Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research on Mathematical Learning Disability: Methodological Issues and Future Directions
Although approximately 5–8% of students have a mathematical learning disability (MLD), researchers have yet to develop a consensus operational definition. To examine how MLD has been identified and what mathematics topics have been explored, the authors conducted a systematic review of 165 studies o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal for research in mathematics education 2016-07, Vol.47 (4), p.338-371 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 371 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 338 |
| container_title | Journal for research in mathematics education |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Lewis, Katherine E Fisher, Marie B |
| description | Although approximately 5–8% of students have a mathematical learning disability (MLD), researchers have yet to develop a consensus operational definition. To examine how MLD has been identified and what mathematics topics have been explored, the authors conducted a systematic review of 165 studies on MLD published between 1974 and 2013. To move the field toward a more precise and shared definition of MLD, the authors argue for standards for methodology and reporting, and they identify a need for research addressing more complex mathematics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1802479734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1106778</ericid><jstor_id>10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ae89115a4a578f55a1f693b5b298d709a87851d249e064f04c6ff96fb559c4db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUE1PwyAYJkYT5_QnGEk8t0ILpXgzc9OZLSY6D54IpbB1H0WBHvbvpc6YePP0vnmfrzcPAFcYpZRTfLN22uudDCtddyolLCUpyvPyCAwwJzTJclQcgwFCGU7KjOJTcOb9GiHEMCoGoFvITdMu4WuwagOtgQTBdy2d7_eX6CydWkHbwnmfEGMaJbdwFs9tL7tvvKyabRP2t3Cuw8rWdmuX35yp9532ULY1nHShczqSnVahsa0_BydGbr2--JlD8DYZL0aPyez5YTq6myWKZFlIpC45xlQSSVlpKJXYFDyvaJXxsmaIy5KVFNcZ4RoVxCCiCmN4YSpKuSJ1lQ_B9cH3w9nP-E0Qa9u5NkYKXKKMMM5yElnswFLOeu-0ER-u2Um3FxiJvmPxp2NBmCCi7zgqLw9K7Rr1qxo_4dgtYz1ODvjaB-v-bfsFw62P4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1802479734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research on Mathematical Learning Disability: Methodological Issues and Future Directions</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lewis, Katherine E ; Fisher, Marie B</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Katherine E ; Fisher, Marie B</creatorcontrib><description>Although approximately 5–8% of students have a mathematical learning disability (MLD), researchers have yet to develop a consensus operational definition. To examine how MLD has been identified and what mathematics topics have been explored, the authors conducted a systematic review of 165 studies on MLD published between 1974 and 2013. To move the field toward a more precise and shared definition of MLD, the authors argue for standards for methodology and reporting, and they identify a need for research addressing more complex mathematics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8251</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRMEDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)</publisher><subject>Achievement Gap ; Achievement Tests ; Arithmetic ; Computation ; Demography ; Disabilities ; Dyscalculia ; Dyslexia ; Educational evaluation ; Educational Research ; Language Fluency ; Learning Disabilities ; Literature Reviews ; Low Achievement ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Achievement ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematics Skills ; Peabody Individual Achievement Test ; Racial Composition ; Research methodology ; Search Strategies ; Special education ; Special needs students ; Statistical Analysis ; Systematic review ; Teaching methods ; Wechsler Individual Achievement Test ; Wide Range Achievement Test ; Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</subject><ispartof>Journal for research in mathematics education, 2016-07, Vol.47 (4), p.338-371</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2016 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ae89115a4a578f55a1f693b5b298d709a87851d249e064f04c6ff96fb559c4db3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,828,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1106778$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Marie B</creatorcontrib><title>Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research on Mathematical Learning Disability: Methodological Issues and Future Directions</title><title>Journal for research in mathematics education</title><description>Although approximately 5–8% of students have a mathematical learning disability (MLD), researchers have yet to develop a consensus operational definition. To examine how MLD has been identified and what mathematics topics have been explored, the authors conducted a systematic review of 165 studies on MLD published between 1974 and 2013. To move the field toward a more precise and shared definition of MLD, the authors argue for standards for methodology and reporting, and they identify a need for research addressing more complex mathematics.</description><subject>Achievement Gap</subject><subject>Achievement Tests</subject><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Dyscalculia</subject><subject>Dyslexia</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Language Fluency</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Low Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Skills</subject><subject>Peabody Individual Achievement Test</subject><subject>Racial Composition</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Search Strategies</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Special needs students</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Wechsler Individual Achievement Test</subject><subject>Wide Range Achievement Test</subject><subject>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</subject><issn>0021-8251</issn><issn>1945-2306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUE1PwyAYJkYT5_QnGEk8t0ILpXgzc9OZLSY6D54IpbB1H0WBHvbvpc6YePP0vnmfrzcPAFcYpZRTfLN22uudDCtddyolLCUpyvPyCAwwJzTJclQcgwFCGU7KjOJTcOb9GiHEMCoGoFvITdMu4WuwagOtgQTBdy2d7_eX6CydWkHbwnmfEGMaJbdwFs9tL7tvvKyabRP2t3Cuw8rWdmuX35yp9532ULY1nHShczqSnVahsa0_BydGbr2--JlD8DYZL0aPyez5YTq6myWKZFlIpC45xlQSSVlpKJXYFDyvaJXxsmaIy5KVFNcZ4RoVxCCiCmN4YSpKuSJ1lQ_B9cH3w9nP-E0Qa9u5NkYKXKKMMM5yElnswFLOeu-0ER-u2Um3FxiJvmPxp2NBmCCi7zgqLw9K7Rr1qxo_4dgtYz1ODvjaB-v-bfsFw62P4g</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Lewis, Katherine E</creator><creator>Fisher, Marie B</creator><general>National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)</general><general>National Council of Teachers of Mathematics</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research on Mathematical Learning Disability: Methodological Issues and Future Directions</title><author>Lewis, Katherine E ; Fisher, Marie B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ae89115a4a578f55a1f693b5b298d709a87851d249e064f04c6ff96fb559c4db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gap</topic><topic>Achievement Tests</topic><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Dyscalculia</topic><topic>Dyslexia</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Language Fluency</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Low Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Skills</topic><topic>Peabody Individual Achievement Test</topic><topic>Racial Composition</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Search Strategies</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Special needs students</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Wechsler Individual Achievement Test</topic><topic>Wide Range Achievement Test</topic><topic>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Marie B</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal for research in mathematics education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Katherine E</au><au>Fisher, Marie B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1106778</ericid><atitle>Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research on Mathematical Learning Disability: Methodological Issues and Future Directions</atitle><jtitle>Journal for research in mathematics education</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>338-371</pages><issn>0021-8251</issn><eissn>1945-2306</eissn><coden>JRMEDN</coden><abstract>Although approximately 5–8% of students have a mathematical learning disability (MLD), researchers have yet to develop a consensus operational definition. To examine how MLD has been identified and what mathematics topics have been explored, the authors conducted a systematic review of 165 studies on MLD published between 1974 and 2013. To move the field toward a more precise and shared definition of MLD, the authors argue for standards for methodology and reporting, and they identify a need for research addressing more complex mathematics.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)</pub><doi>10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8251 |
| ispartof | Journal for research in mathematics education, 2016-07, Vol.47 (4), p.338-371 |
| issn | 0021-8251 1945-2306 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1802479734 |
| source | JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Achievement Gap Achievement Tests Arithmetic Computation Demography Disabilities Dyscalculia Dyslexia Educational evaluation Educational Research Language Fluency Learning Disabilities Literature Reviews Low Achievement Mathematics Mathematics Achievement Mathematics Education Mathematics Instruction Mathematics Skills Peabody Individual Achievement Test Racial Composition Research methodology Search Strategies Special education Special needs students Statistical Analysis Systematic review Teaching methods Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Wide Range Achievement Test Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement |
| title | Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research on Mathematical Learning Disability: Methodological Issues and Future Directions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking%20Stock%20of%2040%20Years%20of%20Research%20on%20Mathematical%20Learning%20Disability:%20Methodological%20Issues%20and%20Future%20Directions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20research%20in%20mathematics%20education&rft.au=Lewis,%20Katherine%20E&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=338-371&rft.issn=0021-8251&rft.eissn=1945-2306&rft.coden=JRMEDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1802479734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1106778&rft_jstor_id=10.5951/jresematheduc.47.4.0338&rfr_iscdi=true |