A Unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives

A Unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives

This paper compares the transitivity of existential and psych‐constructions in Korean to canonical transitives and intransitives. It is shown that these constructions are neither transitives nor intransitives. This paper argues that they can be unified as pseudo‐transitives (i.e., somewhere between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studia linguistica 2016-08, Vol.70 (2), p.144-179
1. Verfasser: Kim, Kyumin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Korean language
Syntactic structures
Valence
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 144
container_title Studia linguistica
container_volume 70
creator Kim, Kyumin
description This paper compares the transitivity of existential and psych‐constructions in Korean to canonical transitives and intransitives. It is shown that these constructions are neither transitives nor intransitives. This paper argues that they can be unified as pseudo‐transitives (i.e., somewhere between transitives and intransitives) and provides a structural analysis for pseudo‐transitives using Appl. Pseudo‐transitives provide support for the theory that transitivity is a continuum, and not categorical (Hopper & Thompson 1980).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/stul.12037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1801409144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1801409144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3397-514309dd3c93549abb746ce74c7d046d191b496807f6748fea52b6d3e83260793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPwyAUx4nRxDm9-AlIvJl0QqFQjsui0zj14JYtuxBaaGTWdkKr67eXWfXou7xH-P1e8v4AnGM0wqGufNOWIxwjwg_AAFPGI5Gk8SEYIERERLAgx-DE-w0Kb5ayAViP4aKyhTUaqkqVnbce1gU0O-sbUzVWlT58aLj1Xf4S5XXlG9fmjQ0DtBW8r51RFVQ-AKbVddQ4VXnb2A_jT8FREXRz9tOHYHFzPZ_cRrOn6d1kPItyQgSPEkwJElqTXJCECpVlnLLccJpzjSjTWOCMCpYiXjBO08KoJM6YJiYlMUNckCG46PduXf3eGt_ITd26cIyXOEWYIoEpDdRlT-Wu9t6ZQm6dfVOukxjJfXZyn538zi7AuIc_bWm6f0j5PF_Mfp2od_bJ7f4c5V4l44Qncvk4lQ-rJV1RsZRr8gVonoEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801409144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kim, Kyumin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyumin</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares the transitivity of existential and psych‐constructions in Korean to canonical transitives and intransitives. It is shown that these constructions are neither transitives nor intransitives. This paper argues that they can be unified as pseudo‐transitives (i.e., somewhere between transitives and intransitives) and provides a structural analysis for pseudo‐transitives using Appl. Pseudo‐transitives provide support for the theory that transitivity is a continuum, and not categorical (Hopper &amp; Thompson 1980).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/stul.12037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Korean language ; Syntactic structures ; Valence</subject><ispartof>Studia linguistica, 2016-08, Vol.70 (2), p.144-179</ispartof><rights>2015 The Editorial Board of</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Editorial Board of Studia Linguistica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3397-514309dd3c93549abb746ce74c7d046d191b496807f6748fea52b6d3e83260793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3397-514309dd3c93549abb746ce74c7d046d191b496807f6748fea52b6d3e83260793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fstul.12037$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fstul.12037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyumin</creatorcontrib><title>A Unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives</title><title>Studia linguistica</title><addtitle>Studia Linguist</addtitle><description>This paper compares the transitivity of existential and psych‐constructions in Korean to canonical transitives and intransitives. It is shown that these constructions are neither transitives nor intransitives. This paper argues that they can be unified as pseudo‐transitives (i.e., somewhere between transitives and intransitives) and provides a structural analysis for pseudo‐transitives using Appl. Pseudo‐transitives provide support for the theory that transitivity is a continuum, and not categorical (Hopper &amp; Thompson 1980).</description><subject>Korean language</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Valence</subject><issn>0039-3193</issn><issn>1467-9582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFPwyAUx4nRxDm9-AlIvJl0QqFQjsui0zj14JYtuxBaaGTWdkKr67eXWfXou7xH-P1e8v4AnGM0wqGufNOWIxwjwg_AAFPGI5Gk8SEYIERERLAgx-DE-w0Kb5ayAViP4aKyhTUaqkqVnbce1gU0O-sbUzVWlT58aLj1Xf4S5XXlG9fmjQ0DtBW8r51RFVQ-AKbVddQ4VXnb2A_jT8FREXRz9tOHYHFzPZ_cRrOn6d1kPItyQgSPEkwJElqTXJCECpVlnLLccJpzjSjTWOCMCpYiXjBO08KoJM6YJiYlMUNckCG46PduXf3eGt_ITd26cIyXOEWYIoEpDdRlT-Wu9t6ZQm6dfVOukxjJfXZyn538zi7AuIc_bWm6f0j5PF_Mfp2od_bJ7f4c5V4l44Qncvk4lQ-rJV1RsZRr8gVonoEM</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Kim, Kyumin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>A Unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives</title><author>Kim, Kyumin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3397-514309dd3c93549abb746ce74c7d046d191b496807f6748fea52b6d3e83260793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Korean language</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Valence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyumin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Studia linguistica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Kyumin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives</atitle><jtitle>Studia linguistica</jtitle><addtitle>Studia Linguist</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>144-179</pages><issn>0039-3193</issn><eissn>1467-9582</eissn><abstract>This paper compares the transitivity of existential and psych‐constructions in Korean to canonical transitives and intransitives. It is shown that these constructions are neither transitives nor intransitives. This paper argues that they can be unified as pseudo‐transitives (i.e., somewhere between transitives and intransitives) and provides a structural analysis for pseudo‐transitives using Appl. Pseudo‐transitives provide support for the theory that transitivity is a continuum, and not categorical (Hopper &amp; Thompson 1980).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/stul.12037</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-3193
ispartof Studia linguistica, 2016-08, Vol.70 (2), p.144-179
issn 0039-3193
1467-9582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1801409144
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Korean language
Syntactic structures
Valence
title A Unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T03%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Unified%20analysis%20of%20existentials%20and%20psych-constructions%20in%20Korean%20as%20pseudo-transitives&rft.jtitle=Studia%20linguistica&rft.au=Kim,%20Kyumin&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=144-179&rft.issn=0039-3193&rft.eissn=1467-9582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/stul.12037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1801409144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801409144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true