Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment

The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of organizational behavior 2016-05, Vol.37 (4), p.613-632
Hauptverfasser: Wasti, S. Arzu, Peterson, Mark F., Breitsohl, Heiko, Cohen, Aaron, Jørgensen, Frances, de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina, Weng, Qingxiong, Xu, Xiaohong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 632
container_issue 4
container_start_page 613
container_title Journal of organizational behavior
container_volume 37
creator Wasti, S. Arzu
Peterson, Mark F.
Breitsohl, Heiko
Cohen, Aaron
Jørgensen, Frances
de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina
Weng, Qingxiong
Xu, Xiaohong
description The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/job.2094
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1784330670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26610550</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26610550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-AWEgi8-2Hlp0iT1zU2dynAIU8GXkKaptLbNTDvm_PR2dMwH8ekO7nd38EfoGMMAAwQXuY0HAUR0B_UwRJGPCY92UQ9ERP22ZfvooK5zAAhpxHpoOLFaNZmtzr3iT3fpjWzVmK9moYrsO6vevaV1H_NCaeNpW5ZZU5qqOUR7qSpqc7SpffR8ezMb3fmT6fh-dDXxNcWkfZ4aarhKSJpAikkU6wQHsY6Z5jqkCQcBPAHMeUIVYUILQlmqYoxZkjDBBOmj0-7u3NnPhakbmduFq9qXEnNBCQHGoVVnndLO1rUzqZy7rFRuJTHIdULtVizXCbXU7-gyK8zqXycfpsONP-l8XjfWbX3AGIYwhN97Wd2Gtp0r9yEZJzyUr49j-RS8RLNrQeQb-QHtbH_P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784330670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wasti, S. Arzu ; Peterson, Mark F. ; Breitsohl, Heiko ; Cohen, Aaron ; Jørgensen, Frances ; de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina ; Weng, Qingxiong ; Xu, Xiaohong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu ; Peterson, Mark F. ; Breitsohl, Heiko ; Cohen, Aaron ; Jørgensen, Frances ; de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina ; Weng, Qingxiong ; Xu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.2094</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Borders ; Commitment ; commitment foci ; Commitments ; Country of origin ; Cultural values ; culture ; Employment ; Meaning ; Moderators ; Organizational behavior ; Residence ; Special Issue Article ; workplace commitment ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-05, Vol.37 (4), p.613-632</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7494-1565</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26610550$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26610550$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27931,27932,31006,45581,45582,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitsohl, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Qingxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><title>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><description>The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Commitment</subject><subject>commitment foci</subject><subject>Commitments</subject><subject>Country of origin</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>culture</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Moderators</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Residence</subject><subject>Special Issue Article</subject><subject>workplace commitment</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4p-AWEgi8-2Hlp0iT1zU2dynAIU8GXkKaptLbNTDvm_PR2dMwH8ekO7nd38EfoGMMAAwQXuY0HAUR0B_UwRJGPCY92UQ9ERP22ZfvooK5zAAhpxHpoOLFaNZmtzr3iT3fpjWzVmK9moYrsO6vevaV1H_NCaeNpW5ZZU5qqOUR7qSpqc7SpffR8ezMb3fmT6fh-dDXxNcWkfZ4aarhKSJpAikkU6wQHsY6Z5jqkCQcBPAHMeUIVYUILQlmqYoxZkjDBBOmj0-7u3NnPhakbmduFq9qXEnNBCQHGoVVnndLO1rUzqZy7rFRuJTHIdULtVizXCbXU7-gyK8zqXycfpsONP-l8XjfWbX3AGIYwhN97Wd2Gtp0r9yEZJzyUr49j-RS8RLNrQeQb-QHtbH_P</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Wasti, S. Arzu</creator><creator>Peterson, Mark F.</creator><creator>Breitsohl, Heiko</creator><creator>Cohen, Aaron</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Frances</creator><creator>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</creator><creator>Weng, Qingxiong</creator><creator>Xu, Xiaohong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-1565</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</title><author>Wasti, S. Arzu ; Peterson, Mark F. ; Breitsohl, Heiko ; Cohen, Aaron ; Jørgensen, Frances ; de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina ; Weng, Qingxiong ; Xu, Xiaohong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4134-3fe4e7ad3fd0f139bcd12bcb6c7c54d70807d0177d4a368c8346fab116dd68683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Commitment</topic><topic>commitment foci</topic><topic>Commitments</topic><topic>Country of origin</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>culture</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Moderators</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Residence</topic><topic>Special Issue Article</topic><topic>workplace commitment</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitsohl, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Qingxiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wasti, S. Arzu</au><au>Peterson, Mark F.</au><au>Breitsohl, Heiko</au><au>Cohen, Aaron</au><au>Jørgensen, Frances</au><au>de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina</au><au>Weng, Qingxiong</au><au>Xu, Xiaohong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>632</epage><pages>613-632</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>The purpose of the present commentary is to discuss the nature and correlates of workplace commitment across cultures. We asked six organizational behavior scholars, who are intimately familiar with Brazil, China, Denmark, Germany, or Israel as their country of origin or extended residence, to “contextualize” workplace commitment. They did so by explicating institutional and cultural characteristics of their context on the emergence, meaning, and evolution of commitment by reference to their own research and extant local research. Their responses not only supported the utility of three-component model of commitment but also revealed the differential salience of various commitment constructs (e.g., components and foci of commitment) as well as possible contextual moderators on the development and outcomes of commitment. The commentators also described changes including the growing prevalence of multicultural workforces within national borders and changes in employment relationships and cultural values in their national contexts and considered future research directions in culture and commitment research.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/job.2094</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-1565</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-3796
ispartof Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-05, Vol.37 (4), p.613-632
issn 0894-3796
1099-1379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1784330670
source Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Behavior
Borders
Commitment
commitment foci
Commitments
Country of origin
Cultural values
culture
Employment
Meaning
Moderators
Organizational behavior
Residence
Special Issue Article
workplace commitment
Workplaces
title Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T04%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Location,%20location,%20location:%20Contextualizing%20workplace%20commitment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Wasti,%20S.%20Arzu&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=632&rft.pages=613-632&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.2094&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26610550%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784330670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26610550&rfr_iscdi=true