CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPACTS ON SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: RECENT FINDINGS AND CONSEQUENCES

The goal of this article is to critically analyze the findings of the first, recently published, studies about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) impacts on Sustainable Human Development (SHD). We aim at deriving conclusions for effective CSR strategies and at identifying consequences for managem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ekonomski vjesnik 2016-01, Vol.29 (1), p.193
Hauptverfasser: Anstätt, Kerstin, Volkert, Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 193
container_title Ekonomski vjesnik
container_volume 29
creator Anstätt, Kerstin
Volkert, Jürgen
description The goal of this article is to critically analyze the findings of the first, recently published, studies about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) impacts on Sustainable Human Development (SHD). We aim at deriving conclusions for effective CSR strategies and at identifying consequences for management and research. As CSR claims to create value for corporations and for society, we argue that the people-centered Capability Approach (CA) is promising to provide neglected and much needed insights how corporate activities affect individuals and communities. Based on a survey of recent literature addressing CSR impacts on SHD, we highlight CSR potentials to improve average well-being in multiple dimensions of SHD. Moreover, we critically assess challenges and limitations of CSR as a strategy to preserve and foster SHD. For instance, studies have shown that, despite CSR-driven well-being increases, social capital, relational capabilities and collective agency may become challenged by corporate strategies. Moreover, corporate environmental impacts have been found to be less often addressed by both, companies and SHD researchers. Resulting inequality and fairness issues have been identified as causes of violence against corporations even in the presence of total well-being improvements. We conclude that companies should strategically take into account a comprehensive range of factors driving and hampering SHD to account for their whole portfolio of corporate opportunities and risks. This requires evaluating CSR impacts instead of only focusing on CSR inputs and outputs. Thereby, corporations can mitigate their risks, improve their stakeholder trust and strengthen their competitiveness.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1802590391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4112093881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-92c074572a8e8c44c247639aef8e3f90d8d3b85f02d2bdbc559ab975016ae62e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj89rwyAAhWVssND1fxB2DhiNie5mrW0Fo1lMxnYq-WEOYaxd0_7_C3Tv8p3e93gPIEpYmscYo-wRRIhQEhPKP5_Bep4ntITmnCMSgUm6qnSVqBX0TmphYKV86azXG210_QV1UQpZe-gs9I2vhbZiYxQ8NIWwcKs-lHFloWz9thTlQrjTdqvt3kNht1AuJvXeKCuVfwFPY_s9h_U_V6DZqVoeYuP2WgoTn5M0u8Yc9yhPaY5bFlifpj1O84zwNowskJGjgQ2kY3REeMDd0PWU8rbjOUVJ1oYMB7ICr3fv-XL6vYX5epxOt8vPMnlMGMJ0-c0T8gcS6kyC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1802590391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPACTS ON SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: RECENT FINDINGS AND CONSEQUENCES</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Anstätt, Kerstin ; Volkert, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Anstätt, Kerstin ; Volkert, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this article is to critically analyze the findings of the first, recently published, studies about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) impacts on Sustainable Human Development (SHD). We aim at deriving conclusions for effective CSR strategies and at identifying consequences for management and research. As CSR claims to create value for corporations and for society, we argue that the people-centered Capability Approach (CA) is promising to provide neglected and much needed insights how corporate activities affect individuals and communities. Based on a survey of recent literature addressing CSR impacts on SHD, we highlight CSR potentials to improve average well-being in multiple dimensions of SHD. Moreover, we critically assess challenges and limitations of CSR as a strategy to preserve and foster SHD. For instance, studies have shown that, despite CSR-driven well-being increases, social capital, relational capabilities and collective agency may become challenged by corporate strategies. Moreover, corporate environmental impacts have been found to be less often addressed by both, companies and SHD researchers. Resulting inequality and fairness issues have been identified as causes of violence against corporations even in the presence of total well-being improvements. We conclude that companies should strategically take into account a comprehensive range of factors driving and hampering SHD to account for their whole portfolio of corporate opportunities and risks. This requires evaluating CSR impacts instead of only focusing on CSR inputs and outputs. Thereby, corporations can mitigate their risks, improve their stakeholder trust and strengthen their competitiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0353-359X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1847-2206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Osijek: J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics</publisher><subject>Beneficiaries ; Commodities ; Freedoms ; Impact analysis ; Risk ; Social responsibility ; Society ; Studies ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Ekonomski vjesnik, 2016-01, Vol.29 (1), p.193</ispartof><rights>Copyright J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anstätt, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volkert, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPACTS ON SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: RECENT FINDINGS AND CONSEQUENCES</title><title>Ekonomski vjesnik</title><description>The goal of this article is to critically analyze the findings of the first, recently published, studies about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) impacts on Sustainable Human Development (SHD). We aim at deriving conclusions for effective CSR strategies and at identifying consequences for management and research. As CSR claims to create value for corporations and for society, we argue that the people-centered Capability Approach (CA) is promising to provide neglected and much needed insights how corporate activities affect individuals and communities. Based on a survey of recent literature addressing CSR impacts on SHD, we highlight CSR potentials to improve average well-being in multiple dimensions of SHD. Moreover, we critically assess challenges and limitations of CSR as a strategy to preserve and foster SHD. For instance, studies have shown that, despite CSR-driven well-being increases, social capital, relational capabilities and collective agency may become challenged by corporate strategies. Moreover, corporate environmental impacts have been found to be less often addressed by both, companies and SHD researchers. Resulting inequality and fairness issues have been identified as causes of violence against corporations even in the presence of total well-being improvements. We conclude that companies should strategically take into account a comprehensive range of factors driving and hampering SHD to account for their whole portfolio of corporate opportunities and risks. This requires evaluating CSR impacts instead of only focusing on CSR inputs and outputs. Thereby, corporations can mitigate their risks, improve their stakeholder trust and strengthen their competitiveness.</description><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Freedoms</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0353-359X</issn><issn>1847-2206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotj89rwyAAhWVssND1fxB2DhiNie5mrW0Fo1lMxnYq-WEOYaxd0_7_C3Tv8p3e93gPIEpYmscYo-wRRIhQEhPKP5_Bep4ntITmnCMSgUm6qnSVqBX0TmphYKV86azXG210_QV1UQpZe-gs9I2vhbZiYxQ8NIWwcKs-lHFloWz9thTlQrjTdqvt3kNht1AuJvXeKCuVfwFPY_s9h_U_V6DZqVoeYuP2WgoTn5M0u8Yc9yhPaY5bFlifpj1O84zwNowskJGjgQ2kY3REeMDd0PWU8rbjOUVJ1oYMB7ICr3fv-XL6vYX5epxOt8vPMnlMGMJ0-c0T8gcS6kyC</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Anstätt, Kerstin</creator><creator>Volkert, Jürgen</creator><general>J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPACTS ON SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: RECENT FINDINGS AND CONSEQUENCES</title><author>Anstätt, Kerstin ; Volkert, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-92c074572a8e8c44c247639aef8e3f90d8d3b85f02d2bdbc559ab975016ae62e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Freedoms</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anstätt, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volkert, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Ekonomski vjesnik</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anstätt, Kerstin</au><au>Volkert, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPACTS ON SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: RECENT FINDINGS AND CONSEQUENCES</atitle><jtitle>Ekonomski vjesnik</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>193</spage><pages>193-</pages><issn>0353-359X</issn><eissn>1847-2206</eissn><abstract>The goal of this article is to critically analyze the findings of the first, recently published, studies about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) impacts on Sustainable Human Development (SHD). We aim at deriving conclusions for effective CSR strategies and at identifying consequences for management and research. As CSR claims to create value for corporations and for society, we argue that the people-centered Capability Approach (CA) is promising to provide neglected and much needed insights how corporate activities affect individuals and communities. Based on a survey of recent literature addressing CSR impacts on SHD, we highlight CSR potentials to improve average well-being in multiple dimensions of SHD. Moreover, we critically assess challenges and limitations of CSR as a strategy to preserve and foster SHD. For instance, studies have shown that, despite CSR-driven well-being increases, social capital, relational capabilities and collective agency may become challenged by corporate strategies. Moreover, corporate environmental impacts have been found to be less often addressed by both, companies and SHD researchers. Resulting inequality and fairness issues have been identified as causes of violence against corporations even in the presence of total well-being improvements. We conclude that companies should strategically take into account a comprehensive range of factors driving and hampering SHD to account for their whole portfolio of corporate opportunities and risks. This requires evaluating CSR impacts instead of only focusing on CSR inputs and outputs. Thereby, corporations can mitigate their risks, improve their stakeholder trust and strengthen their competitiveness.</abstract><cop>Osijek</cop><pub>J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0353-359X
ispartof Ekonomski vjesnik, 2016-01, Vol.29 (1), p.193
issn 0353-359X
1847-2206
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1802590391
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Beneficiaries
Commodities
Freedoms
Impact analysis
Risk
Social responsibility
Society
Studies
Sustainable development
title CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPACTS ON SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: RECENT FINDINGS AND CONSEQUENCES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A19%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CORPORATE%20SOCIAL%20RESPONSIBILITY%20IMPACTS%20ON%20SUSTAINABLE%20HUMAN%20DEVELOPMENT:%20RECENT%20FINDINGS%20AND%20CONSEQUENCES&rft.jtitle=Ekonomski%20vjesnik&rft.au=Anst%C3%A4tt,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=193&rft.pages=193-&rft.issn=0353-359X&rft.eissn=1847-2206&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4112093881%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1802590391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true