Unwidowing: Rachel Jeantel, Black Death, and the “Problem” of Black Intimacy

This article focuses on Rachel Jeantel’s testimony during the highly publicized George Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman was prosecuted on charges of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, of which he was acquitted in July 2013. I treat Jeantel’s testimony as an act of what Sharon Holland ter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2016-06, Vol.41 (4), p.751-774
1. Verfasser: Nash, Jennifer C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 774
container_issue 4
container_start_page 751
container_title Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
container_volume 41
creator Nash, Jennifer C.
description This article focuses on Rachel Jeantel’s testimony during the highly publicized George Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman was prosecuted on charges of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, of which he was acquitted in July 2013. I treat Jeantel’s testimony as an act of what Sharon Holland terms “raising the dead” and as a form of black intimacy. In naming Jeantel’s testimony a practice of black intimacy, I am highlighting the ways in which it has become ordinary for black women—as wives, lovers, daughters, and mothers—to become mediums through which slain black men are allowed to speak, mediums who make visible black male pain, suffering, and disposability. I am also underscoring the ways that black intimacies are enacted, enjoyed, and staged in the face of black perishment in an ongoing moment where black bodies are relegated to what Holland calls the “space of death,” whether that space is the material death of bodies like Martin’s, what Lisa Cacho calls the “social death” of persistent devaluation, or the “civic death” of incarceration and criminalization, as Loïc Wacquant writes. The article then asks how and why Jeantel’s intimate act of raising the dead did not allow her access to a privileged class of black women: civil rights widows. Why, this article asks, wouldn’t Jeantel be interpellated as a kind of contemporary civil rights widow, particularly since the media so often insisted on describing her as Martin’s girlfriend? In what ways was her potential widow status undone or unmade? And what was the role of the legal proceeding in this unwidowing?
doi_str_mv 10.1086/685114
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1796780227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26552852</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26552852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-55975aa7afa35e3d6a2a829dc1cd8a69a0ad9895c5f721c92a2becd42920cd873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9z0FLxDAQBeAgCnZX_QeeBG_VZNJJMkdZdBUWvLjnMCattGi7Jl0W_71dKr7Lu3zM8IS4UvJOSWfujUOlqhNRKKywNFTpU1FISbYkW8lzsci5k8eQLcRi2x_aOBza_uNCnDX8mevLv16K7dPj2-q53LyuX1YPmzKA1WOJSBaZLTessdbRMLADikGF6NgQS47kCAM2FlQgYHivQ6yAQE7C6qW4me_u0vC9r_Pou2Gf-umlV5aMdRLgqG5nFdKQc6obv0vtF6cfr6Q_7vTzzglez7DL45D-FRhEcAj6FzayS2I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1796780227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unwidowing: Rachel Jeantel, Black Death, and the “Problem” of Black Intimacy</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Nash, Jennifer C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nash, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><description>This article focuses on Rachel Jeantel’s testimony during the highly publicized George Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman was prosecuted on charges of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, of which he was acquitted in July 2013. I treat Jeantel’s testimony as an act of what Sharon Holland terms “raising the dead” and as a form of black intimacy. In naming Jeantel’s testimony a practice of black intimacy, I am highlighting the ways in which it has become ordinary for black women—as wives, lovers, daughters, and mothers—to become mediums through which slain black men are allowed to speak, mediums who make visible black male pain, suffering, and disposability. I am also underscoring the ways that black intimacies are enacted, enjoyed, and staged in the face of black perishment in an ongoing moment where black bodies are relegated to what Holland calls the “space of death,” whether that space is the material death of bodies like Martin’s, what Lisa Cacho calls the “social death” of persistent devaluation, or the “civic death” of incarceration and criminalization, as Loïc Wacquant writes. The article then asks how and why Jeantel’s intimate act of raising the dead did not allow her access to a privileged class of black women: civil rights widows. Why, this article asks, wouldn’t Jeantel be interpellated as a kind of contemporary civil rights widow, particularly since the media so often insisted on describing her as Martin’s girlfriend? In what ways was her potential widow status undone or unmade? And what was the role of the legal proceeding in this unwidowing?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-9740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/685114</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJWSDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>African American studies ; Civil rights ; Civil rights movements ; Criminalization ; Death &amp; dying ; Females ; Homicide ; Imprisonment ; Jeantel, Rachel ; Males ; Martin, Trayvon ; Mass media ; Mass media violence ; Mothers ; Murders &amp; murder attempts ; Plague ; Prosecutions ; Rights ; Suffering ; Testimony ; Trials ; Widows &amp; widowers ; Wives ; Womens rights ; Zimmerman, George</subject><ispartof>Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 2016-06, Vol.41 (4), p.751-774</ispartof><rights>2016 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Summer 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-55975aa7afa35e3d6a2a829dc1cd8a69a0ad9895c5f721c92a2becd42920cd873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-55975aa7afa35e3d6a2a829dc1cd8a69a0ad9895c5f721c92a2becd42920cd873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26552852$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26552852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,33774,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nash, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><title>Unwidowing: Rachel Jeantel, Black Death, and the “Problem” of Black Intimacy</title><title>Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society</title><description>This article focuses on Rachel Jeantel’s testimony during the highly publicized George Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman was prosecuted on charges of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, of which he was acquitted in July 2013. I treat Jeantel’s testimony as an act of what Sharon Holland terms “raising the dead” and as a form of black intimacy. In naming Jeantel’s testimony a practice of black intimacy, I am highlighting the ways in which it has become ordinary for black women—as wives, lovers, daughters, and mothers—to become mediums through which slain black men are allowed to speak, mediums who make visible black male pain, suffering, and disposability. I am also underscoring the ways that black intimacies are enacted, enjoyed, and staged in the face of black perishment in an ongoing moment where black bodies are relegated to what Holland calls the “space of death,” whether that space is the material death of bodies like Martin’s, what Lisa Cacho calls the “social death” of persistent devaluation, or the “civic death” of incarceration and criminalization, as Loïc Wacquant writes. The article then asks how and why Jeantel’s intimate act of raising the dead did not allow her access to a privileged class of black women: civil rights widows. Why, this article asks, wouldn’t Jeantel be interpellated as a kind of contemporary civil rights widow, particularly since the media so often insisted on describing her as Martin’s girlfriend? In what ways was her potential widow status undone or unmade? And what was the role of the legal proceeding in this unwidowing?</description><subject>African American studies</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil rights movements</subject><subject>Criminalization</subject><subject>Death &amp; dying</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Homicide</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Jeantel, Rachel</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Martin, Trayvon</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Mass media violence</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Murders &amp; murder attempts</subject><subject>Plague</subject><subject>Prosecutions</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Suffering</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>Widows &amp; widowers</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><subject>Zimmerman, George</subject><issn>0097-9740</issn><issn>1545-6943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9z0FLxDAQBeAgCnZX_QeeBG_VZNJJMkdZdBUWvLjnMCattGi7Jl0W_71dKr7Lu3zM8IS4UvJOSWfujUOlqhNRKKywNFTpU1FISbYkW8lzsci5k8eQLcRi2x_aOBza_uNCnDX8mevLv16K7dPj2-q53LyuX1YPmzKA1WOJSBaZLTessdbRMLADikGF6NgQS47kCAM2FlQgYHivQ6yAQE7C6qW4me_u0vC9r_Pou2Gf-umlV5aMdRLgqG5nFdKQc6obv0vtF6cfr6Q_7vTzzglez7DL45D-FRhEcAj6FzayS2I</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Nash, Jennifer C.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Unwidowing</title><author>Nash, Jennifer C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-55975aa7afa35e3d6a2a829dc1cd8a69a0ad9895c5f721c92a2becd42920cd873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>African American studies</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil rights movements</topic><topic>Criminalization</topic><topic>Death &amp; dying</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Homicide</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Jeantel, Rachel</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Martin, Trayvon</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Mass media violence</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Murders &amp; murder attempts</topic><topic>Plague</topic><topic>Prosecutions</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Suffering</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>Widows &amp; widowers</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><topic>Zimmerman, George</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nash, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nash, Jennifer C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unwidowing: Rachel Jeantel, Black Death, and the “Problem” of Black Intimacy</atitle><jtitle>Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>751</spage><epage>774</epage><pages>751-774</pages><issn>0097-9740</issn><eissn>1545-6943</eissn><coden>SJWSDM</coden><abstract>This article focuses on Rachel Jeantel’s testimony during the highly publicized George Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman was prosecuted on charges of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, of which he was acquitted in July 2013. I treat Jeantel’s testimony as an act of what Sharon Holland terms “raising the dead” and as a form of black intimacy. In naming Jeantel’s testimony a practice of black intimacy, I am highlighting the ways in which it has become ordinary for black women—as wives, lovers, daughters, and mothers—to become mediums through which slain black men are allowed to speak, mediums who make visible black male pain, suffering, and disposability. I am also underscoring the ways that black intimacies are enacted, enjoyed, and staged in the face of black perishment in an ongoing moment where black bodies are relegated to what Holland calls the “space of death,” whether that space is the material death of bodies like Martin’s, what Lisa Cacho calls the “social death” of persistent devaluation, or the “civic death” of incarceration and criminalization, as Loïc Wacquant writes. The article then asks how and why Jeantel’s intimate act of raising the dead did not allow her access to a privileged class of black women: civil rights widows. Why, this article asks, wouldn’t Jeantel be interpellated as a kind of contemporary civil rights widow, particularly since the media so often insisted on describing her as Martin’s girlfriend? In what ways was her potential widow status undone or unmade? And what was the role of the legal proceeding in this unwidowing?</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/685114</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0097-9740
ispartof Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 2016-06, Vol.41 (4), p.751-774
issn 0097-9740
1545-6943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1796780227
source Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects African American studies
Civil rights
Civil rights movements
Criminalization
Death & dying
Females
Homicide
Imprisonment
Jeantel, Rachel
Males
Martin, Trayvon
Mass media
Mass media violence
Mothers
Murders & murder attempts
Plague
Prosecutions
Rights
Suffering
Testimony
Trials
Widows & widowers
Wives
Womens rights
Zimmerman, George
title Unwidowing: Rachel Jeantel, Black Death, and the “Problem” of Black Intimacy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A16%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unwidowing:%20Rachel%20Jeantel,%20Black%20Death,%20and%20the%20%E2%80%9CProblem%E2%80%9D%20of%20Black%20Intimacy&rft.jtitle=Signs:%20Journal%20of%20Women%20in%20Culture%20and%20Society&rft.au=Nash,%20Jennifer%20C.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=751&rft.epage=774&rft.pages=751-774&rft.issn=0097-9740&rft.eissn=1545-6943&rft.coden=SJWSDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/685114&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26552852%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1796780227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26552852&rfr_iscdi=true