Odhad reliability vybraných položek z českých šetření EU SILC kvazisimplexovým modelem

The article presents estimates of the reliability of measurement in the Czech surveys carried out in the EU-SILC international longitudinal research project. The reliability estimates were obtained using the Quasi Simplex Model (QSM), which has never before been used in Czech research. An analysis w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociologický časopis 2016, Vol.52 (1), p.79-106
1. Verfasser: Chylíková, Johana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:cze
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Sociologický časopis
container_volume 52
creator Chylíková, Johana
description The article presents estimates of the reliability of measurement in the Czech surveys carried out in the EU-SILC international longitudinal research project. The reliability estimates were obtained using the Quasi Simplex Model (QSM), which has never before been used in Czech research. An analysis was carried out on all the items in the EU-SILC questionnaire that fulfilled the criteria for the QSM analysis: PH010, the item that asks respondents about their subjective health, HS120, the item that asks about the household’s financial situation, and HS130, which asks what the minimum sufficient income of a household is. The analysis drew on all available data from Czech EU-SILC surveys, that is, data from five rotating panel surveys carried out between 2005 and 2012. The QSM analysis showed that for the selected items EU-SILC data are highly reliable; the estimated reliability of each item was around 0.8, for HS130 it was even above 0.9. The steadiness of the results was confirmed by the high consistency of the reliability estimates across all the panels. A small difference was observed between the reliability of data collected using the PAPI mode and data collected using CAPI. Given the attributes of the QSM model, however, it was impossible to test statistically whether the reliability of PAPI and CAPI data differ significantly.
doi_str_mv 10.13060/00380288.2016.52.1.243
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1782248291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>304818</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>304818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c119t-3d422630711aa2d5f820cfdd1b42961bbb20647b636d251ca15824506b6a590e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFzUFOwkAUBuCJ0USC3MDESVy3znszHaZLQ1BJSFgoiSvJTGcIlZbBthDhDh7ApQfwCLjB3ksQE1cv-f8v_yPkAlgInEl2xRhXDJUKkYEMIwwhRMGPSAM5lwGgejwmjT0K9uqUtMoyNWxfIgBvkKeBnWhLC5el2qRZWq3ocmUKPdtukgmd-8zXX25K1_T7zZXT37D-cFX97mbbT9od0vtev0OnS71OyzSfZ-7VL7ebnObeuszlZ-RkrLPStf5ukwxvug-du6A_uO11rvtBAhBXAbcCUXLWBtAabTRWyJKxtWAExhKMMcikaBvJpcUIEg2RQhExaaSOYuZ4k1wedueFf1m4sho9-0Ux270cQVshCoUx7NT5QSXO-eyfcCYUKP4D7ttmPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1782248291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Odhad reliability vybraných položek z českých šetření EU SILC kvazisimplexovým modelem</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chylíková, Johana</creator><creatorcontrib>Chylíková, Johana</creatorcontrib><description>The article presents estimates of the reliability of measurement in the Czech surveys carried out in the EU-SILC international longitudinal research project. The reliability estimates were obtained using the Quasi Simplex Model (QSM), which has never before been used in Czech research. An analysis was carried out on all the items in the EU-SILC questionnaire that fulfilled the criteria for the QSM analysis: PH010, the item that asks respondents about their subjective health, HS120, the item that asks about the household’s financial situation, and HS130, which asks what the minimum sufficient income of a household is. The analysis drew on all available data from Czech EU-SILC surveys, that is, data from five rotating panel surveys carried out between 2005 and 2012. The QSM analysis showed that for the selected items EU-SILC data are highly reliable; the estimated reliability of each item was around 0.8, for HS130 it was even above 0.9. The steadiness of the results was confirmed by the high consistency of the reliability estimates across all the panels. A small difference was observed between the reliability of data collected using the PAPI mode and data collected using CAPI. Given the attributes of the QSM model, however, it was impossible to test statistically whether the reliability of PAPI and CAPI data differ significantly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2336-128X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2016.52.1.243</identifier><language>cze</language><publisher>Prague: AV ČR Czech Academy of Sciences - Institute of Sociology</publisher><subject>Data ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Reliability ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Sociologický časopis, 2016, Vol.52 (1), p.79-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2016_21683.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27325,27904,27905,27906,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chylíková, Johana</creatorcontrib><title>Odhad reliability vybraných položek z českých šetření EU SILC kvazisimplexovým modelem</title><title>Sociologický časopis</title><addtitle>Sociologicky casopis / Czech Sociological Review</addtitle><description>The article presents estimates of the reliability of measurement in the Czech surveys carried out in the EU-SILC international longitudinal research project. The reliability estimates were obtained using the Quasi Simplex Model (QSM), which has never before been used in Czech research. An analysis was carried out on all the items in the EU-SILC questionnaire that fulfilled the criteria for the QSM analysis: PH010, the item that asks respondents about their subjective health, HS120, the item that asks about the household’s financial situation, and HS130, which asks what the minimum sufficient income of a household is. The analysis drew on all available data from Czech EU-SILC surveys, that is, data from five rotating panel surveys carried out between 2005 and 2012. The QSM analysis showed that for the selected items EU-SILC data are highly reliable; the estimated reliability of each item was around 0.8, for HS130 it was even above 0.9. The steadiness of the results was confirmed by the high consistency of the reliability estimates across all the panels. A small difference was observed between the reliability of data collected using the PAPI mode and data collected using CAPI. Given the attributes of the QSM model, however, it was impossible to test statistically whether the reliability of PAPI and CAPI data differ significantly.</description><subject>Data</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0038-0288</issn><issn>2336-128X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpFzUFOwkAUBuCJ0USC3MDESVy3znszHaZLQ1BJSFgoiSvJTGcIlZbBthDhDh7ApQfwCLjB3ksQE1cv-f8v_yPkAlgInEl2xRhXDJUKkYEMIwwhRMGPSAM5lwGgejwmjT0K9uqUtMoyNWxfIgBvkKeBnWhLC5el2qRZWq3ocmUKPdtukgmd-8zXX25K1_T7zZXT37D-cFX97mbbT9od0vtev0OnS71OyzSfZ-7VL7ebnObeuszlZ-RkrLPStf5ukwxvug-du6A_uO11rvtBAhBXAbcCUXLWBtAabTRWyJKxtWAExhKMMcikaBvJpcUIEg2RQhExaaSOYuZ4k1wedueFf1m4sho9-0Ux270cQVshCoUx7NT5QSXO-eyfcCYUKP4D7ttmPg</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Chylíková, Johana</creator><general>AV ČR Czech Academy of Sciences - Institute of Sociology</general><general>AV ČR - Akademie věd České republiky - Sociologický ústav</general><general>Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Odhad reliability vybraných položek z českých šetření EU SILC kvazisimplexovým modelem</title><author>Chylíková, Johana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c119t-3d422630711aa2d5f820cfdd1b42961bbb20647b636d251ca15824506b6a590e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>cze</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Data</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chylíková, Johana</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociologický časopis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chylíková, Johana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Odhad reliability vybraných položek z českých šetření EU SILC kvazisimplexovým modelem</atitle><jtitle>Sociologický časopis</jtitle><addtitle>Sociologicky casopis / Czech Sociological Review</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>79-106</pages><issn>0038-0288</issn><eissn>2336-128X</eissn><abstract>The article presents estimates of the reliability of measurement in the Czech surveys carried out in the EU-SILC international longitudinal research project. The reliability estimates were obtained using the Quasi Simplex Model (QSM), which has never before been used in Czech research. An analysis was carried out on all the items in the EU-SILC questionnaire that fulfilled the criteria for the QSM analysis: PH010, the item that asks respondents about their subjective health, HS120, the item that asks about the household’s financial situation, and HS130, which asks what the minimum sufficient income of a household is. The analysis drew on all available data from Czech EU-SILC surveys, that is, data from five rotating panel surveys carried out between 2005 and 2012. The QSM analysis showed that for the selected items EU-SILC data are highly reliable; the estimated reliability of each item was around 0.8, for HS130 it was even above 0.9. The steadiness of the results was confirmed by the high consistency of the reliability estimates across all the panels. A small difference was observed between the reliability of data collected using the PAPI mode and data collected using CAPI. Given the attributes of the QSM model, however, it was impossible to test statistically whether the reliability of PAPI and CAPI data differ significantly.</abstract><cop>Prague</cop><pub>AV ČR Czech Academy of Sciences - Institute of Sociology</pub><doi>10.13060/00380288.2016.52.1.243</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0288
ispartof Sociologický časopis, 2016, Vol.52 (1), p.79-106
issn 0038-0288
2336-128X
language cze
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1782248291
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Data
Polls & surveys
Reliability
Sociology
title Odhad reliability vybraných položek z českých šetření EU SILC kvazisimplexovým modelem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A00%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Odhad%20reliability%20vybran%C3%BDch%20polo%C5%BEek%20z%20%C4%8Desk%C3%BDch%20%C5%A1et%C5%99en%C3%AD%20EU%20SILC%20kvazisimplexov%C3%BDm%20modelem&rft.jtitle=Sociologicky%CC%81%20c%CC%8Casopis&rft.au=Chyl%C3%ADkov%C3%A1,%20Johana&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=79-106&rft.issn=0038-0288&rft.eissn=2336-128X&rft_id=info:doi/10.13060/00380288.2016.52.1.243&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E304818%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1782248291&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=304818&rfr_iscdi=true