The Power Dynamics of Mandated Network Administrative Organizations
In understanding what drives the development of network administrative organizations (NAOs) in mandated networks, power bargaining is central. The authors execute a comparative longitudinal case study of NAOs in two policy-mandated networks. The article focuses specifically on the role of power in t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration review 2016-05, Vol.76 (3), p.449-462 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 462 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 449 |
| container_title | Public administration review |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | Saz-Carranza, Angel Salvador Iborra, Susanna Albareda, Adrià |
| description | In understanding what drives the development of network administrative organizations (NAOs) in mandated networks, power bargaining is central. The authors execute a comparative longitudinal case study of NAOs in two policy-mandated networks. The article focuses specifically on the role of power in these developments and concludes that differences in NAO development arise from power dependencies, which are attributable in part to sector characteristics. It is proposed that mandated network members' greater interdependence and greater dependence on external nonmembers, as well as whole network dependence on external actors, partly determine mandated networks' NAO design. These networks will have larger and more capable NAOs (with more staff), accept sharing control of the NAO executive with the mandating party, and have broader responsibilities. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/puar.12445 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1784701847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24757580</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24757580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-f08b5f8e125d729e7a97b6aa4ebb717f7d80e0fc02436c533c3eb6d45fb758013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1PAjEQxRujiYhevJts4s1ksZ_b3SOiogkCIaAJl6a72-ryscV2EfGvt7jK0TnMpHm_N508AM4RbCFf16u1tC2EKWUHoIEYhWGEETwEDQgJCQlh-BicODeDEGFE4wbojN9UMDQbZYPbbSmXReYCo4MnWeayUnnQV9XG2HnQzpdFWbjKyqr4UMHAvsqy-PIPU7pTcKTlwqmz39kEk_u7cech7A26j512L8xIQlmoYZwyHSuEWc5xorhMeBpJSVWacsQ1z2OooM4gpiTKGCEZUWmUU6ZTzmKISBNc1ntX1ryvlavEzKxt6b8UiMeUQ-Sbp65qKrPGOau0WNliKe1WICh2IYldSOInJA-jGt4UC7X9hxTDSXv057moPTNXGbv3YMrZ7k6vh7Xu41Kfe13auYg44Uy89LviZphEIzJ9FlPyDaXXgjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784701847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Power Dynamics of Mandated Network Administrative Organizations</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Saz-Carranza, Angel ; Salvador Iborra, Susanna ; Albareda, Adrià</creator><creatorcontrib>Saz-Carranza, Angel ; Salvador Iborra, Susanna ; Albareda, Adrià</creatorcontrib><description>In understanding what drives the development of network administrative organizations (NAOs) in mandated networks, power bargaining is central. The authors execute a comparative longitudinal case study of NAOs in two policy-mandated networks. The article focuses specifically on the role of power in these developments and concludes that differences in NAO development arise from power dependencies, which are attributable in part to sector characteristics. It is proposed that mandated network members' greater interdependence and greater dependence on external nonmembers, as well as whole network dependence on external actors, partly determine mandated networks' NAO design. These networks will have larger and more capable NAOs (with more staff), accept sharing control of the NAO executive with the mandating party, and have broader responsibilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/puar.12445</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBARBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Interdependence ; Negotiation ; Policy networks ; Power ; Public administration ; Public policy ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2016-05, Vol.76 (3), p.449-462</ispartof><rights>2016 American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>2015 by The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>2016 by The American Society for Public Administration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-f08b5f8e125d729e7a97b6aa4ebb717f7d80e0fc02436c533c3eb6d45fb758013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-f08b5f8e125d729e7a97b6aa4ebb717f7d80e0fc02436c533c3eb6d45fb758013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24757580$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24757580$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45552,45553,57994,58227</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saz-Carranza, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador Iborra, Susanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albareda, Adrià</creatorcontrib><title>The Power Dynamics of Mandated Network Administrative Organizations</title><title>Public administration review</title><addtitle>Public Admin Rev</addtitle><description>In understanding what drives the development of network administrative organizations (NAOs) in mandated networks, power bargaining is central. The authors execute a comparative longitudinal case study of NAOs in two policy-mandated networks. The article focuses specifically on the role of power in these developments and concludes that differences in NAO development arise from power dependencies, which are attributable in part to sector characteristics. It is proposed that mandated network members' greater interdependence and greater dependence on external nonmembers, as well as whole network dependence on external actors, partly determine mandated networks' NAO design. These networks will have larger and more capable NAOs (with more staff), accept sharing control of the NAO executive with the mandating party, and have broader responsibilities.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Policy networks</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1PAjEQxRujiYhevJts4s1ksZ_b3SOiogkCIaAJl6a72-ryscV2EfGvt7jK0TnMpHm_N508AM4RbCFf16u1tC2EKWUHoIEYhWGEETwEDQgJCQlh-BicODeDEGFE4wbojN9UMDQbZYPbbSmXReYCo4MnWeayUnnQV9XG2HnQzpdFWbjKyqr4UMHAvsqy-PIPU7pTcKTlwqmz39kEk_u7cech7A26j512L8xIQlmoYZwyHSuEWc5xorhMeBpJSVWacsQ1z2OooM4gpiTKGCEZUWmUU6ZTzmKISBNc1ntX1ryvlavEzKxt6b8UiMeUQ-Sbp65qKrPGOau0WNliKe1WICh2IYldSOInJA-jGt4UC7X9hxTDSXv057moPTNXGbv3YMrZ7k6vh7Xu41Kfe13auYg44Uy89LviZphEIzJ9FlPyDaXXgjQ</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Saz-Carranza, Angel</creator><creator>Salvador Iborra, Susanna</creator><creator>Albareda, Adrià</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>The Power Dynamics of Mandated Network Administrative Organizations</title><author>Saz-Carranza, Angel ; Salvador Iborra, Susanna ; Albareda, Adrià</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3945-f08b5f8e125d729e7a97b6aa4ebb717f7d80e0fc02436c533c3eb6d45fb758013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Policy networks</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saz-Carranza, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador Iborra, Susanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albareda, Adrià</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saz-Carranza, Angel</au><au>Salvador Iborra, Susanna</au><au>Albareda, Adrià</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Power Dynamics of Mandated Network Administrative Organizations</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><addtitle>Public Admin Rev</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>449-462</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><coden>PBARBM</coden><abstract>In understanding what drives the development of network administrative organizations (NAOs) in mandated networks, power bargaining is central. The authors execute a comparative longitudinal case study of NAOs in two policy-mandated networks. The article focuses specifically on the role of power in these developments and concludes that differences in NAO development arise from power dependencies, which are attributable in part to sector characteristics. It is proposed that mandated network members' greater interdependence and greater dependence on external nonmembers, as well as whole network dependence on external actors, partly determine mandated networks' NAO design. These networks will have larger and more capable NAOs (with more staff), accept sharing control of the NAO executive with the mandating party, and have broader responsibilities.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/puar.12445</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3352 |
| ispartof | Public administration review, 2016-05, Vol.76 (3), p.449-462 |
| issn | 0033-3352 1540-6210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1784701847 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Bargaining Interdependence Negotiation Policy networks Power Public administration Public policy Studies |
| title | The Power Dynamics of Mandated Network Administrative Organizations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T10%3A04%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Power%20Dynamics%20of%20Mandated%20Network%20Administrative%20Organizations&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Saz-Carranza,%20Angel&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=449-462&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft.coden=PBARBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/puar.12445&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24757580%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784701847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24757580&rfr_iscdi=true |