Race, Reason and Reasonableness: Toward an "Unreasonable" Pedagogy
Starting from the contemporary critical-theoretical notion of an objective violence that organizes social reality in capitalism, including processes of systemic racism, as well as from phenomenological inquiries into processes of race and identity, this article explores the relationship between raci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational studies (Ames) 2016-07, Vol.52 (4), p.346-362 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 362 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | Educational studies (Ames) |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | De Lissovoy, Noah |
description | Starting from the contemporary critical-theoretical notion of an objective violence that organizes social reality in capitalism, including processes of systemic racism, as well as from phenomenological inquiries into processes of race and identity, this article explores the relationship between racism and reasonableness in education and society. The category of the reasonable connects the content of particular propositions with the inner truth of the form of thought. At the same time, the reasonable refers to what can be legitimated not only intellectually but practically and morally. I describe how the force of this category, working through neoliberal modalities of appropriation and penality, is an anchor for persistent processes of racial oppression in educational policy and curriculum. Furthermore, if the reasonable is a central figure for ideology, then a kind of thinking that would break with it will show up in the first instance as unreasonable. Thus, I argue that critical pedagogy in the present needs to start from a different and "unreasonable" reason. In addition, taking its cue from interventions by radical educators and students, critical teaching needs to challenge the dominative decorum that forces dialogue on race and racism into the narrow spaces-both material and discursive-of the given. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00131946.2016.1190367 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1810057434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1107303</ericid><sourcerecordid>4141556311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-a34a4f0e8556a74884efa0dbda65fea0e1f14220380638b00a571ce562d0e9643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_QiHUV1Nns5dsfFJLvVFQSvu8TJPdkpJm625L6b83IdVH52UGvnPmwCFkQGFEQcE9AGU043KUAJUjSjNgMj0jPSpYEsssY-ek12riVnRJrkJYQzMcVI88zzA3d9HMYHB1hHVxOnFZmdqE8BDN3QF90aBouKj9HxxGX6bAlVsdr8mFxSqYm9Puk8XLZD5-i6efr-_jp2mcJxnsYmQcuQWjhJCYcqW4sQjFskAprEEw1FKeJMAUSKaWAChSmhshkwJMJjnrk9vu79a7770JO712e183kZoqCiBSzlqV6FS5dyF4Y_XWlxv0R01Bt3Xp37p0W5c-1dX4Bp3P-DL_80w-KIWUAWv4Y8fL2jq_wYPzVaF3eKyctx7rvAya_R_xAwk6eDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810057434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Race, Reason and Reasonableness: Toward an "Unreasonable" Pedagogy</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>De Lissovoy, Noah</creator><creatorcontrib>De Lissovoy, Noah</creatorcontrib><description>Starting from the contemporary critical-theoretical notion of an objective violence that organizes social reality in capitalism, including processes of systemic racism, as well as from phenomenological inquiries into processes of race and identity, this article explores the relationship between racism and reasonableness in education and society. The category of the reasonable connects the content of particular propositions with the inner truth of the form of thought. At the same time, the reasonable refers to what can be legitimated not only intellectually but practically and morally. I describe how the force of this category, working through neoliberal modalities of appropriation and penality, is an anchor for persistent processes of racial oppression in educational policy and curriculum. Furthermore, if the reasonable is a central figure for ideology, then a kind of thinking that would break with it will show up in the first instance as unreasonable. Thus, I argue that critical pedagogy in the present needs to start from a different and "unreasonable" reason. In addition, taking its cue from interventions by radical educators and students, critical teaching needs to challenge the dominative decorum that forces dialogue on race and racism into the narrow spaces-both material and discursive-of the given.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6993</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2016.1190367</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDSTDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Critical Theory ; Curriculum ; Educational Policy ; Ideology ; Neoliberalism ; Phenomenology ; Public Education ; Race ; Racial Bias ; Racism ; Social Systems ; Teaching methods ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Educational studies (Ames), 2016-07, Vol.52 (4), p.346-362</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-a34a4f0e8556a74884efa0dbda65fea0e1f14220380638b00a571ce562d0e9643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-a34a4f0e8556a74884efa0dbda65fea0e1f14220380638b00a571ce562d0e9643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1107303$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Lissovoy, Noah</creatorcontrib><title>Race, Reason and Reasonableness: Toward an "Unreasonable" Pedagogy</title><title>Educational studies (Ames)</title><description>Starting from the contemporary critical-theoretical notion of an objective violence that organizes social reality in capitalism, including processes of systemic racism, as well as from phenomenological inquiries into processes of race and identity, this article explores the relationship between racism and reasonableness in education and society. The category of the reasonable connects the content of particular propositions with the inner truth of the form of thought. At the same time, the reasonable refers to what can be legitimated not only intellectually but practically and morally. I describe how the force of this category, working through neoliberal modalities of appropriation and penality, is an anchor for persistent processes of racial oppression in educational policy and curriculum. Furthermore, if the reasonable is a central figure for ideology, then a kind of thinking that would break with it will show up in the first instance as unreasonable. Thus, I argue that critical pedagogy in the present needs to start from a different and "unreasonable" reason. In addition, taking its cue from interventions by radical educators and students, critical teaching needs to challenge the dominative decorum that forces dialogue on race and racism into the narrow spaces-both material and discursive-of the given.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Public Education</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial Bias</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Social Systems</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0013-1946</issn><issn>1532-6993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_QiHUV1Nns5dsfFJLvVFQSvu8TJPdkpJm625L6b83IdVH52UGvnPmwCFkQGFEQcE9AGU043KUAJUjSjNgMj0jPSpYEsssY-ek12riVnRJrkJYQzMcVI88zzA3d9HMYHB1hHVxOnFZmdqE8BDN3QF90aBouKj9HxxGX6bAlVsdr8mFxSqYm9Puk8XLZD5-i6efr-_jp2mcJxnsYmQcuQWjhJCYcqW4sQjFskAprEEw1FKeJMAUSKaWAChSmhshkwJMJjnrk9vu79a7770JO712e183kZoqCiBSzlqV6FS5dyF4Y_XWlxv0R01Bt3Xp37p0W5c-1dX4Bp3P-DL_80w-KIWUAWv4Y8fL2jq_wYPzVaF3eKyctx7rvAya_R_xAwk6eDM</recordid><startdate>20160703</startdate><enddate>20160703</enddate><creator>De Lissovoy, Noah</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160703</creationdate><title>Race, Reason and Reasonableness: Toward an "Unreasonable" Pedagogy</title><author>De Lissovoy, Noah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-a34a4f0e8556a74884efa0dbda65fea0e1f14220380638b00a571ce562d0e9643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Public Education</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial Bias</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Social Systems</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Lissovoy, Noah</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Educational studies (Ames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Lissovoy, Noah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1107303</ericid><atitle>Race, Reason and Reasonableness: Toward an "Unreasonable" Pedagogy</atitle><jtitle>Educational studies (Ames)</jtitle><date>2016-07-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>346-362</pages><issn>0013-1946</issn><eissn>1532-6993</eissn><coden>EDSTDD</coden><abstract>Starting from the contemporary critical-theoretical notion of an objective violence that organizes social reality in capitalism, including processes of systemic racism, as well as from phenomenological inquiries into processes of race and identity, this article explores the relationship between racism and reasonableness in education and society. The category of the reasonable connects the content of particular propositions with the inner truth of the form of thought. At the same time, the reasonable refers to what can be legitimated not only intellectually but practically and morally. I describe how the force of this category, working through neoliberal modalities of appropriation and penality, is an anchor for persistent processes of racial oppression in educational policy and curriculum. Furthermore, if the reasonable is a central figure for ideology, then a kind of thinking that would break with it will show up in the first instance as unreasonable. Thus, I argue that critical pedagogy in the present needs to start from a different and "unreasonable" reason. In addition, taking its cue from interventions by radical educators and students, critical teaching needs to challenge the dominative decorum that forces dialogue on race and racism into the narrow spaces-both material and discursive-of the given.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00131946.2016.1190367</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-1946 |
ispartof | Educational studies (Ames), 2016-07, Vol.52 (4), p.346-362 |
issn | 0013-1946 1532-6993 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1810057434 |
source | Education Source |
subjects | Capitalism Critical Theory Curriculum Educational Policy Ideology Neoliberalism Phenomenology Public Education Race Racial Bias Racism Social Systems Teaching methods Violence |
title | Race, Reason and Reasonableness: Toward an "Unreasonable" Pedagogy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A09%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Race,%20Reason%20and%20Reasonableness:%20Toward%20an%20%22Unreasonable%22%20Pedagogy&rft.jtitle=Educational%20studies%20(Ames)&rft.au=De%20Lissovoy,%20Noah&rft.date=2016-07-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=346-362&rft.issn=0013-1946&rft.eissn=1532-6993&rft.coden=EDSTDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00131946.2016.1190367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4141556311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810057434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1107303&rfr_iscdi=true |