Should I Stay or Should I Go? Reciprocity, Negotiation, and the Choice of Structurally Disadvantaged Actors to Remain in Networks

Drawing on existing theories of social exchange as well as self-categorization theory, we consider how two forms of direct exchange influence whether structurally disadvantaged actors choose to stay in the micro-structures that disadvantage them. We posit that (1) the exit opportunity is more likely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social psychology quarterly 2016-06, Vol.79 (2), p.115-135
Hauptverfasser: Savage, Scott V., Sommer, Zachary L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 115
container_title Social psychology quarterly
container_volume 79
creator Savage, Scott V.
Sommer, Zachary L.
description Drawing on existing theories of social exchange as well as self-categorization theory, we consider how two forms of direct exchange influence whether structurally disadvantaged actors choose to stay in the micro-structures that disadvantage them. We posit that (1) the exit opportunity is more likely to result in disadvantaged actors coming to view their network as a group if there has been a history of reciprocal, as opposed to negotiated, exchange and (2) this psychological group formation should account for disadvantaged actors disproportionately choosing to remain in reciprocal exchange networks. We also consider whether the information actors have about the alternative network affects this choice. Findings from two laboratory experiments generally support our argument that for disadvantaged actors, psychological group formation mediates the relationship between exchange form and staying in networks.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0190272516641392
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1794994063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44076843</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0190272516641392</sage_id><sourcerecordid>44076843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-119b55e76afb16905d7985fe065d348eb4f0552f5779d5830bac164c98d4cc133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3L0LAq6vJ5mtzklK1FkoFq-clzWbbre2mJlllj_5zU1aKCA4DAzPvPMO8AJxjdI2xEDcIS5SKlGHOKSYyPQA9LIlMMinlIejtxslufgxOvF-hGJTLHviaLW2zLuAYzoJqoXVw3xjZW_hsdLV1VlehvYJTs7ChUqGy9RVUdQHD0sDh0lbaQFtGgGt0aJxar1t4V3lVfKg6qIUp4EAH6zwMNgI3qqphzKkJn9a9-VNwVKq1N2c_tQ9eH-5fho_J5Gk0Hg4miSYEhwRjOWfMCK7KOeYSsULIjJUGcVYQmpk5LRFjacmEkAXLCJorjTnVMiuo1piQPrjsuPGf98b4kK9s4-p4MsdCUikp4jsV6lTaWe-dKfOtqzbKtTlG-c7o_K_RcSXpVnz89Rf0f_1Fp1_56MqeTykSPKOEfANL3oYm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1794994063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should I Stay or Should I Go? Reciprocity, Negotiation, and the Choice of Structurally Disadvantaged Actors to Remain in Networks</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Savage, Scott V. ; Sommer, Zachary L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Savage, Scott V. ; Sommer, Zachary L.</creatorcontrib><description>Drawing on existing theories of social exchange as well as self-categorization theory, we consider how two forms of direct exchange influence whether structurally disadvantaged actors choose to stay in the micro-structures that disadvantage them. We posit that (1) the exit opportunity is more likely to result in disadvantaged actors coming to view their network as a group if there has been a history of reciprocal, as opposed to negotiated, exchange and (2) this psychological group formation should account for disadvantaged actors disproportionately choosing to remain in reciprocal exchange networks. We also consider whether the information actors have about the alternative network affects this choice. Findings from two laboratory experiments generally support our argument that for disadvantaged actors, psychological group formation mediates the relationship between exchange form and staying in networks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-2725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0190272516641392</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPQUD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Actors ; Behavioral decision theory ; Cognitive psychology ; Disadvantaged ; Exchange networks ; Group dynamics ; Group formation ; Negotiation ; Reciprocity ; Social exchange theory ; Social networks ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Social psychology quarterly, 2016-06, Vol.79 (2), p.115-135</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>American Sociological Association 2016</rights><rights>Copyright American Sociological Association Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-119b55e76afb16905d7985fe065d348eb4f0552f5779d5830bac164c98d4cc133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-119b55e76afb16905d7985fe065d348eb4f0552f5779d5830bac164c98d4cc133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44076843$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44076843$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Savage, Scott V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Zachary L.</creatorcontrib><title>Should I Stay or Should I Go? Reciprocity, Negotiation, and the Choice of Structurally Disadvantaged Actors to Remain in Networks</title><title>Social psychology quarterly</title><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><description>Drawing on existing theories of social exchange as well as self-categorization theory, we consider how two forms of direct exchange influence whether structurally disadvantaged actors choose to stay in the micro-structures that disadvantage them. We posit that (1) the exit opportunity is more likely to result in disadvantaged actors coming to view their network as a group if there has been a history of reciprocal, as opposed to negotiated, exchange and (2) this psychological group formation should account for disadvantaged actors disproportionately choosing to remain in reciprocal exchange networks. We also consider whether the information actors have about the alternative network affects this choice. Findings from two laboratory experiments generally support our argument that for disadvantaged actors, psychological group formation mediates the relationship between exchange form and staying in networks.</description><subject>Actors</subject><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Exchange networks</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Group formation</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0190-2725</issn><issn>1939-8999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3L0LAq6vJ5mtzklK1FkoFq-clzWbbre2mJlllj_5zU1aKCA4DAzPvPMO8AJxjdI2xEDcIS5SKlGHOKSYyPQA9LIlMMinlIejtxslufgxOvF-hGJTLHviaLW2zLuAYzoJqoXVw3xjZW_hsdLV1VlehvYJTs7ChUqGy9RVUdQHD0sDh0lbaQFtGgGt0aJxar1t4V3lVfKg6qIUp4EAH6zwMNgI3qqphzKkJn9a9-VNwVKq1N2c_tQ9eH-5fho_J5Gk0Hg4miSYEhwRjOWfMCK7KOeYSsULIjJUGcVYQmpk5LRFjacmEkAXLCJorjTnVMiuo1piQPrjsuPGf98b4kK9s4-p4MsdCUikp4jsV6lTaWe-dKfOtqzbKtTlG-c7o_K_RcSXpVnz89Rf0f_1Fp1_56MqeTykSPKOEfANL3oYm</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Savage, Scott V.</creator><creator>Sommer, Zachary L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Should I Stay or Should I Go? Reciprocity, Negotiation, and the Choice of Structurally Disadvantaged Actors to Remain in Networks</title><author>Savage, Scott V. ; Sommer, Zachary L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-119b55e76afb16905d7985fe065d348eb4f0552f5779d5830bac164c98d4cc133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Actors</topic><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Exchange networks</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Group formation</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Savage, Scott V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Zachary L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Savage, Scott V.</au><au>Sommer, Zachary L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should I Stay or Should I Go? Reciprocity, Negotiation, and the Choice of Structurally Disadvantaged Actors to Remain in Networks</atitle><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>115-135</pages><issn>0190-2725</issn><eissn>1939-8999</eissn><coden>SPQUD6</coden><abstract>Drawing on existing theories of social exchange as well as self-categorization theory, we consider how two forms of direct exchange influence whether structurally disadvantaged actors choose to stay in the micro-structures that disadvantage them. We posit that (1) the exit opportunity is more likely to result in disadvantaged actors coming to view their network as a group if there has been a history of reciprocal, as opposed to negotiated, exchange and (2) this psychological group formation should account for disadvantaged actors disproportionately choosing to remain in reciprocal exchange networks. We also consider whether the information actors have about the alternative network affects this choice. Findings from two laboratory experiments generally support our argument that for disadvantaged actors, psychological group formation mediates the relationship between exchange form and staying in networks.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0190272516641392</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-2725
ispartof Social psychology quarterly, 2016-06, Vol.79 (2), p.115-135
issn 0190-2725
1939-8999
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1794994063
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Actors
Behavioral decision theory
Cognitive psychology
Disadvantaged
Exchange networks
Group dynamics
Group formation
Negotiation
Reciprocity
Social exchange theory
Social networks
Social psychology
title Should I Stay or Should I Go? Reciprocity, Negotiation, and the Choice of Structurally Disadvantaged Actors to Remain in Networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T17%3A22%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20I%20Stay%20or%20Should%20I%20Go?%20Reciprocity,%20Negotiation,%20and%20the%20Choice%20of%20Structurally%20Disadvantaged%20Actors%20to%20Remain%20in%20Networks&rft.jtitle=Social%20psychology%20quarterly&rft.au=Savage,%20Scott%20V.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=115-135&rft.issn=0190-2725&rft.eissn=1939-8999&rft.coden=SPQUD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0190272516641392&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44076843%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1794994063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44076843&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0190272516641392&rfr_iscdi=true