Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial
Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical therapeutics 2015-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1955-1965 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1965 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1955 |
container_title | Clinical therapeutics |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Vives, Roser, MD Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD |
description | Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1785207456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0149291815008590</els_id><sourcerecordid>4038809731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtr3DAUhUVpaaZp_0Ir6LZ2ryRbtrsomDwHAil5QHdCI18TuR5rImlCp78-MpOm0FVWkuCcc3W_Q8gnBjkDJr8OuRntFO_Q65wDK3OQOUD5iixYXTUZY8XP12QBrGgy3rD6gLwLYQAA0ZT8LTngkknBARZkuNY9xh3VU0dbE-2DTQ_X09urjJVQUjvRNrqNNfQY_VpHG234Rlt6lQxubf9g94Ueu-1qxGyVftTRH3c6IF0u6cnvzei8js7v6I23enxP3vR6DPjh6Twkt6cnN0fn2cXl2fKovchMWYmYmaKCBgQiQyZ4zXjRNY0GKWS6CsEKKfpKC4EShenBNIWUALXWRc1Z1azEIfm8z914d7_FENXgtn5KIxWr6pJDVZQyqaq9yngXgsdebbxda79TDNTMWA3qmbGaGSuQKjFOzo9P-dvVGrtn31-oSdDuBZi2fLDoVTAWJ4Od9Wii6px9wZDv_2XMOmv0-At3GP5tpAJXoK7nquemU2lQl4nfI18voxI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785207456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Vives, Roser, MD ; Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD ; Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD ; Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Vives, Roser, MD ; Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD ; Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD ; Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26163200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Adult ; anti-inflammatory agents ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; atopic ; Cell cycle ; clinical trial ; Clinical trials ; Dermatitis ; Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy ; Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage ; Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects ; Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use ; Disease ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug dosages ; eczema ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage ; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical Education ; Middle Aged ; Ointments ; Patients ; Phase II ; Salicylates - administration & dosage ; Salicylates - adverse effects ; Salicylates - therapeutic use ; Skin ; T cell receptors ; Tacrolimus - adverse effects ; Tacrolimus - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2015-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1955-1965</ispartof><rights>Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1785207456?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vives, Roser, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>anti-inflammatory agents</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>atopic</subject><subject>Cell cycle</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>eczema</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ointments</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phase II</subject><subject>Salicylates - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Salicylates - adverse effects</subject><subject>Salicylates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>T cell receptors</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtr3DAUhUVpaaZp_0Ir6LZ2ryRbtrsomDwHAil5QHdCI18TuR5rImlCp78-MpOm0FVWkuCcc3W_Q8gnBjkDJr8OuRntFO_Q65wDK3OQOUD5iixYXTUZY8XP12QBrGgy3rD6gLwLYQAA0ZT8LTngkknBARZkuNY9xh3VU0dbE-2DTQ_X09urjJVQUjvRNrqNNfQY_VpHG234Rlt6lQxubf9g94Ueu-1qxGyVftTRH3c6IF0u6cnvzei8js7v6I23enxP3vR6DPjh6Twkt6cnN0fn2cXl2fKovchMWYmYmaKCBgQiQyZ4zXjRNY0GKWS6CsEKKfpKC4EShenBNIWUALXWRc1Z1azEIfm8z914d7_FENXgtn5KIxWr6pJDVZQyqaq9yngXgsdebbxda79TDNTMWA3qmbGaGSuQKjFOzo9P-dvVGrtn31-oSdDuBZi2fLDoVTAWJ4Od9Wii6px9wZDv_2XMOmv0-At3GP5tpAJXoK7nquemU2lQl4nfI18voxI</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Vives, Roser, MD</creator><creator>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</creator><creator>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</title><author>Vives, Roser, MD ; Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD ; Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD ; Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>anti-inflammatory agents</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>atopic</topic><topic>Cell cycle</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>eczema</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ointments</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phase II</topic><topic>Salicylates - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Salicylates - adverse effects</topic><topic>Salicylates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>T cell receptors</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vives, Roser, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vives, Roser, MD</au><au>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</au><au>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</au><au>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1955</spage><epage>1965</epage><pages>1955-1965</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26163200</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2918 |
ispartof | Clinical therapeutics, 2015-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1955-1965 |
issn | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1785207456 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Administration, Topical Adult anti-inflammatory agents Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use atopic Cell cycle clinical trial Clinical trials Dermatitis Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use Disease Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Double-Blind Method Drug dosages eczema Female Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use Internal Medicine Male Medical Education Middle Aged Ointments Patients Phase II Salicylates - administration & dosage Salicylates - adverse effects Salicylates - therapeutic use Skin T cell receptors Tacrolimus - adverse effects Tacrolimus - therapeutic use Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20Activity%20of%20UR-1505%20in%20Atopic%20Dermatitis:%20A%20Randomized,%20Double-blind%20Phase%20II%20Exploratory%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Vives,%20Roser,%20MD&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1955&rft.epage=1965&rft.pages=1955-1965&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4038809731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785207456&rft_id=info:pmid/26163200&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0149291815008590&rfr_iscdi=true |