Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk
This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky dec...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 465 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Andrews, Steven Giese, Joan Boush, David |
description | This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making. |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1808044679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4134729321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-4591ed3efc4e974186c7469690bfb6490864c962a0647066ec14b50e6eb7edac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjcFOAjEURbvARET_oYlbJ3ll3ry2GxIDoiQQEwNr0um8amHSwenw_6KyOndxcs9IjAGsKey0MrfiLucDgNJINBazJXMb0-eT3H7FdPxbLjVyEUPgntMQXSsX7GOOXZIb92vIXWq4lx8xH-_FTXBt5ocrJ2K3fNnO34r1--tq_rwuTkqVQ4GVVdyUHDyy1agM-UvekoU61IQWDKG3NHVAqIGIvcK6AiauNTfOlxPx-P976rvvM-dhf-jOfbok98qAAUTStvwBw3NCZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>1808044679</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Andrews, Steven ; Giese, Joan ; Boush, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Steven ; Giese, Joan ; Boush, David</creatorcontrib><description>This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-9258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Urbana: Association for Consumer Research</publisher><subject>Behavioral decision theory ; Cognitive psychology ; Decision making ; Information processing ; Risk management ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Advances in consumer research, 2010, Vol.37, p.465</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Consumer Research 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,778,782,787,788,23913,23914,25123</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boush, David</creatorcontrib><title>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</title><title>Advances in consumer research</title><description>This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making.</description><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0098-9258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjcFOAjEURbvARET_oYlbJ3ll3ry2GxIDoiQQEwNr0um8amHSwenw_6KyOndxcs9IjAGsKey0MrfiLucDgNJINBazJXMb0-eT3H7FdPxbLjVyEUPgntMQXSsX7GOOXZIb92vIXWq4lx8xH-_FTXBt5ocrJ2K3fNnO34r1--tq_rwuTkqVQ4GVVdyUHDyy1agM-UvekoU61IQWDKG3NHVAqIGIvcK6AiauNTfOlxPx-P976rvvM-dhf-jOfbok98qAAUTStvwBw3NCZg</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Andrews, Steven</creator><creator>Giese, Joan</creator><creator>Boush, David</creator><general>Association for Consumer Research</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</title><author>Andrews, Steven ; Giese, Joan ; Boush, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-4591ed3efc4e974186c7469690bfb6490864c962a0647066ec14b50e6eb7edac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boush, David</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, Steven</au><au>Giese, Joan</au><au>Boush, David</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk</atitle><btitle>Advances in consumer research</btitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>37</volume><spage>465</spage><pages>465-</pages><issn>0098-9258</issn><abstract>This research explored more closely why some people fail to conform to prospect theory by linking modern decision making ideas with the concepts of decision framing and individual differences. Study 1 demonstrated individual differences regarding the use of both affect and cognition in the risky decision-making process. High affect individuals avoided risk contrary to prospect theory predictions. Study 2 showed that high affect decision makers negatively anticipate risk consequences and are more likely to anticipate regret in the risky decision making process. Future studies should explore more deeply the influence of regret on differential information processing in risky decision making.</abstract><cop>Urbana</cop><pub>Association for Consumer Research</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-9258 |
ispartof | Advances in consumer research, 2010, Vol.37, p.465 |
issn | 0098-9258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1808044679 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Behavioral decision theory Cognitive psychology Decision making Information processing Risk management Studies |
title | Feeling, Thinking, and Differential Decision Making Under Risk |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A34%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Feeling,%20Thinking,%20and%20Differential%20Decision%20Making%20Under%20Risk&rft.btitle=Advances%20in%20consumer%20research&rft.au=Andrews,%20Steven&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.spage=465&rft.pages=465-&rft.issn=0098-9258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4134729321%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808044679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |