The great trilemma: are globalization, democracy, and sovereignty compatible?

Current economic and political developments spotlight the relationship between domestic and global governance and the impact of globalization on both. A key question is whether a sovereign state system, democratic governments, and an integrated global marketplace can coexist. The paper assesses anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International theory 2016-07, Vol.8 (2), p.297-340
1. Verfasser: Stein, Arthur A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue 2
container_start_page 297
container_title International theory
container_volume 8
creator Stein, Arthur A.
description Current economic and political developments spotlight the relationship between domestic and global governance and the impact of globalization on both. A key question is whether a sovereign state system, democratic governments, and an integrated global marketplace can coexist. The paper assesses analytic materialist arguments for their incompatibility and the key assumptions on which they rest. The paper describes the extant pressures operating to limit each of the three: how sovereignty and democracy work to constrain globalization, how globalization and sovereignty generate a democratic deficit, and how globalization and democracy lead to limitations upon, and even the transcendence of, sovereignty. How to make the three compatible, and failing that, which facet to restrain, characterizes political contestation in a globalizing age. Global and domestic governance reflect the need to reconcile the combined implications of globalization, sovereignty, and democracy, and to do so by restraining, limiting, or transforming one or more of these features.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1752971916000063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791579614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1752971916000063</cupid><sourcerecordid>4069413631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-33a6b08a04f674ab04017416f739bc658715c03825d555bd70c7b7c97018104d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC165mmk1m40Wk-A8qHqznJclm65bdTU22wvrpTWkRQZzLDI_fm2EeIedAL4ECXr0C8qlEkCBoLMEOyGgrpRKnePgzgzwmJyGsIiEypCPyvHi3ydJb1Se9rxvbtuo6UT5qjdOqqb9UX7tukpS2dcYrM0wS1ZVJcJ_W23rZ9UNiXLuOlG7szSk5qlQT7Nm-j8nb_d1i9pjOXx6eZrfz1DDB-5QxJTTNFc0qgZnSNIsvZCAqZFIbwXMEbijLp7zknOsSqUGNRiKFHGhWsjG52O1de_exsaEvVm7ju3iyAJTAUQrIIgU7yngXgrdVsfZ1q_xQAC22qRV_UosetveoVvu6XNpfq_91fQOXD2zW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791579614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The great trilemma: are globalization, democracy, and sovereignty compatible?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Stein, Arthur A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stein, Arthur A.</creatorcontrib><description>Current economic and political developments spotlight the relationship between domestic and global governance and the impact of globalization on both. A key question is whether a sovereign state system, democratic governments, and an integrated global marketplace can coexist. The paper assesses analytic materialist arguments for their incompatibility and the key assumptions on which they rest. The paper describes the extant pressures operating to limit each of the three: how sovereignty and democracy work to constrain globalization, how globalization and sovereignty generate a democratic deficit, and how globalization and democracy lead to limitations upon, and even the transcendence of, sovereignty. How to make the three compatible, and failing that, which facet to restrain, characterizes political contestation in a globalizing age. Global and domestic governance reflect the need to reconcile the combined implications of globalization, sovereignty, and democracy, and to do so by restraining, limiting, or transforming one or more of these features.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-9719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-9727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1752971916000063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Democratization ; Globalization ; Governance ; Original Papers ; Political theory ; Sovereignty</subject><ispartof>International theory, 2016-07, Vol.8 (2), p.297-340</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-33a6b08a04f674ab04017416f739bc658715c03825d555bd70c7b7c97018104d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-33a6b08a04f674ab04017416f739bc658715c03825d555bd70c7b7c97018104d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1752971916000063/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stein, Arthur A.</creatorcontrib><title>The great trilemma: are globalization, democracy, and sovereignty compatible?</title><title>International theory</title><addtitle>Int. Theory</addtitle><description>Current economic and political developments spotlight the relationship between domestic and global governance and the impact of globalization on both. A key question is whether a sovereign state system, democratic governments, and an integrated global marketplace can coexist. The paper assesses analytic materialist arguments for their incompatibility and the key assumptions on which they rest. The paper describes the extant pressures operating to limit each of the three: how sovereignty and democracy work to constrain globalization, how globalization and sovereignty generate a democratic deficit, and how globalization and democracy lead to limitations upon, and even the transcendence of, sovereignty. How to make the three compatible, and failing that, which facet to restrain, characterizes political contestation in a globalizing age. Global and domestic governance reflect the need to reconcile the combined implications of globalization, sovereignty, and democracy, and to do so by restraining, limiting, or transforming one or more of these features.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><issn>1752-9719</issn><issn>1752-9727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC165mmk1m40Wk-A8qHqznJclm65bdTU22wvrpTWkRQZzLDI_fm2EeIedAL4ECXr0C8qlEkCBoLMEOyGgrpRKnePgzgzwmJyGsIiEypCPyvHi3ydJb1Se9rxvbtuo6UT5qjdOqqb9UX7tukpS2dcYrM0wS1ZVJcJ_W23rZ9UNiXLuOlG7szSk5qlQT7Nm-j8nb_d1i9pjOXx6eZrfz1DDB-5QxJTTNFc0qgZnSNIsvZCAqZFIbwXMEbijLp7zknOsSqUGNRiKFHGhWsjG52O1de_exsaEvVm7ju3iyAJTAUQrIIgU7yngXgrdVsfZ1q_xQAC22qRV_UosetveoVvu6XNpfq_91fQOXD2zW</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Stein, Arthur A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>The great trilemma: are globalization, democracy, and sovereignty compatible?</title><author>Stein, Arthur A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-33a6b08a04f674ab04017416f739bc658715c03825d555bd70c7b7c97018104d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stein, Arthur A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stein, Arthur A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The great trilemma: are globalization, democracy, and sovereignty compatible?</atitle><jtitle>International theory</jtitle><addtitle>Int. Theory</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>297-340</pages><issn>1752-9719</issn><eissn>1752-9727</eissn><abstract>Current economic and political developments spotlight the relationship between domestic and global governance and the impact of globalization on both. A key question is whether a sovereign state system, democratic governments, and an integrated global marketplace can coexist. The paper assesses analytic materialist arguments for their incompatibility and the key assumptions on which they rest. The paper describes the extant pressures operating to limit each of the three: how sovereignty and democracy work to constrain globalization, how globalization and sovereignty generate a democratic deficit, and how globalization and democracy lead to limitations upon, and even the transcendence of, sovereignty. How to make the three compatible, and failing that, which facet to restrain, characterizes political contestation in a globalizing age. Global and domestic governance reflect the need to reconcile the combined implications of globalization, sovereignty, and democracy, and to do so by restraining, limiting, or transforming one or more of these features.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1752971916000063</doi><tpages>44</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-9719
ispartof International theory, 2016-07, Vol.8 (2), p.297-340
issn 1752-9719
1752-9727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1791579614
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Democracy
Democratization
Globalization
Governance
Original Papers
Political theory
Sovereignty
title The great trilemma: are globalization, democracy, and sovereignty compatible?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A56%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20great%20trilemma:%20are%20globalization,%20democracy,%20and%20sovereignty%20compatible?&rft.jtitle=International%20theory&rft.au=Stein,%20Arthur%20A.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=297-340&rft.issn=1752-9719&rft.eissn=1752-9727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1752971916000063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4069413631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791579614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1752971916000063&rfr_iscdi=true