The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families
This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings pain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alternate routes 2016-01, Vol.27, p.87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Alternate routes |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Lewchuk, Wayne Laflèche, Michelynn Procyk, Stephanie Cook, Charlene Dyson, Diane Goldring, Luin Lior, Karen Meisner, Alan Shields, John Tambureno, Anthony Viducis, Peter |
description | This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1810541761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1810541761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18105417613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kNhXdPWBbh0ERwntVVPbRHNTpX9vBz_A6SyHcwYsEKtlFGZciiELeMaXoZRpMmYToorzOOJxGrDz6Y6QOyyU076DHI2qfbeGg_3A0RAWrUPYNc_adg0aD1tNqnwr49UNCc7WPdARKFNCH9IO9qrRtUaasdFV1YTzH6dssd-dNofw6eyrRfKXyraun9FFSMGTWGSpiP6zvkxtQqk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810541761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lewchuk, Wayne ; Laflèche, Michelynn ; Procyk, Stephanie ; Cook, Charlene ; Dyson, Diane ; Goldring, Luin ; Lior, Karen ; Meisner, Alan ; Shields, John ; Tambureno, Anthony ; Viducis, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewchuk, Wayne ; Laflèche, Michelynn ; Procyk, Stephanie ; Cook, Charlene ; Dyson, Diane ; Goldring, Luin ; Lior, Karen ; Meisner, Alan ; Shields, John ; Tambureno, Anthony ; Viducis, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0702-8865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-7081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Athabasca: Athabasca University</publisher><subject>Children ; Employment ; Households ; Income distribution ; Nuptiality ; Poverty ; Social integration ; Social isolation ; Social participation ; Well being ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Alternate routes, 2016-01, Vol.27, p.87</ispartof><rights>Copyright Athabasca University 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33773</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewchuk, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflèche, Michelynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Procyk, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldring, Luin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lior, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambureno, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viducis, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</title><title>Alternate routes</title><description>This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Nuptiality</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><subject>Social isolation</subject><subject>Social participation</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0702-8865</issn><issn>1923-7081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kNhXdPWBbh0ERwntVVPbRHNTpX9vBz_A6SyHcwYsEKtlFGZciiELeMaXoZRpMmYToorzOOJxGrDz6Y6QOyyU076DHI2qfbeGg_3A0RAWrUPYNc_adg0aD1tNqnwr49UNCc7WPdARKFNCH9IO9qrRtUaasdFV1YTzH6dssd-dNofw6eyrRfKXyraun9FFSMGTWGSpiP6zvkxtQqk</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Lewchuk, Wayne</creator><creator>Laflèche, Michelynn</creator><creator>Procyk, Stephanie</creator><creator>Cook, Charlene</creator><creator>Dyson, Diane</creator><creator>Goldring, Luin</creator><creator>Lior, Karen</creator><creator>Meisner, Alan</creator><creator>Shields, John</creator><creator>Tambureno, Anthony</creator><creator>Viducis, Peter</creator><general>Athabasca University</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</title><author>Lewchuk, Wayne ; Laflèche, Michelynn ; Procyk, Stephanie ; Cook, Charlene ; Dyson, Diane ; Goldring, Luin ; Lior, Karen ; Meisner, Alan ; Shields, John ; Tambureno, Anthony ; Viducis, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18105417613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Nuptiality</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><topic>Social isolation</topic><topic>Social participation</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewchuk, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflèche, Michelynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Procyk, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyson, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldring, Luin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lior, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambureno, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viducis, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Alternate routes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewchuk, Wayne</au><au>Laflèche, Michelynn</au><au>Procyk, Stephanie</au><au>Cook, Charlene</au><au>Dyson, Diane</au><au>Goldring, Luin</au><au>Lior, Karen</au><au>Meisner, Alan</au><au>Shields, John</au><au>Tambureno, Anthony</au><au>Viducis, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families</atitle><jtitle>Alternate routes</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><spage>87</spage><pages>87-</pages><issn>0702-8865</issn><eissn>1923-7081</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area. The analysis is based on data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2014 by the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) research group. The survey findings paint a picture of how low earnings and economic uncertainty translate into delayed formation of relationships, lower marriage rates for workers under the age of 35, and fewer households with children. They also suggest that workers in precarious employment are more likely to experience social isolation. These findings suggest that the Precarity Penalty is not limited to economic outcomes from employment but also includes disadvantages in establishing healthy households and being engaged in one's community. Workers in secure employment enjoy better economic outcomes from employment that provide the basis for better household wellbeing and increased social integration. While much has been made in recent years of the unequal distribution of income, the PEPSO study also points to the unequal distribution of many of the non-financial aspects of life that people value including companionship, having a family and having friends.</abstract><cop>Athabasca</cop><pub>Athabasca University</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0702-8865 |
ispartof | Alternate routes, 2016-01, Vol.27, p.87 |
issn | 0702-8865 1923-7081 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1810541761 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Children Employment Households Income distribution Nuptiality Poverty Social integration Social isolation Social participation Well being Workers |
title | The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Precarity%20Penalty:%20How%20Insecure%20Employment%20Disadvantages%20Workers%20and%20Their%20Families&rft.jtitle=Alternate%20routes&rft.au=Lewchuk,%20Wayne&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.spage=87&rft.pages=87-&rft.issn=0702-8865&rft.eissn=1923-7081&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1810541761%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810541761&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |