Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines
In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated iner...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on power systems 2016-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1129-1138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1138 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1129 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on power systems |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Van de Vyver, Jan De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. Meersman, Bart Vandevelde, Lieven Vandoorn, Tine L. |
description | In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1787239407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7104170</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1816083502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8BL162JrvJJjlK_SoISlvpcYnJrG5Zk5qkQv-9qVUPnl6Yed6BeRA6pWREKVGX86fFdDYqCeWjklEhuNxDA8q5LEgt1D4aECl5IRUnh-goxiUhpM6LAYLr4P0Kj71LwfdYR6wdvuoTBKdT9wl44iCkTvd4CnHlXQQ8S0EneN3g1gec3vJg43KkzvzC2Du86JzF83V46RzEY3TQ6j7CyU8O0fPtzXx8Xzw83k3GVw-FYaxKhbXGWGoJA1ZSVnEt65YbCq2klmrDqaq4ZUqxum4rxaVta10r2wojhRLGVEN0sbu7Cv5jDTE171000PfagV_HhkpaE1lxUmb0_B-69Ov8dJ8pIUVZKUZEpsodZYKPMUDbrEL3rsOmoaTZmm--zTdb882P-Vw625U6APgrCErynlRf7cyAEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787239407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Van de Vyver, Jan ; De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. ; Meersman, Bart ; Vandevelde, Lieven ; Vandoorn, Tine L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van de Vyver, Jan ; De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. ; Meersman, Bart ; Vandevelde, Lieven ; Vandoorn, Tine L.</creatorcontrib><description>In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Ancillary services ; Constants ; Control systems ; Frequency response ; Generators ; Inertia ; Inertial ; inertial response ; Optimization ; power system ; Power systems ; Robustness ; Strategy ; synthetic inertia ; Tuning ; Turbines ; wind energy ; Wind power generation ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2016-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1129-1138</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7104170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,797,27929,27930,54763</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7104170$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van de Vyver, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meersman, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevelde, Lieven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandoorn, Tine L.</creatorcontrib><title>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia.</description><subject>Ancillary services</subject><subject>Constants</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Frequency response</subject><subject>Generators</subject><subject>Inertia</subject><subject>Inertial</subject><subject>inertial response</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>power system</subject><subject>Power systems</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>synthetic inertia</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>wind energy</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8BL162JrvJJjlK_SoISlvpcYnJrG5Zk5qkQv-9qVUPnl6Yed6BeRA6pWREKVGX86fFdDYqCeWjklEhuNxDA8q5LEgt1D4aECl5IRUnh-goxiUhpM6LAYLr4P0Kj71LwfdYR6wdvuoTBKdT9wl44iCkTvd4CnHlXQQ8S0EneN3g1gec3vJg43KkzvzC2Du86JzF83V46RzEY3TQ6j7CyU8O0fPtzXx8Xzw83k3GVw-FYaxKhbXGWGoJA1ZSVnEt65YbCq2klmrDqaq4ZUqxum4rxaVta10r2wojhRLGVEN0sbu7Cv5jDTE171000PfagV_HhkpaE1lxUmb0_B-69Ov8dJ8pIUVZKUZEpsodZYKPMUDbrEL3rsOmoaTZmm--zTdb882P-Vw625U6APgrCErynlRf7cyAEw</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Van de Vyver, Jan</creator><creator>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</creator><creator>Meersman, Bart</creator><creator>Vandevelde, Lieven</creator><creator>Vandoorn, Tine L.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</title><author>Van de Vyver, Jan ; De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. ; Meersman, Bart ; Vandevelde, Lieven ; Vandoorn, Tine L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ancillary services</topic><topic>Constants</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Frequency response</topic><topic>Generators</topic><topic>Inertia</topic><topic>Inertial</topic><topic>inertial response</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>power system</topic><topic>Power systems</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>synthetic inertia</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>wind energy</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van de Vyver, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meersman, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevelde, Lieven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandoorn, Tine L.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van de Vyver, Jan</au><au>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</au><au>Meersman, Bart</au><au>Vandevelde, Lieven</au><au>Vandoorn, Tine L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1138</epage><pages>1129-1138</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8950 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on power systems, 2016-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1129-1138 |
issn | 0885-8950 1558-0679 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1787239407 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Ancillary services Constants Control systems Frequency response Generators Inertia Inertial inertial response Optimization power system Power systems Robustness Strategy synthetic inertia Tuning Turbines wind energy Wind power generation Wind turbines |
title | Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T08%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Droop%20Control%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Inertial%20Response%20Strategy%20for%20the%20Synthetic%20Inertia%20on%20Wind%20Turbines&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Van%20de%20Vyver,%20Jan&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1138&rft.pages=1129-1138&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1816083502%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787239407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7104170&rfr_iscdi=true |