Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial

Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical therapeutics 2015-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1955-1965
Hauptverfasser: Vives, Roser, MD, Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD, Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD, Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1965
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1955
container_title Clinical therapeutics
container_volume 37
creator Vives, Roser, MD
Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD
Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD
Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD
description Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1785207456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0149291815008590</els_id><sourcerecordid>4038809731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtr3DAUhUVpaaZp_0Ir6LZ2ryRbtrsomDwHAil5QHdCI18TuR5rImlCp78-MpOm0FVWkuCcc3W_Q8gnBjkDJr8OuRntFO_Q65wDK3OQOUD5iixYXTUZY8XP12QBrGgy3rD6gLwLYQAA0ZT8LTngkknBARZkuNY9xh3VU0dbE-2DTQ_X09urjJVQUjvRNrqNNfQY_VpHG234Rlt6lQxubf9g94Ueu-1qxGyVftTRH3c6IF0u6cnvzei8js7v6I23enxP3vR6DPjh6Twkt6cnN0fn2cXl2fKovchMWYmYmaKCBgQiQyZ4zXjRNY0GKWS6CsEKKfpKC4EShenBNIWUALXWRc1Z1azEIfm8z914d7_FENXgtn5KIxWr6pJDVZQyqaq9yngXgsdebbxda79TDNTMWA3qmbGaGSuQKjFOzo9P-dvVGrtn31-oSdDuBZi2fLDoVTAWJ4Od9Wii6px9wZDv_2XMOmv0-At3GP5tpAJXoK7nquemU2lQl4nfI18voxI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785207456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Vives, Roser, MD ; Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD ; Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD ; Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Vives, Roser, MD ; Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD ; Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD ; Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26163200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Adult ; anti-inflammatory agents ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; atopic ; Cell cycle ; clinical trial ; Clinical trials ; Dermatitis ; Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy ; Dermatologic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects ; Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use ; Disease ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug dosages ; eczema ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical Education ; Middle Aged ; Ointments ; Patients ; Phase II ; Salicylates - administration &amp; dosage ; Salicylates - adverse effects ; Salicylates - therapeutic use ; Skin ; T cell receptors ; Tacrolimus - adverse effects ; Tacrolimus - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2015-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1955-1965</ispartof><rights>Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1785207456?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26163200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vives, Roser, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>anti-inflammatory agents</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>atopic</subject><subject>Cell cycle</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>eczema</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ointments</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phase II</subject><subject>Salicylates - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Salicylates - adverse effects</subject><subject>Salicylates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>T cell receptors</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtr3DAUhUVpaaZp_0Ir6LZ2ryRbtrsomDwHAil5QHdCI18TuR5rImlCp78-MpOm0FVWkuCcc3W_Q8gnBjkDJr8OuRntFO_Q65wDK3OQOUD5iixYXTUZY8XP12QBrGgy3rD6gLwLYQAA0ZT8LTngkknBARZkuNY9xh3VU0dbE-2DTQ_X09urjJVQUjvRNrqNNfQY_VpHG234Rlt6lQxubf9g94Ueu-1qxGyVftTRH3c6IF0u6cnvzei8js7v6I23enxP3vR6DPjh6Twkt6cnN0fn2cXl2fKovchMWYmYmaKCBgQiQyZ4zXjRNY0GKWS6CsEKKfpKC4EShenBNIWUALXWRc1Z1azEIfm8z914d7_FENXgtn5KIxWr6pJDVZQyqaq9yngXgsdebbxda79TDNTMWA3qmbGaGSuQKjFOzo9P-dvVGrtn31-oSdDuBZi2fLDoVTAWJ4Od9Wii6px9wZDv_2XMOmv0-At3GP5tpAJXoK7nquemU2lQl4nfI18voxI</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Vives, Roser, MD</creator><creator>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</creator><creator>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</title><author>Vives, Roser, MD ; Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD ; Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD ; Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-c470903ee1e1328124d99a0636124331463f7a33e6e3cf0c9466008aa482179b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>anti-inflammatory agents</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>atopic</topic><topic>Cell cycle</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>eczema</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ointments</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phase II</topic><topic>Salicylates - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Salicylates - adverse effects</topic><topic>Salicylates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>T cell receptors</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vives, Roser, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vives, Roser, MD</au><au>Pontes, Caridad, MD, PhD</au><au>Sarasa, Maria, BS, PhD</au><au>Millier, Aurelie, BS, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1955</spage><epage>1965</epage><pages>1955-1965</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose UR-1505 is a new small molecule with immune modulator properties intended for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases that has shown anti-inflammatory effects in models of skin inflammation. We compared the activity of UR-1505 ointment against its vehicle in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Secondary objectives included exploring dose response, safety, and local tolerability of UR-1505. Methods Patients with AD lesions on 2 symmetrical topographic areas (arms, leg, or trunk) were included in this unicenter randomized, double-blind, within-patient, controlled Phase II exploratory trial and received simultaneously 2 different treatments (0.5%, 1%, or 2% UR-1505 and vehicle or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment) once daily during 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment score at Day 28. Secondary end points were percentage of area clearance, local Eczema Area Severity Index (local EASI), and local tolerability. A linear mixed model was used, fitting treatment, body side, and group (treatment at the contralateral side) as fixed factors and the patient as a random effect. Findings Twenty-eight patients were randomized and 25 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, with 50 evaluable lesions (n = 13 for vehicle, n = 8 for UR-1505 0.5%, n = 9 for 1% UR-1505, n=8 for 2% UR-1505, and n=12 for tacrolimus). The mean Investigator Global Assessment score change from baseline at Day 28 was –1.7 for vehicle, –1.0, –1.2, and –1.5 for 0.5%, 1%, and 2% UR-1505, respectively, and –2.6% for tacrolimus ( P = 0.002). No serious nor causal adverse reactions were reported in this study, but patients reported numerous local symptoms after product applications, especially itching, tingling, tightness, and heat/burning sensations at frequencies that were similar for vehicle, 1% UR-1505, and 2% UR-1505; more frequent with 0.5% UR-1505; and lowest for tacrolimus. Implications This study found that UR-1505 may not be a suitable option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis due to its lack of clinically relevant effect compared with its vehicle and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment. EudraCT No.: 2007-002550-27.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26163200</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2918
ispartof Clinical therapeutics, 2015-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1955-1965
issn 0149-2918
1879-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1785207456
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Administration, Topical
Adult
anti-inflammatory agents
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use
atopic
Cell cycle
clinical trial
Clinical trials
Dermatitis
Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy
Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage
Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects
Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use
Disease
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Drug dosages
eczema
Female
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical Education
Middle Aged
Ointments
Patients
Phase II
Salicylates - administration & dosage
Salicylates - adverse effects
Salicylates - therapeutic use
Skin
T cell receptors
Tacrolimus - adverse effects
Tacrolimus - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Safety and Activity of UR-1505 in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Exploratory Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20Activity%20of%20UR-1505%20in%20Atopic%20Dermatitis:%20A%20Randomized,%20Double-blind%20Phase%20II%20Exploratory%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Vives,%20Roser,%20MD&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1955&rft.epage=1965&rft.pages=1955-1965&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4038809731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785207456&rft_id=info:pmid/26163200&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0149291815008590&rfr_iscdi=true