Interpreting vs. Explaining: A Rejoinder to Robert Segal

Robert Segal writes that the "religionist interpretation of religious experience is not separable from the religionist explanation of religious experience." He writes that naturalism "translates" the experience into a "reinterpretation". While it is perfectly appropriat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2014-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1152-1154
1. Verfasser:	Blum, Jason N.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Naturalism Phenomenology Religion Segal, Robert
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	1154
container_issue	4
container_start_page	1152
container_title	Journal of the American Academy of Religion
container_volume	82
creator	Blum, Jason N.
description	Robert Segal writes that the "religionist interpretation of religious experience is not separable from the religionist explanation of religious experience." He writes that naturalism "translates" the experience into a "reinterpretation". While it is perfectly appropriate for naturalism to provide an explanation of an experience, for it to "translate" a religious experience into a naturalistically "reinterpreted" form almost certainly results in a reinterpretation that radically changes the character of the experience as originally described by the religious subject.
doi_str_mv	10.1093/jaarel/lfu076
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1793626593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44945117</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44945117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-d24c57ed273f4a53e1367adcf7ec03e6c3209a8f601c260048ba2726380abeef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKeXXgoBr7vlq0nq3RjzAwbC1OuQpW9GS21qkon-eysVrw4HHs6BB6FrShaUVHzZWhuhW3b-SJQ8QTMqlCpEqctTNCOEsEJRXZ2ji5TasVKm-Azppz5DHCLkpj_gz7TAm6-hs00_1ju8wjtoQ9PXEHEOeBf2EDN-gYPtLtGZt12Cq7-co7f7zev6sdg-PzytV9vCMa1yUTPhSgX1eOaFLTlQLpWtnVfgCAfpOCOV1V4S6pgkROi9ZYpJrondA3g-R7fT7hDDxxFSNm04xn68NFRVXDJZVnykiolyMaQUwZshNu82fhtKzK8cM8kxk5yRv5n4NuUQ_2EhKlFSqvgPp7ViEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793626593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpreting vs. Explaining: A Rejoinder to Robert Segal</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Current</source><creator>Blum, Jason N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blum, Jason N.</creatorcontrib><description>Robert Segal writes that the "religionist interpretation of religious experience is not separable from the religionist explanation of religious experience." He writes that naturalism "translates" the experience into a "reinterpretation". While it is perfectly appropriate for naturalism to provide an explanation of an experience, for it to "translate" a religious experience into a naturalistically "reinterpreted" form almost certainly results in a reinterpretation that radically changes the character of the experience as originally described by the religious subject.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfu076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: American Academy of Religion, Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Naturalism ; Phenomenology ; Religion ; Segal, Robert</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 2014-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1152-1154</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Academy of Religion 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Dec 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-d24c57ed273f4a53e1367adcf7ec03e6c3209a8f601c260048ba2726380abeef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44945117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44945117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blum, Jason N.</creatorcontrib><title>Interpreting vs. Explaining: A Rejoinder to Robert Segal</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</title><description>Robert Segal writes that the "religionist interpretation of religious experience is not separable from the religionist explanation of religious experience." He writes that naturalism "translates" the experience into a "reinterpretation". While it is perfectly appropriate for naturalism to provide an explanation of an experience, for it to "translate" a religious experience into a naturalistically "reinterpreted" form almost certainly results in a reinterpretation that radically changes the character of the experience as originally described by the religious subject.</description><subject>Naturalism</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Segal, Robert</subject><issn>0002-7189</issn><issn>1477-4585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKeXXgoBr7vlq0nq3RjzAwbC1OuQpW9GS21qkon-eysVrw4HHs6BB6FrShaUVHzZWhuhW3b-SJQ8QTMqlCpEqctTNCOEsEJRXZ2ji5TasVKm-Azppz5DHCLkpj_gz7TAm6-hs00_1ju8wjtoQ9PXEHEOeBf2EDN-gYPtLtGZt12Cq7-co7f7zev6sdg-PzytV9vCMa1yUTPhSgX1eOaFLTlQLpWtnVfgCAfpOCOV1V4S6pgkROi9ZYpJrondA3g-R7fT7hDDxxFSNm04xn68NFRVXDJZVnykiolyMaQUwZshNu82fhtKzK8cM8kxk5yRv5n4NuUQ_2EhKlFSqvgPp7ViEg</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Blum, Jason N.</creator><general>American Academy of Religion, Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Interpreting vs. Explaining: A Rejoinder to Robert Segal</title><author>Blum, Jason N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-d24c57ed273f4a53e1367adcf7ec03e6c3209a8f601c260048ba2726380abeef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Naturalism</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Segal, Robert</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blum, Jason N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blum, Jason N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpreting vs. Explaining: A Rejoinder to Robert Segal</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1152</spage><epage>1154</epage><pages>1152-1154</pages><issn>0002-7189</issn><eissn>1477-4585</eissn><abstract>Robert Segal writes that the "religionist interpretation of religious experience is not separable from the religionist explanation of religious experience." He writes that naturalism "translates" the experience into a "reinterpretation". While it is perfectly appropriate for naturalism to provide an explanation of an experience, for it to "translate" a religious experience into a naturalistically "reinterpreted" form almost certainly results in a reinterpretation that radically changes the character of the experience as originally described by the religious subject.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>American Academy of Religion, Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jaarel/lfu076</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0002-7189
ispartof	Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 2014-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1152-1154
issn	0002-7189 1477-4585
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_1793626593
source	Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals Current
subjects	Naturalism Phenomenology Religion Segal, Robert
title	Interpreting vs. Explaining: A Rejoinder to Robert Segal
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A20%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpreting%20vs.%20Explaining:%20A%20Rejoinder%20to%20Robert%20Segal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Religion&rft.au=Blum,%20Jason%20N.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1152&rft.epage=1154&rft.pages=1152-1154&rft.issn=0002-7189&rft.eissn=1477-4585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jaarel/lfu076&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44945117%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793626593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44945117&rfr_iscdi=true