Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system

The paper studies bank lending behaviour over the business cycle in a dual banking system, Malaysia, with the objective of ascertaining whether Islamic banks have a role in stabilizing credit. The study makes use of unbalanced panel data of 21 conventional banks and 16 Islamic banks covering mostly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic modelling 2016-06, Vol.55, p.127-134
1. Verfasser: Ibrahim, Mansor H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue
container_start_page 127
container_title Economic modelling
container_volume 55
creator Ibrahim, Mansor H.
description The paper studies bank lending behaviour over the business cycle in a dual banking system, Malaysia, with the objective of ascertaining whether Islamic banks have a role in stabilizing credit. The study makes use of unbalanced panel data of 21 conventional banks and 16 Islamic banks covering mostly the period 2001–2013. Applying dynamic GMM estimators, we find the aggregate loans by banks to be pro-cyclical in conformity with existing studies. However, when we segregate the lending/financing behaviour of conventional and Islamic banks, the cyclicality of bank lending seems to be true only for conventional banks. As for the Islamic banks, the business cycle does not seem to affect their financing decisions. Indeed, there is indication that the Islamic banks in general and the full-fledged Islamic banks in particular can even be counter-cyclical in their financing decisions. This conclusion is fairly robust to a different loan measure, alternative model specifications, and to an alternative business cycle measure. Hence, our results provide further support to the “stability” view of the Islamic banks in that they have the ability to stabilize credit.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.01.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1789280348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264999316000171</els_id><sourcerecordid>4058187011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ac896ceea0690a9a5a41f16c8b072ae2f9417a2ecef54605bf2af78ab89153633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouH78BCHguTVJ0zY5iS66Cgte9Bym6VRSu-matEL_va27d2FgGOaZd2ZeQm44SznjxV2bou39rq9TMZcp43NkJ2TFVZklBRfilKyYKGSitc7OyUWMLWNMcKlXZPM4RucxRmon2yEFX9MK_Bft0NfOf9J96JeOs9C5YaLOU6D1CN0ftQBxigPurshZA13E62O-JB_PT-_rl2T7tnldP2wTK4UcErBKFxYRWKEZaMhB8oYXVlWsFICi0ZKXINBik8uC5VUjoCkVVErzPCuy7JLcHnTnu75HjINp-zH4eaXhpdJCsUyqmcoPlA19jAEbsw9uB2EynJnFM9Oao2dm8cwwPseifn-Yw_mFH4fBROvQW6xdQDuYunf_KPwC_F93ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789280348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ibrahim, Mansor H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Mansor H.</creatorcontrib><description>The paper studies bank lending behaviour over the business cycle in a dual banking system, Malaysia, with the objective of ascertaining whether Islamic banks have a role in stabilizing credit. The study makes use of unbalanced panel data of 21 conventional banks and 16 Islamic banks covering mostly the period 2001–2013. Applying dynamic GMM estimators, we find the aggregate loans by banks to be pro-cyclical in conformity with existing studies. However, when we segregate the lending/financing behaviour of conventional and Islamic banks, the cyclicality of bank lending seems to be true only for conventional banks. As for the Islamic banks, the business cycle does not seem to affect their financing decisions. Indeed, there is indication that the Islamic banks in general and the full-fledged Islamic banks in particular can even be counter-cyclical in their financing decisions. This conclusion is fairly robust to a different loan measure, alternative model specifications, and to an alternative business cycle measure. Hence, our results provide further support to the “stability” view of the Islamic banks in that they have the ability to stabilize credit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6122</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.01.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bank loans ; Banking industry ; Banks ; Business cycle ; Business cycles ; Dual banking system ; Dualistic economy ; Islamic financing ; Lending decisions ; Malaysia ; Organizational behavior ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Economic modelling, 2016-06, Vol.55, p.127-134</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ac896ceea0690a9a5a41f16c8b072ae2f9417a2ecef54605bf2af78ab89153633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ac896ceea0690a9a5a41f16c8b072ae2f9417a2ecef54605bf2af78ab89153633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999316000171$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Mansor H.</creatorcontrib><title>Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system</title><title>Economic modelling</title><description>The paper studies bank lending behaviour over the business cycle in a dual banking system, Malaysia, with the objective of ascertaining whether Islamic banks have a role in stabilizing credit. The study makes use of unbalanced panel data of 21 conventional banks and 16 Islamic banks covering mostly the period 2001–2013. Applying dynamic GMM estimators, we find the aggregate loans by banks to be pro-cyclical in conformity with existing studies. However, when we segregate the lending/financing behaviour of conventional and Islamic banks, the cyclicality of bank lending seems to be true only for conventional banks. As for the Islamic banks, the business cycle does not seem to affect their financing decisions. Indeed, there is indication that the Islamic banks in general and the full-fledged Islamic banks in particular can even be counter-cyclical in their financing decisions. This conclusion is fairly robust to a different loan measure, alternative model specifications, and to an alternative business cycle measure. Hence, our results provide further support to the “stability” view of the Islamic banks in that they have the ability to stabilize credit.</description><subject>Bank loans</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Business cycle</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Dual banking system</subject><subject>Dualistic economy</subject><subject>Islamic financing</subject><subject>Lending decisions</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0264-9993</issn><issn>1873-6122</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouH78BCHguTVJ0zY5iS66Cgte9Bym6VRSu-matEL_va27d2FgGOaZd2ZeQm44SznjxV2bou39rq9TMZcp43NkJ2TFVZklBRfilKyYKGSitc7OyUWMLWNMcKlXZPM4RucxRmon2yEFX9MK_Bft0NfOf9J96JeOs9C5YaLOU6D1CN0ftQBxigPurshZA13E62O-JB_PT-_rl2T7tnldP2wTK4UcErBKFxYRWKEZaMhB8oYXVlWsFICi0ZKXINBik8uC5VUjoCkVVErzPCuy7JLcHnTnu75HjINp-zH4eaXhpdJCsUyqmcoPlA19jAEbsw9uB2EynJnFM9Oao2dm8cwwPseifn-Yw_mFH4fBROvQW6xdQDuYunf_KPwC_F93ww</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Ibrahim, Mansor H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system</title><author>Ibrahim, Mansor H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-ac896ceea0690a9a5a41f16c8b072ae2f9417a2ecef54605bf2af78ab89153633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bank loans</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Business cycle</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Dual banking system</topic><topic>Dualistic economy</topic><topic>Islamic financing</topic><topic>Lending decisions</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Mansor H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economic modelling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibrahim, Mansor H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system</atitle><jtitle>Economic modelling</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>55</volume><spage>127</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>127-134</pages><issn>0264-9993</issn><eissn>1873-6122</eissn><abstract>The paper studies bank lending behaviour over the business cycle in a dual banking system, Malaysia, with the objective of ascertaining whether Islamic banks have a role in stabilizing credit. The study makes use of unbalanced panel data of 21 conventional banks and 16 Islamic banks covering mostly the period 2001–2013. Applying dynamic GMM estimators, we find the aggregate loans by banks to be pro-cyclical in conformity with existing studies. However, when we segregate the lending/financing behaviour of conventional and Islamic banks, the cyclicality of bank lending seems to be true only for conventional banks. As for the Islamic banks, the business cycle does not seem to affect their financing decisions. Indeed, there is indication that the Islamic banks in general and the full-fledged Islamic banks in particular can even be counter-cyclical in their financing decisions. This conclusion is fairly robust to a different loan measure, alternative model specifications, and to an alternative business cycle measure. Hence, our results provide further support to the “stability” view of the Islamic banks in that they have the ability to stabilize credit.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.econmod.2016.01.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-9993
ispartof Economic modelling, 2016-06, Vol.55, p.127-134
issn 0264-9993
1873-6122
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1789280348
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bank loans
Banking industry
Banks
Business cycle
Business cycles
Dual banking system
Dualistic economy
Islamic financing
Lending decisions
Malaysia
Organizational behavior
Studies
title Business cycle and bank lending procyclicality in a dual banking system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A57%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Business%20cycle%20and%20bank%20lending%20procyclicality%20in%20a%20dual%20banking%20system&rft.jtitle=Economic%20modelling&rft.au=Ibrahim,%20Mansor%20H.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=55&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=127-134&rft.issn=0264-9993&rft.eissn=1873-6122&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.01.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4058187011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789280348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264999316000171&rfr_iscdi=true