Comparison of Agar Media for Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces
The isolation and quantification of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from cattle feces are challenging. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of selected agar media in an attempt to identify an optimal medium for the detection and quantification of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food protection 2016-06, Vol.79 (6), p.939-949 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 949 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 939 |
container_title | Journal of food protection |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Stromberg, Zachary R Lewis, Gentry L Moxley, Rodney A |
description | The isolation and quantification of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from cattle feces are challenging. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of selected agar media in an attempt to identify an optimal medium for the detection and quantification of non-O157 STEC in cattle feces. Comparison studies were performed using CHROMagar STEC, Possé differential agar (Possé), Possé modified by the reduction or addition of antimicrobials, STEC heart infusion washed blood agar with mitomycin C (SHIBAM), and SHIBAM modified by the addition of antimicrobials. Fourteen STEC strains, two each belonging to serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157, were used to test detection in inoculated fecal suspensions at concentrations of 10(2) or 10(3) CFU/g. One STEC strain from each of these seven serogroups was used to estimate the concentration of recovered STEC in feces inoculated at 10(3), 10(4), or 10(5) CFU/g. Significantly more suspensions (P < 0.05) were positive for STEC when plated on Possé containing reduced concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite compared with SHIBAM, but not SHIBAM modified by containing these same antimicrobials at the same concentrations. Numerically, more suspensions were positive for STEC by using this same form of modified Possé compared with Possé, but this difference was not statistically significant. More suspensions were positive for STEC cultured on CHROMagar STEC compared with those on Possé (P < 0.05) and on modified Possé (P = 0.05). Most inoculated fecal suspensions below 10(4) CFU/g of feces were underestimated or not quantifiable for the concentration of STEC by using CHROMagar STEC or modified Possé. These results suggest that CHROMagar STEC performs better than Possé or SHIBAM for detection of STEC in bovine feces, but adjustments in the concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite in the latter two media result in significant improvements in their performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-552 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1792476736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4072477001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-46233f0d933553e3324655e7c85e317d8a053cb6bdffc5d3763d2b23359f78f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNtKAzEQhoMoWg9vIBLwejWb2SSbS6nWA4qKCt6FNIc20m5qsgv69qaergZmvv8f-BA6rMlJAzU7JcBpRWj7enIzeahqVjFGN9Colk1TSSLFJhr9IztoN-c3QgiVlG-jHSqo5EyKEcrjuFzpFHLscPT4bKYTvnM2aOxjwueud6YP5aY7ix8H3fXBB6O_VwV_moeZxs_xI3TVQ4p2MKGb4Yts5i4FMy8tJi4CDh0e675fODxxxuV9tOX1IruD37mHXiYXz-Or6vb-8np8dlsZaOu-ajgF8MRKAMbAAdCGM-aEaZmDWthWEwZmyqfWe8MsCA6WTkuGSS9a38AeOv7pXaX4Prjcq7c4pK68VLWQtBFcAC9U80OZFHNOzqtVCkudPlVN1Nq0WmtUa42qmFZlUUyX2NFv-TBdOvsf-lMLX5efeW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792476736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Agar Media for Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Stromberg, Zachary R ; Lewis, Gentry L ; Moxley, Rodney A</creator><creatorcontrib>Stromberg, Zachary R ; Lewis, Gentry L ; Moxley, Rodney A</creatorcontrib><description>The isolation and quantification of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from cattle feces are challenging. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of selected agar media in an attempt to identify an optimal medium for the detection and quantification of non-O157 STEC in cattle feces. Comparison studies were performed using CHROMagar STEC, Possé differential agar (Possé), Possé modified by the reduction or addition of antimicrobials, STEC heart infusion washed blood agar with mitomycin C (SHIBAM), and SHIBAM modified by the addition of antimicrobials. Fourteen STEC strains, two each belonging to serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157, were used to test detection in inoculated fecal suspensions at concentrations of 10(2) or 10(3) CFU/g. One STEC strain from each of these seven serogroups was used to estimate the concentration of recovered STEC in feces inoculated at 10(3), 10(4), or 10(5) CFU/g. Significantly more suspensions (P < 0.05) were positive for STEC when plated on Possé containing reduced concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite compared with SHIBAM, but not SHIBAM modified by containing these same antimicrobials at the same concentrations. Numerically, more suspensions were positive for STEC by using this same form of modified Possé compared with Possé, but this difference was not statistically significant. More suspensions were positive for STEC cultured on CHROMagar STEC compared with those on Possé (P < 0.05) and on modified Possé (P = 0.05). Most inoculated fecal suspensions below 10(4) CFU/g of feces were underestimated or not quantifiable for the concentration of STEC by using CHROMagar STEC or modified Possé. These results suggest that CHROMagar STEC performs better than Possé or SHIBAM for detection of STEC in bovine feces, but adjustments in the concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite in the latter two media result in significant improvements in their performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-552</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27296597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Agar ; Agriculture ; Animals ; Antimicrobial agents ; Beef ; Cattle ; Culture Media ; E coli ; Feces ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food safety ; Genes ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Organisms ; Performance evaluation ; Potassium ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; Studies ; Toxins</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2016-06, Vol.79 (6), p.939-949</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-46233f0d933553e3324655e7c85e317d8a053cb6bdffc5d3763d2b23359f78f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-46233f0d933553e3324655e7c85e317d8a053cb6bdffc5d3763d2b23359f78f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1792476736?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,64384,64388,72240</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stromberg, Zachary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gentry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moxley, Rodney A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Agar Media for Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>The isolation and quantification of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from cattle feces are challenging. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of selected agar media in an attempt to identify an optimal medium for the detection and quantification of non-O157 STEC in cattle feces. Comparison studies were performed using CHROMagar STEC, Possé differential agar (Possé), Possé modified by the reduction or addition of antimicrobials, STEC heart infusion washed blood agar with mitomycin C (SHIBAM), and SHIBAM modified by the addition of antimicrobials. Fourteen STEC strains, two each belonging to serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157, were used to test detection in inoculated fecal suspensions at concentrations of 10(2) or 10(3) CFU/g. One STEC strain from each of these seven serogroups was used to estimate the concentration of recovered STEC in feces inoculated at 10(3), 10(4), or 10(5) CFU/g. Significantly more suspensions (P < 0.05) were positive for STEC when plated on Possé containing reduced concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite compared with SHIBAM, but not SHIBAM modified by containing these same antimicrobials at the same concentrations. Numerically, more suspensions were positive for STEC by using this same form of modified Possé compared with Possé, but this difference was not statistically significant. More suspensions were positive for STEC cultured on CHROMagar STEC compared with those on Possé (P < 0.05) and on modified Possé (P = 0.05). Most inoculated fecal suspensions below 10(4) CFU/g of feces were underestimated or not quantifiable for the concentration of STEC by using CHROMagar STEC or modified Possé. These results suggest that CHROMagar STEC performs better than Possé or SHIBAM for detection of STEC in bovine feces, but adjustments in the concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite in the latter two media result in significant improvements in their performance.</description><subject>Agar</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kNtKAzEQhoMoWg9vIBLwejWb2SSbS6nWA4qKCt6FNIc20m5qsgv69qaergZmvv8f-BA6rMlJAzU7JcBpRWj7enIzeahqVjFGN9Colk1TSSLFJhr9IztoN-c3QgiVlG-jHSqo5EyKEcrjuFzpFHLscPT4bKYTvnM2aOxjwueud6YP5aY7ix8H3fXBB6O_VwV_moeZxs_xI3TVQ4p2MKGb4Yts5i4FMy8tJi4CDh0e675fODxxxuV9tOX1IruD37mHXiYXz-Or6vb-8np8dlsZaOu-ajgF8MRKAMbAAdCGM-aEaZmDWthWEwZmyqfWe8MsCA6WTkuGSS9a38AeOv7pXaX4Prjcq7c4pK68VLWQtBFcAC9U80OZFHNOzqtVCkudPlVN1Nq0WmtUa42qmFZlUUyX2NFv-TBdOvsf-lMLX5efeW8</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Stromberg, Zachary R</creator><creator>Lewis, Gentry L</creator><creator>Moxley, Rodney A</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Comparison of Agar Media for Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces</title><author>Stromberg, Zachary R ; Lewis, Gentry L ; Moxley, Rodney A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-46233f0d933553e3324655e7c85e317d8a053cb6bdffc5d3763d2b23359f78f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agar</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stromberg, Zachary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gentry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moxley, Rodney A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stromberg, Zachary R</au><au>Lewis, Gentry L</au><au>Moxley, Rodney A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Agar Media for Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>949</epage><pages>939-949</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><abstract>The isolation and quantification of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from cattle feces are challenging. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of selected agar media in an attempt to identify an optimal medium for the detection and quantification of non-O157 STEC in cattle feces. Comparison studies were performed using CHROMagar STEC, Possé differential agar (Possé), Possé modified by the reduction or addition of antimicrobials, STEC heart infusion washed blood agar with mitomycin C (SHIBAM), and SHIBAM modified by the addition of antimicrobials. Fourteen STEC strains, two each belonging to serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157, were used to test detection in inoculated fecal suspensions at concentrations of 10(2) or 10(3) CFU/g. One STEC strain from each of these seven serogroups was used to estimate the concentration of recovered STEC in feces inoculated at 10(3), 10(4), or 10(5) CFU/g. Significantly more suspensions (P < 0.05) were positive for STEC when plated on Possé containing reduced concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite compared with SHIBAM, but not SHIBAM modified by containing these same antimicrobials at the same concentrations. Numerically, more suspensions were positive for STEC by using this same form of modified Possé compared with Possé, but this difference was not statistically significant. More suspensions were positive for STEC cultured on CHROMagar STEC compared with those on Possé (P < 0.05) and on modified Possé (P = 0.05). Most inoculated fecal suspensions below 10(4) CFU/g of feces were underestimated or not quantifiable for the concentration of STEC by using CHROMagar STEC or modified Possé. These results suggest that CHROMagar STEC performs better than Possé or SHIBAM for detection of STEC in bovine feces, but adjustments in the concentrations of novobiocin and potassium tellurite in the latter two media result in significant improvements in their performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>27296597</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-552</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-028X |
ispartof | Journal of food protection, 2016-06, Vol.79 (6), p.939-949 |
issn | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1792476736 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Agar Agriculture Animals Antimicrobial agents Beef Cattle Culture Media E coli Feces Food contamination & poisoning Food safety Genes Laboratories Methods Organisms Performance evaluation Potassium Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Studies Toxins |
title | Comparison of Agar Media for Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A19%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Agar%20Media%20for%20Detection%20and%20Quantification%20of%20Shiga%20Toxin-Producing%20Escherichia%20coli%20in%20Cattle%20Feces&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Stromberg,%20Zachary%20R&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=949&rft.pages=939-949&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4072477001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792476736&rft_id=info:pmid/27296597&rfr_iscdi=true |