DOES STUDYING VOCABULARY IN SMALLER SETS INCREASE LEARNING?
The present study examined the effects of part and whole learning on the acquisition of second language (L2, English) vocabulary. In whole learning, the materials to be learned are repeated in one large block, whereas, in part learning, the materials are divided into smaller blocks and repeated. Exp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in second language acquisition 2016-09, Vol.38 (3), p.523-552 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 552 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 523 |
| container_title | Studies in second language acquisition |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Nakata, Tatsuya Webb, Stuart |
| description | The present study examined the effects of part and whole learning on the acquisition of second language (L2, English) vocabulary. In whole learning, the materials to be learned are repeated in one large block, whereas, in part learning, the materials are divided into smaller blocks and repeated. Experiment 1 compared the effects of the following three treatments: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning, and 10-item part learning. Unlike previous studies, part and whole learning were matched in spacing. In Experiment 2, spacing as well as the part-whole learning distinction were manipulated, and the following three treatments were compared: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning with short spacing, and four-item part learning with long spacing. Results of the two experiments suggest that, (a) as long as spacing is equivalent, the part-whole distinction has little effect on learning, and (b) spacing has a larger effect on learning than the part-whole distinction. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0272263115000236 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1815527945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0272263115000236</cupid><ericid>EJ1113915</ericid><sourcerecordid>4165910451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-67b84748afc09a220f8bd37e419f12b9f2c381f17715b297c09088fdf59e6163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1Lw0AURQdRMFZ_gAsh4Do6byaTN4MLielYKzGFTCp0FfI10mJtm7QL_70JdSG4elzO4T64hFwDvQMKeG8oQ8YCDiAopYwHJ8QBH6kHwhenxBmwN_BzctF1q94JELlDHsYzbVyTzceLaTJx32dR-DSPw3ThThPXvIVxrFPX6Mz0OUp1aLQb6zBNevnxkpzZ4rNrrn7viGTPOotevHg2mUZh7FUM5d4LsJQ--rKwFVUFY9TKsubY-KAssFJZVnEJFhBBlExhb1EpbW2FagII-IjcHmu37WZ3aLp9vtoc2q_-Yw4ShGCofNFbN0eraZdVvm2X66L9zvUrAHAFA-dHXhXrsl3WH82fGpoPI-b_RuQ_mrJbGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815527945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DOES STUDYING VOCABULARY IN SMALLER SETS INCREASE LEARNING?</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Nakata, Tatsuya ; Webb, Stuart</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakata, Tatsuya ; Webb, Stuart</creatorcontrib><description>The present study examined the effects of part and whole learning on the acquisition of second language (L2, English) vocabulary. In whole learning, the materials to be learned are repeated in one large block, whereas, in part learning, the materials are divided into smaller blocks and repeated. Experiment 1 compared the effects of the following three treatments: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning, and 10-item part learning. Unlike previous studies, part and whole learning were matched in spacing. In Experiment 2, spacing as well as the part-whole learning distinction were manipulated, and the following three treatments were compared: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning with short spacing, and four-item part learning with long spacing. Results of the two experiments suggest that, (a) as long as spacing is equivalent, the part-whole distinction has little effect on learning, and (b) spacing has a larger effect on learning than the part-whole distinction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-2631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0272263115000236</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SLACEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Applied Linguistics ; College Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Doctoral Dissertations ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language learning ; Language Acquisition ; Learning processes ; Learning strategies ; Memorization ; Memory ; Researchers ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Student Personnel Services ; Success ; Teaching Methods ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary development ; Vocabulary learning ; Whole language approach</subject><ispartof>Studies in second language acquisition, 2016-09, Vol.38 (3), p.523-552</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-67b84748afc09a220f8bd37e419f12b9f2c381f17715b297c09088fdf59e6163</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0272263115000236/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1113915$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakata, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Stuart</creatorcontrib><title>DOES STUDYING VOCABULARY IN SMALLER SETS INCREASE LEARNING?</title><title>Studies in second language acquisition</title><addtitle>Stud Second Lang Acquis</addtitle><description>The present study examined the effects of part and whole learning on the acquisition of second language (L2, English) vocabulary. In whole learning, the materials to be learned are repeated in one large block, whereas, in part learning, the materials are divided into smaller blocks and repeated. Experiment 1 compared the effects of the following three treatments: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning, and 10-item part learning. Unlike previous studies, part and whole learning were matched in spacing. In Experiment 2, spacing as well as the part-whole learning distinction were manipulated, and the following three treatments were compared: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning with short spacing, and four-item part learning with long spacing. Results of the two experiments suggest that, (a) as long as spacing is equivalent, the part-whole distinction has little effect on learning, and (b) spacing has a larger effect on learning than the part-whole distinction.</description><subject>Applied Linguistics</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Doctoral Dissertations</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Learning processes</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Memorization</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Student Personnel Services</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary development</subject><subject>Vocabulary learning</subject><subject>Whole language approach</subject><issn>0272-2631</issn><issn>1470-1545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1Lw0AURQdRMFZ_gAsh4Do6byaTN4MLielYKzGFTCp0FfI10mJtm7QL_70JdSG4elzO4T64hFwDvQMKeG8oQ8YCDiAopYwHJ8QBH6kHwhenxBmwN_BzctF1q94JELlDHsYzbVyTzceLaTJx32dR-DSPw3ThThPXvIVxrFPX6Mz0OUp1aLQb6zBNevnxkpzZ4rNrrn7viGTPOotevHg2mUZh7FUM5d4LsJQ--rKwFVUFY9TKsubY-KAssFJZVnEJFhBBlExhb1EpbW2FagII-IjcHmu37WZ3aLp9vtoc2q_-Yw4ShGCofNFbN0eraZdVvm2X66L9zvUrAHAFA-dHXhXrsl3WH82fGpoPI-b_RuQ_mrJbGA</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Nakata, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Webb, Stuart</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>DOES STUDYING VOCABULARY IN SMALLER SETS INCREASE LEARNING?</title><author>Nakata, Tatsuya ; Webb, Stuart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-67b84748afc09a220f8bd37e419f12b9f2c381f17715b297c09088fdf59e6163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Applied Linguistics</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Doctoral Dissertations</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Learning processes</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Memorization</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Student Personnel Services</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary development</topic><topic>Vocabulary learning</topic><topic>Whole language approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakata, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Stuart</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Studies in second language acquisition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakata, Tatsuya</au><au>Webb, Stuart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1113915</ericid><atitle>DOES STUDYING VOCABULARY IN SMALLER SETS INCREASE LEARNING?</atitle><jtitle>Studies in second language acquisition</jtitle><addtitle>Stud Second Lang Acquis</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>523</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>523-552</pages><issn>0272-2631</issn><eissn>1470-1545</eissn><coden>SLACEF</coden><abstract>The present study examined the effects of part and whole learning on the acquisition of second language (L2, English) vocabulary. In whole learning, the materials to be learned are repeated in one large block, whereas, in part learning, the materials are divided into smaller blocks and repeated. Experiment 1 compared the effects of the following three treatments: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning, and 10-item part learning. Unlike previous studies, part and whole learning were matched in spacing. In Experiment 2, spacing as well as the part-whole learning distinction were manipulated, and the following three treatments were compared: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning with short spacing, and four-item part learning with long spacing. Results of the two experiments suggest that, (a) as long as spacing is equivalent, the part-whole distinction has little effect on learning, and (b) spacing has a larger effect on learning than the part-whole distinction.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0272263115000236</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0272-2631 |
| ispartof | Studies in second language acquisition, 2016-09, Vol.38 (3), p.523-552 |
| issn | 0272-2631 1470-1545 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1815527945 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Applied Linguistics College Students Comparative Analysis Doctoral Dissertations English (Second Language) English as a second language learning Language Acquisition Learning processes Learning strategies Memorization Memory Researchers Resistance (Psychology) Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Student Personnel Services Success Teaching Methods Vocabulary Vocabulary development Vocabulary learning Whole language approach |
| title | DOES STUDYING VOCABULARY IN SMALLER SETS INCREASE LEARNING? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A58%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DOES%20STUDYING%20VOCABULARY%20IN%20SMALLER%20SETS%20INCREASE%20LEARNING?&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20second%20language%20acquisition&rft.au=Nakata,%20Tatsuya&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=523&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=523-552&rft.issn=0272-2631&rft.eissn=1470-1545&rft.coden=SLACEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0272263115000236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E4165910451%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815527945&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0272263115000236&rft_ericid=EJ1113915&rfr_iscdi=true |