Periodical literature bibliometric analysis: a case study of four international journals

Bibliometrics is most popular among the scholars, researchers and academics in the faculty of Library and Information Science research. The current study is a bibliometrics analysis of four international journals such as: 1st "Language Sciences" (LS) and 2nd "Linguistics and Education...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Library philosophy and practice 2016-04, p.1
Hauptverfasser: Sethi, Bipin Bihari, Maharana, Bulu, Mohanty, Barada Kanta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Library philosophy and practice
container_volume
creator Sethi, Bipin Bihari
Maharana, Bulu
Mohanty, Barada Kanta
description Bibliometrics is most popular among the scholars, researchers and academics in the faculty of Library and Information Science research. The current study is a bibliometrics analysis of four international journals such as: 1st "Language Sciences" (LS) and 2nd "Linguistics and Education" (L&E), 3rd 'Political Geography' (PG), and 4th 'Religion' (Rgn). The present paper attempts to evaluate the publications indexed under the database of Science Direct Top 25 hottest Papers journal literature to understand the global approach of research output in four core journals. This is a comprehensive survey work rendering bibliographic records from Science Direct top 25 hottest papers database during 2005-2013, and this paper strenuously tries to give a complete sketch of the evaluation of research outputs. The key findings of the research divulge that, out of a total number of 3300 papers undertaken for the present research work, 900 were taken from 1st three journals and 60 0 shared by the 4 th journal "Religion". It is indicated from the study that top 15 authors of all four journals identically contributed 349 (38.77%), 281 (31.22%), 384 (42.66 %) and 239 (39.83 %) papers to their credit which counts more than one third of the whole contribution except 2nd journal. In all journals the greater number 79, 76, 72, and 85 percent papers were produced by single authors, while the collaborated papers were only 21, 24, 28, and 15 percent the study unmasks. Considering the authors' institutional affiliation it is ascertained that, the authors' contributed to the journals was affiliated to 153, 152, 169 and 80 unique institutions encompassing intercontinental regions, which again determines maximum number of institutional contributors are involved in 3rd journal, while minimum institutional contributors in 4th journal respectively. Besides, the geographical analysis indicates the involvement of cross national regions in the research practices is well found considerably benchmarking. Moreover, the study evidently shows that the overwhelming and most productive geographical region contributors' USA shared 208 (23.11%), 354 (39.33%) and 231 (38.5 %) papers in 1st, 2nd and 4th journal with posed 1st rank, while UK achieved 1st rank having contribution 396 (44%) to the 3rd journal respectively. Resultantly, it could be professed here that, the both regions (USA and UK) are considerably granted as leading productive nations and prolific in the realm of global research.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1795686221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A455185961</galeid><sourcerecordid>A455185961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g203t-ca119ef2bddc6fa4213b11de87c50976bdf3e055019707998eaf4ba8e95bc53a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFtLAzEQhRdRsFb_Q8DnlVya3Y1vpXiDgj4o-LZMkklJ2W40yT703xvxgkKZhzMcvnMY5qiaMcl5TTnnx3_20-ospS2lXAgqZtXrE0YfrDcwkMFnjJCniER7Pfiwwxy9ITDCsE8-XRMgBhKSlCe7J8ERF6ZI_FhiI2QfCke2xSqazqsTVwQvvnVevdzePK_u6_Xj3cNqua43nIpcG2BMoePaWtM4WHAmNGMWu9ZIqtpGWyeQSkmZammrVIfgFho6VFIbKUDMq8uv3rcY3idMuf-5oGetkk3X8NL5S21gwN6PLuQIZueT6ZcLKVknVfNJ1QeoDY7lLUMY0fli_-OvDvBlLO68ORD4AHkDezI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795686221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periodical literature bibliometric analysis: a case study of four international journals</title><source>Digital Commons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sethi, Bipin Bihari ; Maharana, Bulu ; Mohanty, Barada Kanta</creator><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Bipin Bihari ; Maharana, Bulu ; Mohanty, Barada Kanta</creatorcontrib><description>Bibliometrics is most popular among the scholars, researchers and academics in the faculty of Library and Information Science research. The current study is a bibliometrics analysis of four international journals such as: 1st "Language Sciences" (LS) and 2nd "Linguistics and Education" (L&amp;E), 3rd 'Political Geography' (PG), and 4th 'Religion' (Rgn). The present paper attempts to evaluate the publications indexed under the database of Science Direct Top 25 hottest Papers journal literature to understand the global approach of research output in four core journals. This is a comprehensive survey work rendering bibliographic records from Science Direct top 25 hottest papers database during 2005-2013, and this paper strenuously tries to give a complete sketch of the evaluation of research outputs. The key findings of the research divulge that, out of a total number of 3300 papers undertaken for the present research work, 900 were taken from 1st three journals and 60 0 shared by the 4 th journal "Religion". It is indicated from the study that top 15 authors of all four journals identically contributed 349 (38.77%), 281 (31.22%), 384 (42.66 %) and 239 (39.83 %) papers to their credit which counts more than one third of the whole contribution except 2nd journal. In all journals the greater number 79, 76, 72, and 85 percent papers were produced by single authors, while the collaborated papers were only 21, 24, 28, and 15 percent the study unmasks. Considering the authors' institutional affiliation it is ascertained that, the authors' contributed to the journals was affiliated to 153, 152, 169 and 80 unique institutions encompassing intercontinental regions, which again determines maximum number of institutional contributors are involved in 3rd journal, while minimum institutional contributors in 4th journal respectively. Besides, the geographical analysis indicates the involvement of cross national regions in the research practices is well found considerably benchmarking. Moreover, the study evidently shows that the overwhelming and most productive geographical region contributors' USA shared 208 (23.11%), 354 (39.33%) and 231 (38.5 %) papers in 1st, 2nd and 4th journal with posed 1st rank, while UK achieved 1st rank having contribution 396 (44%) to the 3rd journal respectively. Resultantly, it could be professed here that, the both regions (USA and UK) are considerably granted as leading productive nations and prolific in the realm of global research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-0222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-0222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln</publisher><subject>Author productivity ; Bibliometrics ; Case studies ; Library and information science ; Linguistics ; Periodicals ; Scholars ; Science</subject><ispartof>Library philosophy and practice, 2016-04, p.1</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 University of Nebraska-Lincoln</rights><rights>Copyright Library Philosophy and Practice 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Bipin Bihari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maharana, Bulu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Barada Kanta</creatorcontrib><title>Periodical literature bibliometric analysis: a case study of four international journals</title><title>Library philosophy and practice</title><description>Bibliometrics is most popular among the scholars, researchers and academics in the faculty of Library and Information Science research. The current study is a bibliometrics analysis of four international journals such as: 1st "Language Sciences" (LS) and 2nd "Linguistics and Education" (L&amp;E), 3rd 'Political Geography' (PG), and 4th 'Religion' (Rgn). The present paper attempts to evaluate the publications indexed under the database of Science Direct Top 25 hottest Papers journal literature to understand the global approach of research output in four core journals. This is a comprehensive survey work rendering bibliographic records from Science Direct top 25 hottest papers database during 2005-2013, and this paper strenuously tries to give a complete sketch of the evaluation of research outputs. The key findings of the research divulge that, out of a total number of 3300 papers undertaken for the present research work, 900 were taken from 1st three journals and 60 0 shared by the 4 th journal "Religion". It is indicated from the study that top 15 authors of all four journals identically contributed 349 (38.77%), 281 (31.22%), 384 (42.66 %) and 239 (39.83 %) papers to their credit which counts more than one third of the whole contribution except 2nd journal. In all journals the greater number 79, 76, 72, and 85 percent papers were produced by single authors, while the collaborated papers were only 21, 24, 28, and 15 percent the study unmasks. Considering the authors' institutional affiliation it is ascertained that, the authors' contributed to the journals was affiliated to 153, 152, 169 and 80 unique institutions encompassing intercontinental regions, which again determines maximum number of institutional contributors are involved in 3rd journal, while minimum institutional contributors in 4th journal respectively. Besides, the geographical analysis indicates the involvement of cross national regions in the research practices is well found considerably benchmarking. Moreover, the study evidently shows that the overwhelming and most productive geographical region contributors' USA shared 208 (23.11%), 354 (39.33%) and 231 (38.5 %) papers in 1st, 2nd and 4th journal with posed 1st rank, while UK achieved 1st rank having contribution 396 (44%) to the 3rd journal respectively. Resultantly, it could be professed here that, the both regions (USA and UK) are considerably granted as leading productive nations and prolific in the realm of global research.</description><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Library and information science</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Scholars</subject><subject>Science</subject><issn>1522-0222</issn><issn>1522-0222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkFtLAzEQhRdRsFb_Q8DnlVya3Y1vpXiDgj4o-LZMkklJ2W40yT703xvxgkKZhzMcvnMY5qiaMcl5TTnnx3_20-ospS2lXAgqZtXrE0YfrDcwkMFnjJCniER7Pfiwwxy9ITDCsE8-XRMgBhKSlCe7J8ERF6ZI_FhiI2QfCke2xSqazqsTVwQvvnVevdzePK_u6_Xj3cNqua43nIpcG2BMoePaWtM4WHAmNGMWu9ZIqtpGWyeQSkmZammrVIfgFho6VFIbKUDMq8uv3rcY3idMuf-5oGetkk3X8NL5S21gwN6PLuQIZueT6ZcLKVknVfNJ1QeoDY7lLUMY0fli_-OvDvBlLO68ORD4AHkDezI</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Sethi, Bipin Bihari</creator><creator>Maharana, Bulu</creator><creator>Mohanty, Barada Kanta</creator><general>University of Nebraska-Lincoln</general><general>Library Philosophy and Practice</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Periodical literature bibliometric analysis: a case study of four international journals</title><author>Sethi, Bipin Bihari ; Maharana, Bulu ; Mohanty, Barada Kanta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g203t-ca119ef2bddc6fa4213b11de87c50976bdf3e055019707998eaf4ba8e95bc53a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Library and information science</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Scholars</topic><topic>Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Bipin Bihari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maharana, Bulu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Barada Kanta</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Library philosophy and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sethi, Bipin Bihari</au><au>Maharana, Bulu</au><au>Mohanty, Barada Kanta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periodical literature bibliometric analysis: a case study of four international journals</atitle><jtitle>Library philosophy and practice</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1522-0222</issn><eissn>1522-0222</eissn><abstract>Bibliometrics is most popular among the scholars, researchers and academics in the faculty of Library and Information Science research. The current study is a bibliometrics analysis of four international journals such as: 1st "Language Sciences" (LS) and 2nd "Linguistics and Education" (L&amp;E), 3rd 'Political Geography' (PG), and 4th 'Religion' (Rgn). The present paper attempts to evaluate the publications indexed under the database of Science Direct Top 25 hottest Papers journal literature to understand the global approach of research output in four core journals. This is a comprehensive survey work rendering bibliographic records from Science Direct top 25 hottest papers database during 2005-2013, and this paper strenuously tries to give a complete sketch of the evaluation of research outputs. The key findings of the research divulge that, out of a total number of 3300 papers undertaken for the present research work, 900 were taken from 1st three journals and 60 0 shared by the 4 th journal "Religion". It is indicated from the study that top 15 authors of all four journals identically contributed 349 (38.77%), 281 (31.22%), 384 (42.66 %) and 239 (39.83 %) papers to their credit which counts more than one third of the whole contribution except 2nd journal. In all journals the greater number 79, 76, 72, and 85 percent papers were produced by single authors, while the collaborated papers were only 21, 24, 28, and 15 percent the study unmasks. Considering the authors' institutional affiliation it is ascertained that, the authors' contributed to the journals was affiliated to 153, 152, 169 and 80 unique institutions encompassing intercontinental regions, which again determines maximum number of institutional contributors are involved in 3rd journal, while minimum institutional contributors in 4th journal respectively. Besides, the geographical analysis indicates the involvement of cross national regions in the research practices is well found considerably benchmarking. Moreover, the study evidently shows that the overwhelming and most productive geographical region contributors' USA shared 208 (23.11%), 354 (39.33%) and 231 (38.5 %) papers in 1st, 2nd and 4th journal with posed 1st rank, while UK achieved 1st rank having contribution 396 (44%) to the 3rd journal respectively. Resultantly, it could be professed here that, the both regions (USA and UK) are considerably granted as leading productive nations and prolific in the realm of global research.</abstract><cop>Lincoln</cop><pub>University of Nebraska-Lincoln</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-0222
ispartof Library philosophy and practice, 2016-04, p.1
issn 1522-0222
1522-0222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1795686221
source Digital Commons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Author productivity
Bibliometrics
Case studies
Library and information science
Linguistics
Periodicals
Scholars
Science
title Periodical literature bibliometric analysis: a case study of four international journals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A57%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periodical%20literature%20bibliometric%20analysis:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20four%20international%20journals&rft.jtitle=Library%20philosophy%20and%20practice&rft.au=Sethi,%20Bipin%20Bihari&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1522-0222&rft.eissn=1522-0222&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA455185961%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795686221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A455185961&rfr_iscdi=true