Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic

A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine biology 2016-06, Vol.163 (6), p.1, Article 143
Hauptverfasser: McIntyre, F. D., Drewery, J., Eerkes-Medrano, D., Neat, F. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1
container_title Marine biology
container_volume 163
creator McIntyre, F. D.
Drewery, J.
Eerkes-Medrano, D.
Neat, F. C.
description A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera: Geodia , Thenea , Pheronema , Aphrocallistes and Craniella . In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of Craniella , one of Hexadella and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage. Craniella longipilis was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths Pheronema carpenteri was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species Hexadella sp. increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1793530672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4076401781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewsscXgR5zHspQWkCqQeKyN60xKShsH20Fqvx5HYcGG1Wg0996ZOQidM3rFKM2uPaWcZ4SylPCCCbI_QCOWCE5YVohDNIpjSQRL-TE68X5NY59xMULvt7UPrl52obYN1k2Jy_obnK_DDtsKlwAt8aCxb22zArxytmtKj6M2fAB-th622u3wjW4-8QvobRyHS_w4w5Ow0U2ozSk6qvTGw9lvHaO3-ex1ek8WT3cP08mCmHhVIFqWotJZbkyRS55Dmgghc6CggfNlmkgpjJBAaW64zism9FKbrChTCaKoEi7G6GLIbZ396sAHtbada-JK1SOQgqZZr2KDyjjrvYNKta7uP1CMqh6kGkCqCFL1INU-evjg8VEbIbg_yf-afgA9G3Zb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793530672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McIntyre, F. D. ; Drewery, J. ; Eerkes-Medrano, D. ; Neat, F. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, F. D. ; Drewery, J. ; Eerkes-Medrano, D. ; Neat, F. C.</creatorcontrib><description>A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera: Geodia , Thenea , Pheronema , Aphrocallistes and Craniella . In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of Craniella , one of Hexadella and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage. Craniella longipilis was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths Pheronema carpenteri was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species Hexadella sp. increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic life ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Community composition ; Deep sea ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Microbiology ; Nature conservation ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Seamounts ; Taxonomy ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2016-06, Vol.163 (6), p.1, Article 143</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewery, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neat, F. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera: Geodia , Thenea , Pheronema , Aphrocallistes and Craniella . In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of Craniella , one of Hexadella and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage. Craniella longipilis was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths Pheronema carpenteri was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species Hexadella sp. increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so.</description><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Deep sea</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Seamounts</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewsscXgR5zHspQWkCqQeKyN60xKShsH20Fqvx5HYcGG1Wg0996ZOQidM3rFKM2uPaWcZ4SylPCCCbI_QCOWCE5YVohDNIpjSQRL-TE68X5NY59xMULvt7UPrl52obYN1k2Jy_obnK_DDtsKlwAt8aCxb22zArxytmtKj6M2fAB-th622u3wjW4-8QvobRyHS_w4w5Ow0U2ozSk6qvTGw9lvHaO3-ex1ek8WT3cP08mCmHhVIFqWotJZbkyRS55Dmgghc6CggfNlmkgpjJBAaW64zism9FKbrChTCaKoEi7G6GLIbZ396sAHtbada-JK1SOQgqZZr2KDyjjrvYNKta7uP1CMqh6kGkCqCFL1INU-evjg8VEbIbg_yf-afgA9G3Zb</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>McIntyre, F. D.</creator><creator>Drewery, J.</creator><creator>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</creator><creator>Neat, F. C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</title><author>McIntyre, F. D. ; Drewery, J. ; Eerkes-Medrano, D. ; Neat, F. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Deep sea</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Seamounts</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewery, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neat, F. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McIntyre, F. D.</au><au>Drewery, J.</au><au>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</au><au>Neat, F. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>143</artnum><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera: Geodia , Thenea , Pheronema , Aphrocallistes and Craniella . In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of Craniella , one of Hexadella and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage. Craniella longipilis was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths Pheronema carpenteri was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species Hexadella sp. increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3162
ispartof Marine biology, 2016-06, Vol.163 (6), p.1, Article 143
issn 0025-3162
1432-1793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1793530672
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aquatic life
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Community composition
Deep sea
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Life Sciences
Marine & Freshwater Sciences
Marine biology
Microbiology
Nature conservation
Oceanography
Original Paper
Seamounts
Taxonomy
Zoology
title Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20and%20diversity%20of%20deep-sea%20sponge%20grounds%20on%20the%20Rosemary%20Bank%20Seamount,%20NE%20Atlantic&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=McIntyre,%20F.%20D.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=143&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4076401781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793530672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true