A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning

Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational psychology review 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.353-375
Hauptverfasser: Carpenter, Shana K., Lund, Terry J. S., Coffman, Clark R., Armstrong, Patrick I., Lamm, Monica H., Reason, Robert D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 375
container_issue 2
container_start_page 353
container_title Educational psychology review
container_volume 28
creator Carpenter, Shana K.
Lund, Terry J. S.
Coffman, Clark R.
Armstrong, Patrick I.
Lamm, Monica H.
Reason, Robert D.
description Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1788491972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713722216</galeid><ericid>EJ1100677</ericid><jstor_id>24761236</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713722216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhpfSQtOkP6CHwkLPSvS1kufoGjdpMRT6AbkJrXbWlllLriSn5N9H7pbQW9FBw8zzvjO8TfOO0WtGqb7JjCq5IJR1BARjBF40F6zTggih7l_WmkpKNFf3r5s3Oe8ppaCluGjssl1NNucU46H9Xk7DYxtDW3bYfsPJFh9D3vlj-xHLb8Twh8BQ2qXbeXzAw7m2YahwSbVhJ7IOOxscDu0GbQo-bK-aV6OdMr79-182Pz-tf6zuyObr7efVckOcAChE9ny0MEAHvIOxp9gxsACOWVwMI_SI1KleYifAadYNVoOU0inaa2ElgrhsPsy-xxR_nTAXs4-nFOpKw_RiIYGB5pW6nqmtndD4MMaSrKtvwIN3MeDoa3-pmdCcc6aqgM0Cl2KNCUdzTP5g06Nh1JyjN3P0pkZvztGb8ynvZw0m75759RdWeaV1nfN5nussbDH9c-r_Tfe5xPTsyqVWjAslngBqaZnS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788491972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Carpenter, Shana K. ; Lund, Terry J. S. ; Coffman, Clark R. ; Armstrong, Patrick I. ; Lamm, Monica H. ; Reason, Robert D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Shana K. ; Lund, Terry J. S. ; Coffman, Clark R. ; Armstrong, Patrick I. ; Lamm, Monica H. ; Reason, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><description>Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-336X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPSREO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Biology ; Calibration ; Child and School Psychology ; Class Activities ; Cognition ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational Psychology ; Essay ; ESSAYS ; Experimental psychology ; Feedback (Response) ; Individual Differences ; Information Retrieval ; Introductory Courses ; Junior high school students ; Large Group Instruction ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning laboratories ; Learning Processes ; Memory ; Memory recall ; Metacognition ; Methods ; Oocytes ; Outcomes of Education ; Ova ; Prediction ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Students ; Tests ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Educational psychology review, 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.353-375</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24761236$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24761236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1100677$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Shana K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Terry J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffman, Clark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Patrick I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Monica H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reason, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><title>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</title><title>Educational psychology review</title><addtitle>Educ Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Class Activities</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Essay</subject><subject>ESSAYS</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Junior high school students</subject><subject>Large Group Instruction</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning laboratories</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory recall</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Ova</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1040-726X</issn><issn>1573-336X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhpfSQtOkP6CHwkLPSvS1kufoGjdpMRT6AbkJrXbWlllLriSn5N9H7pbQW9FBw8zzvjO8TfOO0WtGqb7JjCq5IJR1BARjBF40F6zTggih7l_WmkpKNFf3r5s3Oe8ppaCluGjssl1NNucU46H9Xk7DYxtDW3bYfsPJFh9D3vlj-xHLb8Twh8BQ2qXbeXzAw7m2YahwSbVhJ7IOOxscDu0GbQo-bK-aV6OdMr79-182Pz-tf6zuyObr7efVckOcAChE9ny0MEAHvIOxp9gxsACOWVwMI_SI1KleYifAadYNVoOU0inaa2ElgrhsPsy-xxR_nTAXs4-nFOpKw_RiIYGB5pW6nqmtndD4MMaSrKtvwIN3MeDoa3-pmdCcc6aqgM0Cl2KNCUdzTP5g06Nh1JyjN3P0pkZvztGb8ynvZw0m75759RdWeaV1nfN5nussbDH9c-r_Tfe5xPTsyqVWjAslngBqaZnS</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Carpenter, Shana K.</creator><creator>Lund, Terry J. S.</creator><creator>Coffman, Clark R.</creator><creator>Armstrong, Patrick I.</creator><creator>Lamm, Monica H.</creator><creator>Reason, Robert D.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</title><author>Carpenter, Shana K. ; Lund, Terry J. S. ; Coffman, Clark R. ; Armstrong, Patrick I. ; Lamm, Monica H. ; Reason, Robert D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Class Activities</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Essay</topic><topic>ESSAYS</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Junior high school students</topic><topic>Large Group Instruction</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning laboratories</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory recall</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Ova</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Shana K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Terry J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffman, Clark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Patrick I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Monica H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reason, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, Shana K.</au><au>Lund, Terry J. S.</au><au>Coffman, Clark R.</au><au>Armstrong, Patrick I.</au><au>Lamm, Monica H.</au><au>Reason, Robert D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1100677</ericid><atitle>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle><stitle>Educ Psychol Rev</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>353-375</pages><issn>1040-726X</issn><eissn>1573-336X</eissn><coden>EPSREO</coden><abstract>Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-726X
ispartof Educational psychology review, 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.353-375
issn 1040-726X
1573-336X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1788491972
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Academic Achievement
Biology
Calibration
Child and School Psychology
Class Activities
Cognition
Education
Educational Environment
Educational Psychology
Essay
ESSAYS
Experimental psychology
Feedback (Response)
Individual Differences
Information Retrieval
Introductory Courses
Junior high school students
Large Group Instruction
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Learning laboratories
Learning Processes
Memory
Memory recall
Metacognition
Methods
Oocytes
Outcomes of Education
Ova
Prediction
Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Students
Tests
Undergraduate Students
title A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A58%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Classroom%20Study%20on%20the%20Relationship%20Between%20Student%20Achievement%20and%20Retrieval-Enhanced%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Carpenter,%20Shana%20K.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=353-375&rft.issn=1040-726X&rft.eissn=1573-336X&rft.coden=EPSREO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713722216%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788491972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713722216&rft_ericid=EJ1100677&rft_jstor_id=24761236&rfr_iscdi=true