=2044-1282&rft.eissn=2044-1290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4206687501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826446815&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true