‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia
Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of si...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of transitional justice 2016-03, Vol.10 (1), p.46-66 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 66 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | The international journal of transitional justice |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bernath, Julie |
description | Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ijtj/ijv026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1806232772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1806232772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-84e1085ce64f43b07d7393b8594765e6ddc1fe51620279cd359a7bcc3356dc153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1KwzAUx4MoOKdXvkDAS6nmo2la70bxCyfKmN6WNE1dSrvMJB3ubo-hr7cnMaPizTkHzv_8OPwAOMfoCqOMXuvGN6GsEUkOwAhzRiLOSXz4P-PkGJw41yDEMkL5CKx32-_cdKtWfcFX02qvpWjhu5Zed263_YF6Cf1CwUntle2EX0BTw2fhHJx4a6T2mxs4U3WrwoFZOmiG-NOiUxbOTP-h4Nzqsl8GakDloitNpcUpOKpF69TZXx-Dt7vbef4QTV_uH_PJNJIkS32UxgqjlEmVxHVMS8QrTjNapiyLecJUUlUS14rhhCDCM1lRlgleSkkpS8KK0TG4GLgraz575XzRmN6GZ1yBU5QQSoKfkLocUtIa56yqi5XVnbCbAqNiL7bYiy0GsfQXrvhvAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806232772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Bernath, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernath, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-7716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ijtj/ijv026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Atrocities ; Courts ; Fieldwork ; Intellectuals ; Justice ; Political violence ; Qualitative research ; Scholarship ; Tribunals & commissions ; Victims</subject><ispartof>The international journal of transitional justice, 2016-03, Vol.10 (1), p.46-66</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-84e1085ce64f43b07d7393b8594765e6ddc1fe51620279cd359a7bcc3356dc153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernath, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</title><title>The international journal of transitional justice</title><description>Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed.</description><subject>Atrocities</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Political violence</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Tribunals & commissions</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>1752-7716</issn><issn>1752-7724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1KwzAUx4MoOKdXvkDAS6nmo2la70bxCyfKmN6WNE1dSrvMJB3ubo-hr7cnMaPizTkHzv_8OPwAOMfoCqOMXuvGN6GsEUkOwAhzRiLOSXz4P-PkGJw41yDEMkL5CKx32-_cdKtWfcFX02qvpWjhu5Zed263_YF6Cf1CwUntle2EX0BTw2fhHJx4a6T2mxs4U3WrwoFZOmiG-NOiUxbOTP-h4Nzqsl8GakDloitNpcUpOKpF69TZXx-Dt7vbef4QTV_uH_PJNJIkS32UxgqjlEmVxHVMS8QrTjNapiyLecJUUlUS14rhhCDCM1lRlgleSkkpS8KK0TG4GLgraz575XzRmN6GZ1yBU5QQSoKfkLocUtIa56yqi5XVnbCbAqNiL7bYiy0GsfQXrvhvAA</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Bernath, Julie</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</title><author>Bernath, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-84e1085ce64f43b07d7393b8594765e6ddc1fe51620279cd359a7bcc3356dc153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Atrocities</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Political violence</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Tribunals & commissions</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernath, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The international journal of transitional justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernath, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of transitional justice</jtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>46-66</pages><issn>1752-7716</issn><eissn>1752-7724</eissn><abstract>Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ijtj/ijv026</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1752-7716 |
ispartof | The international journal of transitional justice, 2016-03, Vol.10 (1), p.46-66 |
issn | 1752-7716 1752-7724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1806232772 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Atrocities Courts Fieldwork Intellectuals Justice Political violence Qualitative research Scholarship Tribunals & commissions Victims |
title | ‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A26%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Complex%20Political%20Victims%E2%80%99%20in%20the%20Aftermath%20of%20Mass%20Atrocity:%20Reflections%20on%20the%20Khmer%20Rouge%20Tribunal%20in%20Cambodia&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20transitional%20justice&rft.au=Bernath,%20Julie&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=46-66&rft.issn=1752-7716&rft.eissn=1752-7724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ijtj/ijv026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1806232772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806232772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |