PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW
BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2016-09, Vol.33 (9), p.e8-e8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e8 |
container_title | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Edwards, Tim Shaw, Joanna Gray, Danielle Thomson, Neil Faulkner, Mark |
description | BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1815980978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4168168591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1708-95af7e31040dcd940773fc1e16bc001738d22d2c2732541a80b324f5ecf7c89c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtPgzAUx4nRxDn9CqaJz8xegBbfKnSukVsYw8SXBkpJXJxTcA9-e7uw-OzLuf_Pyfk5zi2CC4RIcG92ZtiZzsUQBdYEiIQLHJw5M-RR7EKMyPlfDP1L52octxAiP_TYzDkUpVjl60JWPAGbtQD5EjyLiqcyE4BnMUhlzF_zhKdAZrYANuWjtTyueRaJGBS85KmIZQSKkkeVrGSeiRKsRVnLSDwADkpRlfaAsM1a2KyW4uXaueib99HcnPzc2SxFFa3cJH-SEU_cFlHI3NBvemoIgh7sdBd6kFLSa2RQ0Gr7ASWsw7jDGlOCfQ81DLYEe71vdE81CzWZO3fT3s9h_3Uw47fa7g_Dhz2pELMEGAwps1PBNKWH_TgOplefw9uuGX4UguqIWJ0QqyNiNSFWOLBCNAnb3fa_ml8eE3WM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815980978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Edwards, Tim ; Shaw, Joanna ; Gray, Danielle ; Thomson, Neil ; Faulkner, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Tim ; Shaw, Joanna ; Gray, Danielle ; Thomson, Neil ; Faulkner, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-0205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-0213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2016-09, Vol.33 (9), p.e8-e8</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1708-95af7e31040dcd940773fc1e16bc001738d22d2c2732541a80b324f5ecf7c89c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/33/9/e8.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/33/9/e8.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77343,77374</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faulkner, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><title>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</title><description>BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</description><issn>1472-0205</issn><issn>1472-0213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFtPgzAUx4nRxDn9CqaJz8xegBbfKnSukVsYw8SXBkpJXJxTcA9-e7uw-OzLuf_Pyfk5zi2CC4RIcG92ZtiZzsUQBdYEiIQLHJw5M-RR7EKMyPlfDP1L52octxAiP_TYzDkUpVjl60JWPAGbtQD5EjyLiqcyE4BnMUhlzF_zhKdAZrYANuWjtTyueRaJGBS85KmIZQSKkkeVrGSeiRKsRVnLSDwADkpRlfaAsM1a2KyW4uXaueib99HcnPzc2SxFFa3cJH-SEU_cFlHI3NBvemoIgh7sdBd6kFLSa2RQ0Gr7ASWsw7jDGlOCfQ81DLYEe71vdE81CzWZO3fT3s9h_3Uw47fa7g_Dhz2pELMEGAwps1PBNKWH_TgOplefw9uuGX4UguqIWJ0QqyNiNSFWOLBCNAnb3fa_ml8eE3WM</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Edwards, Tim</creator><creator>Shaw, Joanna</creator><creator>Gray, Danielle</creator><creator>Thomson, Neil</creator><creator>Faulkner, Mark</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><author>Edwards, Tim ; Shaw, Joanna ; Gray, Danielle ; Thomson, Neil ; Faulkner, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1708-95af7e31040dcd940773fc1e16bc001738d22d2c2732541a80b324f5ecf7c89c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faulkner, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Tim</au><au>Shaw, Joanna</au><au>Gray, Danielle</au><au>Thomson, Neil</au><au>Faulkner, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</atitle><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e8</spage><epage>e8</epage><pages>e8-e8</pages><issn>1472-0205</issn><eissn>1472-0213</eissn><abstract>BackgroundThe use of ketamine and midazolam in physician-led prehospital care teams within the UK is well established. Although both agents are in use by paramedics within emergency medical systems in North America and Australasia, there is a paucity of data relating to administration by UK paramedics.MethodsA panel of clinicians utilised a standardised data extraction form to review patient report forms for all cases where an Advanced Paramedic Practitioner (APP) administered ketamine or midazolam from 1st May to 30th September 2015. Reviewers assessed indications for and appropriateness of administration, and identification and management of adverse events.ResultsA total of 21 patients received ketamine for analgesia (n=20, 95%) or to facilitate rapid extrication (n=1, 5%). Pain scores were recorded in 18 patients (90%), the majority of whom experienced a reduction in pain post administration (n=17, 94%). No adverse events occurred following ketamine use. Midazolam was administered to a total of 80 cases. The most common indications for administration were maintenance of an advanced airway in patients with return of spontaneous circulation post cardiac arrest (n=37, 46%), management of acute behavioural disturbance (n=28, 35%) and prolonged seizures (n=15, 18%). Transient airway compromise occurred in 10% (n=8) of cases, all of which were managed appropriately. No other adverse events occurred. The administration of ketamine and midazolam was judged to be appropriate in all cases.ConclusionsThe use of ketamine and midazolam in the context of an urban APP service with high levels of additional education, procedural experience and selective targeting to emergency calls appears safe and effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-0205 |
ispartof | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2016-09, Vol.33 (9), p.e8-e8 |
issn | 1472-0205 1472-0213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1815980978 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | PREHOSPITAL USE OF KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN AN URBAN ADVANCED PARAMEDIC PRACTITIONER SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A49%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PREHOSPITAL%20USE%20OF%20KETAMINE%20AND%20MIDAZOLAM%20IN%20AN%20URBAN%20ADVANCED%20PARAMEDIC%20PRACTITIONER%20SERVICE:%20A%20RETROSPECTIVE%20REVIEW&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20medicine%20journal%20:%20EMJ&rft.au=Edwards,%20Tim&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e8&rft.epage=e8&rft.pages=e8-e8&rft.issn=1472-0205&rft.eissn=1472-0213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2016-206139.26&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4168168591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815980978&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |