The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks

The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school impr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.) Calif.), 2016-06, Vol.30 (4), p.606-648
Hauptverfasser: Peurach, Donald J., Glazer, Joshua L., Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 648
container_issue 4
container_start_page 606
container_title Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.)
container_volume 30
creator Peurach, Donald J.
Glazer, Joshua L.
Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah
description The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0895904814557592
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791355506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1099605</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0895904814557592</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4067929011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L8KC59XJZvOFJ6lVK0UP1vMSwsRu3W5qsq3435tlRUTwNDC_994Mj5BTCheUSnkJSnMNpaIl55LrYo-MKOdFzpQW-2TU47znh-QoxhUASAZiRK4WS8xucIeN36yx7UyTTXem2Zqu9m3mXfZsl9432Wy9CX6HvSR7xO7Dh7d4TA6caSKefM8xebmdLib3-fzpbja5nueWMdrlVBXIGAB3Bq1WDmUhSlU4xQRobtFKKrUDwXSRFkKa0mghWGmwRDBCsTE5H3LTC-9bjF218tvQppNVclLGOU_uMYFBZYOPMaCrNqFem_BZUaj6iqq_FSXL2WDBUNsf-fSBgtYCeOL5wKN5xV9H_8v7AgADbWM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791355506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Peurach, Donald J. ; Glazer, Joshua L. ; Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Peurach, Donald J. ; Glazer, Joshua L. ; Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-9048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3896</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0895904814557592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Best Practices ; Coordination ; Data Collection ; Education reform ; Educational Change ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Practices ; Evaluators ; Evidence Based Practice ; Human Capital ; Intellectual capital ; Interest groups ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Logical Thinking ; Network Analysis ; Networks ; Organizational Development ; Program Evaluation ; Replication (Evaluation) ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.), 2016-06, Vol.30 (4), p.606-648</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0895904814557592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0895904814557592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27845,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1099605$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peurach, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</title><title>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.)</title><description>The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Human Capital</subject><subject>Intellectual capital</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Logical Thinking</subject><subject>Network Analysis</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Organizational Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Replication (Evaluation)</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0895-9048</issn><issn>1552-3896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L8KC59XJZvOFJ6lVK0UP1vMSwsRu3W5qsq3435tlRUTwNDC_994Mj5BTCheUSnkJSnMNpaIl55LrYo-MKOdFzpQW-2TU47znh-QoxhUASAZiRK4WS8xucIeN36yx7UyTTXem2Zqu9m3mXfZsl9432Wy9CX6HvSR7xO7Dh7d4TA6caSKefM8xebmdLib3-fzpbja5nueWMdrlVBXIGAB3Bq1WDmUhSlU4xQRobtFKKrUDwXSRFkKa0mghWGmwRDBCsTE5H3LTC-9bjF218tvQppNVclLGOU_uMYFBZYOPMaCrNqFem_BZUaj6iqq_FSXL2WDBUNsf-fSBgtYCeOL5wKN5xV9H_8v7AgADbWM</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Peurach, Donald J.</creator><creator>Glazer, Joshua L.</creator><creator>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</title><author>Peurach, Donald J. ; Glazer, Joshua L. ; Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-182e33005faec98fe726482f836095cec7179f0639260967a4a96634ae4e0a683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Human Capital</topic><topic>Intellectual capital</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Logical Thinking</topic><topic>Network Analysis</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Organizational Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Replication (Evaluation)</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peurach, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peurach, Donald J.</au><au>Glazer, Joshua L.</au><au>Winchell Lenhoff, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1099605</ericid><atitle>The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks</atitle><jtitle>Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>606-648</pages><issn>0895-9048</issn><eissn>1552-3896</eissn><abstract>The national education reform agenda has rapidly expanded to include attention to continuous improvement research in education. The purpose of this analysis is to propose a new approach to “developmental evaluation” aimed at building a foundation for continuous improvement in large-scale school improvement networks, on the argument that doing so is essential to producing the intellectual capital needed to replicate effective practices and desired outcomes throughout these networks. We begin by developing a rationale for developmental evaluation, both to illuminate the need and to discuss its coordination with other forms of evaluation. We continue by proposing a logic of developmental evaluation to support analyzing networks as learning systems. We then use that logic to structure a framework for developmental evaluation to support evaluators, network executives, and other stakeholders in analyzing and strengthening the foundation for continuous improvement in a given network. Our analysis suggests that building a foundation for continuous improvement among a large number of networks is an educational reform agenda unto itself, one that must be supported and sustained if these networks are to succeed at the level expected under current accountability regimes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0895904814557592</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-9048
ispartof Educational policy (Los Altos, Calif.), 2016-06, Vol.30 (4), p.606-648
issn 0895-9048
1552-3896
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1791355506
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; PAIS Index
subjects Accountability
Best Practices
Coordination
Data Collection
Education reform
Educational Change
Educational Facilities Improvement
Educational Improvement
Educational Practices
Evaluators
Evidence Based Practice
Human Capital
Intellectual capital
Interest groups
Learning
Learning Processes
Logical Thinking
Network Analysis
Networks
Organizational Development
Program Evaluation
Replication (Evaluation)
Sustainability
title The Developmental Evaluation of School Improvement Networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A24%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Developmental%20Evaluation%20of%20School%20Improvement%20Networks&rft.jtitle=Educational%20policy%20(Los%20Altos,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Peurach,%20Donald%20J.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=606-648&rft.issn=0895-9048&rft.eissn=1552-3896&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0895904814557592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4067929011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791355506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1099605&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0895904814557592&rfr_iscdi=true