P84 Utility Values For COPD Patients Based on the EQ-5D Questionnaire from Three Indacaterol Phase III Studies

Introduction and Objectives Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible and disabling symptoms such as breathlessness and COPD exacerbations, which have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The indacaterol c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thorax 2012-12, Vol.67 (Suppl 2), p.A100-A101
Hauptverfasser: Asukai, Y, Baldwin, M, Mungapen, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A101
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page A100
container_title Thorax
container_volume 67
creator Asukai, Y
Baldwin, M
Mungapen, L
description Introduction and Objectives Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible and disabling symptoms such as breathlessness and COPD exacerbations, which have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The indacaterol clinical trial programme (INVOLVE, INHANCE and INLIGHT-2 trials) collected HRQoL using the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument, a commonly used tool to generate preference-based utilities involving five dimensions of a health state. As part of the clinical trial programme, the EQ-5D scores were converted to a utility index score using the UK National Health Survey (1) preference weights. The aim of this analysis was to report mean utilities of COPD patients by disease severity. Methods A total of 11,066 observations from three trials were included in the analysis. Utility index scores were summarised by disease severity (GOLD 2008 FEV1-based) to yield a mean utility weight for each disease severity class. Disease severity was determined by using all available FEV1 readings. Since some trials had a longer duration contributing more records of EQ-5D and spirometry than others, it was necessary to correct for multiple observations; utility values that might have been derived from the shorter-duration trials were considered as ‘missing’ data. To impute missing data, a mixed effects model was used using residual maximum likelihood. Clinic visit and disease severity were included as factors. Utility values were assumed to be missing at random. Results The estimated utility of COPD patients according to levels of disease severity was as follows: Mild = 0.820 (95% CI: 0.800– 0.840); Moderate = 0.801 (95%CI: 0.794–0.809); Severe = 0.774 (95% CI: 0.767–0.782); and Very Severe = 0.743 (95% CI: 0.730–0.756). The correlation between increasing disease severity and decreasing patients’ utility demonstrated the internal validity of the data. Conclusion This analysis provides estimates of utility by COPD disease severity based on one of the largest sample sizes used to date, which is essential for cost-utility analyses that help inform healthcare decisions. Kind P et al. “Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.” BMJ 316, no. 7133 (Mar 1998): 736–41.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781815659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4027140081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2686-8dbe047183c9d4cc20c08cd5c9e7e7c17bc71e9c6c043ae9e2b6af1d09b334e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxD0asA34ktrOEQiESoqkobC3HmaopaVxsV4IdG36ULyFVEHs2M5t75o4OQmeUXFDKxWVcOm_eV12bMEJZP5iQ6oIzsYdGNBUq4SwX-2hESEoSwaU4REchrAghilI5QptSpd-fX8-xaZv4gV9Mu4WAJ87j8bS8waWJDXQx4GsToMauw3EJ-HaWZDd41idj47rONB7wwrs1ni89AC662lgTwbsWl8sexEVR4Ke4rRsIJ-hgYdoAp7_7GD1Pbufj--RheleMrx6SigklElVXQFJJFbd5nVrLiCXK1pnNQYK0VFZWUsitsCTlBnJglTALWpO84jwFxY_R-XB3493b7lO9clvf9ZWaSkUVzUSW96l8SFnvQvCw0BvfrI3_0JTonWD9J1jvBOtBsO4F92wysE2I8P4HGv-qheQy048vY12WjAvCZnrXlQ75ar36R80Poy-RVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781815659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P84 Utility Values For COPD Patients Based on the EQ-5D Questionnaire from Three Indacaterol Phase III Studies</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Asukai, Y ; Baldwin, M ; Mungapen, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Asukai, Y ; Baldwin, M ; Mungapen, L</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and Objectives Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible and disabling symptoms such as breathlessness and COPD exacerbations, which have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The indacaterol clinical trial programme (INVOLVE, INHANCE and INLIGHT-2 trials) collected HRQoL using the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument, a commonly used tool to generate preference-based utilities involving five dimensions of a health state. As part of the clinical trial programme, the EQ-5D scores were converted to a utility index score using the UK National Health Survey (1) preference weights. The aim of this analysis was to report mean utilities of COPD patients by disease severity. Methods A total of 11,066 observations from three trials were included in the analysis. Utility index scores were summarised by disease severity (GOLD 2008 FEV1-based) to yield a mean utility weight for each disease severity class. Disease severity was determined by using all available FEV1 readings. Since some trials had a longer duration contributing more records of EQ-5D and spirometry than others, it was necessary to correct for multiple observations; utility values that might have been derived from the shorter-duration trials were considered as ‘missing’ data. To impute missing data, a mixed effects model was used using residual maximum likelihood. Clinic visit and disease severity were included as factors. Utility values were assumed to be missing at random. Results The estimated utility of COPD patients according to levels of disease severity was as follows: Mild = 0.820 (95% CI: 0.800– 0.840); Moderate = 0.801 (95%CI: 0.794–0.809); Severe = 0.774 (95% CI: 0.767–0.782); and Very Severe = 0.743 (95% CI: 0.730–0.756). The correlation between increasing disease severity and decreasing patients’ utility demonstrated the internal validity of the data. Conclusion This analysis provides estimates of utility by COPD disease severity based on one of the largest sample sizes used to date, which is essential for cost-utility analyses that help inform healthcare decisions. Kind P et al. “Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.” BMJ 316, no. 7133 (Mar 1998): 736–41.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-6376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.326</identifier><identifier>CODEN: THORA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</publisher><ispartof>Thorax, 2012-12, Vol.67 (Suppl 2), p.A100-A101</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2686-8dbe047183c9d4cc20c08cd5c9e7e7c17bc71e9c6c043ae9e2b6af1d09b334e83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/67/Suppl_2/A100.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/67/Suppl_2/A100.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asukai, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mungapen, L</creatorcontrib><title>P84 Utility Values For COPD Patients Based on the EQ-5D Questionnaire from Three Indacaterol Phase III Studies</title><title>Thorax</title><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><description>Introduction and Objectives Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible and disabling symptoms such as breathlessness and COPD exacerbations, which have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The indacaterol clinical trial programme (INVOLVE, INHANCE and INLIGHT-2 trials) collected HRQoL using the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument, a commonly used tool to generate preference-based utilities involving five dimensions of a health state. As part of the clinical trial programme, the EQ-5D scores were converted to a utility index score using the UK National Health Survey (1) preference weights. The aim of this analysis was to report mean utilities of COPD patients by disease severity. Methods A total of 11,066 observations from three trials were included in the analysis. Utility index scores were summarised by disease severity (GOLD 2008 FEV1-based) to yield a mean utility weight for each disease severity class. Disease severity was determined by using all available FEV1 readings. Since some trials had a longer duration contributing more records of EQ-5D and spirometry than others, it was necessary to correct for multiple observations; utility values that might have been derived from the shorter-duration trials were considered as ‘missing’ data. To impute missing data, a mixed effects model was used using residual maximum likelihood. Clinic visit and disease severity were included as factors. Utility values were assumed to be missing at random. Results The estimated utility of COPD patients according to levels of disease severity was as follows: Mild = 0.820 (95% CI: 0.800– 0.840); Moderate = 0.801 (95%CI: 0.794–0.809); Severe = 0.774 (95% CI: 0.767–0.782); and Very Severe = 0.743 (95% CI: 0.730–0.756). The correlation between increasing disease severity and decreasing patients’ utility demonstrated the internal validity of the data. Conclusion This analysis provides estimates of utility by COPD disease severity based on one of the largest sample sizes used to date, which is essential for cost-utility analyses that help inform healthcare decisions. Kind P et al. “Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.” BMJ 316, no. 7133 (Mar 1998): 736–41.</description><issn>0040-6376</issn><issn>1468-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxD0asA34ktrOEQiESoqkobC3HmaopaVxsV4IdG36ULyFVEHs2M5t75o4OQmeUXFDKxWVcOm_eV12bMEJZP5iQ6oIzsYdGNBUq4SwX-2hESEoSwaU4REchrAghilI5QptSpd-fX8-xaZv4gV9Mu4WAJ87j8bS8waWJDXQx4GsToMauw3EJ-HaWZDd41idj47rONB7wwrs1ni89AC662lgTwbsWl8sexEVR4Ke4rRsIJ-hgYdoAp7_7GD1Pbufj--RheleMrx6SigklElVXQFJJFbd5nVrLiCXK1pnNQYK0VFZWUsitsCTlBnJglTALWpO84jwFxY_R-XB3493b7lO9clvf9ZWaSkUVzUSW96l8SFnvQvCw0BvfrI3_0JTonWD9J1jvBOtBsO4F92wysE2I8P4HGv-qheQy048vY12WjAvCZnrXlQ75ar36R80Poy-RVA</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Asukai, Y</creator><creator>Baldwin, M</creator><creator>Mungapen, L</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>P84 Utility Values For COPD Patients Based on the EQ-5D Questionnaire from Three Indacaterol Phase III Studies</title><author>Asukai, Y ; Baldwin, M ; Mungapen, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2686-8dbe047183c9d4cc20c08cd5c9e7e7c17bc71e9c6c043ae9e2b6af1d09b334e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asukai, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mungapen, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asukai, Y</au><au>Baldwin, M</au><au>Mungapen, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P84 Utility Values For COPD Patients Based on the EQ-5D Questionnaire from Three Indacaterol Phase III Studies</atitle><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A100</spage><epage>A101</epage><pages>A100-A101</pages><issn>0040-6376</issn><eissn>1468-3296</eissn><coden>THORA7</coden><abstract>Introduction and Objectives Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible and disabling symptoms such as breathlessness and COPD exacerbations, which have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The indacaterol clinical trial programme (INVOLVE, INHANCE and INLIGHT-2 trials) collected HRQoL using the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument, a commonly used tool to generate preference-based utilities involving five dimensions of a health state. As part of the clinical trial programme, the EQ-5D scores were converted to a utility index score using the UK National Health Survey (1) preference weights. The aim of this analysis was to report mean utilities of COPD patients by disease severity. Methods A total of 11,066 observations from three trials were included in the analysis. Utility index scores were summarised by disease severity (GOLD 2008 FEV1-based) to yield a mean utility weight for each disease severity class. Disease severity was determined by using all available FEV1 readings. Since some trials had a longer duration contributing more records of EQ-5D and spirometry than others, it was necessary to correct for multiple observations; utility values that might have been derived from the shorter-duration trials were considered as ‘missing’ data. To impute missing data, a mixed effects model was used using residual maximum likelihood. Clinic visit and disease severity were included as factors. Utility values were assumed to be missing at random. Results The estimated utility of COPD patients according to levels of disease severity was as follows: Mild = 0.820 (95% CI: 0.800– 0.840); Moderate = 0.801 (95%CI: 0.794–0.809); Severe = 0.774 (95% CI: 0.767–0.782); and Very Severe = 0.743 (95% CI: 0.730–0.756). The correlation between increasing disease severity and decreasing patients’ utility demonstrated the internal validity of the data. Conclusion This analysis provides estimates of utility by COPD disease severity based on one of the largest sample sizes used to date, which is essential for cost-utility analyses that help inform healthcare decisions. Kind P et al. “Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.” BMJ 316, no. 7133 (Mar 1998): 736–41.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</pub><doi>10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.326</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-6376
ispartof Thorax, 2012-12, Vol.67 (Suppl 2), p.A100-A101
issn 0040-6376
1468-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1781815659
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title P84 Utility Values For COPD Patients Based on the EQ-5D Questionnaire from Three Indacaterol Phase III Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A32%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P84%E2%80%85Utility%20Values%20For%20COPD%20Patients%20Based%20on%20the%20EQ-5D%20Questionnaire%20from%20Three%20Indacaterol%20Phase%20III%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Thorax&rft.au=Asukai,%20Y&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A100&rft.epage=A101&rft.pages=A100-A101&rft.issn=0040-6376&rft.eissn=1468-3296&rft.coden=THORA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4027140081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781815659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true