PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2016-09, Vol.33 (9), p.e8-e8
Hauptverfasser: Edwards, Tim, Shaw, Joanna, Gray, Danielle, Thomson, Neil, Faulkner, Mark
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e8
container_issue 9
container_start_page e8
container_title Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
container_volume 33
creator Edwards, Tim
Shaw, Joanna
Gray, Danielle
Thomson, Neil
Faulkner, Mark
description BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1815980978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4168168591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1708-95af7e31040dcd940773fc1e16bc001738d22d2c2732541a80b324f5ecf7c89c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtPgzAUx4nRxDn9CqaJz8xegBbfKnSukVsYw8SXBkpJXJxTcA9-e7uw-OzLuf_Pyfk5zi2CC4RIcG92ZtiZzsUQBdYEiIQLHJw5M-RR7EKMyPlfDP1L52octxAiP_TYzDkUpVjl60JWPAGbtQD5EjyLiqcyE4BnMUhlzF_zhKdAZrYANuWjtTyueRaJGBS85KmIZQSKkkeVrGSeiRKsRVnLSDwADkpRlfaAsM1a2KyW4uXaueib99HcnPzc2SxFFa3cJH-SEU_cFlHI3NBvemoIgh7sdBd6kFLSa2RQ0Gr7ASWsw7jDGlOCfQ81DLYEe71vdE81CzWZO3fT3s9h_3Uw47fa7g_Dhz2pELMEGAwps1PBNKWH_TgOplefw9uuGX4UguqIWJ0QqyNiNSFWOLBCNAnb3fa_ml8eE3WM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815980978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Edwards, Tim ; Shaw, Joanna ; Gray, Danielle ; Thomson, Neil ; Faulkner, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Tim ; Shaw, Joanna ; Gray, Danielle ; Thomson, Neil ; Faulkner, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-0205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-0213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2016-09, Vol.33 (9), p.e8-e8</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1708-95af7e31040dcd940773fc1e16bc001738d22d2c2732541a80b324f5ecf7c89c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/33/9/e8.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/33/9/e8.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77343,77374</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faulkner, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><title>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</title><description>BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</description><issn>1472-0205</issn><issn>1472-0213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFtPgzAUx4nRxDn9CqaJz8xegBbfKnSukVsYw8SXBkpJXJxTcA9-e7uw-OzLuf_Pyfk5zi2CC4RIcG92ZtiZzsUQBdYEiIQLHJw5M-RR7EKMyPlfDP1L52octxAiP_TYzDkUpVjl60JWPAGbtQD5EjyLiqcyE4BnMUhlzF_zhKdAZrYANuWjtTyueRaJGBS85KmIZQSKkkeVrGSeiRKsRVnLSDwADkpRlfaAsM1a2KyW4uXaueib99HcnPzc2SxFFa3cJH-SEU_cFlHI3NBvemoIgh7sdBd6kFLSa2RQ0Gr7ASWsw7jDGlOCfQ81DLYEe71vdE81CzWZO3fT3s9h_3Uw47fa7g_Dhz2pELMEGAwps1PBNKWH_TgOplefw9uuGX4UguqIWJ0QqyNiNSFWOLBCNAnb3fa_ml8eE3WM</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Edwards, Tim</creator><creator>Shaw, Joanna</creator><creator>Gray, Danielle</creator><creator>Thomson, Neil</creator><creator>Faulkner, Mark</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><author>Edwards, Tim ; Shaw, Joanna ; Gray, Danielle ; Thomson, Neil ; Faulkner, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1708-95af7e31040dcd940773fc1e16bc001738d22d2c2732541a80b324f5ecf7c89c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faulkner, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Tim</au><au>Shaw, Joanna</au><au>Gray, Danielle</au><au>Thomson, Neil</au><au>Faulkner, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</atitle><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e8</spage><epage>e8</epage><pages>e8-e8</pages><issn>1472-0205</issn><eissn>1472-0213</eissn><abstract>BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-0205
ispartof Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2016-09, Vol.33 (9), p.e8-e8
issn 1472-0205
1472-0213
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1815980978
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A49%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PREHOSPITAL%20USE%20OF%20KETAMINE%20AND%20MIDAZOLAM%20IN%20AN%20URBAN%20ADVANCED%20PARAMEDIC%20PRACTITIONER%20SERVICE:%20A%20RETROSPECTIVE%20REVIEW&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20medicine%20journal%20:%20EMJ&rft.au=Edwards,%20Tim&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e8&rft.epage=e8&rft.pages=e8-e8&rft.issn=1472-0205&rft.eissn=1472-0213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4168168591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815980978&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true