Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry
Waste management is a successful instrument to minimize generated waste and improve environmental conditions. In spite of the large share of developing countries in the textile industry, limited information is available concerning the waste management strategies implemented for textiles on those cou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2016-08, Vol.188 (8), p.445, Article 445 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 445 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 188 |
creator | Yacout, Dalia M. M. Hassouna, M. S. |
description | Waste management is a successful instrument to minimize generated waste and improve environmental conditions. In spite of the large share of developing countries in the textile industry, limited information is available concerning the waste management strategies implemented for textiles on those countries and their environmental impacts. In the current study, two waste management approaches for hazardous solid waste treatment of acrylic fibers (landfill and incineration) were investigated. The main research questions were: What are the different impacts of each waste management strategy? Which waste management strategy is more ecofriendly? Life cycle assessment was employed in order to model the environmental impacts of each waste streaming approach separately then compare them together. Results revealed that incineration was the more ecofriendly approach. Highest impacts of both approaches were on ecotoxicity and carcinogenic potentials due to release of metals from pigment wastes. Landfill had an impact of 46.8 % on human health as compared to 28 % by incineration. Incineration impact on ecosystem quality was higher than landfill impact (68.4 and 51.3 %, respectively). As for resources category, incineration had a higher impact than landfill (3.5 and 2.0 %, respectively). Those impacts could be mitigated if state-of-the-art landfill or incinerator were used and could be reduced by applying waste to energy approaches for both management systems In conclusion, shifting waste treatment from landfill to incineration would decrease the overall environmental impacts and allow energy recovery. The potential of waste to energy approach by incineration with heat recovery could be considered in further studies. Future research is needed in order to assess the implementation of waste management systems and the preferable waste management strategies in the textile industry on developing countries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1801317303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4106570851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cb9fe4e8d9543e7d2fdd98c46a7937e0b4c7d9256459cc0fa90db097ccf4753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaI44-gHuJGC62rSpE2zlMEXDLjRnRDSPMYMbVqTVJ2_N2VGcePq3sN53OQAcI7gFYKQXgcEqwrlEFV5SQjO6wMwRyXFecFKdgjmiaB5hSs2AychbCCEjBJ2DGYFxbRgsJyD10elXbRma906G_o4AdFm2n1Y37suwYRsNwgZQ9ab7FOEqLM34VQ7OUL0Iuq11SGzLov6K9pWp1WNidmegiMj2qDP9nMBXu5un5cP-erp_nF5s8plekbMBZENM5roWrGSYE1VYZRitSSVoAxTDRsiqWJFWZGSSQmNYFA16TNSGkJLvACXu9zB9--jDpFv-tG7dJKjGiKMKIY4qdBOJX0fgteGD952wm85gnzqk-_65Kk2PvXJ6-S52CePTafVr-OnwCQodoKQKLfW_s_pf1O_AZMsgnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801317303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yacout, Dalia M. M. ; Hassouna, M. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yacout, Dalia M. M. ; Hassouna, M. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Waste management is a successful instrument to minimize generated waste and improve environmental conditions. In spite of the large share of developing countries in the textile industry, limited information is available concerning the waste management strategies implemented for textiles on those countries and their environmental impacts. In the current study, two waste management approaches for hazardous solid waste treatment of acrylic fibers (landfill and incineration) were investigated. The main research questions were: What are the different impacts of each waste management strategy? Which waste management strategy is more ecofriendly? Life cycle assessment was employed in order to model the environmental impacts of each waste streaming approach separately then compare them together. Results revealed that incineration was the more ecofriendly approach. Highest impacts of both approaches were on ecotoxicity and carcinogenic potentials due to release of metals from pigment wastes. Landfill had an impact of 46.8 % on human health as compared to 28 % by incineration. Incineration impact on ecosystem quality was higher than landfill impact (68.4 and 51.3 %, respectively). As for resources category, incineration had a higher impact than landfill (3.5 and 2.0 %, respectively). Those impacts could be mitigated if state-of-the-art landfill or incinerator were used and could be reduced by applying waste to energy approaches for both management systems In conclusion, shifting waste treatment from landfill to incineration would decrease the overall environmental impacts and allow energy recovery. The potential of waste to energy approach by incineration with heat recovery could be considered in further studies. Future research is needed in order to assess the implementation of waste management systems and the preferable waste management strategies in the textile industry on developing countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27372905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Carcinogens ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Developing countries ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Effluents ; Egypt ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy recovery ; Environment ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Fibers ; Hazardous Waste - analysis ; Hazardous wastes ; Heat recovery ; Humans ; Incineration ; Incineration - methods ; Incinerators ; Landfill ; Landfills ; LDCs ; Life cycle analysis ; Materials handling ; Metals ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Pollutants ; Raw materials ; Solid waste treatment ; Solid wastes ; Streaming ; Studies ; Textile Industry ; Textile industry wastes ; Waste Disposal Facilities ; Waste disposal sites ; Waste management ; Waste Management - methods ; Waste management industry ; Waste to energy ; Waste treatment</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2016-08, Vol.188 (8), p.445, Article 445</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cb9fe4e8d9543e7d2fdd98c46a7937e0b4c7d9256459cc0fa90db097ccf4753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cb9fe4e8d9543e7d2fdd98c46a7937e0b4c7d9256459cc0fa90db097ccf4753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27372905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yacout, Dalia M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassouna, M. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Waste management is a successful instrument to minimize generated waste and improve environmental conditions. In spite of the large share of developing countries in the textile industry, limited information is available concerning the waste management strategies implemented for textiles on those countries and their environmental impacts. In the current study, two waste management approaches for hazardous solid waste treatment of acrylic fibers (landfill and incineration) were investigated. The main research questions were: What are the different impacts of each waste management strategy? Which waste management strategy is more ecofriendly? Life cycle assessment was employed in order to model the environmental impacts of each waste streaming approach separately then compare them together. Results revealed that incineration was the more ecofriendly approach. Highest impacts of both approaches were on ecotoxicity and carcinogenic potentials due to release of metals from pigment wastes. Landfill had an impact of 46.8 % on human health as compared to 28 % by incineration. Incineration impact on ecosystem quality was higher than landfill impact (68.4 and 51.3 %, respectively). As for resources category, incineration had a higher impact than landfill (3.5 and 2.0 %, respectively). Those impacts could be mitigated if state-of-the-art landfill or incinerator were used and could be reduced by applying waste to energy approaches for both management systems In conclusion, shifting waste treatment from landfill to incineration would decrease the overall environmental impacts and allow energy recovery. The potential of waste to energy approach by incineration with heat recovery could be considered in further studies. Future research is needed in order to assess the implementation of waste management systems and the preferable waste management strategies in the textile industry on developing countries.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Hazardous Waste - analysis</subject><subject>Hazardous wastes</subject><subject>Heat recovery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incineration</subject><subject>Incineration - methods</subject><subject>Incinerators</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Materials handling</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Solid waste treatment</subject><subject>Solid wastes</subject><subject>Streaming</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Textile Industry</subject><subject>Textile industry wastes</subject><subject>Waste Disposal Facilities</subject><subject>Waste disposal sites</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Waste Management - methods</subject><subject>Waste management industry</subject><subject>Waste to energy</subject><subject>Waste treatment</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaI44-gHuJGC62rSpE2zlMEXDLjRnRDSPMYMbVqTVJ2_N2VGcePq3sN53OQAcI7gFYKQXgcEqwrlEFV5SQjO6wMwRyXFecFKdgjmiaB5hSs2AychbCCEjBJ2DGYFxbRgsJyD10elXbRma906G_o4AdFm2n1Y37suwYRsNwgZQ9ab7FOEqLM34VQ7OUL0Iuq11SGzLov6K9pWp1WNidmegiMj2qDP9nMBXu5un5cP-erp_nF5s8plekbMBZENM5roWrGSYE1VYZRitSSVoAxTDRsiqWJFWZGSSQmNYFA16TNSGkJLvACXu9zB9--jDpFv-tG7dJKjGiKMKIY4qdBOJX0fgteGD952wm85gnzqk-_65Kk2PvXJ6-S52CePTafVr-OnwCQodoKQKLfW_s_pf1O_AZMsgnw</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Yacout, Dalia M. M.</creator><creator>Hassouna, M. S.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry</title><author>Yacout, Dalia M. M. ; Hassouna, M. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a4cb9fe4e8d9543e7d2fdd98c46a7937e0b4c7d9256459cc0fa90db097ccf4753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Hazardous Waste - analysis</topic><topic>Hazardous wastes</topic><topic>Heat recovery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incineration</topic><topic>Incineration - methods</topic><topic>Incinerators</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Materials handling</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Solid waste treatment</topic><topic>Solid wastes</topic><topic>Streaming</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Textile Industry</topic><topic>Textile industry wastes</topic><topic>Waste Disposal Facilities</topic><topic>Waste disposal sites</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Waste Management - methods</topic><topic>Waste management industry</topic><topic>Waste to energy</topic><topic>Waste treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yacout, Dalia M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassouna, M. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yacout, Dalia M. M.</au><au>Hassouna, M. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>188</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>445</spage><pages>445-</pages><artnum>445</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Waste management is a successful instrument to minimize generated waste and improve environmental conditions. In spite of the large share of developing countries in the textile industry, limited information is available concerning the waste management strategies implemented for textiles on those countries and their environmental impacts. In the current study, two waste management approaches for hazardous solid waste treatment of acrylic fibers (landfill and incineration) were investigated. The main research questions were: What are the different impacts of each waste management strategy? Which waste management strategy is more ecofriendly? Life cycle assessment was employed in order to model the environmental impacts of each waste streaming approach separately then compare them together. Results revealed that incineration was the more ecofriendly approach. Highest impacts of both approaches were on ecotoxicity and carcinogenic potentials due to release of metals from pigment wastes. Landfill had an impact of 46.8 % on human health as compared to 28 % by incineration. Incineration impact on ecosystem quality was higher than landfill impact (68.4 and 51.3 %, respectively). As for resources category, incineration had a higher impact than landfill (3.5 and 2.0 %, respectively). Those impacts could be mitigated if state-of-the-art landfill or incinerator were used and could be reduced by applying waste to energy approaches for both management systems In conclusion, shifting waste treatment from landfill to incineration would decrease the overall environmental impacts and allow energy recovery. The potential of waste to energy approach by incineration with heat recovery could be considered in further studies. Future research is needed in order to assess the implementation of waste management systems and the preferable waste management strategies in the textile industry on developing countries.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>27372905</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2016-08, Vol.188 (8), p.445, Article 445 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1801317303 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Carcinogens Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Developing countries Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Effluents Egypt Energy Energy consumption Energy recovery Environment Environmental conditions Environmental impact Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental Monitoring - methods Fibers Hazardous Waste - analysis Hazardous wastes Heat recovery Humans Incineration Incineration - methods Incinerators Landfill Landfills LDCs Life cycle analysis Materials handling Metals Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Pollutants Raw materials Solid waste treatment Solid wastes Streaming Studies Textile Industry Textile industry wastes Waste Disposal Facilities Waste disposal sites Waste management Waste Management - methods Waste management industry Waste to energy Waste treatment |
title | Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20potential%20environmental%20impacts%20of%20waste%20handling%20strategies%20in%20textile%20industry&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Yacout,%20Dalia%20M.%20M.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=445&rft.pages=445-&rft.artnum=445&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4106570851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801317303&rft_id=info:pmid/27372905&rfr_iscdi=true |