River Basin Scale Analysis on the Return Ratio of Diverted Water from Irrigated Paddy Areas
Water flows in irrigated paddy areas are complicated not only by the substantial volumes involved but also by repeated cycles of diversion and return flow. A spatially explicit hydrological model that simulates water diversion and return processes in irrigated paddy areas was used to evaluate the re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Irrigation and drainage 2016-10, Vol.65 (S1), p.31-39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Irrigation and drainage |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Yoshida, Takeo Masumoto, Takao Horikawa, Naoki Kudo, Ryoji Minakawa, Hiroki Nawa, Norio |
description | Water flows in irrigated paddy areas are complicated not only by the substantial volumes involved but also by repeated cycles of diversion and return flow. A spatially explicit hydrological model that simulates water diversion and return processes in irrigated paddy areas was used to evaluate the return ratio of diverted water to river basin. Assuming complete mixing of the rainfall and irrigated water over the entire irrigation period, the time‐averaged return flow was calculated using the simulated net drainage from the irrigated areas. The return ratio, which is defined as the fraction of the total return flow volume to the total diverted water volume, was 48.5% (ranging from 42.3 to 52.1%) in our case study. These values suggest that most of the water diverted to the irrigated paddies will be discharged except that which is lost through evapotranspiration, because we consider the return ratio during a sufficiently long period and for large irrigation areas. While the largest and smallest return ratios were obtained in the driest and wettest years, respectively, the correlation between rainfall amount and return ratio was not significant, suggesting the need for a more appropriate averaging period that accounts for the short‐term variabilities in return flow processes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Résumé
Les flux d'eau dans les systèmes irrigués sont compliqués par les volumes mis en cause et les cycles alternés de détournement et de retour de flux d'eau. Un modèle hydrologique explicite spatialisé a été utilisé pour évaluer le taux de retour de l'eau détournée d'un bassin versant. En supposant un brassage complet des eaux de pluie et d'irrigation, nous avons calculé le drainage effectif pendant la période de calcul de la moyenne. Le taux de restitution, défini comme la part de l'écoulement restituée aux eaux détournées aux déversoirs, était de 48.5% (dans la gamme de 42.3 à 52.1%). Ces valeurs suggèrent que la plus grande partie des eaux prélevées retournent à la rivière modulo les pertes d’évapotranspiration, ce que nous permet de faire la longue période d'observation et la taille du système observé. Alors que les plus grands et les plus petits taux de restitution étaient observés en année sèche et humide, respectivement, la corrélation entre les volumes précipités et les taux de restitution n’était pas significative, suggérant un besoin de périodes plus appropriées pour le calcul des moyennes, qui comptent beaucoup dans la variabilité à c |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ird.2040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1825813363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4203823821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-e81ae65d7b33edd5a0cfe0fbbb219888f739697e29f281bb061946885d3324063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKfgRwj44ktn0qxp8jg33QZjuqoM9CGkTaKZXTuTTu23t2Uy8MGnO47f_-74AXCOUQ8jFF5Zp3oh6qMD0MERwQEiFB_u-4gcgxPvVwghzsO4A14S-6kdvJbeFvAhk7mGg0LmtbcelgWs3jRMdLV1BUxkZUtYGjhqE5VWcCmrJmpcuYZT5-yrbIf3UqkaDpyW_hQcGZl7ffZbu-Dp9uZxOAlmd-PpcDALMsJjFGiGpaaRilNCtFKRRJnRyKRpGmLOGDMx4ZTHOuQmZDhNEcW8TxmLFCFhH1HSBRe7vRtXfmy1r8SqbD5uTgrMwohhQihpqMsdlbnSe6eN2Di7lq4WGIlWnWjUiVZdgwY79Mvmuv6XE9Nk9Je3vtLfe166d0FjEkdiOR-LBZ3PJuMFE8_kB7IjfP4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825813363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>River Basin Scale Analysis on the Return Ratio of Diverted Water from Irrigated Paddy Areas</title><source>Wiley Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Yoshida, Takeo ; Masumoto, Takao ; Horikawa, Naoki ; Kudo, Ryoji ; Minakawa, Hiroki ; Nawa, Norio</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Takeo ; Masumoto, Takao ; Horikawa, Naoki ; Kudo, Ryoji ; Minakawa, Hiroki ; Nawa, Norio</creatorcontrib><description>Water flows in irrigated paddy areas are complicated not only by the substantial volumes involved but also by repeated cycles of diversion and return flow. A spatially explicit hydrological model that simulates water diversion and return processes in irrigated paddy areas was used to evaluate the return ratio of diverted water to river basin. Assuming complete mixing of the rainfall and irrigated water over the entire irrigation period, the time‐averaged return flow was calculated using the simulated net drainage from the irrigated areas. The return ratio, which is defined as the fraction of the total return flow volume to the total diverted water volume, was 48.5% (ranging from 42.3 to 52.1%) in our case study. These values suggest that most of the water diverted to the irrigated paddies will be discharged except that which is lost through evapotranspiration, because we consider the return ratio during a sufficiently long period and for large irrigation areas. While the largest and smallest return ratios were obtained in the driest and wettest years, respectively, the correlation between rainfall amount and return ratio was not significant, suggesting the need for a more appropriate averaging period that accounts for the short‐term variabilities in return flow processes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Résumé
Les flux d'eau dans les systèmes irrigués sont compliqués par les volumes mis en cause et les cycles alternés de détournement et de retour de flux d'eau. Un modèle hydrologique explicite spatialisé a été utilisé pour évaluer le taux de retour de l'eau détournée d'un bassin versant. En supposant un brassage complet des eaux de pluie et d'irrigation, nous avons calculé le drainage effectif pendant la période de calcul de la moyenne. Le taux de restitution, défini comme la part de l'écoulement restituée aux eaux détournées aux déversoirs, était de 48.5% (dans la gamme de 42.3 à 52.1%). Ces valeurs suggèrent que la plus grande partie des eaux prélevées retournent à la rivière modulo les pertes d’évapotranspiration, ce que nous permet de faire la longue période d'observation et la taille du système observé. Alors que les plus grands et les plus petits taux de restitution étaient observés en année sèche et humide, respectivement, la corrélation entre les volumes précipités et les taux de restitution n’était pas significative, suggérant un besoin de périodes plus appropriées pour le calcul des moyennes, qui comptent beaucoup dans la variabilité à court terme dans les processus de retours des flux. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-0353</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ird.2040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bassin versant ; flux de restitution ; irrigated paddies ; return flow ; river basin ; riz irrigué</subject><ispartof>Irrigation and drainage, 2016-10, Vol.65 (S1), p.31-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-e81ae65d7b33edd5a0cfe0fbbb219888f739697e29f281bb061946885d3324063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-e81ae65d7b33edd5a0cfe0fbbb219888f739697e29f281bb061946885d3324063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fird.2040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fird.2040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Takeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masumoto, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horikawa, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minakawa, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawa, Norio</creatorcontrib><title>River Basin Scale Analysis on the Return Ratio of Diverted Water from Irrigated Paddy Areas</title><title>Irrigation and drainage</title><addtitle>Irrig. and Drain</addtitle><description>Water flows in irrigated paddy areas are complicated not only by the substantial volumes involved but also by repeated cycles of diversion and return flow. A spatially explicit hydrological model that simulates water diversion and return processes in irrigated paddy areas was used to evaluate the return ratio of diverted water to river basin. Assuming complete mixing of the rainfall and irrigated water over the entire irrigation period, the time‐averaged return flow was calculated using the simulated net drainage from the irrigated areas. The return ratio, which is defined as the fraction of the total return flow volume to the total diverted water volume, was 48.5% (ranging from 42.3 to 52.1%) in our case study. These values suggest that most of the water diverted to the irrigated paddies will be discharged except that which is lost through evapotranspiration, because we consider the return ratio during a sufficiently long period and for large irrigation areas. While the largest and smallest return ratios were obtained in the driest and wettest years, respectively, the correlation between rainfall amount and return ratio was not significant, suggesting the need for a more appropriate averaging period that accounts for the short‐term variabilities in return flow processes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Résumé
Les flux d'eau dans les systèmes irrigués sont compliqués par les volumes mis en cause et les cycles alternés de détournement et de retour de flux d'eau. Un modèle hydrologique explicite spatialisé a été utilisé pour évaluer le taux de retour de l'eau détournée d'un bassin versant. En supposant un brassage complet des eaux de pluie et d'irrigation, nous avons calculé le drainage effectif pendant la période de calcul de la moyenne. Le taux de restitution, défini comme la part de l'écoulement restituée aux eaux détournées aux déversoirs, était de 48.5% (dans la gamme de 42.3 à 52.1%). Ces valeurs suggèrent que la plus grande partie des eaux prélevées retournent à la rivière modulo les pertes d’évapotranspiration, ce que nous permet de faire la longue période d'observation et la taille du système observé. Alors que les plus grands et les plus petits taux de restitution étaient observés en année sèche et humide, respectivement, la corrélation entre les volumes précipités et les taux de restitution n’était pas significative, suggérant un besoin de périodes plus appropriées pour le calcul des moyennes, qui comptent beaucoup dans la variabilité à court terme dans les processus de retours des flux. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>bassin versant</subject><subject>flux de restitution</subject><subject>irrigated paddies</subject><subject>return flow</subject><subject>river basin</subject><subject>riz irrigué</subject><issn>1531-0353</issn><issn>1531-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKfgRwj44ktn0qxp8jg33QZjuqoM9CGkTaKZXTuTTu23t2Uy8MGnO47f_-74AXCOUQ8jFF5Zp3oh6qMD0MERwQEiFB_u-4gcgxPvVwghzsO4A14S-6kdvJbeFvAhk7mGg0LmtbcelgWs3jRMdLV1BUxkZUtYGjhqE5VWcCmrJmpcuYZT5-yrbIf3UqkaDpyW_hQcGZl7ffZbu-Dp9uZxOAlmd-PpcDALMsJjFGiGpaaRilNCtFKRRJnRyKRpGmLOGDMx4ZTHOuQmZDhNEcW8TxmLFCFhH1HSBRe7vRtXfmy1r8SqbD5uTgrMwohhQihpqMsdlbnSe6eN2Di7lq4WGIlWnWjUiVZdgwY79Mvmuv6XE9Nk9Je3vtLfe166d0FjEkdiOR-LBZ3PJuMFE8_kB7IjfP4</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Yoshida, Takeo</creator><creator>Masumoto, Takao</creator><creator>Horikawa, Naoki</creator><creator>Kudo, Ryoji</creator><creator>Minakawa, Hiroki</creator><creator>Nawa, Norio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>River Basin Scale Analysis on the Return Ratio of Diverted Water from Irrigated Paddy Areas</title><author>Yoshida, Takeo ; Masumoto, Takao ; Horikawa, Naoki ; Kudo, Ryoji ; Minakawa, Hiroki ; Nawa, Norio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-e81ae65d7b33edd5a0cfe0fbbb219888f739697e29f281bb061946885d3324063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>bassin versant</topic><topic>flux de restitution</topic><topic>irrigated paddies</topic><topic>return flow</topic><topic>river basin</topic><topic>riz irrigué</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Takeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masumoto, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horikawa, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minakawa, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawa, Norio</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Irrigation and drainage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoshida, Takeo</au><au>Masumoto, Takao</au><au>Horikawa, Naoki</au><au>Kudo, Ryoji</au><au>Minakawa, Hiroki</au><au>Nawa, Norio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>River Basin Scale Analysis on the Return Ratio of Diverted Water from Irrigated Paddy Areas</atitle><jtitle>Irrigation and drainage</jtitle><addtitle>Irrig. and Drain</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>31-39</pages><issn>1531-0353</issn><eissn>1531-0361</eissn><abstract>Water flows in irrigated paddy areas are complicated not only by the substantial volumes involved but also by repeated cycles of diversion and return flow. A spatially explicit hydrological model that simulates water diversion and return processes in irrigated paddy areas was used to evaluate the return ratio of diverted water to river basin. Assuming complete mixing of the rainfall and irrigated water over the entire irrigation period, the time‐averaged return flow was calculated using the simulated net drainage from the irrigated areas. The return ratio, which is defined as the fraction of the total return flow volume to the total diverted water volume, was 48.5% (ranging from 42.3 to 52.1%) in our case study. These values suggest that most of the water diverted to the irrigated paddies will be discharged except that which is lost through evapotranspiration, because we consider the return ratio during a sufficiently long period and for large irrigation areas. While the largest and smallest return ratios were obtained in the driest and wettest years, respectively, the correlation between rainfall amount and return ratio was not significant, suggesting the need for a more appropriate averaging period that accounts for the short‐term variabilities in return flow processes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Résumé
Les flux d'eau dans les systèmes irrigués sont compliqués par les volumes mis en cause et les cycles alternés de détournement et de retour de flux d'eau. Un modèle hydrologique explicite spatialisé a été utilisé pour évaluer le taux de retour de l'eau détournée d'un bassin versant. En supposant un brassage complet des eaux de pluie et d'irrigation, nous avons calculé le drainage effectif pendant la période de calcul de la moyenne. Le taux de restitution, défini comme la part de l'écoulement restituée aux eaux détournées aux déversoirs, était de 48.5% (dans la gamme de 42.3 à 52.1%). Ces valeurs suggèrent que la plus grande partie des eaux prélevées retournent à la rivière modulo les pertes d’évapotranspiration, ce que nous permet de faire la longue période d'observation et la taille du système observé. Alors que les plus grands et les plus petits taux de restitution étaient observés en année sèche et humide, respectivement, la corrélation entre les volumes précipités et les taux de restitution n’était pas significative, suggérant un besoin de périodes plus appropriées pour le calcul des moyennes, qui comptent beaucoup dans la variabilité à court terme dans les processus de retours des flux. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ird.2040</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1531-0353 |
ispartof | Irrigation and drainage, 2016-10, Vol.65 (S1), p.31-39 |
issn | 1531-0353 1531-0361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1825813363 |
source | Wiley Blackwell Journals |
subjects | bassin versant flux de restitution irrigated paddies return flow river basin riz irrigué |
title | River Basin Scale Analysis on the Return Ratio of Diverted Water from Irrigated Paddy Areas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A26%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=River%20Basin%20Scale%20Analysis%20on%20the%20Return%20Ratio%20of%20Diverted%20Water%20from%20Irrigated%20Paddy%20Areas&rft.jtitle=Irrigation%20and%20drainage&rft.au=Yoshida,%20Takeo&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=31-39&rft.issn=1531-0353&rft.eissn=1531-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ird.2040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4203823821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825813363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |