Ultra‐thin resin embedding method for scanning electron microscopy of individual cells on high and low aspect ratio 3D nanostructures

Summary The preparation of biological cells for either scanning or transmission electron microscopy requires a complex process of fixation, dehydration and drying. Critical point drying is commonly used for samples investigated with a scanning electron beam, whereas resin‐infiltration is typically u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of microscopy (Oxford) 2016-07, Vol.263 (1), p.78-86
Hauptverfasser: BELU, A., SCHNITKER, J., BERTAZZO, S., NEUMANN, E., MAYER, D., OFFENHÄUSSER, A., SANTORO, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title Journal of microscopy (Oxford)
container_volume 263
creator BELU, A.
SCHNITKER, J.
BERTAZZO, S.
NEUMANN, E.
MAYER, D.
OFFENHÄUSSER, A.
SANTORO, F.
description Summary The preparation of biological cells for either scanning or transmission electron microscopy requires a complex process of fixation, dehydration and drying. Critical point drying is commonly used for samples investigated with a scanning electron beam, whereas resin‐infiltration is typically used for transmission electron microscopy. Critical point drying may cause cracks at the cellular surface and a sponge‐like morphology of nondistinguishable intracellular compartments. Resin‐infiltrated biological samples result in a solid block of resin, which can be further processed by mechanical sectioning, however that does not allow a top view examination of small cell–cell and cell–surface contacts. Here, we propose a method for removing resin excess on biological samples before effective polymerization. In this way the cells result to be embedded in an ultra‐thin layer of epoxy resin. This novel method highlights in contrast to standard methods the imaging of individual cells not only on nanostructured planar surfaces but also on topologically challenging substrates with high aspect ratio three‐dimensional features by scanning electron microscopy. Lay Description For decades, biological materials like cells have been analyzed with optical microscopy. While this powerful tool for the investigation of cells reaches down to the sub‐micron regime, it remains limited to visualize the finest cell compartments and organelles in the very few nanometer regime. This limitation can be overcome by the use of electron microscopy, which can reach extremely highly resolution to satisfy that requirement. The artifact‐free transition of living cells into a solid state in order to be inspected in an ultrahigh vacuum remains a challenge. That procedure consists typically of three steps. Firstly, cells need to be chemically fixed and, thereby, morphologically stabilized. Secondly, they need to be dehydrated in order to exchange the water which is typically achieved by an organic solvent. The final crucial step prepares the dehydrated cells in such a way that cells remain in a solid state. Critical point drying (CPD) is a commonly chosen technique as a drying method, in particular for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This method is based on the thermodynamical pathway via a supercritical liquid. For transmission electron microscopy an alternative method was developed, using resin‐infiltration of an organic substance into the cell. While CPD typically might cause cracks at
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jmi.12378
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1796263430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4088176471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-92e292199d729c3e0a6568a9a89ed15a60d3e1ece168aff5e7e3ecdbe291d2243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOAzEQRS0EgvAo-AFkiYpiwY_srl2i8FYQDdQrx55NHO3awd4FpaOj5Rv5EhwCdEwxI43O3Ku5CB1SckpTnc1be0oZL8UGGlBe5BkTVGyiASGMZaxkZAftxjgnhIhckG20wwrBSEHlAL0_NV1Qn28f3cw6HCCmDu0EjLFuilvoZt7g2gcctXJutYMGdBe8w63VwUftF0vsa2ydsS_W9KrBGpom4kTM7HSGlTO48a9YxUU6xEF11mN-gZ1yPnah112fbPfRVq2aCAc_cw89XV0-jm6y8cP17eh8nGkuhMgkAyYZldKUTGoORBV5IZRUQoKhuSqI4UBBA03bus6hBA7aTNIVNYwN-R46Xusugn_uIXbV3PfBJcuKlrJgBR9ykqiTNbX6MAaoq0WwrQrLipJqFXmVIq--I0_s0Y9iP2nB_JG_GSfgbA282gaW_ytVd_e3a8kv9lmOLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1796263430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultra‐thin resin embedding method for scanning electron microscopy of individual cells on high and low aspect ratio 3D nanostructures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>BELU, A. ; SCHNITKER, J. ; BERTAZZO, S. ; NEUMANN, E. ; MAYER, D. ; OFFENHÄUSSER, A. ; SANTORO, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>BELU, A. ; SCHNITKER, J. ; BERTAZZO, S. ; NEUMANN, E. ; MAYER, D. ; OFFENHÄUSSER, A. ; SANTORO, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The preparation of biological cells for either scanning or transmission electron microscopy requires a complex process of fixation, dehydration and drying. Critical point drying is commonly used for samples investigated with a scanning electron beam, whereas resin‐infiltration is typically used for transmission electron microscopy. Critical point drying may cause cracks at the cellular surface and a sponge‐like morphology of nondistinguishable intracellular compartments. Resin‐infiltrated biological samples result in a solid block of resin, which can be further processed by mechanical sectioning, however that does not allow a top view examination of small cell–cell and cell–surface contacts. Here, we propose a method for removing resin excess on biological samples before effective polymerization. In this way the cells result to be embedded in an ultra‐thin layer of epoxy resin. This novel method highlights in contrast to standard methods the imaging of individual cells not only on nanostructured planar surfaces but also on topologically challenging substrates with high aspect ratio three‐dimensional features by scanning electron microscopy. Lay Description For decades, biological materials like cells have been analyzed with optical microscopy. While this powerful tool for the investigation of cells reaches down to the sub‐micron regime, it remains limited to visualize the finest cell compartments and organelles in the very few nanometer regime. This limitation can be overcome by the use of electron microscopy, which can reach extremely highly resolution to satisfy that requirement. The artifact‐free transition of living cells into a solid state in order to be inspected in an ultrahigh vacuum remains a challenge. That procedure consists typically of three steps. Firstly, cells need to be chemically fixed and, thereby, morphologically stabilized. Secondly, they need to be dehydrated in order to exchange the water which is typically achieved by an organic solvent. The final crucial step prepares the dehydrated cells in such a way that cells remain in a solid state. Critical point drying (CPD) is a commonly chosen technique as a drying method, in particular for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This method is based on the thermodynamical pathway via a supercritical liquid. For transmission electron microscopy an alternative method was developed, using resin‐infiltration of an organic substance into the cell. While CPD typically might cause cracks at the cellular surface, resin remains as a solid block of material also on top of the cells. The infiltration of the material stabilizes the inner organelles by not leaving empty areas inside of the cell behind. Subsequently, the cell suffers less structural damages as in the case of the CPD. Finally, we introduced a method which removes resin excess on the sample before the resin is fully polymerized. This method allows to gain access to the surface morphology of the cell which previously could not be inspected with scanning electron microscopy but only with CPD. We applied this method for the imaging of single cells on planar and 3D nanostructured surfaces. We show in addition that this method is excellently suited for sequential cross section with a focused ion beam and, eventually, visualizing the intracellular ultrastructure to a very high degree.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12378</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26820619</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMICAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cells ; Cells, Cultured ; Cerebral Cortex - cytology ; chemical fixation ; Desiccation ; Electron microscopes ; Epoxy Resins - isolation &amp; purification ; epoxy‐based resins ; focused ion beam ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods ; Morphology ; Nanostructures - ultrastructure ; Neurons - ultrastructure ; Rats, Wistar ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Single-Cell Analysis - methods ; Tissue Embedding - methods ; Transmission electron microscopy ; ultra‐structures</subject><ispartof>Journal of microscopy (Oxford), 2016-07, Vol.263 (1), p.78-86</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2016 Royal Microscopical Society</rights><rights>2016 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2016 Royal Microscopical Society.</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2016 Royal Microscopical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-92e292199d729c3e0a6568a9a89ed15a60d3e1ece168aff5e7e3ecdbe291d2243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-92e292199d729c3e0a6568a9a89ed15a60d3e1ece168aff5e7e3ecdbe291d2243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjmi.12378$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjmi.12378$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26820619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BELU, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHNITKER, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERTAZZO, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEUMANN, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYER, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OFFENHÄUSSER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANTORO, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultra‐thin resin embedding method for scanning electron microscopy of individual cells on high and low aspect ratio 3D nanostructures</title><title>Journal of microscopy (Oxford)</title><addtitle>J Microsc</addtitle><description>Summary The preparation of biological cells for either scanning or transmission electron microscopy requires a complex process of fixation, dehydration and drying. Critical point drying is commonly used for samples investigated with a scanning electron beam, whereas resin‐infiltration is typically used for transmission electron microscopy. Critical point drying may cause cracks at the cellular surface and a sponge‐like morphology of nondistinguishable intracellular compartments. Resin‐infiltrated biological samples result in a solid block of resin, which can be further processed by mechanical sectioning, however that does not allow a top view examination of small cell–cell and cell–surface contacts. Here, we propose a method for removing resin excess on biological samples before effective polymerization. In this way the cells result to be embedded in an ultra‐thin layer of epoxy resin. This novel method highlights in contrast to standard methods the imaging of individual cells not only on nanostructured planar surfaces but also on topologically challenging substrates with high aspect ratio three‐dimensional features by scanning electron microscopy. Lay Description For decades, biological materials like cells have been analyzed with optical microscopy. While this powerful tool for the investigation of cells reaches down to the sub‐micron regime, it remains limited to visualize the finest cell compartments and organelles in the very few nanometer regime. This limitation can be overcome by the use of electron microscopy, which can reach extremely highly resolution to satisfy that requirement. The artifact‐free transition of living cells into a solid state in order to be inspected in an ultrahigh vacuum remains a challenge. That procedure consists typically of three steps. Firstly, cells need to be chemically fixed and, thereby, morphologically stabilized. Secondly, they need to be dehydrated in order to exchange the water which is typically achieved by an organic solvent. The final crucial step prepares the dehydrated cells in such a way that cells remain in a solid state. Critical point drying (CPD) is a commonly chosen technique as a drying method, in particular for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This method is based on the thermodynamical pathway via a supercritical liquid. For transmission electron microscopy an alternative method was developed, using resin‐infiltration of an organic substance into the cell. While CPD typically might cause cracks at the cellular surface, resin remains as a solid block of material also on top of the cells. The infiltration of the material stabilizes the inner organelles by not leaving empty areas inside of the cell behind. Subsequently, the cell suffers less structural damages as in the case of the CPD. Finally, we introduced a method which removes resin excess on the sample before the resin is fully polymerized. This method allows to gain access to the surface morphology of the cell which previously could not be inspected with scanning electron microscopy but only with CPD. We applied this method for the imaging of single cells on planar and 3D nanostructured surfaces. We show in addition that this method is excellently suited for sequential cross section with a focused ion beam and, eventually, visualizing the intracellular ultrastructure to a very high degree.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - cytology</subject><subject>chemical fixation</subject><subject>Desiccation</subject><subject>Electron microscopes</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>epoxy‐based resins</subject><subject>focused ion beam</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nanostructures - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Neurons - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Single-Cell Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Embedding - methods</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>ultra‐structures</subject><issn>0022-2720</issn><issn>1365-2818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOAzEQRS0EgvAo-AFkiYpiwY_srl2i8FYQDdQrx55NHO3awd4FpaOj5Rv5EhwCdEwxI43O3Ku5CB1SckpTnc1be0oZL8UGGlBe5BkTVGyiASGMZaxkZAftxjgnhIhckG20wwrBSEHlAL0_NV1Qn28f3cw6HCCmDu0EjLFuilvoZt7g2gcctXJutYMGdBe8w63VwUftF0vsa2ydsS_W9KrBGpom4kTM7HSGlTO48a9YxUU6xEF11mN-gZ1yPnah112fbPfRVq2aCAc_cw89XV0-jm6y8cP17eh8nGkuhMgkAyYZldKUTGoORBV5IZRUQoKhuSqI4UBBA03bus6hBA7aTNIVNYwN-R46Xusugn_uIXbV3PfBJcuKlrJgBR9ykqiTNbX6MAaoq0WwrQrLipJqFXmVIq--I0_s0Y9iP2nB_JG_GSfgbA282gaW_ytVd_e3a8kv9lmOLw</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>BELU, A.</creator><creator>SCHNITKER, J.</creator><creator>BERTAZZO, S.</creator><creator>NEUMANN, E.</creator><creator>MAYER, D.</creator><creator>OFFENHÄUSSER, A.</creator><creator>SANTORO, F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Ultra‐thin resin embedding method for scanning electron microscopy of individual cells on high and low aspect ratio 3D nanostructures</title><author>BELU, A. ; SCHNITKER, J. ; BERTAZZO, S. ; NEUMANN, E. ; MAYER, D. ; OFFENHÄUSSER, A. ; SANTORO, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-92e292199d729c3e0a6568a9a89ed15a60d3e1ece168aff5e7e3ecdbe291d2243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - cytology</topic><topic>chemical fixation</topic><topic>Desiccation</topic><topic>Electron microscopes</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>epoxy‐based resins</topic><topic>focused ion beam</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nanostructures - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Neurons - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Single-Cell Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Embedding - methods</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>ultra‐structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BELU, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHNITKER, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERTAZZO, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEUMANN, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYER, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OFFENHÄUSSER, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANTORO, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of microscopy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BELU, A.</au><au>SCHNITKER, J.</au><au>BERTAZZO, S.</au><au>NEUMANN, E.</au><au>MAYER, D.</au><au>OFFENHÄUSSER, A.</au><au>SANTORO, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultra‐thin resin embedding method for scanning electron microscopy of individual cells on high and low aspect ratio 3D nanostructures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microscopy (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>J Microsc</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>263</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>78-86</pages><issn>0022-2720</issn><eissn>1365-2818</eissn><coden>JMICAR</coden><abstract>Summary The preparation of biological cells for either scanning or transmission electron microscopy requires a complex process of fixation, dehydration and drying. Critical point drying is commonly used for samples investigated with a scanning electron beam, whereas resin‐infiltration is typically used for transmission electron microscopy. Critical point drying may cause cracks at the cellular surface and a sponge‐like morphology of nondistinguishable intracellular compartments. Resin‐infiltrated biological samples result in a solid block of resin, which can be further processed by mechanical sectioning, however that does not allow a top view examination of small cell–cell and cell–surface contacts. Here, we propose a method for removing resin excess on biological samples before effective polymerization. In this way the cells result to be embedded in an ultra‐thin layer of epoxy resin. This novel method highlights in contrast to standard methods the imaging of individual cells not only on nanostructured planar surfaces but also on topologically challenging substrates with high aspect ratio three‐dimensional features by scanning electron microscopy. Lay Description For decades, biological materials like cells have been analyzed with optical microscopy. While this powerful tool for the investigation of cells reaches down to the sub‐micron regime, it remains limited to visualize the finest cell compartments and organelles in the very few nanometer regime. This limitation can be overcome by the use of electron microscopy, which can reach extremely highly resolution to satisfy that requirement. The artifact‐free transition of living cells into a solid state in order to be inspected in an ultrahigh vacuum remains a challenge. That procedure consists typically of three steps. Firstly, cells need to be chemically fixed and, thereby, morphologically stabilized. Secondly, they need to be dehydrated in order to exchange the water which is typically achieved by an organic solvent. The final crucial step prepares the dehydrated cells in such a way that cells remain in a solid state. Critical point drying (CPD) is a commonly chosen technique as a drying method, in particular for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This method is based on the thermodynamical pathway via a supercritical liquid. For transmission electron microscopy an alternative method was developed, using resin‐infiltration of an organic substance into the cell. While CPD typically might cause cracks at the cellular surface, resin remains as a solid block of material also on top of the cells. The infiltration of the material stabilizes the inner organelles by not leaving empty areas inside of the cell behind. Subsequently, the cell suffers less structural damages as in the case of the CPD. Finally, we introduced a method which removes resin excess on the sample before the resin is fully polymerized. This method allows to gain access to the surface morphology of the cell which previously could not be inspected with scanning electron microscopy but only with CPD. We applied this method for the imaging of single cells on planar and 3D nanostructured surfaces. We show in addition that this method is excellently suited for sequential cross section with a focused ion beam and, eventually, visualizing the intracellular ultrastructure to a very high degree.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>26820619</pmid><doi>10.1111/jmi.12378</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2720
ispartof Journal of microscopy (Oxford), 2016-07, Vol.263 (1), p.78-86
issn 0022-2720
1365-2818
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1796263430
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content
subjects Animals
Cells
Cells, Cultured
Cerebral Cortex - cytology
chemical fixation
Desiccation
Electron microscopes
Epoxy Resins - isolation & purification
epoxy‐based resins
focused ion beam
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning - methods
Morphology
Nanostructures - ultrastructure
Neurons - ultrastructure
Rats, Wistar
Scanning electron microscopy
Single-Cell Analysis - methods
Tissue Embedding - methods
Transmission electron microscopy
ultra‐structures
title Ultra‐thin resin embedding method for scanning electron microscopy of individual cells on high and low aspect ratio 3D nanostructures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A36%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultra%E2%80%90thin%20resin%20embedding%20method%20for%20scanning%20electron%20microscopy%20of%20individual%20cells%20on%20high%20and%20low%20aspect%20ratio%203D%20nanostructures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microscopy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=BELU,%20A.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=263&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=78-86&rft.issn=0022-2720&rft.eissn=1365-2818&rft.coden=JMICAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jmi.12378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4088176471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1796263430&rft_id=info:pmid/26820619&rfr_iscdi=true