Toward an understanding of market resilience: market liquidity and heterogeneity in the investor decision cycle

During liquidity shocks such as occur when margin calls force the liquidation of leveraged positions, there is a widening disparity between the reaction speed of the liquidity demanders and the liquidity providers. Those who are forced to sell typically must take action within the span of a day, whi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic interaction and coordination 2016-10, Vol.11 (2), p.205-227
Hauptverfasser: Bookstaber, Richard, Foley, Michael D., Tivnan, Brian F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 227
container_issue 2
container_start_page 205
container_title Journal of economic interaction and coordination
container_volume 11
creator Bookstaber, Richard
Foley, Michael D.
Tivnan, Brian F.
description During liquidity shocks such as occur when margin calls force the liquidation of leveraged positions, there is a widening disparity between the reaction speed of the liquidity demanders and the liquidity providers. Those who are forced to sell typically must take action within the span of a day, while those who are providing liquidity do not face similar urgency. Indeed, the flurry of activity and increased volatility of prices during the liquidity shocks might actually reduce the speed with which many liquidity providers come to the market. To analyze these dynamics, we build upon previous agent-based models of financial markets, and specifically the Preis et. al (Europhys Lett 75(3):510–516, 2006 ) model, to develop an order-book model with heterogeneity in trader decision cycles. The model demonstrates an adherence to important stylized facts such as a leptokurtic distribution of returns, decay of autocorrelations over moderate to long time lags, and clustering volatility. Consistent with empirical analysis of recent market events, we demonstrate the impact of heterogeneous decision cycles on market resilience and the stochastic properties of market prices.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11403-015-0162-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1819663068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4183208041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9c56d5f94abb37000f28e77c1cfb01bfc93715c173abe90a366f1d84ca95eca63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAULKLgsu4P8BbwXM1r2qT1JotfsOBlBW8hTV93ozXZTVpl_70pVfHi4TGPYeZ9TJKcA70ESsVVAMgpSykUsXiWlkfJDEpOUwFZefzbw8tpsgjB1JRBxpnIxSxxa_epfEOUJYNt0Ide2cbYDXEteVf-DXviMZjOoNV4_UN1Zj-YxvSH6GvIFnv0boMWR8ZY0m8xwgeG3nnSoDbBOEv0QXd4lpy0qgu4-MZ58nx3u14-pKun-8flzSrVecb6tNIFb4q2ylVdM0EpbbMShdCg25pC3eqKCSg0CKZqrKhinLfQlLlWVYFacTZPLqa5O-_2Q7xEvrrB27hSQgkV54zyMqpgUmnvQvDYyp038ceDBCrHaOUUrYzRyjFaOXqyyROi1m7Q_5n8r-kLgXR-Ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819663068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an understanding of market resilience: market liquidity and heterogeneity in the investor decision cycle</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Bookstaber, Richard ; Foley, Michael D. ; Tivnan, Brian F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bookstaber, Richard ; Foley, Michael D. ; Tivnan, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><description>During liquidity shocks such as occur when margin calls force the liquidation of leveraged positions, there is a widening disparity between the reaction speed of the liquidity demanders and the liquidity providers. Those who are forced to sell typically must take action within the span of a day, while those who are providing liquidity do not face similar urgency. Indeed, the flurry of activity and increased volatility of prices during the liquidity shocks might actually reduce the speed with which many liquidity providers come to the market. To analyze these dynamics, we build upon previous agent-based models of financial markets, and specifically the Preis et. al (Europhys Lett 75(3):510–516, 2006 ) model, to develop an order-book model with heterogeneity in trader decision cycles. The model demonstrates an adherence to important stylized facts such as a leptokurtic distribution of returns, decay of autocorrelations over moderate to long time lags, and clustering volatility. Consistent with empirical analysis of recent market events, we demonstrate the impact of heterogeneous decision cycles on market resilience and the stochastic properties of market prices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1860-711X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1860-7128</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11403-015-0162-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Finance ; Futures market ; Investments ; Investors ; Liquidity ; Market prices ; Mathematical and Computational Physics ; Regular Article ; Securities markets ; Stock exchanges ; Studies ; Suppliers ; Theoretical ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic interaction and coordination, 2016-10, Vol.11 (2), p.205-227</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9c56d5f94abb37000f28e77c1cfb01bfc93715c173abe90a366f1d84ca95eca63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9c56d5f94abb37000f28e77c1cfb01bfc93715c173abe90a366f1d84ca95eca63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11403-015-0162-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11403-015-0162-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bookstaber, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tivnan, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an understanding of market resilience: market liquidity and heterogeneity in the investor decision cycle</title><title>Journal of economic interaction and coordination</title><addtitle>J Econ Interact Coord</addtitle><description>During liquidity shocks such as occur when margin calls force the liquidation of leveraged positions, there is a widening disparity between the reaction speed of the liquidity demanders and the liquidity providers. Those who are forced to sell typically must take action within the span of a day, while those who are providing liquidity do not face similar urgency. Indeed, the flurry of activity and increased volatility of prices during the liquidity shocks might actually reduce the speed with which many liquidity providers come to the market. To analyze these dynamics, we build upon previous agent-based models of financial markets, and specifically the Preis et. al (Europhys Lett 75(3):510–516, 2006 ) model, to develop an order-book model with heterogeneity in trader decision cycles. The model demonstrates an adherence to important stylized facts such as a leptokurtic distribution of returns, decay of autocorrelations over moderate to long time lags, and clustering volatility. Consistent with empirical analysis of recent market events, we demonstrate the impact of heterogeneous decision cycles on market resilience and the stochastic properties of market prices.</description><subject>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Futures market</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Mathematical and Computational Physics</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Theoretical</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>1860-711X</issn><issn>1860-7128</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAULKLgsu4P8BbwXM1r2qT1JotfsOBlBW8hTV93ozXZTVpl_70pVfHi4TGPYeZ9TJKcA70ESsVVAMgpSykUsXiWlkfJDEpOUwFZefzbw8tpsgjB1JRBxpnIxSxxa_epfEOUJYNt0Ide2cbYDXEteVf-DXviMZjOoNV4_UN1Zj-YxvSH6GvIFnv0boMWR8ZY0m8xwgeG3nnSoDbBOEv0QXd4lpy0qgu4-MZ58nx3u14-pKun-8flzSrVecb6tNIFb4q2ylVdM0EpbbMShdCg25pC3eqKCSg0CKZqrKhinLfQlLlWVYFacTZPLqa5O-_2Q7xEvrrB27hSQgkV54zyMqpgUmnvQvDYyp038ceDBCrHaOUUrYzRyjFaOXqyyROi1m7Q_5n8r-kLgXR-Ag</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Bookstaber, Richard</creator><creator>Foley, Michael D.</creator><creator>Tivnan, Brian F.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Toward an understanding of market resilience: market liquidity and heterogeneity in the investor decision cycle</title><author>Bookstaber, Richard ; Foley, Michael D. ; Tivnan, Brian F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-9c56d5f94abb37000f28e77c1cfb01bfc93715c173abe90a366f1d84ca95eca63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Futures market</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Mathematical and Computational Physics</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Theoretical</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bookstaber, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tivnan, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic interaction and coordination</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bookstaber, Richard</au><au>Foley, Michael D.</au><au>Tivnan, Brian F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an understanding of market resilience: market liquidity and heterogeneity in the investor decision cycle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic interaction and coordination</jtitle><stitle>J Econ Interact Coord</stitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>205-227</pages><issn>1860-711X</issn><eissn>1860-7128</eissn><abstract>During liquidity shocks such as occur when margin calls force the liquidation of leveraged positions, there is a widening disparity between the reaction speed of the liquidity demanders and the liquidity providers. Those who are forced to sell typically must take action within the span of a day, while those who are providing liquidity do not face similar urgency. Indeed, the flurry of activity and increased volatility of prices during the liquidity shocks might actually reduce the speed with which many liquidity providers come to the market. To analyze these dynamics, we build upon previous agent-based models of financial markets, and specifically the Preis et. al (Europhys Lett 75(3):510–516, 2006 ) model, to develop an order-book model with heterogeneity in trader decision cycles. The model demonstrates an adherence to important stylized facts such as a leptokurtic distribution of returns, decay of autocorrelations over moderate to long time lags, and clustering volatility. Consistent with empirical analysis of recent market events, we demonstrate the impact of heterogeneous decision cycles on market resilience and the stochastic properties of market prices.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11403-015-0162-8</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1860-711X
ispartof Journal of economic interaction and coordination, 2016-10, Vol.11 (2), p.205-227
issn 1860-711X
1860-7128
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1819663068
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Economic models
Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Finance
Futures market
Investments
Investors
Liquidity
Market prices
Mathematical and Computational Physics
Regular Article
Securities markets
Stock exchanges
Studies
Suppliers
Theoretical
Volatility
title Toward an understanding of market resilience: market liquidity and heterogeneity in the investor decision cycle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20understanding%20of%20market%20resilience:%20market%20liquidity%20and%20heterogeneity%20in%20the%20investor%20decision%20cycle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20interaction%20and%20coordination&rft.au=Bookstaber,%20Richard&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=205-227&rft.issn=1860-711X&rft.eissn=1860-7128&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11403-015-0162-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4183208041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819663068&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true