The Taxonomy of Legal Systems under Effect of Globalization: Classification of China and the United States
This article examines the scope and nature of current global legal transformations as a result of economic globalization. It takes the idea that legal systems are already by nature highly impacted by economical, political, and societal developments as a starting point and continues to discuss in par...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Global jurist 2016-04, Vol.16 (1), p.51-80 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 80 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 51 |
| container_title | Global jurist |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Müller, Lukas Frederik |
| description | This article examines the scope and nature of current global legal transformations as a result of economic globalization. It takes the idea that legal systems are already by nature highly impacted by economical, political, and societal developments as a starting point and continues to discuss in particular the legal consequences of economic global assimilation and the widespread decline of state sovereignty. Following these ideas, the article discusses how the current substantial legal transformations will affect the comparative method of classifying the legal systems of the world and suggests a modern, unbiased, and flexible model of taxonomy that is suitable to display the ongoing economic and legal globalization trends beyond Euro-American centrism. On the basis of this model of taxonomy, this article considers the classification of the United States and Chinese legal system and evaluates the historic factors that have formed them. In particular, special emphasis is directed towards the impact of professional, political, and traditional social norms and the degree of state sovereignty for each that led to the development of their respective legal systems today. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/gj-2015-0005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1789096574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4057332951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1851-2d2d3e2b5540e9817517426c591942e480e97f483ec8c3b2419843d916eadf7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWw8QMssRKwHTuJ2VAEBakSQ9vZcuNLmihNiu0Iwq_HoQwMTPf13Hu6F6FrSu6ooOK-aiJGqIgIIeIEzaiMecQSTk7RjFHJI5Gk4hxdONcEgLNUzlCz3gFe68--6_cj7ku8hEq3eDU6D3uHh86AxU9lCYWfpou23-q2_tK-7rsHnLfaubqsi596AvJd3WmsO4N9EN50tQeDV157cJforNStg6vfOEeb56d1_hIt3xav-eMyKmgmaMQMMzGwrRCcgMxoKmjKWVIIGV5gwLPQTUuexVBkRbxlnMqMx0bSBLQpUx3P0c1R92D79wGcV00_2C6cVDTNJJGJSHmgbo9UYXvnLJTqYOu9tqOiRE1uqqpRk5tqcjPg8oh_6NaDNVDZYQzJH-1_1mgSWvE33kx5DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789096574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Taxonomy of Legal Systems under Effect of Globalization: Classification of China and the United States</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Müller, Lukas Frederik</creator><creatorcontrib>Müller, Lukas Frederik</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the scope and nature of current global legal transformations as a result of economic globalization. It takes the idea that legal systems are already by nature highly impacted by economical, political, and societal developments as a starting point and continues to discuss in particular the legal consequences of economic global assimilation and the widespread decline of state sovereignty. Following these ideas, the article discusses how the current substantial legal transformations will affect the comparative method of classifying the legal systems of the world and suggests a modern, unbiased, and flexible model of taxonomy that is suitable to display the ongoing economic and legal globalization trends beyond Euro-American centrism. On the basis of this model of taxonomy, this article considers the classification of the United States and Chinese legal system and evaluates the historic factors that have formed them. In particular, special emphasis is directed towards the impact of professional, political, and traditional social norms and the degree of state sovereignty for each that led to the development of their respective legal systems today.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-5675</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-2640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/gj-2015-0005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>20th century ; American dollar ; China ; Classification ; Globalization ; Hypotheses ; International law ; legal classification ; Politics ; Religion ; Rule of law ; Social norms ; Sovereignty ; state sovereignty ; Studies ; Taxonomy ; Trends ; Uniform Commercial Code-US ; United States</subject><ispartof>Global jurist, 2016-04, Vol.16 (1), p.51-80</ispartof><rights>Copyright Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1851-2d2d3e2b5540e9817517426c591942e480e97f483ec8c3b2419843d916eadf7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gj-2015-0005/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gj-2015-0005/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,66503,68287</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Müller, Lukas Frederik</creatorcontrib><title>The Taxonomy of Legal Systems under Effect of Globalization: Classification of China and the United States</title><title>Global jurist</title><description>This article examines the scope and nature of current global legal transformations as a result of economic globalization. It takes the idea that legal systems are already by nature highly impacted by economical, political, and societal developments as a starting point and continues to discuss in particular the legal consequences of economic global assimilation and the widespread decline of state sovereignty. Following these ideas, the article discusses how the current substantial legal transformations will affect the comparative method of classifying the legal systems of the world and suggests a modern, unbiased, and flexible model of taxonomy that is suitable to display the ongoing economic and legal globalization trends beyond Euro-American centrism. On the basis of this model of taxonomy, this article considers the classification of the United States and Chinese legal system and evaluates the historic factors that have formed them. In particular, special emphasis is directed towards the impact of professional, political, and traditional social norms and the degree of state sovereignty for each that led to the development of their respective legal systems today.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>American dollar</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>legal classification</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>state sovereignty</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Uniform Commercial Code-US</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2194-5675</issn><issn>1934-2640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWw8QMssRKwHTuJ2VAEBakSQ9vZcuNLmihNiu0Iwq_HoQwMTPf13Hu6F6FrSu6ooOK-aiJGqIgIIeIEzaiMecQSTk7RjFHJI5Gk4hxdONcEgLNUzlCz3gFe68--6_cj7ku8hEq3eDU6D3uHh86AxU9lCYWfpou23-q2_tK-7rsHnLfaubqsi596AvJd3WmsO4N9EN50tQeDV157cJforNStg6vfOEeb56d1_hIt3xav-eMyKmgmaMQMMzGwrRCcgMxoKmjKWVIIGV5gwLPQTUuexVBkRbxlnMqMx0bSBLQpUx3P0c1R92D79wGcV00_2C6cVDTNJJGJSHmgbo9UYXvnLJTqYOu9tqOiRE1uqqpRk5tqcjPg8oh_6NaDNVDZYQzJH-1_1mgSWvE33kx5DA</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Müller, Lukas Frederik</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>The Taxonomy of Legal Systems under Effect of Globalization: Classification of China and the United States</title><author>Müller, Lukas Frederik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1851-2d2d3e2b5540e9817517426c591942e480e97f483ec8c3b2419843d916eadf7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>American dollar</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>legal classification</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>state sovereignty</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Uniform Commercial Code-US</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Müller, Lukas Frederik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Global jurist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Müller, Lukas Frederik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Taxonomy of Legal Systems under Effect of Globalization: Classification of China and the United States</atitle><jtitle>Global jurist</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>51-80</pages><issn>2194-5675</issn><eissn>1934-2640</eissn><abstract>This article examines the scope and nature of current global legal transformations as a result of economic globalization. It takes the idea that legal systems are already by nature highly impacted by economical, political, and societal developments as a starting point and continues to discuss in particular the legal consequences of economic global assimilation and the widespread decline of state sovereignty. Following these ideas, the article discusses how the current substantial legal transformations will affect the comparative method of classifying the legal systems of the world and suggests a modern, unbiased, and flexible model of taxonomy that is suitable to display the ongoing economic and legal globalization trends beyond Euro-American centrism. On the basis of this model of taxonomy, this article considers the classification of the United States and Chinese legal system and evaluates the historic factors that have formed them. In particular, special emphasis is directed towards the impact of professional, political, and traditional social norms and the degree of state sovereignty for each that led to the development of their respective legal systems today.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/gj-2015-0005</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2194-5675 |
| ispartof | Global jurist, 2016-04, Vol.16 (1), p.51-80 |
| issn | 2194-5675 1934-2640 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1789096574 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; De Gruyter journals |
| subjects | 20th century American dollar China Classification Globalization Hypotheses International law legal classification Politics Religion Rule of law Social norms Sovereignty state sovereignty Studies Taxonomy Trends Uniform Commercial Code-US United States |
| title | The Taxonomy of Legal Systems under Effect of Globalization: Classification of China and the United States |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Taxonomy%20of%20Legal%20Systems%20under%20Effect%20of%20Globalization:%20Classification%20of%20China%20and%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Global%20jurist&rft.au=M%C3%BCller,%20Lukas%20Frederik&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=51-80&rft.issn=2194-5675&rft.eissn=1934-2640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/gj-2015-0005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4057332951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789096574&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |