The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families

This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings pain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alternate routes 2016-01, Vol.27, p.87
Hauptverfasser: Lewchuk, Wayne, Laflèche, Michelynn, Procyk, Stephanie, Cook, Charlene, Dyson, Diane, Goldring, Luin, Lior, Karen, Meisner, Alan, Shields, John, Tambureno, Anthony, Viducis, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 87
container_title Alternate routes
container_volume 27
creator Lewchuk, Wayne
Laflèche, Michelynn
Procyk, Stephanie
Cook, Charlene
Dyson, Diane
Goldring, Luin
Lior, Karen
Meisner, Alan
Shields, John
Tambureno, Anthony
Viducis, Peter
description This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1810541761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1810541761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18105417613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kNhXdPWBbh0ERwntVVPbRHNTpX9vBz_A6SyHcwYsEKtlFGZciiELeMaXoZRpMmYToorzOOJxGrDz6Y6QOyyU076DHI2qfbeGg_3A0RAWrUPYNc_adg0aD1tNqnwr49UNCc7WPdARKFNCH9IO9qrRtUaasdFV1YTzH6dssd-dNofw6eyrRfKXyraun9FFSMGTWGSpiP6zvkxtQqk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810541761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lewchuk, Wayne ; Laflèche, Michelynn ; Procyk, Stephanie ; Cook, Charlene ; Dyson, Diane ; Goldring, Luin ; Lior, Karen ; Meisner, Alan ; Shields, John ; Tambureno, Anthony ; Viducis, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewchuk, Wayne ; Laflèche, Michelynn ; Procyk, Stephanie ; Cook, Charlene ; Dyson, Diane ; Goldring, Luin ; Lior, Karen ; Meisner, Alan ; Shields, John ; Tambureno, Anthony ; Viducis, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0702-8865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-7081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Athabasca: Athabasca University</publisher><subject>Children ; Employment ; Households ; Income distribution ; Nuptiality ; Poverty ; Social integration ; Social isolation ; Social participation ; Well being ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Alternate routes, 2016-01, Vol.27, p.87</ispartof><rights>Copyright Athabasca University 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33773</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewchuk, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflèche, Michelynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Procyk, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldring, Luin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lior, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambureno, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viducis, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</title><title>Alternate routes</title><description>This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Nuptiality</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><subject>Social isolation</subject><subject>Social participation</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0702-8865</issn><issn>1923-7081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kNhXdPWBbh0ERwntVVPbRHNTpX9vBz_A6SyHcwYsEKtlFGZciiELeMaXoZRpMmYToorzOOJxGrDz6Y6QOyyU076DHI2qfbeGg_3A0RAWrUPYNc_adg0aD1tNqnwr49UNCc7WPdARKFNCH9IO9qrRtUaasdFV1YTzH6dssd-dNofw6eyrRfKXyraun9FFSMGTWGSpiP6zvkxtQqk</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Lewchuk, Wayne</creator><creator>Laflèche, Michelynn</creator><creator>Procyk, Stephanie</creator><creator>Cook, Charlene</creator><creator>Dyson, Diane</creator><creator>Goldring, Luin</creator><creator>Lior, Karen</creator><creator>Meisner, Alan</creator><creator>Shields, John</creator><creator>Tambureno, Anthony</creator><creator>Viducis, Peter</creator><general>Athabasca University</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</title><author>Lewchuk, Wayne ; Laflèche, Michelynn ; Procyk, Stephanie ; Cook, Charlene ; Dyson, Diane ; Goldring, Luin ; Lior, Karen ; Meisner, Alan ; Shields, John ; Tambureno, Anthony ; Viducis, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18105417613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Nuptiality</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><topic>Social isolation</topic><topic>Social participation</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewchuk, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflèche, Michelynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Procyk, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldring, Luin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lior, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambureno, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viducis, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Alternate routes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewchuk, Wayne</au><au>Laflèche, Michelynn</au><au>Procyk, Stephanie</au><au>Cook, Charlene</au><au>Dyson, Diane</au><au>Goldring, Luin</au><au>Lior, Karen</au><au>Meisner, Alan</au><au>Shields, John</au><au>Tambureno, Anthony</au><au>Viducis, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</atitle><jtitle>Alternate routes</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><spage>87</spage><pages>87-</pages><issn>0702-8865</issn><eissn>1923-7081</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends.</abstract><cop>Athabasca</cop><pub>Athabasca University</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0702-8865
ispartof Alternate routes, 2016-01, Vol.27, p.87
issn 0702-8865
1923-7081
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1810541761
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Children
Employment
Households
Income distribution
Nuptiality
Poverty
Social integration
Social isolation
Social participation
Well being
Workers
title The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Precarity%20Penalty:%20How%20Insecure%20Employment%20Disadvantages%20Workers%20and%20Their%20Families&rft.jtitle=Alternate%20routes&rft.au=Lewchuk,%20Wayne&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.spage=87&rft.pages=87-&rft.issn=0702-8865&rft.eissn=1923-7081&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1810541761%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810541761&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true