Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment
The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “cont...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of organizational behavior 2016-05, Vol.37 (4), p.613-632 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 632 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 613 |
container_title | Journal of organizational behavior |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Wasti, S. Arzu Peterson, Mark F. Breitsohl, Heiko Cohen, Aaron Jørgensen, Frances de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina Weng, Qingxiong Xu, Xiaohong |
description | The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/job.2094 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1784330670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26610550</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26610550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-AWEgi8-2Hlp0iT1zU2dynAIU8GXkKaptLbNTDvm_PR2dMwH8ekO7nd38EfoGMMAAwQXuY0HAUR0B_UwRJGPCY92UQ9ERP22ZfvooK5zAAhpxHpoOLFaNZmtzr3iT3fpjWzVmK9moYrsO6vevaV1H_NCaeNpW5ZZU5qqOUR7qSpqc7SpffR8ezMb3fmT6fh-dDXxNcWkfZ4aarhKSJpAikkU6wQHsY6Z5jqkCQcBPAHMeUIVYUILQlmqYoxZkjDBBOmj0-7u3NnPhakbmduFq9qXEnNBCQHGoVVnndLO1rUzqZy7rFRuJTHIdULtVizXCbXU7-gyK8zqXycfpsONP-l8XjfWbX3AGIYwhN97Wd2Gtp0r9yEZJzyUr49j-RS8RLNrQeQb-QHtbH_P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784330670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wasti, S. Arzu ; Peterson, Mark F. ; Breitsohl, Heiko ; Cohen, Aaron ; Jørgensen, Frances ; de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina ; Weng, Qingxiong ; Xu, Xiaohong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu ; Peterson, Mark F. ; Breitsohl, Heiko ; Cohen, Aaron ; Jørgensen, Frances ; de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina ; Weng, Qingxiong ; Xu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.2094</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Borders ; Commitment ; commitment foci ; Commitments ; Country of origin ; Cultural values ; culture ; Employment ; Meaning ; Moderators ; Organizational behavior ; Residence ; Special Issue Article ; workplace commitment ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-05, Vol.37 (4), p.613-632</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7494-1565</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26610550$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26610550$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27931,27932,31006,45581,45582,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitsohl, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Qingxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><title>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><description>The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Commitment</subject><subject>commitment foci</subject><subject>Commitments</subject><subject>Country of origin</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>culture</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Moderators</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Residence</subject><subject>Special Issue Article</subject><subject>workplace commitment</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-AWEgi8-2Hlp0iT1zU2dynAIU8GXkKaptLbNTDvm_PR2dMwH8ekO7nd38EfoGMMAAwQXuY0HAUR0B_UwRJGPCY92UQ9ERP22ZfvooK5zAAhpxHpoOLFaNZmtzr3iT3fpjWzVmK9moYrsO6vevaV1H_NCaeNpW5ZZU5qqOUR7qSpqc7SpffR8ezMb3fmT6fh-dDXxNcWkfZ4aarhKSJpAikkU6wQHsY6Z5jqkCQcBPAHMeUIVYUILQlmqYoxZkjDBBOmj0-7u3NnPhakbmduFq9qXEnNBCQHGoVVnndLO1rUzqZy7rFRuJTHIdULtVizXCbXU7-gyK8zqXycfpsONP-l8XjfWbX3AGIYwhN97Wd2Gtp0r9yEZJzyUr49j-RS8RLNrQeQb-QHtbH_P</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Wasti, S. Arzu</creator><creator>Peterson, Mark F.</creator><creator>Breitsohl, Heiko</creator><creator>Cohen, Aaron</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Frances</creator><creator>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</creator><creator>Weng, Qingxiong</creator><creator>Xu, Xiaohong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-1565</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</title><author>Wasti, S. Arzu ; Peterson, Mark F. ; Breitsohl, Heiko ; Cohen, Aaron ; Jørgensen, Frances ; de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina ; Weng, Qingxiong ; Xu, Xiaohong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Commitment</topic><topic>commitment foci</topic><topic>Commitments</topic><topic>Country of origin</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>culture</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Moderators</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Residence</topic><topic>Special Issue Article</topic><topic>workplace commitment</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitsohl, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Qingxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wasti, S. Arzu</au><au>Peterson, Mark F.</au><au>Breitsohl, Heiko</au><au>Cohen, Aaron</au><au>Jørgensen, Frances</au><au>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</au><au>Weng, Qingxiong</au><au>Xu, Xiaohong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>632</epage><pages>613-632</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/job.2094</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-1565</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-3796 |
ispartof | Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-05, Vol.37 (4), p.613-632 |
issn | 0894-3796 1099-1379 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1784330670 |
source | Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Behavior Borders Commitment commitment foci Commitments Country of origin Cultural values culture Employment Meaning Moderators Organizational behavior Residence Special Issue Article workplace commitment Workplaces |
title | Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T04%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Location,%20location,%20location:%20Contextualizing%20workplace%20commitment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Wasti,%20S.%20Arzu&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=632&rft.pages=613-632&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.2094&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26610550%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784330670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26610550&rfr_iscdi=true |