A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning
Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational psychology review 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.353-375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 353 |
container_title | Educational psychology review |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Carpenter, Shana K. Lund, Terry J. S. Coffman, Clark R. Armstrong, Patrick I. Lamm, Monica H. Reason, Robert D. |
description | Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1788491972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713722216</galeid><ericid>EJ1100677</ericid><jstor_id>24761236</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713722216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhpfSQtOkP6CHwkLPSvS1kufoGjdpMRT6AbkJrXbWlllLriSn5N9H7pbQW9FBw8zzvjO8TfOO0WtGqb7JjCq5IJR1BARjBF40F6zTggih7l_WmkpKNFf3r5s3Oe8ppaCluGjssl1NNucU46H9Xk7DYxtDW3bYfsPJFh9D3vlj-xHLb8Twh8BQ2qXbeXzAw7m2YahwSbVhJ7IOOxscDu0GbQo-bK-aV6OdMr79-182Pz-tf6zuyObr7efVckOcAChE9ny0MEAHvIOxp9gxsACOWVwMI_SI1KleYifAadYNVoOU0inaa2ElgrhsPsy-xxR_nTAXs4-nFOpKw_RiIYGB5pW6nqmtndD4MMaSrKtvwIN3MeDoa3-pmdCcc6aqgM0Cl2KNCUdzTP5g06Nh1JyjN3P0pkZvztGb8ynvZw0m75759RdWeaV1nfN5nussbDH9c-r_Tfe5xPTsyqVWjAslngBqaZnS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788491972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Carpenter, Shana K. ; Lund, Terry J. S. ; Coffman, Clark R. ; Armstrong, Patrick I. ; Lamm, Monica H. ; Reason, Robert D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Shana K. ; Lund, Terry J. S. ; Coffman, Clark R. ; Armstrong, Patrick I. ; Lamm, Monica H. ; Reason, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><description>Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-336X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPSREO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Biology ; Calibration ; Child and School Psychology ; Class Activities ; Cognition ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational Psychology ; Essay ; ESSAYS ; Experimental psychology ; Feedback (Response) ; Individual Differences ; Information Retrieval ; Introductory Courses ; Junior high school students ; Large Group Instruction ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning laboratories ; Learning Processes ; Memory ; Memory recall ; Metacognition ; Methods ; Oocytes ; Outcomes of Education ; Ova ; Prediction ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Students ; Tests ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Educational psychology review, 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.353-375</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24761236$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24761236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1100677$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Shana K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Terry J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffman, Clark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Patrick I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Monica H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reason, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><title>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</title><title>Educational psychology review</title><addtitle>Educ Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Class Activities</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Essay</subject><subject>ESSAYS</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Junior high school students</subject><subject>Large Group Instruction</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning laboratories</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory recall</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Ova</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1040-726X</issn><issn>1573-336X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhpfSQtOkP6CHwkLPSvS1kufoGjdpMRT6AbkJrXbWlllLriSn5N9H7pbQW9FBw8zzvjO8TfOO0WtGqb7JjCq5IJR1BARjBF40F6zTggih7l_WmkpKNFf3r5s3Oe8ppaCluGjssl1NNucU46H9Xk7DYxtDW3bYfsPJFh9D3vlj-xHLb8Twh8BQ2qXbeXzAw7m2YahwSbVhJ7IOOxscDu0GbQo-bK-aV6OdMr79-182Pz-tf6zuyObr7efVckOcAChE9ny0MEAHvIOxp9gxsACOWVwMI_SI1KleYifAadYNVoOU0inaa2ElgrhsPsy-xxR_nTAXs4-nFOpKw_RiIYGB5pW6nqmtndD4MMaSrKtvwIN3MeDoa3-pmdCcc6aqgM0Cl2KNCUdzTP5g06Nh1JyjN3P0pkZvztGb8ynvZw0m75759RdWeaV1nfN5nussbDH9c-r_Tfe5xPTsyqVWjAslngBqaZnS</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Carpenter, Shana K.</creator><creator>Lund, Terry J. S.</creator><creator>Coffman, Clark R.</creator><creator>Armstrong, Patrick I.</creator><creator>Lamm, Monica H.</creator><creator>Reason, Robert D.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</title><author>Carpenter, Shana K. ; Lund, Terry J. S. ; Coffman, Clark R. ; Armstrong, Patrick I. ; Lamm, Monica H. ; Reason, Robert D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4b2fa9d959259fb0e519a99c1ae8df9bee0c6b4e539c715da79444c60b73a4e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Class Activities</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Essay</topic><topic>ESSAYS</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Junior high school students</topic><topic>Large Group Instruction</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning laboratories</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory recall</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Ova</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Shana K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Terry J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffman, Clark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Patrick I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Monica H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reason, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, Shana K.</au><au>Lund, Terry J. S.</au><au>Coffman, Clark R.</au><au>Armstrong, Patrick I.</au><au>Lamm, Monica H.</au><au>Reason, Robert D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1100677</ericid><atitle>A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle><stitle>Educ Psychol Rev</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>353-375</pages><issn>1040-726X</issn><eissn>1573-336X</eissn><coden>EPSREO</coden><abstract>Retrieval practice has been shown to produce powerful learning gains in laboratory experiments but has seldom been explored in classrooms as a means of enhancing students' learning of their course-relevant material. Furthermore, research is lacking concerning the role of individual differences in learning from retrieval. The current study explored the effects of retrieval in a large undergraduate introductory biology course as a function of individual differences in student achievement. Students completed in-class exercises that required them to retrieve course information (e.g., recalling definitions for terms and labeling diagrams) followed by feedback or to simply copy the information without retrieving it. A later quiz over the information showed that high-performing students benefited more from retrieving than copying, whereas middle- and low-performing students benefited more from copying than retrieving. When asked to predict their quiz scores following the in-class exercises, high-performers demonstrated better overall metacognitive calibration compared to middle- or low-performers. These results highlight the importance of individual differences in learning from retrieval and encourage future research using course-relevant material to consider the role of student achievement in classroom-based interventions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-726X |
ispartof | Educational psychology review, 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.353-375 |
issn | 1040-726X 1573-336X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1788491972 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Academic Achievement Biology Calibration Child and School Psychology Class Activities Cognition Education Educational Environment Educational Psychology Essay ESSAYS Experimental psychology Feedback (Response) Individual Differences Information Retrieval Introductory Courses Junior high school students Large Group Instruction Learning Learning and Instruction Learning laboratories Learning Processes Memory Memory recall Metacognition Methods Oocytes Outcomes of Education Ova Prediction Self Evaluation (Individuals) Students Tests Undergraduate Students |
title | A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A58%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Classroom%20Study%20on%20the%20Relationship%20Between%20Student%20Achievement%20and%20Retrieval-Enhanced%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Carpenter,%20Shana%20K.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=353-375&rft.issn=1040-726X&rft.eissn=1573-336X&rft.coden=EPSREO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10648-015-9311-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713722216%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788491972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713722216&rft_ericid=EJ1100677&rft_jstor_id=24761236&rfr_iscdi=true |