Doing the ‘dirty work’ of the green economy: Resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU

Europe has set out its plans to foster a ‘green economy’, focused around recycling, by 2020. This pan-European recycling economy, it is argued, will have the triple virtues of: first, stopping wastes being ‘dumped’ on poor countries; second, reusing them and thus decoupling economic prosperity from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urban and regional studies 2016-10, Vol.23 (4), p.541-555
Hauptverfasser: Gregson, Nicky, Crang, Mike, Botticello, Julie, Calestani, Melania, Krzywoszynska, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 555
container_issue 4
container_start_page 541
container_title European urban and regional studies
container_volume 23
creator Gregson, Nicky
Crang, Mike
Botticello, Julie
Calestani, Melania
Krzywoszynska, Anna
description Europe has set out its plans to foster a ‘green economy’, focused around recycling, by 2020. This pan-European recycling economy, it is argued, will have the triple virtues of: first, stopping wastes being ‘dumped’ on poor countries; second, reusing them and thus decoupling economic prosperity from demands on global resources; and third, creating a wave of employment in recycling industries. European resource recovery is represented in academic and practitioner literatures as ‘clean and green’. Underpinned by a technical and physical materialism, it highlights the clean-up of Europe’s waste management and the high-tech character of resource recovery. Analysis shows this representation to mask the cultural and physical associations between recycling work and waste work, and thus to obscure that resource recovery is mostly ‘dirty’ work. Through an empirical analysis of three sectors of resource recovery (‘dry recyclables’, textiles and ships) in Northern member states, we show that resource recovery is a new form of dirty work, located in secondary labour markets and reliant on itinerant and migrant labour, often from accession states. We show therefore that, when wastes stay put within the EU, labour moves to process them. At the micro scale of localities and workplaces, the reluctance of local labour to work in this new sector is shown to connect with embodied knowledge of old manufacturing industries and a sense of spatial injustice. Alongside that, the positioning of migrant workers is shown to rely on stereotypical assumptions that create a hierarchy, connecting reputational qualities of labour with the stigmas of different dirty jobs – a hierarchy upon which those workers at the apex can play.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0969776414554489
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1825694955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0969776414554489</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4203606161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-92ac050d4bed9eb5ec66dd70b11ab9b924305e6c3b8b898143b9de718da791063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgre5dBlyPJp08Ju6kPqEgiF2HPG7Hqe2kJlNldv0M_b1-idPWhQiuLpzXPRyETik5p1TKC6KEklIwyjhnrFB7qEeZoJnsgH3U29DZhj9ERylNCSGikKqH9HWo6hI3L4DXq09fxabFHyG-rldfOEy2eBkBagwu1GHeXuInSGEZHeDYQe8QW2xqj-dVGU3d4JmxHYuremu9GR-jg4mZJTj5uX00vr15Ht5no8e7h-HVKHM5p02mBsYRTjyz4BVYDk4I7yWxlBqrrBqwnHAQLreFLVRBWW6VB0kLb6SiROR9dLbLXcTwtoTU6GnXo-5ealoMuFBMcd6pyE7lYkgpwkQvYjU3sdWU6M2M-u-MnSXbWZIp4Vfof_pvMFhzfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825694955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doing the ‘dirty work’ of the green economy: Resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Gregson, Nicky ; Crang, Mike ; Botticello, Julie ; Calestani, Melania ; Krzywoszynska, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Gregson, Nicky ; Crang, Mike ; Botticello, Julie ; Calestani, Melania ; Krzywoszynska, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Europe has set out its plans to foster a ‘green economy’, focused around recycling, by 2020. This pan-European recycling economy, it is argued, will have the triple virtues of: first, stopping wastes being ‘dumped’ on poor countries; second, reusing them and thus decoupling economic prosperity from demands on global resources; and third, creating a wave of employment in recycling industries. European resource recovery is represented in academic and practitioner literatures as ‘clean and green’. Underpinned by a technical and physical materialism, it highlights the clean-up of Europe’s waste management and the high-tech character of resource recovery. Analysis shows this representation to mask the cultural and physical associations between recycling work and waste work, and thus to obscure that resource recovery is mostly ‘dirty’ work. Through an empirical analysis of three sectors of resource recovery (‘dry recyclables’, textiles and ships) in Northern member states, we show that resource recovery is a new form of dirty work, located in secondary labour markets and reliant on itinerant and migrant labour, often from accession states. We show therefore that, when wastes stay put within the EU, labour moves to process them. At the micro scale of localities and workplaces, the reluctance of local labour to work in this new sector is shown to connect with embodied knowledge of old manufacturing industries and a sense of spatial injustice. Alongside that, the positioning of migrant workers is shown to rely on stereotypical assumptions that create a hierarchy, connecting reputational qualities of labour with the stigmas of different dirty jobs – a hierarchy upon which those workers at the apex can play.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0969776414554489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accession ; Employment ; Hierarchies ; Management ; Manufacturing ; Markets ; Materialism ; Migrant workers ; Recycling ; Representation ; Resource recovery ; Stereotypes ; Waste management ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>European urban and regional studies, 2016-10, Vol.23 (4), p.541-555</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-92ac050d4bed9eb5ec66dd70b11ab9b924305e6c3b8b898143b9de718da791063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-92ac050d4bed9eb5ec66dd70b11ab9b924305e6c3b8b898143b9de718da791063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0969776414554489$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0969776414554489$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gregson, Nicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crang, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botticello, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calestani, Melania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzywoszynska, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Doing the ‘dirty work’ of the green economy: Resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU</title><title>European urban and regional studies</title><description>Europe has set out its plans to foster a ‘green economy’, focused around recycling, by 2020. This pan-European recycling economy, it is argued, will have the triple virtues of: first, stopping wastes being ‘dumped’ on poor countries; second, reusing them and thus decoupling economic prosperity from demands on global resources; and third, creating a wave of employment in recycling industries. European resource recovery is represented in academic and practitioner literatures as ‘clean and green’. Underpinned by a technical and physical materialism, it highlights the clean-up of Europe’s waste management and the high-tech character of resource recovery. Analysis shows this representation to mask the cultural and physical associations between recycling work and waste work, and thus to obscure that resource recovery is mostly ‘dirty’ work. Through an empirical analysis of three sectors of resource recovery (‘dry recyclables’, textiles and ships) in Northern member states, we show that resource recovery is a new form of dirty work, located in secondary labour markets and reliant on itinerant and migrant labour, often from accession states. We show therefore that, when wastes stay put within the EU, labour moves to process them. At the micro scale of localities and workplaces, the reluctance of local labour to work in this new sector is shown to connect with embodied knowledge of old manufacturing industries and a sense of spatial injustice. Alongside that, the positioning of migrant workers is shown to rely on stereotypical assumptions that create a hierarchy, connecting reputational qualities of labour with the stigmas of different dirty jobs – a hierarchy upon which those workers at the apex can play.</description><subject>Accession</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Materialism</subject><subject>Migrant workers</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Resource recovery</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0969-7764</issn><issn>1461-7145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgre5dBlyPJp08Ju6kPqEgiF2HPG7Hqe2kJlNldv0M_b1-idPWhQiuLpzXPRyETik5p1TKC6KEklIwyjhnrFB7qEeZoJnsgH3U29DZhj9ERylNCSGikKqH9HWo6hI3L4DXq09fxabFHyG-rldfOEy2eBkBagwu1GHeXuInSGEZHeDYQe8QW2xqj-dVGU3d4JmxHYuremu9GR-jg4mZJTj5uX00vr15Ht5no8e7h-HVKHM5p02mBsYRTjyz4BVYDk4I7yWxlBqrrBqwnHAQLreFLVRBWW6VB0kLb6SiROR9dLbLXcTwtoTU6GnXo-5ealoMuFBMcd6pyE7lYkgpwkQvYjU3sdWU6M2M-u-MnSXbWZIp4Vfof_pvMFhzfw</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Gregson, Nicky</creator><creator>Crang, Mike</creator><creator>Botticello, Julie</creator><creator>Calestani, Melania</creator><creator>Krzywoszynska, Anna</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Doing the ‘dirty work’ of the green economy: Resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU</title><author>Gregson, Nicky ; Crang, Mike ; Botticello, Julie ; Calestani, Melania ; Krzywoszynska, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-92ac050d4bed9eb5ec66dd70b11ab9b924305e6c3b8b898143b9de718da791063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accession</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Materialism</topic><topic>Migrant workers</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Representation</topic><topic>Resource recovery</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gregson, Nicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crang, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botticello, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calestani, Melania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzywoszynska, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European urban and regional studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gregson, Nicky</au><au>Crang, Mike</au><au>Botticello, Julie</au><au>Calestani, Melania</au><au>Krzywoszynska, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doing the ‘dirty work’ of the green economy: Resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU</atitle><jtitle>European urban and regional studies</jtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>541-555</pages><issn>0969-7764</issn><eissn>1461-7145</eissn><abstract>Europe has set out its plans to foster a ‘green economy’, focused around recycling, by 2020. This pan-European recycling economy, it is argued, will have the triple virtues of: first, stopping wastes being ‘dumped’ on poor countries; second, reusing them and thus decoupling economic prosperity from demands on global resources; and third, creating a wave of employment in recycling industries. European resource recovery is represented in academic and practitioner literatures as ‘clean and green’. Underpinned by a technical and physical materialism, it highlights the clean-up of Europe’s waste management and the high-tech character of resource recovery. Analysis shows this representation to mask the cultural and physical associations between recycling work and waste work, and thus to obscure that resource recovery is mostly ‘dirty’ work. Through an empirical analysis of three sectors of resource recovery (‘dry recyclables’, textiles and ships) in Northern member states, we show that resource recovery is a new form of dirty work, located in secondary labour markets and reliant on itinerant and migrant labour, often from accession states. We show therefore that, when wastes stay put within the EU, labour moves to process them. At the micro scale of localities and workplaces, the reluctance of local labour to work in this new sector is shown to connect with embodied knowledge of old manufacturing industries and a sense of spatial injustice. Alongside that, the positioning of migrant workers is shown to rely on stereotypical assumptions that create a hierarchy, connecting reputational qualities of labour with the stigmas of different dirty jobs – a hierarchy upon which those workers at the apex can play.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0969776414554489</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-7764
ispartof European urban and regional studies, 2016-10, Vol.23 (4), p.541-555
issn 0969-7764
1461-7145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1825694955
source Access via SAGE; PAIS Index
subjects Accession
Employment
Hierarchies
Management
Manufacturing
Markets
Materialism
Migrant workers
Recycling
Representation
Resource recovery
Stereotypes
Waste management
Workplaces
title Doing the ‘dirty work’ of the green economy: Resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A22%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doing%20the%20%E2%80%98dirty%20work%E2%80%99%20of%20the%20green%20economy:%20Resource%20recovery%20and%20migrant%20labour%20in%20the%20EU&rft.jtitle=European%20urban%20and%20regional%20studies&rft.au=Gregson,%20Nicky&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=541-555&rft.issn=0969-7764&rft.eissn=1461-7145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0969776414554489&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4203606161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825694955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0969776414554489&rfr_iscdi=true