Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography

Cardiac CT is a non-invasive modality with the ability to estimate LVEF. However, given its limited temporal resolution and radiation, there has been initial resistance to use CT to measure LVEF. Developing an accurate, fast, low radiation dose protocol is desirable. The objective of this study is t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear cardiology 2016-06, Vol.23 (3), p.414-421
Hauptverfasser: Yang, YiQi, Yam, Yeung, Chen, Li, Aljizeeri, Ahmed, Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak, Al-Harbi, Ibraheem, Pen, Ally, Ruddy, Terrence D., Chow, Benjamin J.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 421
container_issue 3
container_start_page 414
container_title Journal of nuclear cardiology
container_volume 23
creator Yang, YiQi
Yam, Yeung
Chen, Li
Aljizeeri, Ahmed
Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak
Al-Harbi, Ibraheem
Pen, Ally
Ruddy, Terrence D.
Chow, Benjamin J.W.
description Cardiac CT is a non-invasive modality with the ability to estimate LVEF. However, given its limited temporal resolution and radiation, there has been initial resistance to use CT to measure LVEF. Developing an accurate, fast, low radiation dose protocol is desirable. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that a ‘low radiation dose’ 64 slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol is feasible and can accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) while delivering a radiation dose lower than radionuclide angiography (RNA). Patients undergoing RNA were prospectively screened and enrolled to undergo a ‘low-dose’ 64 slice CT LVEF protocol. LVEF measures, duration of each study and radiation dose between CT and RNA were compared. A total of 77 patients (mean age = 61.8 ± 12.2 years and 58 men) were analyzed. The mean LVEF measured by CT and RNA were 41.9 ± 15.2% and 39.4 ± 13.9%, respectively, (P = 0.154) with a good correlation (r = 0.863). Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between the CT and RNA LVEF (mean difference of −2.4). There was good agreement between CT LVEF and RNA for identifying patients with LVEF ≤30% (kappa = 0.693) and LVEF ≥50% (kappa = 0.749). The mean dose estimated effective dose for CT and RNA were 4.7 ± 1.6 and 9.5 ± 1.0 mSv, respectively. The mean CT LVEF imaging duration (4:32 ± 3:05 minutes) was significantly shorter than the RNA image acquisition time (9:05 ± 2:36 minutes; p < 0.001). The results of our study suggest that low-dose CT LVEF protocol is feasible, accurate, and fast while delivering a lower radiation dose than traditional RNA.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12350-015-0123-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1788698436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071358123068368</els_id><sourcerecordid>4055436131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c34e5b147f5a537a4c015cc6d4511e0e28f1f73f77e9b1c1a752122aad95c973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonReH8AN4bEdZUDpbRxZYy3xMSNW0MYehiZTMsIrWbeXsaqceWCcID_Ej5CToCdA2PqIgEXkhUMZF5cFNUW2QcpeFFJCdt5ZgoKIWvYIwcpLRhjjWiaXbLHK8Z4DeU-eblKCVPqsB9ocHSJbqDv-RC9HZcmUlygHXzoqYtmGsbk-zldhg8aTevN110bElIbutU4YEuH0IV5NKvX9RHZcWaZ8Ph7PyTPtzfP1_fF49Pdw_XVY2FLXg6FFSXKGZTKSSOFMqXNX7K2aksJgAx57cAp4ZTCZgYWjJIcODembaRtlDgkZ1PsKoa3EdOgF2GMfW7UoOq6aupSVFkFk8rGkFJEp1fRdyauNTC94aknnjqX6w1PvfGcfiePsw7bX8cPwCzgkyDlp36O8U_1P6mXkwkzk3efTcl67C22Pmbcug3-H_cnAC6UTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788698436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yang, YiQi ; Yam, Yeung ; Chen, Li ; Aljizeeri, Ahmed ; Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak ; Al-Harbi, Ibraheem ; Pen, Ally ; Ruddy, Terrence D. ; Chow, Benjamin J.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, YiQi ; Yam, Yeung ; Chen, Li ; Aljizeeri, Ahmed ; Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak ; Al-Harbi, Ibraheem ; Pen, Ally ; Ruddy, Terrence D. ; Chow, Benjamin J.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiac CT is a non-invasive modality with the ability to estimate LVEF. However, given its limited temporal resolution and radiation, there has been initial resistance to use CT to measure LVEF. Developing an accurate, fast, low radiation dose protocol is desirable. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that a ‘low radiation dose’ 64 slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol is feasible and can accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) while delivering a radiation dose lower than radionuclide angiography (RNA). Patients undergoing RNA were prospectively screened and enrolled to undergo a ‘low-dose’ 64 slice CT LVEF protocol. LVEF measures, duration of each study and radiation dose between CT and RNA were compared. A total of 77 patients (mean age = 61.8 ± 12.2 years and 58 men) were analyzed. The mean LVEF measured by CT and RNA were 41.9 ± 15.2% and 39.4 ± 13.9%, respectively, (P = 0.154) with a good correlation (r = 0.863). Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between the CT and RNA LVEF (mean difference of −2.4). There was good agreement between CT LVEF and RNA for identifying patients with LVEF ≤30% (kappa = 0.693) and LVEF ≥50% (kappa = 0.749). The mean dose estimated effective dose for CT and RNA were 4.7 ± 1.6 and 9.5 ± 1.0 mSv, respectively. The mean CT LVEF imaging duration (4:32 ± 3:05 minutes) was significantly shorter than the RNA image acquisition time (9:05 ± 2:36 minutes; p &lt; 0.001). The results of our study suggest that low-dose CT LVEF protocol is feasible, accurate, and fast while delivering a lower radiation dose than traditional RNA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-3581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0123-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26002814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Computed tomography ; ejection fraction ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original Article ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection - methods ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiology ; radionuclide angiography ; Radionuclide Angiography - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stroke Volume ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2016-06, Vol.23 (3), p.414-421</ispartof><rights>2016 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Published by ELSEVIER INC. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2015</rights><rights>American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c34e5b147f5a537a4c015cc6d4511e0e28f1f73f77e9b1c1a752122aad95c973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c34e5b147f5a537a4c015cc6d4511e0e28f1f73f77e9b1c1a752122aad95c973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12350-015-0123-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12350-015-0123-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26002814$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, YiQi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yam, Yeung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljizeeri, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Harbi, Ibraheem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pen, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruddy, Terrence D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Benjamin J.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography</title><title>Journal of nuclear cardiology</title><addtitle>J. Nucl. Cardiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><description>Cardiac CT is a non-invasive modality with the ability to estimate LVEF. However, given its limited temporal resolution and radiation, there has been initial resistance to use CT to measure LVEF. Developing an accurate, fast, low radiation dose protocol is desirable. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that a ‘low radiation dose’ 64 slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol is feasible and can accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) while delivering a radiation dose lower than radionuclide angiography (RNA). Patients undergoing RNA were prospectively screened and enrolled to undergo a ‘low-dose’ 64 slice CT LVEF protocol. LVEF measures, duration of each study and radiation dose between CT and RNA were compared. A total of 77 patients (mean age = 61.8 ± 12.2 years and 58 men) were analyzed. The mean LVEF measured by CT and RNA were 41.9 ± 15.2% and 39.4 ± 13.9%, respectively, (P = 0.154) with a good correlation (r = 0.863). Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between the CT and RNA LVEF (mean difference of −2.4). There was good agreement between CT LVEF and RNA for identifying patients with LVEF ≤30% (kappa = 0.693) and LVEF ≥50% (kappa = 0.749). The mean dose estimated effective dose for CT and RNA were 4.7 ± 1.6 and 9.5 ± 1.0 mSv, respectively. The mean CT LVEF imaging duration (4:32 ± 3:05 minutes) was significantly shorter than the RNA image acquisition time (9:05 ± 2:36 minutes; p &lt; 0.001). The results of our study suggest that low-dose CT LVEF protocol is feasible, accurate, and fast while delivering a lower radiation dose than traditional RNA.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>ejection fraction</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>radionuclide angiography</subject><subject>Radionuclide Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>1071-3581</issn><issn>1532-6551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonReH8AN4bEdZUDpbRxZYy3xMSNW0MYehiZTMsIrWbeXsaqceWCcID_Ej5CToCdA2PqIgEXkhUMZF5cFNUW2QcpeFFJCdt5ZgoKIWvYIwcpLRhjjWiaXbLHK8Z4DeU-eblKCVPqsB9ocHSJbqDv-RC9HZcmUlygHXzoqYtmGsbk-zldhg8aTevN110bElIbutU4YEuH0IV5NKvX9RHZcWaZ8Ph7PyTPtzfP1_fF49Pdw_XVY2FLXg6FFSXKGZTKSSOFMqXNX7K2aksJgAx57cAp4ZTCZgYWjJIcODembaRtlDgkZ1PsKoa3EdOgF2GMfW7UoOq6aupSVFkFk8rGkFJEp1fRdyauNTC94aknnjqX6w1PvfGcfiePsw7bX8cPwCzgkyDlp36O8U_1P6mXkwkzk3efTcl67C22Pmbcug3-H_cnAC6UTg</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Yang, YiQi</creator><creator>Yam, Yeung</creator><creator>Chen, Li</creator><creator>Aljizeeri, Ahmed</creator><creator>Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak</creator><creator>Al-Harbi, Ibraheem</creator><creator>Pen, Ally</creator><creator>Ruddy, Terrence D.</creator><creator>Chow, Benjamin J.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography</title><author>Yang, YiQi ; Yam, Yeung ; Chen, Li ; Aljizeeri, Ahmed ; Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak ; Al-Harbi, Ibraheem ; Pen, Ally ; Ruddy, Terrence D. ; Chow, Benjamin J.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c34e5b147f5a537a4c015cc6d4511e0e28f1f73f77e9b1c1a752122aad95c973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>ejection fraction</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>radionuclide angiography</topic><topic>Radionuclide Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, YiQi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yam, Yeung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljizeeri, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Harbi, Ibraheem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pen, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruddy, Terrence D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Benjamin J.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, YiQi</au><au>Yam, Yeung</au><au>Chen, Li</au><au>Aljizeeri, Ahmed</au><au>Aliyary Ghraboghly, Siamak</au><au>Al-Harbi, Ibraheem</au><au>Pen, Ally</au><au>Ruddy, Terrence D.</au><au>Chow, Benjamin J.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle><stitle>J. Nucl. Cardiol</stitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>414-421</pages><issn>1071-3581</issn><eissn>1532-6551</eissn><abstract>Cardiac CT is a non-invasive modality with the ability to estimate LVEF. However, given its limited temporal resolution and radiation, there has been initial resistance to use CT to measure LVEF. Developing an accurate, fast, low radiation dose protocol is desirable. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that a ‘low radiation dose’ 64 slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol is feasible and can accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) while delivering a radiation dose lower than radionuclide angiography (RNA). Patients undergoing RNA were prospectively screened and enrolled to undergo a ‘low-dose’ 64 slice CT LVEF protocol. LVEF measures, duration of each study and radiation dose between CT and RNA were compared. A total of 77 patients (mean age = 61.8 ± 12.2 years and 58 men) were analyzed. The mean LVEF measured by CT and RNA were 41.9 ± 15.2% and 39.4 ± 13.9%, respectively, (P = 0.154) with a good correlation (r = 0.863). Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between the CT and RNA LVEF (mean difference of −2.4). There was good agreement between CT LVEF and RNA for identifying patients with LVEF ≤30% (kappa = 0.693) and LVEF ≥50% (kappa = 0.749). The mean dose estimated effective dose for CT and RNA were 4.7 ± 1.6 and 9.5 ± 1.0 mSv, respectively. The mean CT LVEF imaging duration (4:32 ± 3:05 minutes) was significantly shorter than the RNA image acquisition time (9:05 ± 2:36 minutes; p &lt; 0.001). The results of our study suggest that low-dose CT LVEF protocol is feasible, accurate, and fast while delivering a lower radiation dose than traditional RNA.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26002814</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12350-015-0123-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-3581
ispartof Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2016-06, Vol.23 (3), p.414-421
issn 1071-3581
1532-6551
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1788698436
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Cardiology
Computed tomography
ejection fraction
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Imaging
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nuclear Medicine
Original Article
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Protection - methods
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiology
radionuclide angiography
Radionuclide Angiography - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stroke Volume
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging
title Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A29%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20left%20ventricular%20ejection%20fraction%20using%20low%20radiation%20dose%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20cardiology&rft.au=Yang,%20YiQi&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=414-421&rft.issn=1071-3581&rft.eissn=1532-6551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12350-015-0123-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4055436131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788698436&rft_id=info:pmid/26002814&rft_els_id=S1071358123068368&rfr_iscdi=true