Impact of E1a Modifications on Tumor-Selective Adenoviral Replication and Toxicity
Replicating adenoviral vectors are capable of multiplying up to a thousandfold in the target cell, a property that might prove to be of tremendous potential for cancer therapy. However, restricting viral replication and toxicity to cancer cells is essential to optimize safety. It has been proposed t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular therapy 2004-10, Vol.10 (4), p.749-757 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 757 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 749 |
container_title | Molecular therapy |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Sauthoff, Harald Pipiya, Teona Heitner, Sheila Chen, Shu Bleck, Bertram Reibman, Joan Chang, William Norman, Robert G Rom, William N Hay, John G |
description | Replicating adenoviral vectors are capable of multiplying up to a thousandfold in the target cell, a property that might prove to be of tremendous potential for cancer therapy. However, restricting viral replication and toxicity to cancer cells is essential to optimize safety. It has been proposed that modifications of the E1a protein that impair binding to Rb or p300 will prevent S-phase induction in normal cells, resulting in selective viral replication in tumor cells. However, it remains uncertain which of the several possible E1a modifications would be most effective at protecting normal cells without compromising the oncolytic effect of the vector. In this study, we have expressed several E1a-deletion mutants at high levels using the CMV promoter and tested them for their ability to facilitate S-phase induction, viral replication, and cytotoxicity in both normal and cancer cells. Deletion of the Rb-binding domain within E1a only slightly decreased the ability of the virus to induce S phase in growth-arrested cells. The effect of this deletion on viral replication and cytotoxicity was variable. There was reduced cytotoxicity in normal bronchial epithelial cells; however, in some normal cell types there was equal viral replication and cytotoxicity compared with wild type. Deletions in both the N-terminus and the Rb-binding domain were required to block S-phase induction effectively in growth-arrested normal cells; in addition, this virus demonstrated reduced viral replication and cytotoxicity in normal cells. An equally favorable replication and cytotoxicity profile was induced by a virus expressing E1a that is incapable of binding to the transcriptional adapter motif (TRAM) of p300. All viruses were equally cytotoxic to cancer cells compared with wild-type virus. In conclusion, deletion of the Rb-binding site alone within E1a may not be the most efficacious means of targeting viral replication and toxicity. However, deletion within the N-terminus in conjunction with a deletion within the Rb-binding domain, or deletion of the p300-TRAM binding domain, induces a more favorable cytotoxicity profile. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.07.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1792810643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4074035421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-b597d601874928d00cda1106cf9a34343c80f49ce6bae6203825007717d4afc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUQIMobk5_gSABn1vvbZN-PI4xdTAR5nwOWZpiS9vUtB3u35u5MsnDvQ_nnsAh5B7BR8DoqfQPdf-l_QCA-RD7gOyCTJEH3AMI2OV5x2hCbrqudBvyNLomE-SMI-PplGxWdStVT01Olyjpm8mKvFCyL0zTUdPQ7VAb633oSqu-2Gs6z3Rj9oWVFd3othpRKpuMbs1PoYr-cEuucll1-m6cM_L5vNwuXr31-8tqMV97KkTGvB1P4ywCTGKWBkkGoDKJCJHKUxky91QCOUuVjnZSRwGEScAB4hjjjMlcsXBGHk_e1prvQXe9KM1gG_elwNgpnYuFjgpPlLKm66zORWuLWtqDQBDHjqIUfx3FsaOAWLiO7uphdA-7Wmf_N2M4B9AT0Mh-sPoM1P1Rg0EC4S-Hh3kl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792810643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of E1a Modifications on Tumor-Selective Adenoviral Replication and Toxicity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Sauthoff, Harald ; Pipiya, Teona ; Heitner, Sheila ; Chen, Shu ; Bleck, Bertram ; Reibman, Joan ; Chang, William ; Norman, Robert G ; Rom, William N ; Hay, John G</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauthoff, Harald ; Pipiya, Teona ; Heitner, Sheila ; Chen, Shu ; Bleck, Bertram ; Reibman, Joan ; Chang, William ; Norman, Robert G ; Rom, William N ; Hay, John G</creatorcontrib><description>Replicating adenoviral vectors are capable of multiplying up to a thousandfold in the target cell, a property that might prove to be of tremendous potential for cancer therapy. However, restricting viral replication and toxicity to cancer cells is essential to optimize safety. It has been proposed that modifications of the E1a protein that impair binding to Rb or p300 will prevent S-phase induction in normal cells, resulting in selective viral replication in tumor cells. However, it remains uncertain which of the several possible E1a modifications would be most effective at protecting normal cells without compromising the oncolytic effect of the vector. In this study, we have expressed several E1a-deletion mutants at high levels using the CMV promoter and tested them for their ability to facilitate S-phase induction, viral replication, and cytotoxicity in both normal and cancer cells. Deletion of the Rb-binding domain within E1a only slightly decreased the ability of the virus to induce S phase in growth-arrested cells. The effect of this deletion on viral replication and cytotoxicity was variable. There was reduced cytotoxicity in normal bronchial epithelial cells; however, in some normal cell types there was equal viral replication and cytotoxicity compared with wild type. Deletions in both the N-terminus and the Rb-binding domain were required to block S-phase induction effectively in growth-arrested normal cells; in addition, this virus demonstrated reduced viral replication and cytotoxicity in normal cells. An equally favorable replication and cytotoxicity profile was induced by a virus expressing E1a that is incapable of binding to the transcriptional adapter motif (TRAM) of p300. All viruses were equally cytotoxic to cancer cells compared with wild-type virus. In conclusion, deletion of the Rb-binding site alone within E1a may not be the most efficacious means of targeting viral replication and toxicity. However, deletion within the N-terminus in conjunction with a deletion within the Rb-binding domain, or deletion of the p300-TRAM binding domain, induces a more favorable cytotoxicity profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-0016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-0024</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.07.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15451459</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Adenoviridae - genetics ; Adenovirus E1A Proteins - genetics ; Adenovirus E1A Proteins - metabolism ; Adenoviruses ; Amino Acid Motifs - genetics ; Amino acids ; Binding sites ; Binding Sites - genetics ; Cancer therapies ; Cell cycle ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cytotoxicity ; Gene therapy ; Genetic Therapy - methods ; Genetic Vectors - toxicity ; Humans ; Immunoprecipitation ; Medicine ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nuclear Proteins - metabolism ; Protein Structure, Tertiary - genetics ; Proteins ; Retinoblastoma ; Retinoblastoma Protein - genetics ; Retinoblastoma Protein - metabolism ; S Phase ; Sequence Deletion ; Toxicity ; Trans-Activators - metabolism ; Transcription factors ; Virus Replication - genetics ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Molecular therapy, 2004-10, Vol.10 (4), p.749-757</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-b597d601874928d00cda1106cf9a34343c80f49ce6bae6203825007717d4afc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-b597d601874928d00cda1106cf9a34343c80f49ce6bae6203825007717d4afc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1792810643?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,64383,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15451459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauthoff, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipiya, Teona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitner, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleck, Bertram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reibman, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rom, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, John G</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of E1a Modifications on Tumor-Selective Adenoviral Replication and Toxicity</title><title>Molecular therapy</title><addtitle>Mol Ther</addtitle><description>Replicating adenoviral vectors are capable of multiplying up to a thousandfold in the target cell, a property that might prove to be of tremendous potential for cancer therapy. However, restricting viral replication and toxicity to cancer cells is essential to optimize safety. It has been proposed that modifications of the E1a protein that impair binding to Rb or p300 will prevent S-phase induction in normal cells, resulting in selective viral replication in tumor cells. However, it remains uncertain which of the several possible E1a modifications would be most effective at protecting normal cells without compromising the oncolytic effect of the vector. In this study, we have expressed several E1a-deletion mutants at high levels using the CMV promoter and tested them for their ability to facilitate S-phase induction, viral replication, and cytotoxicity in both normal and cancer cells. Deletion of the Rb-binding domain within E1a only slightly decreased the ability of the virus to induce S phase in growth-arrested cells. The effect of this deletion on viral replication and cytotoxicity was variable. There was reduced cytotoxicity in normal bronchial epithelial cells; however, in some normal cell types there was equal viral replication and cytotoxicity compared with wild type. Deletions in both the N-terminus and the Rb-binding domain were required to block S-phase induction effectively in growth-arrested normal cells; in addition, this virus demonstrated reduced viral replication and cytotoxicity in normal cells. An equally favorable replication and cytotoxicity profile was induced by a virus expressing E1a that is incapable of binding to the transcriptional adapter motif (TRAM) of p300. All viruses were equally cytotoxic to cancer cells compared with wild-type virus. In conclusion, deletion of the Rb-binding site alone within E1a may not be the most efficacious means of targeting viral replication and toxicity. However, deletion within the N-terminus in conjunction with a deletion within the Rb-binding domain, or deletion of the p300-TRAM binding domain, induces a more favorable cytotoxicity profile.</description><subject>Adenoviridae - genetics</subject><subject>Adenovirus E1A Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Adenovirus E1A Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Adenoviruses</subject><subject>Amino Acid Motifs - genetics</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Binding Sites - genetics</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cell cycle</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Gene therapy</subject><subject>Genetic Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Genetic Vectors - toxicity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoprecipitation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nuclear Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Tertiary - genetics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Retinoblastoma</subject><subject>Retinoblastoma Protein - genetics</subject><subject>Retinoblastoma Protein - metabolism</subject><subject>S Phase</subject><subject>Sequence Deletion</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Trans-Activators - metabolism</subject><subject>Transcription factors</subject><subject>Virus Replication - genetics</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1525-0016</issn><issn>1525-0024</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUQIMobk5_gSABn1vvbZN-PI4xdTAR5nwOWZpiS9vUtB3u35u5MsnDvQ_nnsAh5B7BR8DoqfQPdf-l_QCA-RD7gOyCTJEH3AMI2OV5x2hCbrqudBvyNLomE-SMI-PplGxWdStVT01Olyjpm8mKvFCyL0zTUdPQ7VAb633oSqu-2Gs6z3Rj9oWVFd3othpRKpuMbs1PoYr-cEuucll1-m6cM_L5vNwuXr31-8tqMV97KkTGvB1P4ywCTGKWBkkGoDKJCJHKUxky91QCOUuVjnZSRwGEScAB4hjjjMlcsXBGHk_e1prvQXe9KM1gG_elwNgpnYuFjgpPlLKm66zORWuLWtqDQBDHjqIUfx3FsaOAWLiO7uphdA-7Wmf_N2M4B9AT0Mh-sPoM1P1Rg0EC4S-Hh3kl</recordid><startdate>200410</startdate><enddate>200410</enddate><creator>Sauthoff, Harald</creator><creator>Pipiya, Teona</creator><creator>Heitner, Sheila</creator><creator>Chen, Shu</creator><creator>Bleck, Bertram</creator><creator>Reibman, Joan</creator><creator>Chang, William</creator><creator>Norman, Robert G</creator><creator>Rom, William N</creator><creator>Hay, John G</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200410</creationdate><title>Impact of E1a Modifications on Tumor-Selective Adenoviral Replication and Toxicity</title><author>Sauthoff, Harald ; Pipiya, Teona ; Heitner, Sheila ; Chen, Shu ; Bleck, Bertram ; Reibman, Joan ; Chang, William ; Norman, Robert G ; Rom, William N ; Hay, John G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-b597d601874928d00cda1106cf9a34343c80f49ce6bae6203825007717d4afc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adenoviridae - genetics</topic><topic>Adenovirus E1A Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Adenovirus E1A Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Adenoviruses</topic><topic>Amino Acid Motifs - genetics</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Binding Sites - genetics</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cell cycle</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Gene therapy</topic><topic>Genetic Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Genetic Vectors - toxicity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoprecipitation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nuclear Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Tertiary - genetics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Retinoblastoma</topic><topic>Retinoblastoma Protein - genetics</topic><topic>Retinoblastoma Protein - metabolism</topic><topic>S Phase</topic><topic>Sequence Deletion</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Trans-Activators - metabolism</topic><topic>Transcription factors</topic><topic>Virus Replication - genetics</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauthoff, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipiya, Teona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitner, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleck, Bertram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reibman, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rom, William N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, John G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Molecular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauthoff, Harald</au><au>Pipiya, Teona</au><au>Heitner, Sheila</au><au>Chen, Shu</au><au>Bleck, Bertram</au><au>Reibman, Joan</au><au>Chang, William</au><au>Norman, Robert G</au><au>Rom, William N</au><au>Hay, John G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of E1a Modifications on Tumor-Selective Adenoviral Replication and Toxicity</atitle><jtitle>Molecular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Ther</addtitle><date>2004-10</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>749</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>749-757</pages><issn>1525-0016</issn><eissn>1525-0024</eissn><abstract>Replicating adenoviral vectors are capable of multiplying up to a thousandfold in the target cell, a property that might prove to be of tremendous potential for cancer therapy. However, restricting viral replication and toxicity to cancer cells is essential to optimize safety. It has been proposed that modifications of the E1a protein that impair binding to Rb or p300 will prevent S-phase induction in normal cells, resulting in selective viral replication in tumor cells. However, it remains uncertain which of the several possible E1a modifications would be most effective at protecting normal cells without compromising the oncolytic effect of the vector. In this study, we have expressed several E1a-deletion mutants at high levels using the CMV promoter and tested them for their ability to facilitate S-phase induction, viral replication, and cytotoxicity in both normal and cancer cells. Deletion of the Rb-binding domain within E1a only slightly decreased the ability of the virus to induce S phase in growth-arrested cells. The effect of this deletion on viral replication and cytotoxicity was variable. There was reduced cytotoxicity in normal bronchial epithelial cells; however, in some normal cell types there was equal viral replication and cytotoxicity compared with wild type. Deletions in both the N-terminus and the Rb-binding domain were required to block S-phase induction effectively in growth-arrested normal cells; in addition, this virus demonstrated reduced viral replication and cytotoxicity in normal cells. An equally favorable replication and cytotoxicity profile was induced by a virus expressing E1a that is incapable of binding to the transcriptional adapter motif (TRAM) of p300. All viruses were equally cytotoxic to cancer cells compared with wild-type virus. In conclusion, deletion of the Rb-binding site alone within E1a may not be the most efficacious means of targeting viral replication and toxicity. However, deletion within the N-terminus in conjunction with a deletion within the Rb-binding domain, or deletion of the p300-TRAM binding domain, induces a more favorable cytotoxicity profile.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>15451459</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.07.014</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-0016 |
ispartof | Molecular therapy, 2004-10, Vol.10 (4), p.749-757 |
issn | 1525-0016 1525-0024 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1792810643 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Adenoviridae - genetics Adenovirus E1A Proteins - genetics Adenovirus E1A Proteins - metabolism Adenoviruses Amino Acid Motifs - genetics Amino acids Binding sites Binding Sites - genetics Cancer therapies Cell cycle Cell Line, Tumor Cytotoxicity Gene therapy Genetic Therapy - methods Genetic Vectors - toxicity Humans Immunoprecipitation Medicine Neoplasms - therapy Nuclear Proteins - metabolism Protein Structure, Tertiary - genetics Proteins Retinoblastoma Retinoblastoma Protein - genetics Retinoblastoma Protein - metabolism S Phase Sequence Deletion Toxicity Trans-Activators - metabolism Transcription factors Virus Replication - genetics Viruses |
title | Impact of E1a Modifications on Tumor-Selective Adenoviral Replication and Toxicity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A39%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20E1a%20Modifications%20on%20Tumor-Selective%20Adenoviral%20Replication%20and%20Toxicity&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20therapy&rft.au=Sauthoff,%20Harald&rft.date=2004-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=749&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=749-757&rft.issn=1525-0016&rft.eissn=1525-0024&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.07.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4074035421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792810643&rft_id=info:pmid/15451459&rfr_iscdi=true |