Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines

In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated iner...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2016-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1129-1138
Hauptverfasser: Van de Vyver, Jan, De Kooning, Jeroen D. M., Meersman, Bart, Vandevelde, Lieven, Vandoorn, Tine L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1129
container_title IEEE transactions on power systems
container_volume 31
creator Van de Vyver, Jan
De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.
Meersman, Bart
Vandevelde, Lieven
Vandoorn, Tine L.
description In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1787239407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7104170</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1816083502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8BL162JrvJJjlK_SoISlvpcYnJrG5Zk5qkQv-9qVUPnl6Yed6BeRA6pWREKVGX86fFdDYqCeWjklEhuNxDA8q5LEgt1D4aECl5IRUnh-goxiUhpM6LAYLr4P0Kj71LwfdYR6wdvuoTBKdT9wl44iCkTvd4CnHlXQQ8S0EneN3g1gec3vJg43KkzvzC2Du86JzF83V46RzEY3TQ6j7CyU8O0fPtzXx8Xzw83k3GVw-FYaxKhbXGWGoJA1ZSVnEt65YbCq2klmrDqaq4ZUqxum4rxaVta10r2wojhRLGVEN0sbu7Cv5jDTE171000PfagV_HhkpaE1lxUmb0_B-69Ov8dJ8pIUVZKUZEpsodZYKPMUDbrEL3rsOmoaTZmm--zTdb882P-Vw625U6APgrCErynlRf7cyAEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787239407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Van de Vyver, Jan ; De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. ; Meersman, Bart ; Vandevelde, Lieven ; Vandoorn, Tine L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van de Vyver, Jan ; De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. ; Meersman, Bart ; Vandevelde, Lieven ; Vandoorn, Tine L.</creatorcontrib><description>In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Ancillary services ; Constants ; Control systems ; Frequency response ; Generators ; Inertia ; Inertial ; inertial response ; Optimization ; power system ; Power systems ; Robustness ; Strategy ; synthetic inertia ; Tuning ; Turbines ; wind energy ; Wind power generation ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2016-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1129-1138</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7104170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,797,27929,27930,54763</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7104170$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van de Vyver, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meersman, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevelde, Lieven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandoorn, Tine L.</creatorcontrib><title>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia.</description><subject>Ancillary services</subject><subject>Constants</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Frequency response</subject><subject>Generators</subject><subject>Inertia</subject><subject>Inertial</subject><subject>inertial response</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>power system</subject><subject>Power systems</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>synthetic inertia</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>wind energy</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8BL162JrvJJjlK_SoISlvpcYnJrG5Zk5qkQv-9qVUPnl6Yed6BeRA6pWREKVGX86fFdDYqCeWjklEhuNxDA8q5LEgt1D4aECl5IRUnh-goxiUhpM6LAYLr4P0Kj71LwfdYR6wdvuoTBKdT9wl44iCkTvd4CnHlXQQ8S0EneN3g1gec3vJg43KkzvzC2Du86JzF83V46RzEY3TQ6j7CyU8O0fPtzXx8Xzw83k3GVw-FYaxKhbXGWGoJA1ZSVnEt65YbCq2klmrDqaq4ZUqxum4rxaVta10r2wojhRLGVEN0sbu7Cv5jDTE171000PfagV_HhkpaE1lxUmb0_B-69Ov8dJ8pIUVZKUZEpsodZYKPMUDbrEL3rsOmoaTZmm--zTdb882P-Vw625U6APgrCErynlRf7cyAEw</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Van de Vyver, Jan</creator><creator>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</creator><creator>Meersman, Bart</creator><creator>Vandevelde, Lieven</creator><creator>Vandoorn, Tine L.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</title><author>Van de Vyver, Jan ; De Kooning, Jeroen D. M. ; Meersman, Bart ; Vandevelde, Lieven ; Vandoorn, Tine L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ddccd1d04e421435a86f5c1ef81d1ac51935d499466f3958df6a69df7c8797cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ancillary services</topic><topic>Constants</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Frequency response</topic><topic>Generators</topic><topic>Inertia</topic><topic>Inertial</topic><topic>inertial response</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>power system</topic><topic>Power systems</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>synthetic inertia</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>wind energy</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van de Vyver, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meersman, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevelde, Lieven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandoorn, Tine L.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van de Vyver, Jan</au><au>De Kooning, Jeroen D. M.</au><au>Meersman, Bart</au><au>Vandevelde, Lieven</au><au>Vandoorn, Tine L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1138</epage><pages>1129-1138</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>In several countries, the wind power penetration increased tremendously in recent years. To ensure the proper functioning of the power system, some grid operators already require the capability to provide inertial response or primary control with wind turbines. This paper discusses the emulated inertial response with wind turbines by means of the synthetic inertia and the droop control strategy. The behavior of the synthetic inertia strategy is determined by the inertial and the droop constant, whereas droop control only has a droop constant. When these strategies are used, it is important to tune the control parameters depending on the power system to which the wind turbines are connected. Simulations show that it is possible to enhance but also to deteriorate the frequency response of the system, dependent on these parameters. For different power system compositions, the optimal inertial constant is always close to zero. This way, the synthetic inertia strategy reduces to a fast droop control strategy. This is an important outcome, as it means that no differentiation of the frequency is needed to obtain an optimal inertial response from the wind turbines, which is beneficial in terms of robustness. Consequently, droop control is a viable alternative for the synthetic inertia.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-8950
ispartof IEEE transactions on power systems, 2016-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1129-1138
issn 0885-8950
1558-0679
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1787239407
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Ancillary services
Constants
Control systems
Frequency response
Generators
Inertia
Inertial
inertial response
Optimization
power system
Power systems
Robustness
Strategy
synthetic inertia
Tuning
Turbines
wind energy
Wind power generation
Wind turbines
title Droop Control as an Alternative Inertial Response Strategy for the Synthetic Inertia on Wind Turbines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T08%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Droop%20Control%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Inertial%20Response%20Strategy%20for%20the%20Synthetic%20Inertia%20on%20Wind%20Turbines&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Van%20de%20Vyver,%20Jan&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1138&rft.pages=1129-1138&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2417758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1816083502%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787239407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7104170&rfr_iscdi=true