Jewish and Islamic Religious Feminist Exegesis of the Sacred Books: Adam, Woman and Gender
From the 1970s and 1980s, Jewish and Islamic religious feminists—diverging from earlier Jewish and Muslim feminists—undertook to reinterpret problematic and even misogynistic narratives and verses in the Hebrew Bible and the Quran. Comparative analysis of their feminist exegesis of the creation stor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nashim : a journal of Jewish women's studies & gender issues 2015-09 (29), p.56-80 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 80 |
---|---|
container_issue | 29 |
container_start_page | 56 |
container_title | Nashim : a journal of Jewish women's studies & gender issues |
container_volume | |
creator | Roded, Ruth |
description | From the 1970s and 1980s, Jewish and Islamic religious feminists—diverging from earlier Jewish and Muslim feminists—undertook to reinterpret problematic and even misogynistic narratives and verses in the Hebrew Bible and the Quran. Comparative analysis of their feminist exegesis of the creation story reveals some remarkable similarities in purpose, method and even results. Religious feminist re-interpretation of the parallel phrases in the holy books defining gender—“he shall rule (yimshol) over you” (Gen. 3:16) and “Men are in charge (qawwāmūna) of women” (Quran 4:34)—has been undertaken with innovative, dynamic methodologies, along with grounding in “tradition.” The term qawwāmūn seems far more salient to contemporary Muslims, however, than yimshol is to Jews. Jewish and Islamic religious feminist exegetes have engaged similar language issues, strategies, some methods and use of secondary sources, but the innovative methodologies that they have fashioned are dissimilar. In conclusion, I shall highlight some differences between Jewish and Islamic feminist exegetes relating to their background and environment, as well as to the significance of the creation story and the gender phrase for their lives. I shall also point to some innovations in interpretative methods and some consequences of their endeavors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2979/nashim.29.56 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1792381789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A448031715</galeid><jstor_id>10.2979/nashim.29.56</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A448031715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-18d7c80df78c4ffd183e49454a1cdfdf8be4a4179cdde64e5c557af20fc506723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9rFDEQx4MoeJ6--W7AJ6F7bnaTTda3s7S1UhD8geBLiMlkL-duUjN7qP99064ghUPmYYbh8_0OM0PIc1Zvml72r6PBXZhKvRHdA7JiohOVaJR6SFa17NtK9S1_TJ4g7uu66fpWrsi39_Ar4I6a6OgljmYKln6EMQwhHZCewxRiwJme_YYBMCBNns47oJ-MzeDo25R-4Bu6dWY6oV_TZOKd0QVEB_kpeeTNiPDsb16TL-dnn0_fVVcfLi5Pt1eV5V03V0w5aVXtvFSWe--YaoH3XHDDrPPOq-_ADWeyt85Bx0FYIaTxTe2tqDvZtGvycvG9zunnAXDW-3TIsYzURdW0ismy-Jq8WKjBjKDHbAdzQNRbzlXdMsnEP587IkSf5mzsFNDep6oj1AARshlTBB9K-x6_OcKXcOW29qjgZBHYnBAzeH2dw2TyH81qfftmvby51Fp0BX-14HucU_4_ewPnhaY7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792381789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Jewish and Islamic Religious Feminist Exegesis of the Sacred Books: Adam, Woman and Gender</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Roded, Ruth</creator><creatorcontrib>Roded, Ruth</creatorcontrib><description>From the 1970s and 1980s, Jewish and Islamic religious feminists—diverging from earlier Jewish and Muslim feminists—undertook to reinterpret problematic and even misogynistic narratives and verses in the Hebrew Bible and the Quran. Comparative analysis of their feminist exegesis of the creation story reveals some remarkable similarities in purpose, method and even results. Religious feminist re-interpretation of the parallel phrases in the holy books defining gender—“he shall rule (yimshol) over you” (Gen. 3:16) and “Men are in charge (qawwāmūna) of women” (Quran 4:34)—has been undertaken with innovative, dynamic methodologies, along with grounding in “tradition.” The term qawwāmūn seems far more salient to contemporary Muslims, however, than yimshol is to Jews. Jewish and Islamic religious feminist exegetes have engaged similar language issues, strategies, some methods and use of secondary sources, but the innovative methodologies that they have fashioned are dissimilar. In conclusion, I shall highlight some differences between Jewish and Islamic feminist exegetes relating to their background and environment, as well as to the significance of the creation story and the gender phrase for their lives. I shall also point to some innovations in interpretative methods and some consequences of their endeavors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0793-8934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1565-5288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2979/nashim.29.56</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jerusalem: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bible ; Biblical hermeneutics ; Feminism ; Feminist exegesis ; Feminist literary theory ; Gender ; Hebrew language ; Islam ; Jewish people ; Judaic studies ; Judaism ; Koran ; Men ; Muslims ; Religious literature ; Torah ; Women ; Womens studies</subject><ispartof>Nashim : a journal of Jewish women's studies & gender issues, 2015-09 (29), p.56-80</ispartof><rights>2015 Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies and Hadassah-Brandeis Institute</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Indiana University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Indiana University Press Fall 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-18d7c80df78c4ffd183e49454a1cdfdf8be4a4179cdde64e5c557af20fc506723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roded, Ruth</creatorcontrib><title>Jewish and Islamic Religious Feminist Exegesis of the Sacred Books: Adam, Woman and Gender</title><title>Nashim : a journal of Jewish women's studies & gender issues</title><description>From the 1970s and 1980s, Jewish and Islamic religious feminists—diverging from earlier Jewish and Muslim feminists—undertook to reinterpret problematic and even misogynistic narratives and verses in the Hebrew Bible and the Quran. Comparative analysis of their feminist exegesis of the creation story reveals some remarkable similarities in purpose, method and even results. Religious feminist re-interpretation of the parallel phrases in the holy books defining gender—“he shall rule (yimshol) over you” (Gen. 3:16) and “Men are in charge (qawwāmūna) of women” (Quran 4:34)—has been undertaken with innovative, dynamic methodologies, along with grounding in “tradition.” The term qawwāmūn seems far more salient to contemporary Muslims, however, than yimshol is to Jews. Jewish and Islamic religious feminist exegetes have engaged similar language issues, strategies, some methods and use of secondary sources, but the innovative methodologies that they have fashioned are dissimilar. In conclusion, I shall highlight some differences between Jewish and Islamic feminist exegetes relating to their background and environment, as well as to the significance of the creation story and the gender phrase for their lives. I shall also point to some innovations in interpretative methods and some consequences of their endeavors.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bible</subject><subject>Biblical hermeneutics</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Feminist exegesis</subject><subject>Feminist literary theory</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hebrew language</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Jewish people</subject><subject>Judaic studies</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Koran</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Religious literature</subject><subject>Torah</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens studies</subject><issn>0793-8934</issn><issn>1565-5288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9rFDEQx4MoeJ6--W7AJ6F7bnaTTda3s7S1UhD8geBLiMlkL-duUjN7qP99064ghUPmYYbh8_0OM0PIc1Zvml72r6PBXZhKvRHdA7JiohOVaJR6SFa17NtK9S1_TJ4g7uu66fpWrsi39_Ar4I6a6OgljmYKln6EMQwhHZCewxRiwJme_YYBMCBNns47oJ-MzeDo25R-4Bu6dWY6oV_TZOKd0QVEB_kpeeTNiPDsb16TL-dnn0_fVVcfLi5Pt1eV5V03V0w5aVXtvFSWe--YaoH3XHDDrPPOq-_ADWeyt85Bx0FYIaTxTe2tqDvZtGvycvG9zunnAXDW-3TIsYzURdW0ismy-Jq8WKjBjKDHbAdzQNRbzlXdMsnEP587IkSf5mzsFNDep6oj1AARshlTBB9K-x6_OcKXcOW29qjgZBHYnBAzeH2dw2TyH81qfftmvby51Fp0BX-14HucU_4_ewPnhaY7</recordid><startdate>20150922</startdate><enddate>20150922</enddate><creator>Roded, Ruth</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>PETBT</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PHNHU</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150922</creationdate><title>Jewish and Islamic Religious Feminist Exegesis of the Sacred Books: Adam, Woman and Gender</title><author>Roded, Ruth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-18d7c80df78c4ffd183e49454a1cdfdf8be4a4179cdde64e5c557af20fc506723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bible</topic><topic>Biblical hermeneutics</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Feminist exegesis</topic><topic>Feminist literary theory</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hebrew language</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Jewish people</topic><topic>Judaic studies</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Koran</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Religious literature</topic><topic>Torah</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roded, Ruth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Global & International Studies Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Global Studies & International Relations</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>Nashim : a journal of Jewish women's studies & gender issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roded, Ruth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Jewish and Islamic Religious Feminist Exegesis of the Sacred Books: Adam, Woman and Gender</atitle><jtitle>Nashim : a journal of Jewish women's studies & gender issues</jtitle><date>2015-09-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><issue>29</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>56-80</pages><issn>0793-8934</issn><eissn>1565-5288</eissn><abstract>From the 1970s and 1980s, Jewish and Islamic religious feminists—diverging from earlier Jewish and Muslim feminists—undertook to reinterpret problematic and even misogynistic narratives and verses in the Hebrew Bible and the Quran. Comparative analysis of their feminist exegesis of the creation story reveals some remarkable similarities in purpose, method and even results. Religious feminist re-interpretation of the parallel phrases in the holy books defining gender—“he shall rule (yimshol) over you” (Gen. 3:16) and “Men are in charge (qawwāmūna) of women” (Quran 4:34)—has been undertaken with innovative, dynamic methodologies, along with grounding in “tradition.” The term qawwāmūn seems far more salient to contemporary Muslims, however, than yimshol is to Jews. Jewish and Islamic religious feminist exegetes have engaged similar language issues, strategies, some methods and use of secondary sources, but the innovative methodologies that they have fashioned are dissimilar. In conclusion, I shall highlight some differences between Jewish and Islamic feminist exegetes relating to their background and environment, as well as to the significance of the creation story and the gender phrase for their lives. I shall also point to some innovations in interpretative methods and some consequences of their endeavors.</abstract><cop>Jerusalem</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub><doi>10.2979/nashim.29.56</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0793-8934 |
ispartof | Nashim : a journal of Jewish women's studies & gender issues, 2015-09 (29), p.56-80 |
issn | 0793-8934 1565-5288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1792381789 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Analysis Bible Biblical hermeneutics Feminism Feminist exegesis Feminist literary theory Gender Hebrew language Islam Jewish people Judaic studies Judaism Koran Men Muslims Religious literature Torah Women Womens studies |
title | Jewish and Islamic Religious Feminist Exegesis of the Sacred Books: Adam, Woman and Gender |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T14%3A10%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jewish%20and%20Islamic%20Religious%20Feminist%20Exegesis%20of%20the%20Sacred%20Books:%20Adam,%20Woman%20and%20Gender&rft.jtitle=Nashim%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20Jewish%20women's%20studies%20&%20gender%20issues&rft.au=Roded,%20Ruth&rft.date=2015-09-22&rft.issue=29&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=56-80&rft.issn=0793-8934&rft.eissn=1565-5288&rft_id=info:doi/10.2979/nashim.29.56&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA448031715%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792381789&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A448031715&rft_jstor_id=10.2979/nashim.29.56&rfr_iscdi=true |