An Integrated Spatial Model of Population Change in South Carolina Counties
Existing studies of population change have grown to consider spatial dependence. The current literature highlights the importance of location when modeling population change. The evidence clearly suggests that population change in one area is dependent on population change in neighboring areas. What...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of regional studies 2016-01, Vol.46 (2), p.127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | The Review of regional studies |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Lewis Jr, Willis Stanley, Brooke |
description | Existing studies of population change have grown to consider spatial dependence. The current literature highlights the importance of location when modeling population change. The evidence clearly suggests that population change in one area is dependent on population change in neighboring areas. What is missing in the existing literature is an analysis of which specific features in surrounding areas impact the local area. We employ a model using spatially lagged explanatory variables (SLX) to model population change in South Carolina. In addition to the normal impacts of the explanatory variables in a standard OLS regression, the SLX model measures the impact of the independent variables in contiguous areas. It also allows for eparation of spillovers from rural counties versus those from urban counties. We find that the impact of neighboring counties is distinctly different for rural versus urban counties. Local urban population growth is influenced by neighboring counties, both urban and rural. However, local rural population growth is influenced only by neighboring rural counties. For rural counties, the share of retirees and recreational activities in surrounding rural counties are significant in explaining population change. For urban population growth, birth rates, income, and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring urban counties are significant. Retiree share and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring rural counties are also significant in explaining urban population change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.52324/001c.8038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1803341802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4115101961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4d182ddab64f94640989ae6894aaa6c73852d3c829e63f362edcbc746242263f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsXP0HAm7D1bZJNk2NZ_FOsKFTBW0iTbLtlTdYke_Dbu7Ve3sAwzPB-CF2XMKsIJewOoDQzAVScoElZVbQAIckpmgAwUcyZ_DxHFyntAYAT4BP0vPB46bPbRp2dxete51Z3-CVY1-HQ4LfQD93oBY_rnfZbh1uP12HIO1zrGLrWa1yHwefWpUt01uguuat_naKPh_v3-qlYvT4u68WqMLSSuWC2FMRaveGskYwzkEJqx4VkWmtu5lRUxFIjiHScNpQTZ83GzBknjJCDM0U3x94-hu_Bpaz2YYh-nFTl-Dpl4yVj6vaYMjGkFF2j-th-6fijSlB_sNQBljrAor_TWVqL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1803341802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Integrated Spatial Model of Population Change in South Carolina Counties</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lewis Jr, Willis ; Stanley, Brooke</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis Jr, Willis ; Stanley, Brooke</creatorcontrib><description>Existing studies of population change have grown to consider spatial dependence. The current literature highlights the importance of location when modeling population change. The evidence clearly suggests that population change in one area is dependent on population change in neighboring areas. What is missing in the existing literature is an analysis of which specific features in surrounding areas impact the local area. We employ a model using spatially lagged explanatory variables (SLX) to model population change in South Carolina. In addition to the normal impacts of the explanatory variables in a standard OLS regression, the SLX model measures the impact of the independent variables in contiguous areas. It also allows for eparation of spillovers from rural counties versus those from urban counties. We find that the impact of neighboring counties is distinctly different for rural versus urban counties. Local urban population growth is influenced by neighboring counties, both urban and rural. However, local rural population growth is influenced only by neighboring rural counties. For rural counties, the share of retirees and recreational activities in surrounding rural counties are significant in explaining population change. For urban population growth, birth rates, income, and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring urban counties are significant. Retiree share and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring rural counties are also significant in explaining urban population change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-749X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-0892</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52324/001c.8038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Brunswick: Southern Regional Science Association</publisher><subject>Changes ; College professors ; Counties ; Econometrics ; Employment ; Location analysis ; Manufacturing ; Migration ; Population ; Population growth ; Quality of life ; Regional studies ; Regression analysis ; Rural areas ; Spatial analysis ; Tourism ; Trends ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>The Review of regional studies, 2016-01, Vol.46 (2), p.127</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southern Regional Science Association 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4d182ddab64f94640989ae6894aaa6c73852d3c829e63f362edcbc746242263f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis Jr, Willis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Brooke</creatorcontrib><title>An Integrated Spatial Model of Population Change in South Carolina Counties</title><title>The Review of regional studies</title><description>Existing studies of population change have grown to consider spatial dependence. The current literature highlights the importance of location when modeling population change. The evidence clearly suggests that population change in one area is dependent on population change in neighboring areas. What is missing in the existing literature is an analysis of which specific features in surrounding areas impact the local area. We employ a model using spatially lagged explanatory variables (SLX) to model population change in South Carolina. In addition to the normal impacts of the explanatory variables in a standard OLS regression, the SLX model measures the impact of the independent variables in contiguous areas. It also allows for eparation of spillovers from rural counties versus those from urban counties. We find that the impact of neighboring counties is distinctly different for rural versus urban counties. Local urban population growth is influenced by neighboring counties, both urban and rural. However, local rural population growth is influenced only by neighboring rural counties. For rural counties, the share of retirees and recreational activities in surrounding rural counties are significant in explaining population change. For urban population growth, birth rates, income, and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring urban counties are significant. Retiree share and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring rural counties are also significant in explaining urban population change.</description><subject>Changes</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Location analysis</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0048-749X</issn><issn>1553-0892</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsXP0HAm7D1bZJNk2NZ_FOsKFTBW0iTbLtlTdYke_Dbu7Ve3sAwzPB-CF2XMKsIJewOoDQzAVScoElZVbQAIckpmgAwUcyZ_DxHFyntAYAT4BP0vPB46bPbRp2dxete51Z3-CVY1-HQ4LfQD93oBY_rnfZbh1uP12HIO1zrGLrWa1yHwefWpUt01uguuat_naKPh_v3-qlYvT4u68WqMLSSuWC2FMRaveGskYwzkEJqx4VkWmtu5lRUxFIjiHScNpQTZ83GzBknjJCDM0U3x94-hu_Bpaz2YYh-nFTl-Dpl4yVj6vaYMjGkFF2j-th-6fijSlB_sNQBljrAor_TWVqL</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Lewis Jr, Willis</creator><creator>Stanley, Brooke</creator><general>Southern Regional Science Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>An Integrated Spatial Model of Population Change in South Carolina Counties</title><author>Lewis Jr, Willis ; Stanley, Brooke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4d182ddab64f94640989ae6894aaa6c73852d3c829e63f362edcbc746242263f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Changes</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Location analysis</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis Jr, Willis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Brooke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Review of regional studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis Jr, Willis</au><au>Stanley, Brooke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Integrated Spatial Model of Population Change in South Carolina Counties</atitle><jtitle>The Review of regional studies</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><pages>127-</pages><issn>0048-749X</issn><eissn>1553-0892</eissn><abstract>Existing studies of population change have grown to consider spatial dependence. The current literature highlights the importance of location when modeling population change. The evidence clearly suggests that population change in one area is dependent on population change in neighboring areas. What is missing in the existing literature is an analysis of which specific features in surrounding areas impact the local area. We employ a model using spatially lagged explanatory variables (SLX) to model population change in South Carolina. In addition to the normal impacts of the explanatory variables in a standard OLS regression, the SLX model measures the impact of the independent variables in contiguous areas. It also allows for eparation of spillovers from rural counties versus those from urban counties. We find that the impact of neighboring counties is distinctly different for rural versus urban counties. Local urban population growth is influenced by neighboring counties, both urban and rural. However, local rural population growth is influenced only by neighboring rural counties. For rural counties, the share of retirees and recreational activities in surrounding rural counties are significant in explaining population change. For urban population growth, birth rates, income, and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring urban counties are significant. Retiree share and single female pregnancy rates in neighboring rural counties are also significant in explaining urban population change.</abstract><cop>New Brunswick</cop><pub>Southern Regional Science Association</pub><doi>10.52324/001c.8038</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-749X |
ispartof | The Review of regional studies, 2016-01, Vol.46 (2), p.127 |
issn | 0048-749X 1553-0892 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1803341802 |
source | Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Changes College professors Counties Econometrics Employment Location analysis Manufacturing Migration Population Population growth Quality of life Regional studies Regression analysis Rural areas Spatial analysis Tourism Trends Urban areas |
title | An Integrated Spatial Model of Population Change in South Carolina Counties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Integrated%20Spatial%20Model%20of%20Population%20Change%20in%20South%20Carolina%20Counties&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20regional%20studies&rft.au=Lewis%20Jr,%20Willis&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.pages=127-&rft.issn=0048-749X&rft.eissn=1553-0892&rft_id=info:doi/10.52324/001c.8038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4115101961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1803341802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |