Novel genetic disease claim struck out: A and M v University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (High Court, 15 April 2016 Judge McKenna)
Mr X suffers from a genetic disease known as AMN, which adversely impacts upon the white matter of the brain. A and B are, or were, second cousins of X. A suffers from Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) the childhood version of AMN, as did B until his death on 26 April 2012. Both A and B were diagnosed with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical risk 2015-11, Vol.21 (6), p.128-129 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 129 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | Clinical risk |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Mead, John |
description | Mr X suffers from a genetic disease known as AMN, which adversely impacts upon the white matter of the brain. A and B are, or were, second cousins of X. A suffers from Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) the childhood version of AMN, as did B until his death on 26 April 2012. Both A and B were diagnosed with ALD in 2006. In brief, it was alleged that the condition suffered by X should has been diagnosed by the trust earlier and that this would, in turn, have led to an earlier diagnosis of the condition in both A and B, leading to significantly better outcomes for both of them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1356262216659423a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1817572817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1356262216659423a</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1817572817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-2e9a354ff3bb9d153593467c6a770530710ef0b7a90088445b006264d0a9402d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOwzAQRCMEEqXwAdxW4gISKWs7jhNuVQUUaMuB9hy5iRNc0qTYTqV-Ab-NUTkgIS7rlTwzO3pBcE5wQIgQN4TxmMaUkjjmaUSZPAh6RPAkJEiTQ7_7__BbcBycWLtCRIaE94LPWbtVNVSqUU7nUGirpFWQ11KvwTrT5e_Qdu4WhiCbAqawhUWjt8pY7XYwbu1GO1lbaEuYKJ0r65SB2fgV5qazDi7HunqDUdsZdw2Ew3BjdA0USQxPXVEpmObPqmnk1WlwVPocdfbz9oPF_d18NA4nLw-Po-EkzIlIXUhVKhmPypItl2lBOOMpi2KRx1II5AwFQVXiUsgUMUmiiC8RPZeoQJlGSAvWDy72uRvTfnS-brby5Rp_MiOJByaon15F9qrctNYaVWa-91qaXUYw--ad_eHtPYO9x8pK_Ur91_AFSRp8iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817572817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel genetic disease claim struck out: A and M v University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (High Court, 15 April 2016 Judge McKenna)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Mead, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Mead, John</creatorcontrib><description>Mr X suffers from a genetic disease known as AMN, which adversely impacts upon the white matter of the brain. A and B are, or were, second cousins of X. A suffers from Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) the childhood version of AMN, as did B until his death on 26 April 2012. Both A and B were diagnosed with ALD in 2006. In brief, it was alleged that the condition suffered by X should has been diagnosed by the trust earlier and that this would, in turn, have led to an earlier diagnosis of the condition in both A and B, leading to significantly better outcomes for both of them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-2622</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2516-0435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2516-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1356262216659423a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Disease ; Genetic disorders</subject><ispartof>Clinical risk, 2015-11, Vol.21 (6), p.128-129</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1356262216659423a$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356262216659423a$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mead, John</creatorcontrib><title>Novel genetic disease claim struck out: A and M v University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (High Court, 15 April 2016 Judge McKenna)</title><title>Clinical risk</title><description>Mr X suffers from a genetic disease known as AMN, which adversely impacts upon the white matter of the brain. A and B are, or were, second cousins of X. A suffers from Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) the childhood version of AMN, as did B until his death on 26 April 2012. Both A and B were diagnosed with ALD in 2006. In brief, it was alleged that the condition suffered by X should has been diagnosed by the trust earlier and that this would, in turn, have led to an earlier diagnosis of the condition in both A and B, leading to significantly better outcomes for both of them.</description><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Genetic disorders</subject><issn>1356-2622</issn><issn>2516-0435</issn><issn>1758-1028</issn><issn>2516-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFOwzAQRCMEEqXwAdxW4gISKWs7jhNuVQUUaMuB9hy5iRNc0qTYTqV-Ab-NUTkgIS7rlTwzO3pBcE5wQIgQN4TxmMaUkjjmaUSZPAh6RPAkJEiTQ7_7__BbcBycWLtCRIaE94LPWbtVNVSqUU7nUGirpFWQ11KvwTrT5e_Qdu4WhiCbAqawhUWjt8pY7XYwbu1GO1lbaEuYKJ0r65SB2fgV5qazDi7HunqDUdsZdw2Ew3BjdA0USQxPXVEpmObPqmnk1WlwVPocdfbz9oPF_d18NA4nLw-Po-EkzIlIXUhVKhmPypItl2lBOOMpi2KRx1II5AwFQVXiUsgUMUmiiC8RPZeoQJlGSAvWDy72uRvTfnS-brby5Rp_MiOJByaon15F9qrctNYaVWa-91qaXUYw--ad_eHtPYO9x8pK_Ur91_AFSRp8iw</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Mead, John</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Novel genetic disease claim struck out: A and M v University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (High Court, 15 April 2016 Judge McKenna)</title><author>Mead, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-2e9a354ff3bb9d153593467c6a770530710ef0b7a90088445b006264d0a9402d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Genetic disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mead, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Clinical risk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mead, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel genetic disease claim struck out: A and M v University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (High Court, 15 April 2016 Judge McKenna)</atitle><jtitle>Clinical risk</jtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>128-129</pages><issn>1356-2622</issn><issn>2516-0435</issn><eissn>1758-1028</eissn><eissn>2516-0443</eissn><abstract>Mr X suffers from a genetic disease known as AMN, which adversely impacts upon the white matter of the brain. A and B are, or were, second cousins of X. A suffers from Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) the childhood version of AMN, as did B until his death on 26 April 2012. Both A and B were diagnosed with ALD in 2006. In brief, it was alleged that the condition suffered by X should has been diagnosed by the trust earlier and that this would, in turn, have led to an earlier diagnosis of the condition in both A and B, leading to significantly better outcomes for both of them.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1356262216659423a</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-2622 |
ispartof | Clinical risk, 2015-11, Vol.21 (6), p.128-129 |
issn | 1356-2622 2516-0435 1758-1028 2516-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1817572817 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete |
subjects | Disease Genetic disorders |
title | Novel genetic disease claim struck out: A and M v University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (High Court, 15 April 2016 Judge McKenna) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T10%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20genetic%20disease%20claim%20struck%20out:%20A%20and%20M%20v%20University%20Hospitals%20of%20Leicester%20NHS%20Trust%20(High%20Court,%2015%20April%202016%20Judge%20McKenna)&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20risk&rft.au=Mead,%20John&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=128-129&rft.issn=1356-2622&rft.eissn=1758-1028&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1356262216659423a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1817572817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817572817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1356262216659423a&rfr_iscdi=true |