Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic
A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine biology 2016-06, Vol.163 (6), p.1, Article 143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Marine biology |
container_volume | 163 |
creator | McIntyre, F. D. Drewery, J. Eerkes-Medrano, D. Neat, F. C. |
description | A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera:
Geodia
,
Thenea
,
Pheronema
,
Aphrocallistes
and
Craniella
. In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of
Craniella
, one of
Hexadella
and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage.
Craniella longipilis
was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths
Pheronema carpenteri
was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species
Hexadella sp.
increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1793530672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4076401781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewsscXgR5zHspQWkCqQeKyN60xKShsH20Fqvx5HYcGG1Wg0996ZOQidM3rFKM2uPaWcZ4SylPCCCbI_QCOWCE5YVohDNIpjSQRL-TE68X5NY59xMULvt7UPrl52obYN1k2Jy_obnK_DDtsKlwAt8aCxb22zArxytmtKj6M2fAB-th622u3wjW4-8QvobRyHS_w4w5Ow0U2ozSk6qvTGw9lvHaO3-ex1ek8WT3cP08mCmHhVIFqWotJZbkyRS55Dmgghc6CggfNlmkgpjJBAaW64zism9FKbrChTCaKoEi7G6GLIbZ396sAHtbada-JK1SOQgqZZr2KDyjjrvYNKta7uP1CMqh6kGkCqCFL1INU-evjg8VEbIbg_yf-afgA9G3Zb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793530672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McIntyre, F. D. ; Drewery, J. ; Eerkes-Medrano, D. ; Neat, F. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, F. D. ; Drewery, J. ; Eerkes-Medrano, D. ; Neat, F. C.</creatorcontrib><description>A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera:
Geodia
,
Thenea
,
Pheronema
,
Aphrocallistes
and
Craniella
. In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of
Craniella
, one of
Hexadella
and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage.
Craniella longipilis
was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths
Pheronema carpenteri
was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species
Hexadella sp.
increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic life ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Community composition ; Deep sea ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Microbiology ; Nature conservation ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Seamounts ; Taxonomy ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2016-06, Vol.163 (6), p.1, Article 143</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewery, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neat, F. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera:
Geodia
,
Thenea
,
Pheronema
,
Aphrocallistes
and
Craniella
. In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of
Craniella
, one of
Hexadella
and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage.
Craniella longipilis
was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths
Pheronema carpenteri
was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species
Hexadella sp.
increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so.</description><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Deep sea</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Seamounts</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewsscXgR5zHspQWkCqQeKyN60xKShsH20Fqvx5HYcGG1Wg0996ZOQidM3rFKM2uPaWcZ4SylPCCCbI_QCOWCE5YVohDNIpjSQRL-TE68X5NY59xMULvt7UPrl52obYN1k2Jy_obnK_DDtsKlwAt8aCxb22zArxytmtKj6M2fAB-th622u3wjW4-8QvobRyHS_w4w5Ow0U2ozSk6qvTGw9lvHaO3-ex1ek8WT3cP08mCmHhVIFqWotJZbkyRS55Dmgghc6CggfNlmkgpjJBAaW64zism9FKbrChTCaKoEi7G6GLIbZ396sAHtbada-JK1SOQgqZZr2KDyjjrvYNKta7uP1CMqh6kGkCqCFL1INU-evjg8VEbIbg_yf-afgA9G3Zb</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>McIntyre, F. D.</creator><creator>Drewery, J.</creator><creator>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</creator><creator>Neat, F. C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</title><author>McIntyre, F. D. ; Drewery, J. ; Eerkes-Medrano, D. ; Neat, F. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5d3fa78cc98528e643358e0eae22b64553c35e008c2a8f13abac79d65e39f423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Deep sea</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Seamounts</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewery, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neat, F. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McIntyre, F. D.</au><au>Drewery, J.</au><au>Eerkes-Medrano, D.</au><au>Neat, F. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>143</artnum><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>A towed camera survey revealed extensive sponge grounds on the deep slopes of the Rosemary Bank Seamount in the NE Atlantic. An Agassiz trawl deployed in the same area yielded samples for taxonomic validation and comparison to the visual survey. The sponge grounds were observed between 1200 and 1440 m depth. Eight species were identified in the trawl samples from five genera:
Geodia
,
Thenea
,
Pheronema
,
Aphrocallistes
and
Craniella
. In addition, there were 2 unresolved species of
Craniella
, one of
Hexadella
and 2 other unidentifiable Porifera species. Seven taxa were consistently identified from the video footage.
Craniella longipilis
was numerically dominant across all depths, but other species showed significant change in abundance with depth. At shallower depths
Pheronema carpenteri
was more prevalent, whereas the encrusting species
Hexadella sp.
increased in frequency with depth. Although all species have been previously reported from the North Atlantic, community composition at Rosemary Bank appears to be more diverse than other regions. Estimates of the number of sponges within the surveyed area suggest around 88 million sponges may be present. The community appears to be largely in pristine condition and the recent designation of Rosemary Bank as a nature conservation MPA should help ensure it remains so.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-3162 |
ispartof | Marine biology, 2016-06, Vol.163 (6), p.1, Article 143 |
issn | 0025-3162 1432-1793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1793530672 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Aquatic life Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Community composition Deep sea Freshwater & Marine Ecology Life Sciences Marine & Freshwater Sciences Marine biology Microbiology Nature conservation Oceanography Original Paper Seamounts Taxonomy Zoology |
title | Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary Bank Seamount, NE Atlantic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20and%20diversity%20of%20deep-sea%20sponge%20grounds%20on%20the%20Rosemary%20Bank%20Seamount,%20NE%20Atlantic&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=McIntyre,%20F.%20D.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=143&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-016-2913-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4076401781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793530672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |