A Meta-Synthesis of Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) in SLA
This meta-analysis reports the results of a systematic synthesis of primary studies on the effectiveness of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in second language acquisition (SLA) for the period 2000-2012. By extracting information on 21 features from each primary study, this meta-analysis intend...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language learning & technology 2015-06, Vol.19 (2), p.85 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Language learning & technology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lin, Huifen |
description | This meta-analysis reports the results of a systematic synthesis of primary studies on the effectiveness of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in second language acquisition (SLA) for the period 2000-2012. By extracting information on 21 features from each primary study, this meta-analysis intends to summarize the CMC research literature for the past decade by calculating an average effect size and performing a series of moderator analyses to factor out elements that might mediate the effect of such media in SLA. In total, 59 studies were identified as eligible after excluding three outlier studies, covering both published and unpublished studies. All studies were coded for learner characteristics (5 features), methodological characteristics (14 features) and publication characteristics (2 features), six of which were further analyzed as moderator variables. The results show that (a) there was a positive and medium overall effect for CMC used for instructional/learning purposes in SLA, (b) among the four language skills which CMC was intended to facilitate, writing skills produced the largest effect size, as did pragmatic competence, among the three language components, i.e. pragmatics, vocabulary and pronunciation explored in this meta-analysis; however this result should be interpreted as tentative since only one study measured pragmatic competence in the current meta-analysis, and (c) smaller group studies produced a larger effect size than those using larger groups or no grouping. [See the earlier study from this research project: "Establishing an Empirical Link between Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and SLA: A Meta-Analysis of the Research," v18 n3 p120-147 Oct 2014 in ERIC at EJ1046538.] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1788496305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1063777</ericid><sourcerecordid>1788496305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e205t-f8742c65a50e9de81ac5a2fa4f76192208a6995caa3fa8b312bf8c3a0a1438993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj81LxDAQxYsouK7-CULAix4KSdO0yXEp9YstgqvnMpudsFm3HyapsP-90fXgaYaZ33uPd5LMGFV5ygVlp__28-TC-x2lTLCcz5KPBWkwQLo69GGL3noyGFJ3o3VWw568okdwekuGnsQ_qY1BHewX9uh_0WroximgSxvcWAi4-bl0Ux_VwUbRbdVUd8T2ZLVcXCZnBvYer_7mPHm_r9-qx3T58vBULZYpZlSE1Mgyz3QhQFBUG5QMtIDMQG7KgqksoxIKpYQG4AbkmrNsbaTmQCE2kkrxeXJz9B3d8DmhD-1umFwfI1tWSpmrglMRqesjhbFqOzrbgTu09TOjBS_Lkn8DGXddkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788496305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Synthesis of Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) in SLA</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lin, Huifen</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Huifen</creatorcontrib><description>This meta-analysis reports the results of a systematic synthesis of primary studies on the effectiveness of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in second language acquisition (SLA) for the period 2000-2012. By extracting information on 21 features from each primary study, this meta-analysis intends to summarize the CMC research literature for the past decade by calculating an average effect size and performing a series of moderator analyses to factor out elements that might mediate the effect of such media in SLA. In total, 59 studies were identified as eligible after excluding three outlier studies, covering both published and unpublished studies. All studies were coded for learner characteristics (5 features), methodological characteristics (14 features) and publication characteristics (2 features), six of which were further analyzed as moderator variables. The results show that (a) there was a positive and medium overall effect for CMC used for instructional/learning purposes in SLA, (b) among the four language skills which CMC was intended to facilitate, writing skills produced the largest effect size, as did pragmatic competence, among the three language components, i.e. pragmatics, vocabulary and pronunciation explored in this meta-analysis; however this result should be interpreted as tentative since only one study measured pragmatic competence in the current meta-analysis, and (c) smaller group studies produced a larger effect size than those using larger groups or no grouping. [See the earlier study from this research project: "Establishing an Empirical Link between Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and SLA: A Meta-Analysis of the Research," v18 n3 p120-147 Oct 2014 in ERIC at EJ1046538.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-3501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1094-3501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Honolulu: University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center</publisher><subject>Communicative Competence (Languages) ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Computer assisted language learning ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Effect Size ; English (Second Language) ; Foreign Countries ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learning outcomes ; Meta Analysis ; Pragmatics ; Pronunciation ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Second language writing ; Statistical Analysis ; Taiwan ; Teaching Methods ; Test of English as a Foreign Language ; Vocabulary Development ; Writing Skills</subject><ispartof>Language learning & technology, 2015-06, Vol.19 (2), p.85</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center Jun 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1063777$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Huifen</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Synthesis of Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) in SLA</title><title>Language learning & technology</title><description>This meta-analysis reports the results of a systematic synthesis of primary studies on the effectiveness of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in second language acquisition (SLA) for the period 2000-2012. By extracting information on 21 features from each primary study, this meta-analysis intends to summarize the CMC research literature for the past decade by calculating an average effect size and performing a series of moderator analyses to factor out elements that might mediate the effect of such media in SLA. In total, 59 studies were identified as eligible after excluding three outlier studies, covering both published and unpublished studies. All studies were coded for learner characteristics (5 features), methodological characteristics (14 features) and publication characteristics (2 features), six of which were further analyzed as moderator variables. The results show that (a) there was a positive and medium overall effect for CMC used for instructional/learning purposes in SLA, (b) among the four language skills which CMC was intended to facilitate, writing skills produced the largest effect size, as did pragmatic competence, among the three language components, i.e. pragmatics, vocabulary and pronunciation explored in this meta-analysis; however this result should be interpreted as tentative since only one study measured pragmatic competence in the current meta-analysis, and (c) smaller group studies produced a larger effect size than those using larger groups or no grouping. [See the earlier study from this research project: "Establishing an Empirical Link between Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and SLA: A Meta-Analysis of the Research," v18 n3 p120-147 Oct 2014 in ERIC at EJ1046538.]</description><subject>Communicative Competence (Languages)</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Computer assisted language learning</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language writing</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Test of English as a Foreign Language</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><issn>1094-3501</issn><issn>1094-3501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNj81LxDAQxYsouK7-CULAix4KSdO0yXEp9YstgqvnMpudsFm3HyapsP-90fXgaYaZ33uPd5LMGFV5ygVlp__28-TC-x2lTLCcz5KPBWkwQLo69GGL3noyGFJ3o3VWw568okdwekuGnsQ_qY1BHewX9uh_0WroximgSxvcWAi4-bl0Ux_VwUbRbdVUd8T2ZLVcXCZnBvYer_7mPHm_r9-qx3T58vBULZYpZlSE1Mgyz3QhQFBUG5QMtIDMQG7KgqksoxIKpYQG4AbkmrNsbaTmQCE2kkrxeXJz9B3d8DmhD-1umFwfI1tWSpmrglMRqesjhbFqOzrbgTu09TOjBS_Lkn8DGXddkA</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Lin, Huifen</creator><general>University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center</general><general>University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>A Meta-Synthesis of Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) in SLA</title><author>Lin, Huifen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e205t-f8742c65a50e9de81ac5a2fa4f76192208a6995caa3fa8b312bf8c3a0a1438993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Communicative Competence (Languages)</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Computer assisted language learning</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language writing</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Test of English as a Foreign Language</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Huifen</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language learning & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Huifen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1063777</ericid><atitle>A Meta-Synthesis of Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) in SLA</atitle><jtitle>Language learning & technology</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>85</spage><pages>85-</pages><issn>1094-3501</issn><eissn>1094-3501</eissn><abstract>This meta-analysis reports the results of a systematic synthesis of primary studies on the effectiveness of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in second language acquisition (SLA) for the period 2000-2012. By extracting information on 21 features from each primary study, this meta-analysis intends to summarize the CMC research literature for the past decade by calculating an average effect size and performing a series of moderator analyses to factor out elements that might mediate the effect of such media in SLA. In total, 59 studies were identified as eligible after excluding three outlier studies, covering both published and unpublished studies. All studies were coded for learner characteristics (5 features), methodological characteristics (14 features) and publication characteristics (2 features), six of which were further analyzed as moderator variables. The results show that (a) there was a positive and medium overall effect for CMC used for instructional/learning purposes in SLA, (b) among the four language skills which CMC was intended to facilitate, writing skills produced the largest effect size, as did pragmatic competence, among the three language components, i.e. pragmatics, vocabulary and pronunciation explored in this meta-analysis; however this result should be interpreted as tentative since only one study measured pragmatic competence in the current meta-analysis, and (c) smaller group studies produced a larger effect size than those using larger groups or no grouping. [See the earlier study from this research project: "Establishing an Empirical Link between Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and SLA: A Meta-Analysis of the Research," v18 n3 p120-147 Oct 2014 in ERIC at EJ1046538.]</abstract><cop>Honolulu</cop><pub>University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center</pub><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1094-3501 |
ispartof | Language learning & technology, 2015-06, Vol.19 (2), p.85 |
issn | 1094-3501 1094-3501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1788496305 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Communicative Competence (Languages) Computer Assisted Instruction Computer assisted language learning Computer Mediated Communication Effect Size English (Second Language) Foreign Countries Instructional Effectiveness Learning outcomes Meta Analysis Pragmatics Pronunciation Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Second language writing Statistical Analysis Taiwan Teaching Methods Test of English as a Foreign Language Vocabulary Development Writing Skills |
title | A Meta-Synthesis of Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) in SLA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A56%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Synthesis%20of%20Empirical%20Research%20on%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20Computer-Mediated%20Communication%20(CMC)%20in%20SLA&rft.jtitle=Language%20learning%20&%20technology&rft.au=Lin,%20Huifen&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=85&rft.pages=85-&rft.issn=1094-3501&rft.eissn=1094-3501&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1788496305%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788496305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1063777&rfr_iscdi=true |