The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks
The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school impr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.) Calif.), 2016-06, Vol.30 (4), p.606-648 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 648 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 606 |
container_title | Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Peurach, Donald J. Glazer, Joshua L. Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah |
description | The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0895904814557592 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791355506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1099605</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0895904814557592</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4067929011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L8KC59XJZvOFJ6lVK0UP1vMSwsRu3W5qsq3435tlRUTwNDC_994Mj5BTCheUSnkJSnMNpaIl55LrYo-MKOdFzpQW-2TU47znh-QoxhUASAZiRK4WS8xucIeN36yx7UyTTXem2Zqu9m3mXfZsl9432Wy9CX6HvSR7xO7Dh7d4TA6caSKefM8xebmdLib3-fzpbja5nueWMdrlVBXIGAB3Bq1WDmUhSlU4xQRobtFKKrUDwXSRFkKa0mghWGmwRDBCsTE5H3LTC-9bjF218tvQppNVclLGOU_uMYFBZYOPMaCrNqFem_BZUaj6iqq_FSXL2WDBUNsf-fSBgtYCeOL5wKN5xV9H_8v7AgADbWM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791355506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Peurach, Donald J. ; Glazer, Joshua L. ; Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Peurach, Donald J. ; Glazer, Joshua L. ; Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-9048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3896</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0895904814557592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Best Practices ; Coordination ; Data Collection ; Education reform ; Educational Change ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Practices ; Evaluators ; Evidence Based Practice ; Human Capital ; Intellectual capital ; Interest groups ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Logical Thinking ; Network Analysis ; Networks ; Organizational Development ; Program Evaluation ; Replication (Evaluation) ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.), 2016-06, Vol.30 (4), p.606-648</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0895904814557592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0895904814557592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27845,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1099605$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peurach, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</title><title>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.)</title><description>The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Human Capital</subject><subject>Intellectual capital</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Network Analysis</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Organizational Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Replication (Evaluation)</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0895-9048</issn><issn>1552-3896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L8KC59XJZvOFJ6lVK0UP1vMSwsRu3W5qsq3435tlRUTwNDC_994Mj5BTCheUSnkJSnMNpaIl55LrYo-MKOdFzpQW-2TU47znh-QoxhUASAZiRK4WS8xucIeN36yx7UyTTXem2Zqu9m3mXfZsl9432Wy9CX6HvSR7xO7Dh7d4TA6caSKefM8xebmdLib3-fzpbja5nueWMdrlVBXIGAB3Bq1WDmUhSlU4xQRobtFKKrUDwXSRFkKa0mghWGmwRDBCsTE5H3LTC-9bjF218tvQppNVclLGOU_uMYFBZYOPMaCrNqFem_BZUaj6iqq_FSXL2WDBUNsf-fSBgtYCeOL5wKN5xV9H_8v7AgADbWM</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Peurach, Donald J.</creator><creator>Glazer, Joshua L.</creator><creator>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</title><author>Peurach, Donald J. ; Glazer, Joshua L. ; Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Human Capital</topic><topic>Intellectual capital</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Network Analysis</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Organizational Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Replication (Evaluation)</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peurach, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peurach, Donald J.</au><au>Glazer, Joshua L.</au><au>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1099605</ericid><atitle>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</atitle><jtitle>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>606-648</pages><issn>0895-9048</issn><eissn>1552-3896</eissn><abstract>The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0895904814557592</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-9048 |
ispartof | Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.), 2016-06, Vol.30 (4), p.606-648 |
issn | 0895-9048 1552-3896 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1791355506 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; PAIS Index |
subjects | Accountability Best Practices Coordination Data Collection Education reform Educational Change Educational Facilities Improvement Educational Improvement Educational Practices Evaluators Evidence Based Practice Human Capital Intellectual capital Interest groups Learning Learning Processes Logical Thinking Network Analysis Networks Organizational Development Program Evaluation Replication (Evaluation) Sustainability |
title | The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A24%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Developmental%20Evaluation%20of%20School%20Improvement%20Networks&rft.jtitle=Educational%20policy%20(Los%20Altos,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Peurach,%20Donald%20J.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=606-648&rft.issn=0895-9048&rft.eissn=1552-3896&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0895904814557592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4067929011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791355506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1099605&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0895904814557592&rfr_iscdi=true |