Political Instability and the Informal Economy

•We investigate the political environment that allows the informal economy to develop.•Political instability, social polarization, and an autocratic authority pattern increase informality.•Efforts to reduce informality should focus on political reforms.•Democratic reforms can increase informality if...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World development 2016-09, Vol.85, p.31-42
Hauptverfasser: Elbahnasawy, Nasr G., Ellis, Michael A., Adom, Assandé Désiré
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue
container_start_page 31
container_title World development
container_volume 85
creator Elbahnasawy, Nasr G.
Ellis, Michael A.
Adom, Assandé Désiré
description •We investigate the political environment that allows the informal economy to develop.•Political instability, social polarization, and an autocratic authority pattern increase informality.•Efforts to reduce informality should focus on political reforms.•Democratic reforms can increase informality if it increases political instability. Understanding the determinants of the informal economy is a crucial issue in economic development because of its effect on economic performance as well as undermining the construction of indicators to monitor economic development. While the focus on the literature has been on the proximate causes of informal production, such as taxation, we investigate the political environment that causes governments to choose policies that allow the informal economy to develop. We argue that the political environment affects the government’s incentive to invest in the efficiency of tax collection, and therefore the ability of the government to detect informal production. We show that political instability, social polarization along ethnic and religious lines, and an autocratic authority pattern are associated with a larger informal economy. The results suggest that efforts to reduce informal production should shift from an emphasis on the proximate causes to political reforms. Since polarization along ethnic and religious lines is structural, reforms should focus on reducing political instability and autocracy. However, the results imply that democratic reforms that change the authority pattern from autocracy to democracy can increase informal economic activity if it increases political instability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1797260998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X16303680</els_id><sourcerecordid>4090489561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f010f6f695e9a3b14236be1f4078860be7437ce88989d74d46fbcaf3779329553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QQqed51svjY3pdRaKOhBwVvYzQdm2W5qsq3035tSPXsa3pn3nWEehG4xlBgwv-_K7xB7Y-y-rLIugZYA8gxNcC1IwaTE52gCBFghGHxcoquUOgBgRIoJKl9D70evm362GtLYtD7Lw6wZzGz8tLnnQtzk4UKHIWwO1-jCNX2yN791it6fFm_z52L9slzNH9eFpkDHwgEGxx2XzMqGtJhWhLcWOwqirjm0VlAitK1rWUsjqKHctbpxRAhJKskYmaK7095tDF87m0bVhV0c8kmFhRQVBynr7OInl44hpWid2ka_aeJBYVBHNqpTf2zUkY0CqjKbHHw4BW3-Ye9tVEl7O2hrfLR6VCb4_1b8AP4Pb0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797260998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political Instability and the Informal Economy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Elbahnasawy, Nasr G. ; Ellis, Michael A. ; Adom, Assandé Désiré</creator><creatorcontrib>Elbahnasawy, Nasr G. ; Ellis, Michael A. ; Adom, Assandé Désiré</creatorcontrib><description>•We investigate the political environment that allows the informal economy to develop.•Political instability, social polarization, and an autocratic authority pattern increase informality.•Efforts to reduce informality should focus on political reforms.•Democratic reforms can increase informality if it increases political instability. Understanding the determinants of the informal economy is a crucial issue in economic development because of its effect on economic performance as well as undermining the construction of indicators to monitor economic development. While the focus on the literature has been on the proximate causes of informal production, such as taxation, we investigate the political environment that causes governments to choose policies that allow the informal economy to develop. We argue that the political environment affects the government’s incentive to invest in the efficiency of tax collection, and therefore the ability of the government to detect informal production. We show that political instability, social polarization along ethnic and religious lines, and an autocratic authority pattern are associated with a larger informal economy. The results suggest that efforts to reduce informal production should shift from an emphasis on the proximate causes to political reforms. Since polarization along ethnic and religious lines is structural, reforms should focus on reducing political instability and autocracy. However, the results imply that democratic reforms that change the authority pattern from autocracy to democracy can increase informal economic activity if it increases political instability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Autarchy ; Autocracy ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Economic activity ; Economic conditions ; Economic development ; Economics ; Efficiency ; Indexes ; Informal economy ; Polarization ; Political factors ; political instability ; political polarization ; Politics ; Production ; Proximate causes ; Stability ; Studies ; Tax collections ; Taxation ; Well construction</subject><ispartof>World development, 2016-09, Vol.85, p.31-42</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f010f6f695e9a3b14236be1f4078860be7437ce88989d74d46fbcaf3779329553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f010f6f695e9a3b14236be1f4078860be7437ce88989d74d46fbcaf3779329553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X16303680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elbahnasawy, Nasr G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adom, Assandé Désiré</creatorcontrib><title>Political Instability and the Informal Economy</title><title>World development</title><description>•We investigate the political environment that allows the informal economy to develop.•Political instability, social polarization, and an autocratic authority pattern increase informality.•Efforts to reduce informality should focus on political reforms.•Democratic reforms can increase informality if it increases political instability. Understanding the determinants of the informal economy is a crucial issue in economic development because of its effect on economic performance as well as undermining the construction of indicators to monitor economic development. While the focus on the literature has been on the proximate causes of informal production, such as taxation, we investigate the political environment that causes governments to choose policies that allow the informal economy to develop. We argue that the political environment affects the government’s incentive to invest in the efficiency of tax collection, and therefore the ability of the government to detect informal production. We show that political instability, social polarization along ethnic and religious lines, and an autocratic authority pattern are associated with a larger informal economy. The results suggest that efforts to reduce informal production should shift from an emphasis on the proximate causes to political reforms. Since polarization along ethnic and religious lines is structural, reforms should focus on reducing political instability and autocracy. However, the results imply that democratic reforms that change the authority pattern from autocracy to democracy can increase informal economic activity if it increases political instability.</description><subject>Autarchy</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>political instability</subject><subject>political polarization</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Proximate causes</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax collections</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Well construction</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QQqed51svjY3pdRaKOhBwVvYzQdm2W5qsq3035tSPXsa3pn3nWEehG4xlBgwv-_K7xB7Y-y-rLIugZYA8gxNcC1IwaTE52gCBFghGHxcoquUOgBgRIoJKl9D70evm362GtLYtD7Lw6wZzGz8tLnnQtzk4UKHIWwO1-jCNX2yN791it6fFm_z52L9slzNH9eFpkDHwgEGxx2XzMqGtJhWhLcWOwqirjm0VlAitK1rWUsjqKHctbpxRAhJKskYmaK7095tDF87m0bVhV0c8kmFhRQVBynr7OInl44hpWid2ka_aeJBYVBHNqpTf2zUkY0CqjKbHHw4BW3-Ye9tVEl7O2hrfLR6VCb4_1b8AP4Pb0I</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Elbahnasawy, Nasr G.</creator><creator>Ellis, Michael A.</creator><creator>Adom, Assandé Désiré</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Political Instability and the Informal Economy</title><author>Elbahnasawy, Nasr G. ; Ellis, Michael A. ; Adom, Assandé Désiré</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f010f6f695e9a3b14236be1f4078860be7437ce88989d74d46fbcaf3779329553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Autarchy</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>political instability</topic><topic>political polarization</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Proximate causes</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax collections</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Well construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elbahnasawy, Nasr G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adom, Assandé Désiré</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elbahnasawy, Nasr G.</au><au>Ellis, Michael A.</au><au>Adom, Assandé Désiré</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political Instability and the Informal Economy</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>31</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>31-42</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>•We investigate the political environment that allows the informal economy to develop.•Political instability, social polarization, and an autocratic authority pattern increase informality.•Efforts to reduce informality should focus on political reforms.•Democratic reforms can increase informality if it increases political instability. Understanding the determinants of the informal economy is a crucial issue in economic development because of its effect on economic performance as well as undermining the construction of indicators to monitor economic development. While the focus on the literature has been on the proximate causes of informal production, such as taxation, we investigate the political environment that causes governments to choose policies that allow the informal economy to develop. We argue that the political environment affects the government’s incentive to invest in the efficiency of tax collection, and therefore the ability of the government to detect informal production. We show that political instability, social polarization along ethnic and religious lines, and an autocratic authority pattern are associated with a larger informal economy. The results suggest that efforts to reduce informal production should shift from an emphasis on the proximate causes to political reforms. Since polarization along ethnic and religious lines is structural, reforms should focus on reducing political instability and autocracy. However, the results imply that democratic reforms that change the authority pattern from autocracy to democracy can increase informal economic activity if it increases political instability.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.009</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-750X
ispartof World development, 2016-09, Vol.85, p.31-42
issn 0305-750X
1873-5991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1797260998
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Autarchy
Autocracy
Democracy
Democratization
Economic activity
Economic conditions
Economic development
Economics
Efficiency
Indexes
Informal economy
Polarization
Political factors
political instability
political polarization
Politics
Production
Proximate causes
Stability
Studies
Tax collections
Taxation
Well construction
title Political Instability and the Informal Economy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20Instability%20and%20the%20Informal%20Economy&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Elbahnasawy,%20Nasr%20G.&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=31-42&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4090489561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797260998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305750X16303680&rfr_iscdi=true