Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk

This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky dec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Andrews, Steven, Giese, Joan, Boush, David
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 465
container_title
container_volume 37
creator Andrews, Steven
Giese, Joan
Boush, David
description This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making.
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1808044679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4134729321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-4591ed3efc4e974186c7469690bfb6490864c962a0647066ec14b50e6eb7edac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjcFOAjEURbvARET_oYlbJ3ll3ry2GxIDoiQQEwNr0um8amHSwenw_6KyOndxcs9IjAGsKey0MrfiLucDgNJINBazJXMb0-eT3H7FdPxbLjVyEUPgntMQXSsX7GOOXZIb92vIXWq4lx8xH-_FTXBt5ocrJ2K3fNnO34r1--tq_rwuTkqVQ4GVVdyUHDyy1agM-UvekoU61IQWDKG3NHVAqIGIvcK6AiauNTfOlxPx-P976rvvM-dhf-jOfbok98qAAUTStvwBw3NCZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>1808044679</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Andrews, Steven ; Giese, Joan ; Boush, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Steven ; Giese, Joan ; Boush, David</creatorcontrib><description>This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-9258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Urbana: Association for Consumer Research</publisher><subject>Behavioral decision theory ; Cognitive psychology ; Decision making ; Information processing ; Risk management ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Advances in consumer research, 2010, Vol.37, p.465</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Consumer Research 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,778,782,787,788,23913,23914,25123</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boush, David</creatorcontrib><title>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</title><title>Advances in consumer research</title><description>This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making.</description><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0098-9258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjcFOAjEURbvARET_oYlbJ3ll3ry2GxIDoiQQEwNr0um8amHSwenw_6KyOndxcs9IjAGsKey0MrfiLucDgNJINBazJXMb0-eT3H7FdPxbLjVyEUPgntMQXSsX7GOOXZIb92vIXWq4lx8xH-_FTXBt5ocrJ2K3fNnO34r1--tq_rwuTkqVQ4GVVdyUHDyy1agM-UvekoU61IQWDKG3NHVAqIGIvcK6AiauNTfOlxPx-P976rvvM-dhf-jOfbok98qAAUTStvwBw3NCZg</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Andrews, Steven</creator><creator>Giese, Joan</creator><creator>Boush, David</creator><general>Association for Consumer Research</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</title><author>Andrews, Steven ; Giese, Joan ; Boush, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-4591ed3efc4e974186c7469690bfb6490864c962a0647066ec14b50e6eb7edac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boush, David</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, Steven</au><au>Giese, Joan</au><au>Boush, David</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</atitle><btitle>Advances in consumer research</btitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>37</volume><spage>465</spage><pages>465-</pages><issn>0098-9258</issn><abstract>This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making.</abstract><cop>Urbana</cop><pub>Association for Consumer Research</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-9258
ispartof Advances in consumer research, 2010, Vol.37, p.465
issn 0098-9258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1808044679
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Behavioral decision theory
Cognitive psychology
Decision making
Information processing
Risk management
Studies
title Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A34%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Feeling,%20Thinking,%20and%20Differential%20Decision%20Making%20Under%20Risk&rft.btitle=Advances%20in%20consumer%20research&rft.au=Andrews,%20Steven&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.spage=465&rft.pages=465-&rft.issn=0098-9258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4134729321%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808044679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true