Social pitfalls for river restoration: How public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance

As in several other infrastructure sectors—highly popular German examples are the protests concerning “Stuttgart 21” or Munich airport—the people’s “new voice” is severely inhibiting the enforcement progress of common legislation in the water management sector, in particular the European Water Frame...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental earth sciences 2016-07, Vol.75 (13), p.1, Article 1053
Hauptverfasser: Heldt, Sonja, Budryte, Paulina, Ingensiep, Hans Werner, Teichgräber, Burkhard, Schneider, Ute, Denecke, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1
container_title Environmental earth sciences
container_volume 75
creator Heldt, Sonja
Budryte, Paulina
Ingensiep, Hans Werner
Teichgräber, Burkhard
Schneider, Ute
Denecke, Martin
description As in several other infrastructure sectors—highly popular German examples are the protests concerning “Stuttgart 21” or Munich airport—the people’s “new voice” is severely inhibiting the enforcement progress of common legislation in the water management sector, in particular the European Water Framework Directive (2000; EU-WFD). With the launch of the EU-WFD, the European Union is forcing serious changes in watersheds to reach a “good ecological status”. However, although affirmatively described by experts, not all of these changes are appreciated by local communities. According to Connif ( 2014 ), 75 % of river restoration projects did not reach their minimal goals due to the lack of active stakeholder involvement. To prevent this, a comprehensive consideration of social aspects is essential for a sustainable implementation success of river restoration projects in the German water management sector. In this paper, local stakeholders’ individual acceptance and the overall public acceptance of the project to ecologically improve the Emscher River’s mouth in the context of the Emscher Conversion (“Emscherumbau”) and its relation to certain steps of action in the project (including public participation measures) will be discussed as a case study. To our knowledge, no other research has been conducted so far combining the advantages of qualitative stakeholder interviews and a comprehensive media analysis to get an individual insight into the attitude of different stakeholder groups and to consistently identify snapshots of the public attitude during the course of the project. At first sight the project has high potential for conflicts because of drastic alterations of the current environment, intense construction works and soil transport activities, a relatively dense settlement in close proximity as well as a community that is experienced in asserting their rights. But although public participation was basically limited to information and formal consultation, the local attitude towards the ecological improvement of the Emscher River’s mouth is overall positive.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12665-016-5787-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1799518979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4100962841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c492a4fd36db61f32b5abc56f82e3d130aa5328ece7f0735ba60384a81b1b5683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxEb7A7yReF5llsKCN9OoNWniQT0ToKyl2S4r7Nr030tdNV7kAJPwvTczD6ELIFdASHWdoOScFQR4wSpRFfsjNAHBecFLKY9_a0FO0TSlDcmHApWET9D6OVivG9z5vtZNk3AdIo7-w-XbpT5E3fvQ3uBF2OFuMI23uNOx99Z3Xz94aG3IdMJdDKZx24R3vl__sNpa1_W6te4cneQGyU2_3zP0en_3Ml8Uy6eHx_ntsrAUeF_YmSz1rF5RvjIcaloapo1lvBaloyugRGtGS-Gsq2pSUWY0J1TMtAADhnFBz9Dl6JvneR_yCmoThtjmlgoqKRkIWclMwUjZGFKKrlZd9Fsd9wqIOmSqxkxVzlQdMlX7rClHTcps--biH-d_RZ_kTHwh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1799518979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social pitfalls for river restoration: How public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Heldt, Sonja ; Budryte, Paulina ; Ingensiep, Hans Werner ; Teichgräber, Burkhard ; Schneider, Ute ; Denecke, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Heldt, Sonja ; Budryte, Paulina ; Ingensiep, Hans Werner ; Teichgräber, Burkhard ; Schneider, Ute ; Denecke, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>As in several other infrastructure sectors—highly popular German examples are the protests concerning “Stuttgart 21” or Munich airport—the people’s “new voice” is severely inhibiting the enforcement progress of common legislation in the water management sector, in particular the European Water Framework Directive (2000; EU-WFD). With the launch of the EU-WFD, the European Union is forcing serious changes in watersheds to reach a “good ecological status”. However, although affirmatively described by experts, not all of these changes are appreciated by local communities. According to Connif ( 2014 ), 75 % of river restoration projects did not reach their minimal goals due to the lack of active stakeholder involvement. To prevent this, a comprehensive consideration of social aspects is essential for a sustainable implementation success of river restoration projects in the German water management sector. In this paper, local stakeholders’ individual acceptance and the overall public acceptance of the project to ecologically improve the Emscher River’s mouth in the context of the Emscher Conversion (“Emscherumbau”) and its relation to certain steps of action in the project (including public participation measures) will be discussed as a case study. To our knowledge, no other research has been conducted so far combining the advantages of qualitative stakeholder interviews and a comprehensive media analysis to get an individual insight into the attitude of different stakeholder groups and to consistently identify snapshots of the public attitude during the course of the project. At first sight the project has high potential for conflicts because of drastic alterations of the current environment, intense construction works and soil transport activities, a relatively dense settlement in close proximity as well as a community that is experienced in asserting their rights. But although public participation was basically limited to information and formal consultation, the local attitude towards the ecological improvement of the Emscher River’s mouth is overall positive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-6280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-6299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-5787-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biogeosciences ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental restoration ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Legislation ; Local communities ; Public opinion ; Public participation ; River basins ; Rivers ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Thematic Issue ; Water in Germany ; Water management</subject><ispartof>Environmental earth sciences, 2016-07, Vol.75 (13), p.1, Article 1053</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Environmental Earth Sciences is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c492a4fd36db61f32b5abc56f82e3d130aa5328ece7f0735ba60384a81b1b5683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c492a4fd36db61f32b5abc56f82e3d130aa5328ece7f0735ba60384a81b1b5683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-016-5787-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12665-016-5787-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heldt, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budryte, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingensiep, Hans Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichgräber, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denecke, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Social pitfalls for river restoration: How public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance</title><title>Environmental earth sciences</title><addtitle>Environ Earth Sci</addtitle><description>As in several other infrastructure sectors—highly popular German examples are the protests concerning “Stuttgart 21” or Munich airport—the people’s “new voice” is severely inhibiting the enforcement progress of common legislation in the water management sector, in particular the European Water Framework Directive (2000; EU-WFD). With the launch of the EU-WFD, the European Union is forcing serious changes in watersheds to reach a “good ecological status”. However, although affirmatively described by experts, not all of these changes are appreciated by local communities. According to Connif ( 2014 ), 75 % of river restoration projects did not reach their minimal goals due to the lack of active stakeholder involvement. To prevent this, a comprehensive consideration of social aspects is essential for a sustainable implementation success of river restoration projects in the German water management sector. In this paper, local stakeholders’ individual acceptance and the overall public acceptance of the project to ecologically improve the Emscher River’s mouth in the context of the Emscher Conversion (“Emscherumbau”) and its relation to certain steps of action in the project (including public participation measures) will be discussed as a case study. To our knowledge, no other research has been conducted so far combining the advantages of qualitative stakeholder interviews and a comprehensive media analysis to get an individual insight into the attitude of different stakeholder groups and to consistently identify snapshots of the public attitude during the course of the project. At first sight the project has high potential for conflicts because of drastic alterations of the current environment, intense construction works and soil transport activities, a relatively dense settlement in close proximity as well as a community that is experienced in asserting their rights. But although public participation was basically limited to information and formal consultation, the local attitude towards the ecological improvement of the Emscher River’s mouth is overall positive.</description><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Thematic Issue</subject><subject>Water in Germany</subject><subject>Water management</subject><issn>1866-6280</issn><issn>1866-6299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxEb7A7yReF5llsKCN9OoNWniQT0ToKyl2S4r7Nr030tdNV7kAJPwvTczD6ELIFdASHWdoOScFQR4wSpRFfsjNAHBecFLKY9_a0FO0TSlDcmHApWET9D6OVivG9z5vtZNk3AdIo7-w-XbpT5E3fvQ3uBF2OFuMI23uNOx99Z3Xz94aG3IdMJdDKZx24R3vl__sNpa1_W6te4cneQGyU2_3zP0en_3Ml8Uy6eHx_ntsrAUeF_YmSz1rF5RvjIcaloapo1lvBaloyugRGtGS-Gsq2pSUWY0J1TMtAADhnFBz9Dl6JvneR_yCmoThtjmlgoqKRkIWclMwUjZGFKKrlZd9Fsd9wqIOmSqxkxVzlQdMlX7rClHTcps--biH-d_RZ_kTHwh</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Heldt, Sonja</creator><creator>Budryte, Paulina</creator><creator>Ingensiep, Hans Werner</creator><creator>Teichgräber, Burkhard</creator><creator>Schneider, Ute</creator><creator>Denecke, Martin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Social pitfalls for river restoration: How public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance</title><author>Heldt, Sonja ; Budryte, Paulina ; Ingensiep, Hans Werner ; Teichgräber, Burkhard ; Schneider, Ute ; Denecke, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c492a4fd36db61f32b5abc56f82e3d130aa5328ece7f0735ba60384a81b1b5683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Thematic Issue</topic><topic>Water in Germany</topic><topic>Water management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heldt, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budryte, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingensiep, Hans Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichgräber, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denecke, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heldt, Sonja</au><au>Budryte, Paulina</au><au>Ingensiep, Hans Werner</au><au>Teichgräber, Burkhard</au><au>Schneider, Ute</au><au>Denecke, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social pitfalls for river restoration: How public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance</atitle><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle><stitle>Environ Earth Sci</stitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>1053</artnum><issn>1866-6280</issn><eissn>1866-6299</eissn><abstract>As in several other infrastructure sectors—highly popular German examples are the protests concerning “Stuttgart 21” or Munich airport—the people’s “new voice” is severely inhibiting the enforcement progress of common legislation in the water management sector, in particular the European Water Framework Directive (2000; EU-WFD). With the launch of the EU-WFD, the European Union is forcing serious changes in watersheds to reach a “good ecological status”. However, although affirmatively described by experts, not all of these changes are appreciated by local communities. According to Connif ( 2014 ), 75 % of river restoration projects did not reach their minimal goals due to the lack of active stakeholder involvement. To prevent this, a comprehensive consideration of social aspects is essential for a sustainable implementation success of river restoration projects in the German water management sector. In this paper, local stakeholders’ individual acceptance and the overall public acceptance of the project to ecologically improve the Emscher River’s mouth in the context of the Emscher Conversion (“Emscherumbau”) and its relation to certain steps of action in the project (including public participation measures) will be discussed as a case study. To our knowledge, no other research has been conducted so far combining the advantages of qualitative stakeholder interviews and a comprehensive media analysis to get an individual insight into the attitude of different stakeholder groups and to consistently identify snapshots of the public attitude during the course of the project. At first sight the project has high potential for conflicts because of drastic alterations of the current environment, intense construction works and soil transport activities, a relatively dense settlement in close proximity as well as a community that is experienced in asserting their rights. But although public participation was basically limited to information and formal consultation, the local attitude towards the ecological improvement of the Emscher River’s mouth is overall positive.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12665-016-5787-y</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-6280
ispartof Environmental earth sciences, 2016-07, Vol.75 (13), p.1, Article 1053
issn 1866-6280
1866-6299
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1799518979
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Biogeosciences
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental restoration
Environmental Science and Engineering
Geochemistry
Geology
Hydrology/Water Resources
Legislation
Local communities
Public opinion
Public participation
River basins
Rivers
Terrestrial Pollution
Thematic Issue
Water in Germany
Water management
title Social pitfalls for river restoration: How public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20pitfalls%20for%20river%20restoration:%20How%20public%20participation%20uncovers%20problems%20with%20public%20acceptance&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20earth%20sciences&rft.au=Heldt,%20Sonja&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=1053&rft.issn=1866-6280&rft.eissn=1866-6299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12665-016-5787-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4100962841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1799518979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true