Procedural effects on performance on the Hick paradigm: Bias in reaction time and movement time parameters
This study investigated the effects that procedural variations may have on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) parameters from the Hick paradigm. Each of the 122 subjects was assigned to one of six experimental conditions. The six conditions represented the factorial crossing of two effects: (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intelligence (Norwood) 1989, Vol.13 (1), p.63-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 85 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Intelligence (Norwood) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Widaman, Keith F. Carlson, Jerry S. |
description | This study investigated the effects that procedural variations may have on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) parameters from the Hick paradigm. Each of the 122 subjects was assigned to one of six experimental conditions. The six conditions represented the factorial crossing of two effects: (a) order of administration of bit conditions (ascending, random, and reversed), and (b) grouping of response alternatives (grouped and spread). The results revealed significant linear effects of order, and therefore of practice, on the slope relating both RT and MT to bits of information; corresponding effects on RT and MT intercept were in the predicted direction, but were nonsignificant. Visual attention effects were not found on any of the parameters; however, the difference in the slope relating MT to bits of information between grouped and spread response alternatives was interpreted as a response bias effect. Correlations between RT and MT slope parameters and Scholastic Aptitude Test scores supported the hypothesis that correlations between intelligence and RT and MT slope parameters derived from the Hick paradigm are a function of individual differences in practice effects, rather than individual differences in basic speed of information processing. Implications for research on the Hick paradigm are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0160-2896(89)90007-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791766120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016028968990007X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1791766120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f307698fa8a58dcfe041c871132091b7d74e28ddf16d72fa09f75405435b8d993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKtv4CGgBz2sJpvdTeJB0KJWKOhBobeQJhNN7e7WZFvw7c3a0qOHMGT4_hnmQ-iUkitKaHWdHslyIasLIS8lIYRn0z00oIKzjEtW7qPBDjlERzHOE1PSQgzQ_DW0Buwq6AUG58B0EbcNXkJwbah1Y6D_dp-Ax9584aUO2vqP-gbfex2xb3AAbTrfM74GrBuL63YNNTTdptMnauggxGN04PQiwsm2DtH748PbaJxNXp6eR3eTzLCKdZljhFdSOC10KaxxQApqBKeU5UTSGbe8gFxY62hlee40kY6XBSkLVs6ElZIN0dlm7jK03yuInZq3q9CklYpySXlV0ZwkqthQJrQxBnBqGXytw4-iRPVWVa9M9cqUkOrPqpqm2Pl2uI5GL1xIinzcZSsuCZM8YbcbDNKhaw9BReMh2bQ-JMfKtv7_Pb_3E4tC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791766120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Procedural effects on performance on the Hick paradigm: Bias in reaction time and movement time parameters</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Widaman, Keith F. ; Carlson, Jerry S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Widaman, Keith F. ; Carlson, Jerry S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the effects that procedural variations may have on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) parameters from the Hick paradigm. Each of the 122 subjects was assigned to one of six experimental conditions. The six conditions represented the factorial crossing of two effects: (a) order of administration of bit conditions (ascending, random, and reversed), and (b) grouping of response alternatives (grouped and spread). The results revealed significant linear effects of order, and therefore of practice, on the slope relating both RT and MT to bits of information; corresponding effects on RT and MT intercept were in the predicted direction, but were nonsignificant. Visual attention effects were not found on any of the parameters; however, the difference in the slope relating MT to bits of information between grouped and spread response alternatives was interpreted as a response bias effect. Correlations between RT and MT slope parameters and Scholastic Aptitude Test scores supported the hypothesis that correlations between intelligence and RT and MT slope parameters derived from the Hick paradigm are a function of individual differences in practice effects, rather than individual differences in basic speed of information processing. Implications for research on the Hick paradigm are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0160-2896(89)90007-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Orlando, FL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 1989, Vol.13 (1), p.63-85</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f307698fa8a58dcfe041c871132091b7d74e28ddf16d72fa09f75405435b8d993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f307698fa8a58dcfe041c871132091b7d74e28ddf16d72fa09f75405435b8d993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(89)90007-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6790397$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Widaman, Keith F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Jerry S.</creatorcontrib><title>Procedural effects on performance on the Hick paradigm: Bias in reaction time and movement time parameters</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>This study investigated the effects that procedural variations may have on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) parameters from the Hick paradigm. Each of the 122 subjects was assigned to one of six experimental conditions. The six conditions represented the factorial crossing of two effects: (a) order of administration of bit conditions (ascending, random, and reversed), and (b) grouping of response alternatives (grouped and spread). The results revealed significant linear effects of order, and therefore of practice, on the slope relating both RT and MT to bits of information; corresponding effects on RT and MT intercept were in the predicted direction, but were nonsignificant. Visual attention effects were not found on any of the parameters; however, the difference in the slope relating MT to bits of information between grouped and spread response alternatives was interpreted as a response bias effect. Correlations between RT and MT slope parameters and Scholastic Aptitude Test scores supported the hypothesis that correlations between intelligence and RT and MT slope parameters derived from the Hick paradigm are a function of individual differences in practice effects, rather than individual differences in basic speed of information processing. Implications for research on the Hick paradigm are discussed.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKtv4CGgBz2sJpvdTeJB0KJWKOhBobeQJhNN7e7WZFvw7c3a0qOHMGT4_hnmQ-iUkitKaHWdHslyIasLIS8lIYRn0z00oIKzjEtW7qPBDjlERzHOE1PSQgzQ_DW0Buwq6AUG58B0EbcNXkJwbah1Y6D_dp-Ax9584aUO2vqP-gbfex2xb3AAbTrfM74GrBuL63YNNTTdptMnauggxGN04PQiwsm2DtH748PbaJxNXp6eR3eTzLCKdZljhFdSOC10KaxxQApqBKeU5UTSGbe8gFxY62hlee40kY6XBSkLVs6ElZIN0dlm7jK03yuInZq3q9CklYpySXlV0ZwkqthQJrQxBnBqGXytw4-iRPVWVa9M9cqUkOrPqpqm2Pl2uI5GL1xIinzcZSsuCZM8YbcbDNKhaw9BReMh2bQ-JMfKtv7_Pb_3E4tC</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>Widaman, Keith F.</creator><creator>Carlson, Jerry S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Norwood, N.J. :Ablex Pub. Corp</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>S0M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Procedural effects on performance on the Hick paradigm: Bias in reaction time and movement time parameters</title><author>Widaman, Keith F. ; Carlson, Jerry S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f307698fa8a58dcfe041c871132091b7d74e28ddf16d72fa09f75405435b8d993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reasoning. Problem solving</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Widaman, Keith F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Jerry S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 49</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Widaman, Keith F.</au><au>Carlson, Jerry S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Procedural effects on performance on the Hick paradigm: Bias in reaction time and movement time parameters</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>63-85</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>This study investigated the effects that procedural variations may have on reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) parameters from the Hick paradigm. Each of the 122 subjects was assigned to one of six experimental conditions. The six conditions represented the factorial crossing of two effects: (a) order of administration of bit conditions (ascending, random, and reversed), and (b) grouping of response alternatives (grouped and spread). The results revealed significant linear effects of order, and therefore of practice, on the slope relating both RT and MT to bits of information; corresponding effects on RT and MT intercept were in the predicted direction, but were nonsignificant. Visual attention effects were not found on any of the parameters; however, the difference in the slope relating MT to bits of information between grouped and spread response alternatives was interpreted as a response bias effect. Correlations between RT and MT slope parameters and Scholastic Aptitude Test scores supported the hypothesis that correlations between intelligence and RT and MT slope parameters derived from the Hick paradigm are a function of individual differences in practice effects, rather than individual differences in basic speed of information processing. Implications for research on the Hick paradigm are discussed.</abstract><cop>Orlando, FL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0160-2896(89)90007-X</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-2896 |
ispartof | Intelligence (Norwood), 1989, Vol.13 (1), p.63-85 |
issn | 0160-2896 1873-7935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1791766120 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cognition. Intelligence Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reasoning. Problem solving |
title | Procedural effects on performance on the Hick paradigm: Bias in reaction time and movement time parameters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T10%3A19%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Procedural%20effects%20on%20performance%20on%20the%20Hick%20paradigm:%20Bias%20in%20reaction%20time%20and%20movement%20time%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Widaman,%20Keith%20F.&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=63-85&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0160-2896(89)90007-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1791766120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791766120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=016028968990007X&rfr_iscdi=true |