Pasture responses to phosphatic fertilisers
The relative effectiveness of superphosphate and equal weights of alternative phosphate fertilisers has been determined on two Waikato soil types over a period of 4 years. Nauru rock phosphate gave approximately half the yield increases obtained with superphosphate on Hamilton clay loam and one-thir...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand journal of agricultural research 1958-02, Vol.1 (1), p.51-60 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 60 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | New Zealand journal of agricultural research |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Karlovsky, J. |
description | The relative effectiveness of superphosphate and equal weights of alternative phosphate fertilisers has been determined on two Waikato soil types over a period of 4 years.
Nauru rock phosphate gave approximately half the yield increases obtained with superphosphate on Hamilton clay loam and one-third on Horotiu sandy loam. (The superphosphate responses were of the order of 16% on Hamilton clay loam and 32% on Horotiu sandy loam).
North African phosphate gave yields similar to superphosphate on unlimed ground, but was less effective on limed ground, markedly so in the case of Horotiu sandy loam.
Oxalic acid superphosphate gave inferior results on Hamilton clay loam, yielding in eight seasons significantly less than superphosphate.
Serpentine superphosphate yielded slightly but consistently less than superphosphate.
"Super compound" (75% superphosphate, 15% Nauru rock phosphate, 10% serpentine rock) gave similar results to superphosphate, except in one season on each of the soils when yields were significantly lower.
Carbonate of lime had no detectable effect on pasture production on the Nauru rock phosphate plots on either soil type.
The addition of lime to superphosphate increased pasture production on Hamilton clay loam (initial pH 5.7), but had a negligible effect on Horotiu sandy loam (initial pH 5.9).
Nauru rock phosphate greatly, and North African phosphate to a lesser extent, increased the soil phosphorus (Truog method).
On Horotiu sandy loam the soil potassium was significantly decreased by the phosphate treatments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00288233.1958.10422059 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791699421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1791699421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i156t-7ad5ee1d56e29e64d680b222f04d26c4e80c7d21296162b158d7c81fb4aeb8173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQpeSmdOms_LMfyCgV7odUibU9ZRm5pkiP_elrmrw3t4eF94CLkFugKq6QOlTGtWVSswQk8vzhgV5owsAJQotVLinCxmqJypS3KV0n6KkmuzIPfvLuVDxCJiGsOQMBU5FOMupHHnctcULcbc9V3CmK7JRev6hDf_d0k-nx4_Ni_l9u35dbPelh0ImUvlvEAELyQyg5J7qWnNGGsp90w2HDVtlGfAjATJahDaq0ZDW3OHtQZVLcndsXeM4fuAKdt9OMRhmrSgDEhjOIOJWh-pbmhD_HI_IfbeZvfbh9hGNzRdshVQOzuyJ0d2dmRPjqo_zWBZUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791699421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pasture responses to phosphatic fertilisers</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Royal Society of New Zealand Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Karlovsky, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karlovsky, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The relative effectiveness of superphosphate and equal weights of alternative phosphate fertilisers has been determined on two Waikato soil types over a period of 4 years.
Nauru rock phosphate gave approximately half the yield increases obtained with superphosphate on Hamilton clay loam and one-third on Horotiu sandy loam. (The superphosphate responses were of the order of 16% on Hamilton clay loam and 32% on Horotiu sandy loam).
North African phosphate gave yields similar to superphosphate on unlimed ground, but was less effective on limed ground, markedly so in the case of Horotiu sandy loam.
Oxalic acid superphosphate gave inferior results on Hamilton clay loam, yielding in eight seasons significantly less than superphosphate.
Serpentine superphosphate yielded slightly but consistently less than superphosphate.
"Super compound" (75% superphosphate, 15% Nauru rock phosphate, 10% serpentine rock) gave similar results to superphosphate, except in one season on each of the soils when yields were significantly lower.
Carbonate of lime had no detectable effect on pasture production on the Nauru rock phosphate plots on either soil type.
The addition of lime to superphosphate increased pasture production on Hamilton clay loam (initial pH 5.7), but had a negligible effect on Horotiu sandy loam (initial pH 5.9).
Nauru rock phosphate greatly, and North African phosphate to a lesser extent, increased the soil phosphorus (Truog method).
On Horotiu sandy loam the soil potassium was significantly decreased by the phosphate treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-8233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1175-8775</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00288233.1958.10422059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wellington: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>New Zealand journal of agricultural research, 1958-02, Vol.1 (1), p.51-60</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1958</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karlovsky, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Pasture responses to phosphatic fertilisers</title><title>New Zealand journal of agricultural research</title><description>The relative effectiveness of superphosphate and equal weights of alternative phosphate fertilisers has been determined on two Waikato soil types over a period of 4 years.
Nauru rock phosphate gave approximately half the yield increases obtained with superphosphate on Hamilton clay loam and one-third on Horotiu sandy loam. (The superphosphate responses were of the order of 16% on Hamilton clay loam and 32% on Horotiu sandy loam).
North African phosphate gave yields similar to superphosphate on unlimed ground, but was less effective on limed ground, markedly so in the case of Horotiu sandy loam.
Oxalic acid superphosphate gave inferior results on Hamilton clay loam, yielding in eight seasons significantly less than superphosphate.
Serpentine superphosphate yielded slightly but consistently less than superphosphate.
"Super compound" (75% superphosphate, 15% Nauru rock phosphate, 10% serpentine rock) gave similar results to superphosphate, except in one season on each of the soils when yields were significantly lower.
Carbonate of lime had no detectable effect on pasture production on the Nauru rock phosphate plots on either soil type.
The addition of lime to superphosphate increased pasture production on Hamilton clay loam (initial pH 5.7), but had a negligible effect on Horotiu sandy loam (initial pH 5.9).
Nauru rock phosphate greatly, and North African phosphate to a lesser extent, increased the soil phosphorus (Truog method).
On Horotiu sandy loam the soil potassium was significantly decreased by the phosphate treatments.</description><issn>0028-8233</issn><issn>1175-8775</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1958</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQpeSmdOms_LMfyCgV7odUibU9ZRm5pkiP_elrmrw3t4eF94CLkFugKq6QOlTGtWVSswQk8vzhgV5owsAJQotVLinCxmqJypS3KV0n6KkmuzIPfvLuVDxCJiGsOQMBU5FOMupHHnctcULcbc9V3CmK7JRev6hDf_d0k-nx4_Ni_l9u35dbPelh0ImUvlvEAELyQyg5J7qWnNGGsp90w2HDVtlGfAjATJahDaq0ZDW3OHtQZVLcndsXeM4fuAKdt9OMRhmrSgDEhjOIOJWh-pbmhD_HI_IfbeZvfbh9hGNzRdshVQOzuyJ0d2dmRPjqo_zWBZUQ</recordid><startdate>19580201</startdate><enddate>19580201</enddate><creator>Karlovsky, J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Wellington :Royal Society of New Zealand</general><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>S0M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19580201</creationdate><title>Pasture responses to phosphatic fertilisers</title><author>Karlovsky, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i156t-7ad5ee1d56e29e64d680b222f04d26c4e80c7d21296162b158d7c81fb4aeb8173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1958</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karlovsky, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 49</collection><jtitle>New Zealand journal of agricultural research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karlovsky, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pasture responses to phosphatic fertilisers</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand journal of agricultural research</jtitle><date>1958-02-01</date><risdate>1958</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>51-60</pages><issn>0028-8233</issn><eissn>1175-8775</eissn><abstract>The relative effectiveness of superphosphate and equal weights of alternative phosphate fertilisers has been determined on two Waikato soil types over a period of 4 years.
Nauru rock phosphate gave approximately half the yield increases obtained with superphosphate on Hamilton clay loam and one-third on Horotiu sandy loam. (The superphosphate responses were of the order of 16% on Hamilton clay loam and 32% on Horotiu sandy loam).
North African phosphate gave yields similar to superphosphate on unlimed ground, but was less effective on limed ground, markedly so in the case of Horotiu sandy loam.
Oxalic acid superphosphate gave inferior results on Hamilton clay loam, yielding in eight seasons significantly less than superphosphate.
Serpentine superphosphate yielded slightly but consistently less than superphosphate.
"Super compound" (75% superphosphate, 15% Nauru rock phosphate, 10% serpentine rock) gave similar results to superphosphate, except in one season on each of the soils when yields were significantly lower.
Carbonate of lime had no detectable effect on pasture production on the Nauru rock phosphate plots on either soil type.
The addition of lime to superphosphate increased pasture production on Hamilton clay loam (initial pH 5.7), but had a negligible effect on Horotiu sandy loam (initial pH 5.9).
Nauru rock phosphate greatly, and North African phosphate to a lesser extent, increased the soil phosphorus (Truog method).
On Horotiu sandy loam the soil potassium was significantly decreased by the phosphate treatments.</abstract><cop>Wellington</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00288233.1958.10422059</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-8233 |
ispartof | New Zealand journal of agricultural research, 1958-02, Vol.1 (1), p.51-60 |
issn | 0028-8233 1175-8775 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1791699421 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Royal Society of New Zealand Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Pasture responses to phosphatic fertilisers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pasture%20responses%20to%20phosphatic%20fertilisers&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20research&rft.au=Karlovsky,%20J.&rft.date=1958-02-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=51-60&rft.issn=0028-8233&rft.eissn=1175-8775&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00288233.1958.10422059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1791699421%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791699421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |