Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment
•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic behavior & organization 2016-04, Vol.124, p.102-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102 |
container_title | Journal of economic behavior & organization |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Choo, C.Y. Lawrence Fonseca, Miguel A. Myles, Gareth D. |
description | •We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab.
We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1787756016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167268115002589</els_id><sourcerecordid>4050234921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wFXA9YzJfGUCgkitH1Bwo-uQZF5oxrYZk7S0_94M49ps7iLnvvc4CN1SklNCm_s-70G5vCC0zgnPU5yhGW0Zzyir6TmaJYhlRdPSS3QVQk_SYwWfofWzwyHuO9jFgBWs5QHwxn4D9iA3OMrjIE_gA7Y7HNfpS6pHvDzYxGvAxrstlhMKxjgfxwbWbjtsrBwJOA7g7TZNv0YXRm4C3PzlHH29LD8Xb9nq4_V98bTKdMmLmKmqVLrSkhPZFg2vTccrVVMNtKxbzgveaEW7quyASNNVbalpK1VRNqpl1GhdztHdNHfw7mcPIYre7f0urRSUtYzVTVKRqGKitHcheDBiSGdKfxKUiNGo6MVoVIxGBeEiRSo9TCVI9x8seBG0HUV01oOOonP2v_ov2N5_6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787756016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence ; Fonseca, Miguel A. ; Myles, Gareth D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence ; Fonseca, Miguel A. ; Myles, Gareth D.</creatorcontrib><description>•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab.
We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-2681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1751</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Behavior change ; Compliance ; Field experiment ; Fines ; Fines & penalties ; Frame analysis ; Income taxes ; Manipulation ; Real effort ; Self employment ; Self evaluation ; Studies ; Tax compliance ; Taxation ; Taxpayers</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic behavior & organization, 2016-04, Vol.124, p.102-114</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5294-6784</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268115002589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myles, Gareth D.</creatorcontrib><title>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</title><title>Journal of economic behavior & organization</title><description>•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab.
We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab.</description><subject>Behavior change</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Field experiment</subject><subject>Fines</subject><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Real effort</subject><subject>Self employment</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax compliance</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxpayers</subject><issn>0167-2681</issn><issn>1879-1751</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wFXA9YzJfGUCgkitH1Bwo-uQZF5oxrYZk7S0_94M49ps7iLnvvc4CN1SklNCm_s-70G5vCC0zgnPU5yhGW0Zzyir6TmaJYhlRdPSS3QVQk_SYwWfofWzwyHuO9jFgBWs5QHwxn4D9iA3OMrjIE_gA7Y7HNfpS6pHvDzYxGvAxrstlhMKxjgfxwbWbjtsrBwJOA7g7TZNv0YXRm4C3PzlHH29LD8Xb9nq4_V98bTKdMmLmKmqVLrSkhPZFg2vTccrVVMNtKxbzgveaEW7quyASNNVbalpK1VRNqpl1GhdztHdNHfw7mcPIYre7f0urRSUtYzVTVKRqGKitHcheDBiSGdKfxKUiNGo6MVoVIxGBeEiRSo9TCVI9x8seBG0HUV01oOOonP2v_ov2N5_6Q</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</creator><creator>Fonseca, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Myles, Gareth D.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-6784</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</title><author>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence ; Fonseca, Miguel A. ; Myles, Gareth D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavior change</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Field experiment</topic><topic>Fines</topic><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Real effort</topic><topic>Self employment</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax compliance</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxpayers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myles, Gareth D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic behavior & organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</au><au>Fonseca, Miguel A.</au><au>Myles, Gareth D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic behavior & organization</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>124</volume><spage>102</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>102-114</pages><issn>0167-2681</issn><eissn>1879-1751</eissn><coden>JEBOD9</coden><abstract>•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab.
We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-6784</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-2681 |
ispartof | Journal of economic behavior & organization, 2016-04, Vol.124, p.102-114 |
issn | 0167-2681 1879-1751 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1787756016 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Behavior change Compliance Field experiment Fines Fines & penalties Frame analysis Income taxes Manipulation Real effort Self employment Self evaluation Studies Tax compliance Taxation Taxpayers |
title | Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A43%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20students%20behave%20like%20real%20taxpayers%20in%20the%20lab?%20Evidence%20from%20a%20real%20effort%20tax%20compliance%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20behavior%20&%20organization&rft.au=Choo,%20C.Y.%20Lawrence&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=124&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=102-114&rft.issn=0167-2681&rft.eissn=1879-1751&rft.coden=JEBOD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4050234921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787756016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167268115002589&rfr_iscdi=true |