The Linguistic Vitality of American Indian Sign Language: Endangered, yet Not Vanished

This article examines the linguistic status and potential for revitalization of American Indian Sign Language (AISL), which is considered an endangered language variety. It reports recent findings from the first documentary linguistics fieldwork carried out in over fifty years to focus on the AISL v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sign language studies 2016-07, Vol.16 (4), p.535-562
1. Verfasser: DAVIS, JEFFREY E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 562
container_issue 4
container_start_page 535
container_title Sign language studies
container_volume 16
creator DAVIS, JEFFREY E.
description This article examines the linguistic status and potential for revitalization of American Indian Sign Language (AISL), which is considered an endangered language variety. It reports recent findings from the first documentary linguistics fieldwork carried out in over fifty years to focus on the AISL variety, which has been learned and used as a primary or secondary language among members of some American Indian communities since the eighteenth century and possibly earlier. AISL has been maintained over the past several generations chiefly by tribal elders and these efforts have been buoyed by deaf tribal members who have acquired it as a fluent means of communication within their own native communities. While research continues to identify different AISL dialects and the number of remaining native signers, reportedly hundreds of North American Indians still use and understand AISL to varying degrees of proficiency and mutual intelligibility. The AISL variety has been transmitted for many generations and used internationally among dozens of American Indian nations of the United States and Canada; today, representing mainly Algonquian and Siouan language families. Up to now, both deaf and hearing tribal members have served a vital role in the development and transmission of indigenous sign language. Hence, it has been well documented that American indigenous sign language served a wide variety of discourse functions and purposes—ranging from in-group (shared within a single tribe or family) to international communication (shared between different Indian tribes and nations). The article also highlights how documentary linguistics contributes to language preservation and revitalization.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/sls.2016.0011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1813643401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26191233</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26191233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d974c9b1910b3776725f714ebe094f88ae5590dec98788ce387386010d75d313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkD1rwzAQhkVpoWnasWPB0NmuTidL8hhCPwKGDgldhSPLqUxip5I95N9XJiWdbrj34-4h5BFoBpjjS9iHjFEQGaUAV2QGOWIqmMBrMqNIWQpc5rfkLoSWUlpwWcyI2nzbpHTdbnRhcCb5ckO1d8Mp6ZtkcbDemapLVl3t4li7XZeUVdRWO3tPbppqH-zD35yTzdvrZvmRlp_vq-WiTA0iG9K6kNwUWyiAblFKIVneSOB2a-MBjVKVzfOC1tYUSiplLCqJSlCgtcxrBJyT53Ps0fc_ow2DbvvRd7FRgwIUHDmdVOlZZXwfgreNPnp3qPxJA9UTGx3Z6ImNnthEPb-kttYMhzHY_2DBZAzW64nfhA8Ej7wQo-3pbGvD0PtLBxPxPRb3vwSnblc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813643401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Linguistic Vitality of American Indian Sign Language: Endangered, yet Not Vanished</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>DAVIS, JEFFREY E.</creator><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, JEFFREY E.</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the linguistic status and potential for revitalization of American Indian Sign Language (AISL), which is considered an endangered language variety. It reports recent findings from the first documentary linguistics fieldwork carried out in over fifty years to focus on the AISL variety, which has been learned and used as a primary or secondary language among members of some American Indian communities since the eighteenth century and possibly earlier. AISL has been maintained over the past several generations chiefly by tribal elders and these efforts have been buoyed by deaf tribal members who have acquired it as a fluent means of communication within their own native communities. While research continues to identify different AISL dialects and the number of remaining native signers, reportedly hundreds of North American Indians still use and understand AISL to varying degrees of proficiency and mutual intelligibility. The AISL variety has been transmitted for many generations and used internationally among dozens of American Indian nations of the United States and Canada; today, representing mainly Algonquian and Siouan language families. Up to now, both deaf and hearing tribal members have served a vital role in the development and transmission of indigenous sign language. Hence, it has been well documented that American indigenous sign language served a wide variety of discourse functions and purposes—ranging from in-group (shared within a single tribe or family) to international communication (shared between different Indian tribes and nations). The article also highlights how documentary linguistics contributes to language preservation and revitalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-1475</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1533-6263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/sls.2016.0011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Gallaudet University Press</publisher><subject>Algonquian languages ; American Indians ; American sign language ; Anthropology ; Communication ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Communities ; Community Relations ; Cultural Pluralism ; Deafness ; Diachronic Linguistics ; Dialect Studies ; Discourse functions ; Documentation ; Endangered languages ; Field study ; Fieldwork ; Historical linguistics ; Intelligibility ; International sign language ; Language ; Language Dominance ; Language Skill Attrition ; Language Variation ; Language varieties ; Linguistics ; Metalinguistics ; Multilingualism ; Mutual Intelligibility ; Native Americans ; Native Language ; Native languages ; Native North Americans ; Oral Language ; Plains sign talk ; Regional dialects ; Sign language ; Sign languages ; Sociolinguistics ; Tribes</subject><ispartof>Sign language studies, 2016-07, Vol.16 (4), p.535-562</ispartof><rights>2016 Gallaudet University</rights><rights>Copyright © Gallaudet University.</rights><rights>Copyright American Annals of the Deaf Summer 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d974c9b1910b3776725f714ebe094f88ae5590dec98788ce387386010d75d313</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26191233$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26191233$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, JEFFREY E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Linguistic Vitality of American Indian Sign Language: Endangered, yet Not Vanished</title><title>Sign language studies</title><description>This article examines the linguistic status and potential for revitalization of American Indian Sign Language (AISL), which is considered an endangered language variety. It reports recent findings from the first documentary linguistics fieldwork carried out in over fifty years to focus on the AISL variety, which has been learned and used as a primary or secondary language among members of some American Indian communities since the eighteenth century and possibly earlier. AISL has been maintained over the past several generations chiefly by tribal elders and these efforts have been buoyed by deaf tribal members who have acquired it as a fluent means of communication within their own native communities. While research continues to identify different AISL dialects and the number of remaining native signers, reportedly hundreds of North American Indians still use and understand AISL to varying degrees of proficiency and mutual intelligibility. The AISL variety has been transmitted for many generations and used internationally among dozens of American Indian nations of the United States and Canada; today, representing mainly Algonquian and Siouan language families. Up to now, both deaf and hearing tribal members have served a vital role in the development and transmission of indigenous sign language. Hence, it has been well documented that American indigenous sign language served a wide variety of discourse functions and purposes—ranging from in-group (shared within a single tribe or family) to international communication (shared between different Indian tribes and nations). The article also highlights how documentary linguistics contributes to language preservation and revitalization.</description><subject>Algonquian languages</subject><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>American sign language</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Cultural Pluralism</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Diachronic Linguistics</subject><subject>Dialect Studies</subject><subject>Discourse functions</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Endangered languages</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Historical linguistics</subject><subject>Intelligibility</subject><subject>International sign language</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Dominance</subject><subject>Language Skill Attrition</subject><subject>Language Variation</subject><subject>Language varieties</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Metalinguistics</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Mutual Intelligibility</subject><subject>Native Americans</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>Native languages</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Plains sign talk</subject><subject>Regional dialects</subject><subject>Sign language</subject><subject>Sign languages</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><subject>Tribes</subject><issn>0302-1475</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkD1rwzAQhkVpoWnasWPB0NmuTidL8hhCPwKGDgldhSPLqUxip5I95N9XJiWdbrj34-4h5BFoBpjjS9iHjFEQGaUAV2QGOWIqmMBrMqNIWQpc5rfkLoSWUlpwWcyI2nzbpHTdbnRhcCb5ckO1d8Mp6ZtkcbDemapLVl3t4li7XZeUVdRWO3tPbppqH-zD35yTzdvrZvmRlp_vq-WiTA0iG9K6kNwUWyiAblFKIVneSOB2a-MBjVKVzfOC1tYUSiplLCqJSlCgtcxrBJyT53Ps0fc_ow2DbvvRd7FRgwIUHDmdVOlZZXwfgreNPnp3qPxJA9UTGx3Z6ImNnthEPb-kttYMhzHY_2DBZAzW64nfhA8Ej7wQo-3pbGvD0PtLBxPxPRb3vwSnblc</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>DAVIS, JEFFREY E.</creator><general>Gallaudet University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>The Linguistic Vitality of American Indian Sign Language</title><author>DAVIS, JEFFREY E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d974c9b1910b3776725f714ebe094f88ae5590dec98788ce387386010d75d313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algonquian languages</topic><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>American sign language</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Cultural Pluralism</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Diachronic Linguistics</topic><topic>Dialect Studies</topic><topic>Discourse functions</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Endangered languages</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Historical linguistics</topic><topic>Intelligibility</topic><topic>International sign language</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Dominance</topic><topic>Language Skill Attrition</topic><topic>Language Variation</topic><topic>Language varieties</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Metalinguistics</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Mutual Intelligibility</topic><topic>Native Americans</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>Native languages</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Plains sign talk</topic><topic>Regional dialects</topic><topic>Sign language</topic><topic>Sign languages</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><topic>Tribes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, JEFFREY E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Sign language studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DAVIS, JEFFREY E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Linguistic Vitality of American Indian Sign Language: Endangered, yet Not Vanished</atitle><jtitle>Sign language studies</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>535-562</pages><issn>0302-1475</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><eissn>1533-6263</eissn><abstract>This article examines the linguistic status and potential for revitalization of American Indian Sign Language (AISL), which is considered an endangered language variety. It reports recent findings from the first documentary linguistics fieldwork carried out in over fifty years to focus on the AISL variety, which has been learned and used as a primary or secondary language among members of some American Indian communities since the eighteenth century and possibly earlier. AISL has been maintained over the past several generations chiefly by tribal elders and these efforts have been buoyed by deaf tribal members who have acquired it as a fluent means of communication within their own native communities. While research continues to identify different AISL dialects and the number of remaining native signers, reportedly hundreds of North American Indians still use and understand AISL to varying degrees of proficiency and mutual intelligibility. The AISL variety has been transmitted for many generations and used internationally among dozens of American Indian nations of the United States and Canada; today, representing mainly Algonquian and Siouan language families. Up to now, both deaf and hearing tribal members have served a vital role in the development and transmission of indigenous sign language. Hence, it has been well documented that American indigenous sign language served a wide variety of discourse functions and purposes—ranging from in-group (shared within a single tribe or family) to international communication (shared between different Indian tribes and nations). The article also highlights how documentary linguistics contributes to language preservation and revitalization.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Gallaudet University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/sls.2016.0011</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-1475
ispartof Sign language studies, 2016-07, Vol.16 (4), p.535-562
issn 0302-1475
1533-6263
1533-6263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1813643401
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Algonquian languages
American Indians
American sign language
Anthropology
Communication
Communication (Thought Transfer)
Communities
Community Relations
Cultural Pluralism
Deafness
Diachronic Linguistics
Dialect Studies
Discourse functions
Documentation
Endangered languages
Field study
Fieldwork
Historical linguistics
Intelligibility
International sign language
Language
Language Dominance
Language Skill Attrition
Language Variation
Language varieties
Linguistics
Metalinguistics
Multilingualism
Mutual Intelligibility
Native Americans
Native Language
Native languages
Native North Americans
Oral Language
Plains sign talk
Regional dialects
Sign language
Sign languages
Sociolinguistics
Tribes
title The Linguistic Vitality of American Indian Sign Language: Endangered, yet Not Vanished
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A08%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Linguistic%20Vitality%20of%20American%20Indian%20Sign%20Language:%20Endangered,%20yet%20Not%20Vanished&rft.jtitle=Sign%20language%20studies&rft.au=DAVIS,%20JEFFREY%20E.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=535-562&rft.issn=0302-1475&rft.eissn=1533-6263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/sls.2016.0011&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26191233%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813643401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26191233&rfr_iscdi=true