‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia

Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of transitional justice 2016-03, Vol.10 (1), p.46-66
1. Verfasser: Bernath, Julie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 66
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title The international journal of transitional justice
container_volume 10
creator Bernath, Julie
description Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ijtj/ijv026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1806232772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1806232772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-84e1085ce64f43b07d7393b8594765e6ddc1fe51620279cd359a7bcc3356dc153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1KwzAUx4MoOKdXvkDAS6nmo2la70bxCyfKmN6WNE1dSrvMJB3ubo-hr7cnMaPizTkHzv_8OPwAOMfoCqOMXuvGN6GsEUkOwAhzRiLOSXz4P-PkGJw41yDEMkL5CKx32-_cdKtWfcFX02qvpWjhu5Zed263_YF6Cf1CwUntle2EX0BTw2fhHJx4a6T2mxs4U3WrwoFZOmiG-NOiUxbOTP-h4Nzqsl8GakDloitNpcUpOKpF69TZXx-Dt7vbef4QTV_uH_PJNJIkS32UxgqjlEmVxHVMS8QrTjNapiyLecJUUlUS14rhhCDCM1lRlgleSkkpS8KK0TG4GLgraz575XzRmN6GZ1yBU5QQSoKfkLocUtIa56yqi5XVnbCbAqNiL7bYiy0GsfQXrvhvAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806232772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Bernath, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernath, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-7716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ijtj/ijv026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Atrocities ; Courts ; Fieldwork ; Intellectuals ; Justice ; Political violence ; Qualitative research ; Scholarship ; Tribunals &amp; commissions ; Victims</subject><ispartof>The international journal of transitional justice, 2016-03, Vol.10 (1), p.46-66</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-84e1085ce64f43b07d7393b8594765e6ddc1fe51620279cd359a7bcc3356dc153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernath, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</title><title>The international journal of transitional justice</title><description>Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed.</description><subject>Atrocities</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Political violence</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Tribunals &amp; commissions</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>1752-7716</issn><issn>1752-7724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1KwzAUx4MoOKdXvkDAS6nmo2la70bxCyfKmN6WNE1dSrvMJB3ubo-hr7cnMaPizTkHzv_8OPwAOMfoCqOMXuvGN6GsEUkOwAhzRiLOSXz4P-PkGJw41yDEMkL5CKx32-_cdKtWfcFX02qvpWjhu5Zed263_YF6Cf1CwUntle2EX0BTw2fhHJx4a6T2mxs4U3WrwoFZOmiG-NOiUxbOTP-h4Nzqsl8GakDloitNpcUpOKpF69TZXx-Dt7vbef4QTV_uH_PJNJIkS32UxgqjlEmVxHVMS8QrTjNapiyLecJUUlUS14rhhCDCM1lRlgleSkkpS8KK0TG4GLgraz575XzRmN6GZ1yBU5QQSoKfkLocUtIa56yqi5XVnbCbAqNiL7bYiy0GsfQXrvhvAA</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Bernath, Julie</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</title><author>Bernath, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-84e1085ce64f43b07d7393b8594765e6ddc1fe51620279cd359a7bcc3356dc153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Atrocities</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Political violence</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Tribunals &amp; commissions</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernath, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The international journal of transitional justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernath, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of transitional justice</jtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>46-66</pages><issn>1752-7716</issn><eissn>1752-7724</eissn><abstract>Reflecting on the case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), this article asks how transitional justice (TJ) processes account for the complexity of victimhood in political violence and mass atrocity. It speaks to the critical scholarship which questions the use of simplistic dichotomies of (innocent) victims versus (guilty) perpetrators in TJ processes. Findings from empirical, qualitative fieldwork conducted in 2013 and 2014 show that both inclusion and exclusion dynamics towards complex political victims take place at the ECCC. Whilst most critical scholarship questions the exclusion of complex political victims from TJ processes, this article highlights the limitations and challenges of both the inclusion and the exclusion of such victims. It argues that the complexity of victimhood in contexts of mass atrocity poses vexing questions to TJ scholars and practitioners that have yet to be addressed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ijtj/ijv026</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-7716
ispartof The international journal of transitional justice, 2016-03, Vol.10 (1), p.46-66
issn 1752-7716
1752-7724
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1806232772
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Atrocities
Courts
Fieldwork
Intellectuals
Justice
Political violence
Qualitative research
Scholarship
Tribunals & commissions
Victims
title ‘Complex Political Victims’ in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A26%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Complex%20Political%20Victims%E2%80%99%20in%20the%20Aftermath%20of%20Mass%20Atrocity:%20Reflections%20on%20the%20Khmer%20Rouge%20Tribunal%20in%20Cambodia&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20transitional%20justice&rft.au=Bernath,%20Julie&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=46-66&rft.issn=1752-7716&rft.eissn=1752-7724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ijtj/ijv026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1806232772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806232772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true