Incomplete acquisition of the Turkish differential object marking
The differential object marking (the Accusative case) emerges very early, with very few errors in the speech of children acquiring Turkish. However, its early use is restricted to definite objects, although in adult speech it can be used with a variety of different interpretations, among which are s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revue roumaine de linguistique 2015, Vol.60 (4), p.421 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 421 |
container_title | Revue roumaine de linguistique |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Ketrez, F Nihan |
description | The differential object marking (the Accusative case) emerges very early, with very few errors in the speech of children acquiring Turkish. However, its early use is restricted to definite objects, although in adult speech it can be used with a variety of different interpretations, among which are specificity, presuppositionality, and wide scope with respect to other constituents. In this study, through experiments, 4;0, 5;0 and 6;0 year old children's comprehension of Accusative indefinites was tested. The results of the experiments suggested that the children did not differentiate Accusative-marked and non-case-marked objects in terms of their scope-taking properties, therefore provided evidence for an incomplete acquisition pattern despite the early emergence of the Accusative case in spontaneous productions. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1807927143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1807927143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-4977ebeb7f9e3ebaa06497839d755f8664ba84e995175ed7622c354011e5ffc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjc1qAjEYRbOwULG-Q6DrgfxOkqVIWwWhG7uWJPOlZhyTcZJ5_w7Y1YVz4NwVWhPCZcONVK9oW0pPCGGMUqL1Gu2Oyef7OEAFbP1jjiXWmBPOAdcr4PM83WK54i6GABOkGu2As-vBV3y3i0u_b-gl2KHA9n836Ofz47w_NKfvr-N-d2pGqnlthFEKHDgVDHBw1pJ2QZqbTkkZdNsKZ7UAYyRVEjrVMua5FIRSkCF4wTfo_dkdp_yYodRLn-cpLZcXqokyTFHB-R9k10Wg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807927143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incomplete acquisition of the Turkish differential object marking</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ketrez, F Nihan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ketrez, F Nihan</creatorcontrib><description>The differential object marking (the Accusative case) emerges very early, with very few errors in the speech of children acquiring Turkish. However, its early use is restricted to definite objects, although in adult speech it can be used with a variety of different interpretations, among which are specificity, presuppositionality, and wide scope with respect to other constituents. In this study, through experiments, 4;0, 5;0 and 6;0 year old children's comprehension of Accusative indefinites was tested. The results of the experiments suggested that the children did not differentiate Accusative-marked and non-case-marked objects in terms of their scope-taking properties, therefore provided evidence for an incomplete acquisition pattern despite the early emergence of the Accusative case in spontaneous productions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-3957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: Editura Academiei Romane, Publishing House of the Romanian Academy</publisher><subject>Case marking ; Children ; Comprehension ; Native language acquisition ; Reference (Semantic) ; Turkish language</subject><ispartof>Revue roumaine de linguistique, 2015, Vol.60 (4), p.421</ispartof><rights>Copyright Editura Academiei Romane, Publishing House of the Romanian Academy 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4021</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ketrez, F Nihan</creatorcontrib><title>Incomplete acquisition of the Turkish differential object marking</title><title>Revue roumaine de linguistique</title><description>The differential object marking (the Accusative case) emerges very early, with very few errors in the speech of children acquiring Turkish. However, its early use is restricted to definite objects, although in adult speech it can be used with a variety of different interpretations, among which are specificity, presuppositionality, and wide scope with respect to other constituents. In this study, through experiments, 4;0, 5;0 and 6;0 year old children's comprehension of Accusative indefinites was tested. The results of the experiments suggested that the children did not differentiate Accusative-marked and non-case-marked objects in terms of their scope-taking properties, therefore provided evidence for an incomplete acquisition pattern despite the early emergence of the Accusative case in spontaneous productions.</description><subject>Case marking</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Reference (Semantic)</subject><subject>Turkish language</subject><issn>0035-3957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjc1qAjEYRbOwULG-Q6DrgfxOkqVIWwWhG7uWJPOlZhyTcZJ5_w7Y1YVz4NwVWhPCZcONVK9oW0pPCGGMUqL1Gu2Oyef7OEAFbP1jjiXWmBPOAdcr4PM83WK54i6GABOkGu2As-vBV3y3i0u_b-gl2KHA9n836Ofz47w_NKfvr-N-d2pGqnlthFEKHDgVDHBw1pJ2QZqbTkkZdNsKZ7UAYyRVEjrVMua5FIRSkCF4wTfo_dkdp_yYodRLn-cpLZcXqokyTFHB-R9k10Wg</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Ketrez, F Nihan</creator><general>Editura Academiei Romane, Publishing House of the Romanian Academy</general><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Incomplete acquisition of the Turkish differential object marking</title><author>Ketrez, F Nihan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-4977ebeb7f9e3ebaa06497839d755f8664ba84e995175ed7622c354011e5ffc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Case marking</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Reference (Semantic)</topic><topic>Turkish language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ketrez, F Nihan</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Revue roumaine de linguistique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ketrez, F Nihan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incomplete acquisition of the Turkish differential object marking</atitle><jtitle>Revue roumaine de linguistique</jtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>421</spage><pages>421-</pages><issn>0035-3957</issn><abstract>The differential object marking (the Accusative case) emerges very early, with very few errors in the speech of children acquiring Turkish. However, its early use is restricted to definite objects, although in adult speech it can be used with a variety of different interpretations, among which are specificity, presuppositionality, and wide scope with respect to other constituents. In this study, through experiments, 4;0, 5;0 and 6;0 year old children's comprehension of Accusative indefinites was tested. The results of the experiments suggested that the children did not differentiate Accusative-marked and non-case-marked objects in terms of their scope-taking properties, therefore provided evidence for an incomplete acquisition pattern despite the early emergence of the Accusative case in spontaneous productions.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Editura Academiei Romane, Publishing House of the Romanian Academy</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-3957 |
ispartof | Revue roumaine de linguistique, 2015, Vol.60 (4), p.421 |
issn | 0035-3957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1807927143 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Case marking Children Comprehension Native language acquisition Reference (Semantic) Turkish language |
title | Incomplete acquisition of the Turkish differential object marking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A06%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incomplete%20acquisition%20of%20the%20Turkish%20differential%20object%20marking&rft.jtitle=Revue%20roumaine%20de%20linguistique&rft.au=Ketrez,%20F%20Nihan&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=421&rft.pages=421-&rft.issn=0035-3957&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1807927143%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807927143&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |