Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?

This paper is concerned with the relationship between two central constructs—reasoning ability and working-memory capacity—which arise from two distinct bodies of literature on individual differences in cognition, the psychometric and the information-processing, respectively. In four separate studie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intelligence (Norwood) 1990-10, Vol.14 (4), p.389-433
Hauptverfasser: Kyllonen, Patrick C., Christal, Raymond E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 433
container_issue 4
container_start_page 389
container_title Intelligence (Norwood)
container_volume 14
creator Kyllonen, Patrick C.
Christal, Raymond E.
description This paper is concerned with the relationship between two central constructs—reasoning ability and working-memory capacity—which arise from two distinct bodies of literature on individual differences in cognition, the psychometric and the information-processing, respectively. In four separate studies ( N = 723, 412, 415, and 594), we assessed reasoning ability using various tests from the psychometric literature, and working-memory capacity using tests constructed according to Baddeley's (1986) definition of working memory. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded consistently high estimates of the correlation between working-memory capacity and reasoning ability factors ( r = .80 to .90). We also found differentiation between the two factors: Reasoning correlated comparatively highly with general knowledge; working-memory capacity correlated comparatively highly with processing speed. Inspection of residuals from model fitting suggested the existence of a verbal versus quantitative content factor. We discuss the implications of our results for what they tell us about the nature of reasoning, and the nature of working memory.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791766760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ422179</ericid><els_id>S0160289605800121</els_id><sourcerecordid>1791766760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-2b0c4ddf20eb7fd9d5957dcea1790da77b5f06a2ac348632e01d1c1035218fbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKv_QGFBhPZhdSa72ew-VSn1RkHw8hyySVZT292abJX-e9ML9dGXyZDzzZnhEHKGcImA2dVLKBDTvMh6wPo5ANIY90gHc57EvEjYPunskENy5P0EABimeYdcPxvpm9rW75Es7dS2y8j6qBeadmqiWeNM1H7Iuh_9NO4zUPHMhM9lpORcqkAPjslBJafenGzfLnm7Hb0O7-Px093D8GYcqzSFNqYlqFTrioIpeaULzQrGtTISeQFacl6yCjJJpUrSPEuoAdSoEBJGMa9KlXTJ-cZ37pqvhfGtmDQLV4eVIlggzzKeQaDYhlKu8d6ZSsydnUm3FAhiFZZYhyVWSQhgYh2WwDB3sXWXXslp5WStrP8bLtKcMsYCd7rhjLNqJ48eU0rDFUEebOWQxLc1TnhlTa2Mts6oVujG_nPIL5PHhlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791766760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Kyllonen, Patrick C. ; Christal, Raymond E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kyllonen, Patrick C. ; Christal, Raymond E.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is concerned with the relationship between two central constructs—reasoning ability and working-memory capacity—which arise from two distinct bodies of literature on individual differences in cognition, the psychometric and the information-processing, respectively. In four separate studies ( N = 723, 412, 415, and 594), we assessed reasoning ability using various tests from the psychometric literature, and working-memory capacity using tests constructed according to Baddeley's (1986) definition of working memory. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded consistently high estimates of the correlation between working-memory capacity and reasoning ability factors ( r = .80 to .90). We also found differentiation between the two factors: Reasoning correlated comparatively highly with general knowledge; working-memory capacity correlated comparatively highly with processing speed. Inspection of residuals from model fitting suggested the existence of a verbal versus quantitative content factor. We discuss the implications of our results for what they tell us about the nature of reasoning, and the nature of working memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Orlando, FL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adults ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Cognitive Tests ; Confirmatory Factor Analysis ; Correlation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Individual Differences ; Memory ; Military Personnel ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reasoning. Problem solving ; Thinking Skills ; Working Memory</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 1990-10, Vol.14 (4), p.389-433</ispartof><rights>1990 Ablex Publishing Corporation</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-2b0c4ddf20eb7fd9d5957dcea1790da77b5f06a2ac348632e01d1c1035218fbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-2b0c4ddf20eb7fd9d5957dcea1790da77b5f06a2ac348632e01d1c1035218fbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605800121$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27848,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ422179$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19482555$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kyllonen, Patrick C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christal, Raymond E.</creatorcontrib><title>Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>This paper is concerned with the relationship between two central constructs—reasoning ability and working-memory capacity—which arise from two distinct bodies of literature on individual differences in cognition, the psychometric and the information-processing, respectively. In four separate studies ( N = 723, 412, 415, and 594), we assessed reasoning ability using various tests from the psychometric literature, and working-memory capacity using tests constructed according to Baddeley's (1986) definition of working memory. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded consistently high estimates of the correlation between working-memory capacity and reasoning ability factors ( r = .80 to .90). We also found differentiation between the two factors: Reasoning correlated comparatively highly with general knowledge; working-memory capacity correlated comparatively highly with processing speed. Inspection of residuals from model fitting suggested the existence of a verbal versus quantitative content factor. We discuss the implications of our results for what they tell us about the nature of reasoning, and the nature of working memory.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Cognitive Tests</subject><subject>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Working Memory</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKv_QGFBhPZhdSa72ew-VSn1RkHw8hyySVZT292abJX-e9ML9dGXyZDzzZnhEHKGcImA2dVLKBDTvMh6wPo5ANIY90gHc57EvEjYPunskENy5P0EABimeYdcPxvpm9rW75Es7dS2y8j6qBeadmqiWeNM1H7Iuh_9NO4zUPHMhM9lpORcqkAPjslBJafenGzfLnm7Hb0O7-Px093D8GYcqzSFNqYlqFTrioIpeaULzQrGtTISeQFacl6yCjJJpUrSPEuoAdSoEBJGMa9KlXTJ-cZ37pqvhfGtmDQLV4eVIlggzzKeQaDYhlKu8d6ZSsydnUm3FAhiFZZYhyVWSQhgYh2WwDB3sXWXXslp5WStrP8bLtKcMsYCd7rhjLNqJ48eU0rDFUEebOWQxLc1TnhlTa2Mts6oVujG_nPIL5PHhlc</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>Kyllonen, Patrick C.</creator><creator>Christal, Raymond E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Norwood, N.J. :Ablex Pub. Corp</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>S0M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?</title><author>Kyllonen, Patrick C. ; Christal, Raymond E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-2b0c4ddf20eb7fd9d5957dcea1790da77b5f06a2ac348632e01d1c1035218fbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Cognitive Tests</topic><topic>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reasoning. Problem solving</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Working Memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kyllonen, Patrick C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christal, Raymond E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 49</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kyllonen, Patrick C.</au><au>Christal, Raymond E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ422179</ericid><atitle>Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>389-433</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>This paper is concerned with the relationship between two central constructs—reasoning ability and working-memory capacity—which arise from two distinct bodies of literature on individual differences in cognition, the psychometric and the information-processing, respectively. In four separate studies ( N = 723, 412, 415, and 594), we assessed reasoning ability using various tests from the psychometric literature, and working-memory capacity using tests constructed according to Baddeley's (1986) definition of working memory. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded consistently high estimates of the correlation between working-memory capacity and reasoning ability factors ( r = .80 to .90). We also found differentiation between the two factors: Reasoning correlated comparatively highly with general knowledge; working-memory capacity correlated comparatively highly with processing speed. Inspection of residuals from model fitting suggested the existence of a verbal versus quantitative content factor. We discuss the implications of our results for what they tell us about the nature of reasoning, and the nature of working memory.</abstract><cop>Orlando, FL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1</doi><tpages>45</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-2896
ispartof Intelligence (Norwood), 1990-10, Vol.14 (4), p.389-433
issn 0160-2896
1873-7935
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1791766760
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Adults
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition. Intelligence
Cognitive Tests
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Correlation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Individual Differences
Memory
Military Personnel
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reasoning. Problem solving
Thinking Skills
Working Memory
title Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T11%3A41%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reasoning%20ability%20is%20(little%20more%20than)%20working-memory%20capacity?&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Kyllonen,%20Patrick%20C.&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=389-433&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1791766760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791766760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ422179&rft_els_id=S0160289605800121&rfr_iscdi=true