Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment

•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic behavior & organization 2016-04, Vol.124, p.102-114
Hauptverfasser: Choo, C.Y. Lawrence, Fonseca, Miguel A., Myles, Gareth D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue
container_start_page 102
container_title Journal of economic behavior & organization
container_volume 124
creator Choo, C.Y. Lawrence
Fonseca, Miguel A.
Myles, Gareth D.
description •We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab. We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1787756016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167268115002589</els_id><sourcerecordid>4050234921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wFXA9YzJfGUCgkitH1Bwo-uQZF5oxrYZk7S0_94M49ps7iLnvvc4CN1SklNCm_s-70G5vCC0zgnPU5yhGW0Zzyir6TmaJYhlRdPSS3QVQk_SYwWfofWzwyHuO9jFgBWs5QHwxn4D9iA3OMrjIE_gA7Y7HNfpS6pHvDzYxGvAxrstlhMKxjgfxwbWbjtsrBwJOA7g7TZNv0YXRm4C3PzlHH29LD8Xb9nq4_V98bTKdMmLmKmqVLrSkhPZFg2vTccrVVMNtKxbzgveaEW7quyASNNVbalpK1VRNqpl1GhdztHdNHfw7mcPIYre7f0urRSUtYzVTVKRqGKitHcheDBiSGdKfxKUiNGo6MVoVIxGBeEiRSo9TCVI9x8seBG0HUV01oOOonP2v_ov2N5_6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787756016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence ; Fonseca, Miguel A. ; Myles, Gareth D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence ; Fonseca, Miguel A. ; Myles, Gareth D.</creatorcontrib><description>•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab. We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-2681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1751</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Behavior change ; Compliance ; Field experiment ; Fines ; Fines &amp; penalties ; Frame analysis ; Income taxes ; Manipulation ; Real effort ; Self employment ; Self evaluation ; Studies ; Tax compliance ; Taxation ; Taxpayers</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic behavior &amp; organization, 2016-04, Vol.124, p.102-114</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5294-6784</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268115002589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myles, Gareth D.</creatorcontrib><title>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</title><title>Journal of economic behavior &amp; organization</title><description>•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab. We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab.</description><subject>Behavior change</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Field experiment</subject><subject>Fines</subject><subject>Fines &amp; penalties</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Real effort</subject><subject>Self employment</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax compliance</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxpayers</subject><issn>0167-2681</issn><issn>1879-1751</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKt_wFXA9YzJfGUCgkitH1Bwo-uQZF5oxrYZk7S0_94M49ps7iLnvvc4CN1SklNCm_s-70G5vCC0zgnPU5yhGW0Zzyir6TmaJYhlRdPSS3QVQk_SYwWfofWzwyHuO9jFgBWs5QHwxn4D9iA3OMrjIE_gA7Y7HNfpS6pHvDzYxGvAxrstlhMKxjgfxwbWbjtsrBwJOA7g7TZNv0YXRm4C3PzlHH29LD8Xb9nq4_V98bTKdMmLmKmqVLrSkhPZFg2vTccrVVMNtKxbzgveaEW7quyASNNVbalpK1VRNqpl1GhdztHdNHfw7mcPIYre7f0urRSUtYzVTVKRqGKitHcheDBiSGdKfxKUiNGo6MVoVIxGBeEiRSo9TCVI9x8seBG0HUV01oOOonP2v_ov2N5_6Q</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</creator><creator>Fonseca, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Myles, Gareth D.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-6784</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</title><author>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence ; Fonseca, Miguel A. ; Myles, Gareth D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-b43bc4ca90a82695fd94b51ce135899296cb1d43de0afd483c18ab236b871fcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavior change</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Field experiment</topic><topic>Fines</topic><topic>Fines &amp; penalties</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Real effort</topic><topic>Self employment</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax compliance</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxpayers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myles, Gareth D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic behavior &amp; organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choo, C.Y. Lawrence</au><au>Fonseca, Miguel A.</au><au>Myles, Gareth D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic behavior &amp; organization</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>124</volume><spage>102</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>102-114</pages><issn>0167-2681</issn><eissn>1879-1751</eissn><coden>JEBOD9</coden><abstract>•We run tax evasion experiments on three samples with varied tax filing experience.•Students are the least compliant sample, but most responsive to treatment changes.•Non-students are more compliant but non-responsive to treatment changes.•We find strong evidence of the bomb-crater effect only in the student sample.•We show sample differences in behavior are due to compliance norms outside the lab. We report on data from a real-effort tax compliance experiment using three subject pools: students, who do not pay income tax; company employees, whose income is reported by their employer; and self-employed taxpayers, who are responsible for filing and payment. While compliance behavior is unaffected by changes in the level of, or information about the audit probability, higher fines increase compliance. We find subject pool differences: self-assessed taxpayers are the most compliant, while students are the least compliant. Through a simple framing manipulation, we show that such differences are driven by norms of compliance from outside the lab.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-6784</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-2681
ispartof Journal of economic behavior & organization, 2016-04, Vol.124, p.102-114
issn 0167-2681
1879-1751
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1787756016
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Behavior change
Compliance
Field experiment
Fines
Fines & penalties
Frame analysis
Income taxes
Manipulation
Real effort
Self employment
Self evaluation
Studies
Tax compliance
Taxation
Taxpayers
title Do students behave like real taxpayers in the lab? Evidence from a real effort tax compliance experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A43%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20students%20behave%20like%20real%20taxpayers%20in%20the%20lab?%20Evidence%20from%20a%20real%20effort%20tax%20compliance%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20behavior%20&%20organization&rft.au=Choo,%20C.Y.%20Lawrence&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=124&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=102-114&rft.issn=0167-2681&rft.eissn=1879-1751&rft.coden=JEBOD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4050234921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787756016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167268115002589&rfr_iscdi=true