Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research
This article is about note taking, but it is not an exhaustive review of note-taking literature. Instead, it portrays the application of note-taking research to an unusual and important area of practice—the law. I was hired to serve as an expert witness on note taking in a legal case that hinged, in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational psychology review 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.377-384 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 384 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 377 |
| container_title | Educational psychology review |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Kiewra, Kenneth A. |
| description | This article is about note taking, but it is not an exhaustive review of note-taking literature. Instead, it portrays the application of note-taking research to an unusual and important area of practice—the law. I was hired to serve as an expert witness on note taking in a legal case that hinged, in part, on the completeness and accuracy of handwritten meeting notes. Based on my own research and that of others, I rendered three opinions about handwritten notes: (a) They omit most of what is said, (b) they omit details, context, and essential qualifiers, and (c) they contain inaccuracies or vague statements. This article tells the story of how I came to investigate note taking, become an expert witness, and render those three opinions. It concludes with a call to investigate note taking in non-academic settings such as meetings and to uncover ways to boost and improve note-taking methods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10648-015-9353-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1788491632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713722215</galeid><ericid>EJ1100682</ericid><jstor_id>24761237</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713722215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-1348241c3028cf9780d8412a1fb4dc23db7087861bbc4b4acb3079167e12f1283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcfwAeh4HNmbpI1qW9lzH8MBZmwt5Cm6czsmpl0D-7Tm9ExfJM8JOT8zr2HkyTXgEeAMb8LgDMmEIYxyumYot1JMoAxp4jSbHEa35hhxEm2OE8uQlhhjHPO6CApXl1n0rn6su0ydW0691Y192mRzsxSNWmx2TRWq85GydXpHkYH-N0Eo7z-vEzOatUEc3W4h8nHw3Q-eUKzt8fnSTFDmuZ5h4AyQRhoionQdc4FrgQDoqAuWaUJrUqOBRcZlKVmJVO6pJjnkHEDpAYi6DC57eduvPvemtDJldv6Nq6UwIVgkaUkUqOeiumNtG3tOq90PJVZW-1aU9v4X3CgnBAC42iA3qC9C8GbWm68XSv_IwHLfbWyr1bGauW-WrmLnpveY7zVR376ApHPxD4E6fUQtXZp_J-o_w9dhc7541TCeAaEcvoLg0eMJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788491632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Kiewra, Kenneth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kiewra, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article is about note taking, but it is not an exhaustive review of note-taking literature. Instead, it portrays the application of note-taking research to an unusual and important area of practice—the law. I was hired to serve as an expert witness on note taking in a legal case that hinged, in part, on the completeness and accuracy of handwritten meeting notes. Based on my own research and that of others, I rendered three opinions about handwritten notes: (a) They omit most of what is said, (b) they omit details, context, and essential qualifiers, and (c) they contain inaccuracies or vague statements. This article tells the story of how I came to investigate note taking, become an expert witness, and render those three opinions. It concludes with a call to investigate note taking in non-academic settings such as meetings and to uncover ways to boost and improve note-taking methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-336X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9353-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPSREO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Ambiguity (Semantics) ; Child and School Psychology ; College Students ; Conversation ; Court Litigation ; Education ; Educational Psychology ; Energy ; Essay ; ESSAYS ; Evidence, Expert ; Expert witness testimony ; Expertise ; Government agencies ; Graduate Students ; Handwriting ; Instructional Materials ; Investors ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Lectures ; Literature Reviews ; Meetings ; Notetaking ; Opinions ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Seminars ; Telephones</subject><ispartof>Educational psychology review, 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.377-384</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-1348241c3028cf9780d8412a1fb4dc23db7087861bbc4b4acb3079167e12f1283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-1348241c3028cf9780d8412a1fb4dc23db7087861bbc4b4acb3079167e12f1283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24761237$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24761237$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1100682$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kiewra, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research</title><title>Educational psychology review</title><addtitle>Educ Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>This article is about note taking, but it is not an exhaustive review of note-taking literature. Instead, it portrays the application of note-taking research to an unusual and important area of practice—the law. I was hired to serve as an expert witness on note taking in a legal case that hinged, in part, on the completeness and accuracy of handwritten meeting notes. Based on my own research and that of others, I rendered three opinions about handwritten notes: (a) They omit most of what is said, (b) they omit details, context, and essential qualifiers, and (c) they contain inaccuracies or vague statements. This article tells the story of how I came to investigate note taking, become an expert witness, and render those three opinions. It concludes with a call to investigate note taking in non-academic settings such as meetings and to uncover ways to boost and improve note-taking methods.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Ambiguity (Semantics)</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Court Litigation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Essay</subject><subject>ESSAYS</subject><subject>Evidence, Expert</subject><subject>Expert witness testimony</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Handwriting</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Lectures</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Notetaking</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><issn>1040-726X</issn><issn>1573-336X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcfwAeh4HNmbpI1qW9lzH8MBZmwt5Cm6czsmpl0D-7Tm9ExfJM8JOT8zr2HkyTXgEeAMb8LgDMmEIYxyumYot1JMoAxp4jSbHEa35hhxEm2OE8uQlhhjHPO6CApXl1n0rn6su0ydW0691Y192mRzsxSNWmx2TRWq85GydXpHkYH-N0Eo7z-vEzOatUEc3W4h8nHw3Q-eUKzt8fnSTFDmuZ5h4AyQRhoionQdc4FrgQDoqAuWaUJrUqOBRcZlKVmJVO6pJjnkHEDpAYi6DC57eduvPvemtDJldv6Nq6UwIVgkaUkUqOeiumNtG3tOq90PJVZW-1aU9v4X3CgnBAC42iA3qC9C8GbWm68XSv_IwHLfbWyr1bGauW-WrmLnpveY7zVR376ApHPxD4E6fUQtXZp_J-o_w9dhc7541TCeAaEcvoLg0eMJQ</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Kiewra, Kenneth A.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research</title><author>Kiewra, Kenneth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-1348241c3028cf9780d8412a1fb4dc23db7087861bbc4b4acb3079167e12f1283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Ambiguity (Semantics)</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Court Litigation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Essay</topic><topic>ESSAYS</topic><topic>Evidence, Expert</topic><topic>Expert witness testimony</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Handwriting</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Lectures</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Notetaking</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kiewra, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kiewra, Kenneth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1100682</ericid><atitle>Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle><stitle>Educ Psychol Rev</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>377-384</pages><issn>1040-726X</issn><eissn>1573-336X</eissn><coden>EPSREO</coden><abstract>This article is about note taking, but it is not an exhaustive review of note-taking literature. Instead, it portrays the application of note-taking research to an unusual and important area of practice—the law. I was hired to serve as an expert witness on note taking in a legal case that hinged, in part, on the completeness and accuracy of handwritten meeting notes. Based on my own research and that of others, I rendered three opinions about handwritten notes: (a) They omit most of what is said, (b) they omit details, context, and essential qualifiers, and (c) they contain inaccuracies or vague statements. This article tells the story of how I came to investigate note taking, become an expert witness, and render those three opinions. It concludes with a call to investigate note taking in non-academic settings such as meetings and to uncover ways to boost and improve note-taking methods.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10648-015-9353-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1040-726X |
| ispartof | Educational psychology review, 2016-06, Vol.28 (2), p.377-384 |
| issn | 1040-726X 1573-336X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1788491632 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Accuracy Ambiguity (Semantics) Child and School Psychology College Students Conversation Court Litigation Education Educational Psychology Energy Essay ESSAYS Evidence, Expert Expert witness testimony Expertise Government agencies Graduate Students Handwriting Instructional Materials Investors Learning Learning and Instruction Lectures Literature Reviews Meetings Notetaking Opinions Resistance (Psychology) Seminars Telephones |
| title | Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A56%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Note%20Taking%20on%20Trial:%20A%20Legal%20Application%20of%20Note-Taking%20Research&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Kiewra,%20Kenneth%20A.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=377-384&rft.issn=1040-726X&rft.eissn=1573-336X&rft.coden=EPSREO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10648-015-9353-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713722215%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788491632&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713722215&rft_ericid=EJ1100682&rft_jstor_id=24761237&rfr_iscdi=true |