Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns?
We use data on signed option volume to study which components of option volume predict stock returns and resolve the seemingly inconsistent results in the literature. We find no evidence that trades related to synthetic short positions in the underlying stocks contain more information than trades re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of financial economics 2016-06, Vol.120 (3), p.601-622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 622 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 601 |
container_title | Journal of financial economics |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Ge, Li Lin, Tse-Chun Pearson, Neil D. |
description | We use data on signed option volume to study which components of option volume predict stock returns and resolve the seemingly inconsistent results in the literature. We find no evidence that trades related to synthetic short positions in the underlying stocks contain more information than trades related to synthetic long positions. Purchases of calls that open new positions are the strongest predictor of returns, followed by call sales that close out existing purchased call positions. Overall, our results indicate that the role of options in providing embedded leverage is the most important channel why option trading predicts stock returns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1790491769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304405X16000167</els_id><sourcerecordid>4064611661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-b24cc87a278204493f1339ee31a22cf3d194416e48086ff305fab4473dd8642c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4EIeB518nHbpJTleIXFLwoegvbbEJ3bTdrkhb6701p785lYOa9N_MeQrcESgKkvu_L3nWDNb6kQKoSZAlEnaEJkUIVVAh-jibAgBccqu9LdBVjD7lEpSbo4Wu1x623EaeVxX5MnR9w8jgmb37wzq-3G4tDk8d4DLbtTDqtgk3bMMTZNbpwzTram1Ofos_np4_5a7F4f3mbPy4Kw4GkYkm5MVI0VEgKnCvmCGPKWkYaSo1jLVGck9pyCbJ2jkHlmiXngrWtrDk1bIrujrpj8L9bG5PufX4gn9REKOCKiFplVHVEmeBjDNbpMXSbJuw1AX0IS_f6FJY-hKVB6hxW5s2OPJst7DobdDSdHUx2HKxJuvXdPwp_lah0Uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790491769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ge, Li ; Lin, Tse-Chun ; Pearson, Neil D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ge, Li ; Lin, Tse-Chun ; Pearson, Neil D.</creatorcontrib><description>We use data on signed option volume to study which components of option volume predict stock returns and resolve the seemingly inconsistent results in the literature. We find no evidence that trades related to synthetic short positions in the underlying stocks contain more information than trades related to synthetic long positions. Purchases of calls that open new positions are the strongest predictor of returns, followed by call sales that close out existing purchased call positions. Overall, our results indicate that the role of options in providing embedded leverage is the most important channel why option trading predicts stock returns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-405X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFECDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Information ; Leverage ; Option trading volume ; Options trading ; Rates of return ; Securities trading volume ; Stock return predictability ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial economics, 2016-06, Vol.120 (3), p.601-622</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-b24cc87a278204493f1339ee31a22cf3d194416e48086ff305fab4473dd8642c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-b24cc87a278204493f1339ee31a22cf3d194416e48086ff305fab4473dd8642c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ge, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tse-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Neil D.</creatorcontrib><title>Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns?</title><title>Journal of financial economics</title><description>We use data on signed option volume to study which components of option volume predict stock returns and resolve the seemingly inconsistent results in the literature. We find no evidence that trades related to synthetic short positions in the underlying stocks contain more information than trades related to synthetic long positions. Purchases of calls that open new positions are the strongest predictor of returns, followed by call sales that close out existing purchased call positions. Overall, our results indicate that the role of options in providing embedded leverage is the most important channel why option trading predicts stock returns.</description><subject>Information</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>Option trading volume</subject><subject>Options trading</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>Securities trading volume</subject><subject>Stock return predictability</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0304-405X</issn><issn>1879-2774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4EIeB518nHbpJTleIXFLwoegvbbEJ3bTdrkhb6701p785lYOa9N_MeQrcESgKkvu_L3nWDNb6kQKoSZAlEnaEJkUIVVAh-jibAgBccqu9LdBVjD7lEpSbo4Wu1x623EaeVxX5MnR9w8jgmb37wzq-3G4tDk8d4DLbtTDqtgk3bMMTZNbpwzTram1Ofos_np4_5a7F4f3mbPy4Kw4GkYkm5MVI0VEgKnCvmCGPKWkYaSo1jLVGck9pyCbJ2jkHlmiXngrWtrDk1bIrujrpj8L9bG5PufX4gn9REKOCKiFplVHVEmeBjDNbpMXSbJuw1AX0IS_f6FJY-hKVB6hxW5s2OPJst7DobdDSdHUx2HKxJuvXdPwp_lah0Uw</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Ge, Li</creator><creator>Lin, Tse-Chun</creator><creator>Pearson, Neil D.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns?</title><author>Ge, Li ; Lin, Tse-Chun ; Pearson, Neil D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-b24cc87a278204493f1339ee31a22cf3d194416e48086ff305fab4473dd8642c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Information</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>Option trading volume</topic><topic>Options trading</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>Securities trading volume</topic><topic>Stock return predictability</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ge, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tse-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Neil D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ge, Li</au><au>Lin, Tse-Chun</au><au>Pearson, Neil D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>601</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>601-622</pages><issn>0304-405X</issn><eissn>1879-2774</eissn><coden>JFECDT</coden><abstract>We use data on signed option volume to study which components of option volume predict stock returns and resolve the seemingly inconsistent results in the literature. We find no evidence that trades related to synthetic short positions in the underlying stocks contain more information than trades related to synthetic long positions. Purchases of calls that open new positions are the strongest predictor of returns, followed by call sales that close out existing purchased call positions. Overall, our results indicate that the role of options in providing embedded leverage is the most important channel why option trading predicts stock returns.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.019</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-405X |
ispartof | Journal of financial economics, 2016-06, Vol.120 (3), p.601-622 |
issn | 0304-405X 1879-2774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1790491769 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Information Leverage Option trading volume Options trading Rates of return Securities trading volume Stock return predictability Studies |
title | Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20does%20the%20option%20to%20stock%20volume%20ratio%20predict%20stock%20returns?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20economics&rft.au=Ge,%20Li&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=601&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=601-622&rft.issn=0304-405X&rft.eissn=1879-2774&rft.coden=JFECDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4064611661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790491769&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0304405X16000167&rfr_iscdi=true |